I see that horizon doesn't use Travis CI
Is that a political decision?
If not, would there be resistance to adding a minimal .travis.yml file to
horizon/master so that other people can use travis for their public horizon
repos? Travis requires the file to exist on all branches for historical
Openstack has it's own CI system that is independent of travis, so I'm not sure
the benefit of adding it into horizons repo.
If u have a public fork what stops u from putting the file/s in that fork?
Seems like u should be able to manipulate your fork however u want.
Sent from my really tiny
On 03/12/2014 05:00 AM, Adam Nelson wrote:
I see that horizon doesn't use Travis CI
Is that a political decision?
No. It's a technical one. I'm not sure if you know, but OpenStack runs a
pretty massive and amazing CI system.
If not, would there be resistance to adding a minimal
