FYI, allowing 0.9 recently merged into openstack/requirements:
https://review.openstack.org/79817
This is a good example of how we should be linking gerrit and mailing
list discussions together more. I don't think the gerrit review was
linked in this thread nor was the mailing list discussion
In fairness, there were also copious IRC conversations on the topic as
well. I think because there were so few people in this thread, and all
those people were participating in the review and irc conversations,
updating the thread just fell off the list.
My bad. When conversations jump media it's
There's a proposed change to Keystone to update SQLAlchemy to 0.9[0] which
is failing in the doc build. I'm not sure exactly what it's doing that's
causing it to fail. I proposed changes to work around the issues[1] based
on the error messages. Part of the fix requires a change in oslo-incubator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Because of where we are in the freeze, I think this should wait
until Juno opens to fix. Icehouse will only be compatible with
SQLA 0.8, which I think is fine. I expect the rest of the issues
can be addressed during Juno 1.
Agreed. I think we
On 03/13/2014 12:42 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
Because of where we are in the freeze, I think this should wait
until Juno opens to fix. Icehouse will only be compatible with
SQLA 0.8, which I think is fine. I expect the rest of the issues
can be addressed during Juno 1.
Agreed. I think we have
On 03/13/2014 12:31 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 03/12/2014 07:07 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Because of where we are in the freeze, I think this should wait until
Juno opens to fix. Icehouse will only be compatible with SQLA 0.8, which
I think is fine. I expect the rest of the issues can be
On 03/14/2014 02:06 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/13/2014 12:31 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 03/12/2014 07:07 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Because of where we are in the freeze, I think this should wait until
Juno opens to fix. Icehouse will only be compatible with SQLA 0.8, which
I think is fine. I
Hi all,
I think it's actually not that hard to fix the errors we have when
using SQLAlchemy 0.9.x releases.
I uploaded two changes two Nova to fix unit tests:
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80431/ (this one should also fix
the Tempest test run error)
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80432/
On 03/08/2014 05:00 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I just tried this:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79129/
and it seems everything works. \o/
Shall we lift the SQLA cap right away?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
___
OpenStack-dev
