Re: [openstack-dev] Standard way to indicate a partial blueprint implementation?

2015-06-05 Thread Alexis Lee
Chris Friesen said on Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:57:54PM -0600: > On 06/04/2015 05:23 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > > I have personally been using: > > > > Implements: partial-blueprint x > > > >but I don't actually care much. I would also be fine with: > > > > Partially-Implements: blueprint x > > If

Re: [openstack-dev] Standard way to indicate a partial blueprint implementation?

2015-06-05 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 04/06/15 19:23 -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: Ever since we established[1] a format for including metadata about bugs in Git commit messages that included a 'Partial-Bug' tag, people have been looking for a way to do the equivalent for partial blueprint implementations. A non-exhaustive search of

Re: [openstack-dev] Standard way to indicate a partial blueprint implementation?

2015-06-04 Thread Chris Friesen
On 06/04/2015 05:23 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: Ever since we established[1] a format for including metadata about bugs in Git commit messages that included a 'Partial-Bug' tag, people have been looking for a way to do the equivalent for partial blueprint implementations. > I have personally been

[openstack-dev] Standard way to indicate a partial blueprint implementation?

2015-06-04 Thread Zane Bitter
Ever since we established[1] a format for including metadata about bugs in Git commit messages that included a 'Partial-Bug' tag, people have been looking for a way to do the equivalent for partial blueprint implementations. A non-exhaustive search of a small number of projects reveals at least