Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Midcycle Sprint Summary

2015-08-18 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Great summary. We covered a lot of ground. Thanks Mike! On 08/17/2015 10:53 AM, Mike Perez wrote: A *summary* of the Cinder midcycle sprint, in attempt to keep your attention. Full meeting notes available [1]. Image Caching = Glance Cinder backend store + Cinder Image Caching are

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

2015-08-18 Thread Jay S. Bryant
+1 He has been doing good reviews and shown a sustained commitment. Well done! Jay On 08/13/2015 02:13 PM, Mike Perez wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

2015-08-18 Thread Duncan Thomas
+1 On 17 Aug 2015 18:51, Ivan Kolodyazhny e...@e0ne.info wrote: +1. Gorka, Thanks for your contribution! Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, Web Developer, http://blog.e0ne.info/, http://notacash.com/, http://kharkivpy.org.ua/ On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 6:25 AM, John Griffith

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [third-party] ProphetStor CI account

2015-08-18 Thread Asselin, Ramy
[mailto:rick.c...@prophetstor.com] Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 8:22 AM To: 'Mike Perez' Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [third-party] ProphetStor CI account HI Mike: I completed to refine our CI configuration to follow Ramy's comments. Does any

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [third-party] ProphetStor CI account

2015-08-17 Thread Rick Chen
HI Abhishek: For you information in the below. HI Mike: What I have missed it? On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Rick Chen rick.c...@prophetstor.com mailto:rick.c...@prophetstor.com wrote: HI Mike: I completed to refine our CI configuration to follow Ramy's

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [third-party] ProphetStor CI account

2015-08-17 Thread Rick Chen
HI Adhishek: One more information, how are you catching the logs and making it browsable? Do you mean item[6]? I just follow OpenStack Third-part CI document. You can reference http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html#faq-frequently-asked-questions. Add this

[openstack-dev] [cinder][ThirdPartyCI]CloudFounders OpenvStorage CI - request to re-add the cinder driver

2015-08-17 Thread Eduard Matei
Hi, We had our driver removed by commit: https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/f0ab819732d77a8a6dd1a91422ac183ac4894419 due to no CI. Last week we got it working again and it's been commenting for the last 3 days continuously. A normal run looks like this: *08:40:37* Ran: 1265 tests in

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [third-party] ProphetStor CI account

2015-08-17 Thread Rick Chen
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [third-party] ProphetStor CI account Hi Rick, I know we had to put the following for making logs browsable, but where exactly to put it, I mean in which file can you specify it clearly. On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Rick Chen rick.c...@prophetstor.com

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Midcycle Sprint Summary

2015-08-17 Thread Mike Perez
A *summary* of the Cinder midcycle sprint, in attempt to keep your attention. Full meeting notes available [1]. Image Caching = Glance Cinder backend store + Cinder Image Caching are so similar, it would just be confusing to operators. We'll document only about the Cinder Image

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [third-party] ProphetStor CI account

2015-08-17 Thread Rick Chen
HI Mike: I completed to refine our CI configuration to follow Ramy's comments. Does any missed or other attention I need respect? [1] Add export DEVSTACK_GATE_TEMPEST_REGEX=volume to verify all cinder volume testing. [2] Add each service configuration in the log.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Midcycle Sprint Summary

2015-08-17 Thread Jay Pipes
On 08/17/2015 11:53 AM, Mike Perez wrote: Getting rid of API extensions = Move obvious things over (volume attach, type manager) to core API controllers. Deprecate existing extensions and have these use core API controller code. Get rid of the silly os- prefix in

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

2015-08-17 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
+1. Gorka, Thanks for your contribution! Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, Web Developer, http://blog.e0ne.info/, http://notacash.com/, http://kharkivpy.org.ua/ On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 6:25 AM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Walter A. Boring IV

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

2015-08-14 Thread Li, Xiaoyan
On Aug 14, 2015 03:13, Mike Perez wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Gorka+Eguileor%22+project:o penstack/cinder,p,0035b6410002dd11 60/90

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

2015-08-14 Thread Sean McGinnis
+1 On 08/13/2015 02:13 PM, Mike Perez wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Gorka+Eguileor%22+project:openstack/cinder,p,0035b6410002dd11 60/90

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

2015-08-14 Thread Deepak Shetty
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

