On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 04:36:18PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 2013-08-22 16:28, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> >Another option that I've thought about is making the testr-full
> >jobs voting on
> >the check queue. This way it will raise parallel failures to
> >peoples attention
> >but not increase the
On 2013-08-22 16:28, Matthew Treinish wrote:
Another option that I've thought about is making the testr-full jobs
voting on
the check queue. This way it will raise parallel failures to peoples
attention
but not increase the number of gate resets. The only tradeoff here is
that it
will make the
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:13:18PM -0300, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Matthew Treinish wrote:
> > Also, if anyone has any input on what threshold they feel is good enough
> > for this I'd welcome any input on that. For example, do we want to ensure
> > a >= 1:1 match for job success? Or would somethin
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:03:57PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> >>>Getting this in before the H3 rush would be very helpful. When we made
> >>>the switch with Nova's unittests we fixed as many of the test bugs
> >>>that we could find, merged the change to switch the test runner, then
> >>>treated all
On 2013-08-14 16:10, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:05:35AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-08-13 16:39, Clark Boylan wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Treinish
> wrote:
>>
>>Hi everyone,
>>
>>So for the past month or so I've been working on getting tempest
>>t
+1 good idea
I was wondering this myself.
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Aug 14, 2013, at 1:07 PM, "Alexius Ludeman"
mailto:l...@lexinator.com>> wrote:
I kind of high jacked another thread with my testr problems, but I want to
reiterate it directly on this one as they are my pain point
Matthew Treinish wrote:
> Also, if anyone has any input on what threshold they feel is good enough
> for this I'd welcome any input on that. For example, do we want to ensure
> a >= 1:1 match for job success? Or would something like 90% as stable as the
> serial job be good enough considering the
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:05:35AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 2013-08-13 16:39, Clark Boylan wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Treinish
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi everyone,
> >>
> >>So for the past month or so I've been working on getting tempest
> >>to work stably
> >>with testr in
On 15 August 2013 08:02, Alexius Ludeman wrote:
> I kind of high jacked another thread with my testr problems, but I want to
> reiterate it directly on this one as they are my pain points I had from the
> transition.
>
> testr does not appear to support --exclusion[1] or --stop[2].
1 is tricky to
- Original Message -
> From: "Matthew Treinish"
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 4:25:14 PM
> Subject: [openstack-dev] Migrating to testr parallel in tempest
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> So for the past mon
I kind of high jacked another thread with my testr problems, but I want to
reiterate it directly on this one as they are my pain points I had from the
transition.
testr does not appear to support --exclusion[1] or --stop[2].
I have a work around for --exclusion, by:
testr list-tests | egrep -v r
On 2013-08-13 16:39, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Treinish
wrote:
Hi everyone,
So for the past month or so I've been working on getting tempest to
work stably
with testr in parallel. As part of this you may have noticed the
testr-full
jobs that get run on the
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> So for the past month or so I've been working on getting tempest to work
> stably
> with testr in parallel. As part of this you may have noticed the testr-full
> jobs that get run on the zuul check queue. I was using th
On 08/13/2013 04:25 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
Hi everyone,
So for the past month or so I've been working on getting tempest to work stably
with testr in parallel. As part of this you may have noticed the testr-full
jobs that get run on the zuul check queue. I was using that job to debug some
Hi everyone,
So for the past month or so I've been working on getting tempest to work stably
with testr in parallel. As part of this you may have noticed the testr-full
jobs that get run on the zuul check queue. I was using that job to debug some
of the more obvious race conditions and stability
15 matches
Mail list logo