2015-08-14 Thread Huang Zhiteng
+1 On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

2015-08-14 Thread yang, xing
+1 On 8/13/15, 3:13 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Gorka+Eguileor%22+project:openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

2015-08-14 Thread Eric Harney
On 08/13/2015 03:13 PM, Mike Perez wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Cinder core, please reply with a +1 for approval. This will be left open until August 19th. Assuming there are no objections, this will go forward after voting is closed. +1

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [third-party]RE: [OpenStack-Infra] ProphetStor CI account

2015-08-14 Thread Mike Perez
On 09:44 Aug 14, Rick Chen wrote: HI Mike: Sorry again, I already add email alert agent in our CI Jenkins server to capture each failed build result. [1] - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/third-party-announce/2015-June/000192.h tml [2] -

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [third-party]RE: [OpenStack-Infra] ProphetStor CI account

2015-08-14 Thread Rick Chen
HI Mike: Ok, Thanks. I will refine my CI configuration to follow Ramy's comment. I will notify you when I refine Ramy's comment. Another my latest review log should been today: http://download.prophetstor.com/prophetstor_ci/203895/3/check/prophetstor-ds

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

2015-08-14 Thread Walter A. Boring IV
+1 It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Gorka+Eguileor%22+project:openstack/cinder,p,0035b6410002dd11 60/90 day review stats:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] I have a question about openstack cinder zonemanager driver.

2015-08-14 Thread Walter A. Boring IV
Currently, The FCZM doesn't support this. Also, from my experience Brocade and Cisco switches don't play well together when managing the same fabrics. Walt Hi, guys I am using Brocade FC switch in my OpenStack environment. I have a question about OpenStack cinder zonemanger driver.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

2015-08-14 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Walter A. Boring IV walter.bor...@hp.com wrote: +1 It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated:

[openstack-dev] [cinder] I have a question about openstack cinder zonemanager driver.

2015-08-13 Thread Chenying (A)
Hi, guys I am using Brocade FC switch in my OpenStack environment. I have a question about OpenStack cinder zonemanger driver. I find that [fc-zone-manager] can only configure one zone driver. If I want to use two FC switches from different vendors at the same time. One is Brocade FC

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] I have a question about openstack cinder zonemanager driver.

2015-08-13 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Danny is correct. You cannot have two different Zone Manager drivers configured for one volume process. Jay On 08/13/2015 11:00 AM, Daniel Wilson wrote: I am fairly certain you cannot currently use two different FC switch zone drivers in one cinder.conf. In this case it looks like you would

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Brocade CI

2015-08-13 Thread Nagendra Jaladanki
@lists.openstack.org *Cc:* brocade-openstack...@brocade.com *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Brocade CI Mike, Thanks for your feedback and suggestions. I had send my response yesterday but looks like didn't get posted on the lists.openstack.org. Hence posting it here again. We reviewed

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Brocade CI

2015-08-13 Thread Asselin, Ramy
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Cc: brocade-openstack...@brocade.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Brocade CI Mike, Thanks for your feedback and suggestions. I had send my response yesterday but looks like didn't get posted

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

2015-08-13 Thread Tom Barron
On 8/13/15 3:13 PM, Mike Perez wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Gorka+Eguileor%22+project:openstack/cinder,p,0035b6410002dd11 60/90 day

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

2015-08-13 Thread Mike Perez
It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Gorka+Eguileor%22+project:openstack/cinder,p,0035b6410002dd11 60/90 day review stats:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] I have a question about openstack cinder zonemanager driver

2015-08-13 Thread Chenying (A)
? Thanks, ChenYing 发件人: Jay S. Bryant [mailto:jsbry...@electronicjungle.net] 发送时间: 2015年8月14日 0:36 收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 主题: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] I have a question about openstack cinder zonemanager driver. Danny is correct. You cannot have two

[openstack-dev] [cinder] [third-party]RE: [OpenStack-Infra] ProphetStor CI account

2015-08-13 Thread Rick Chen
HI Mike: Sorry again, I already add email alert agent in our CI Jenkins server to capture each failed build result. [1] - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/third-party-announce/2015-June/000192.h tml [2] -

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] I have a question about openstack cinder zonemanager driver.

2015-08-13 Thread Daniel Wilson
I am fairly certain you cannot currently use two different FC switch zone drivers in one cinder.conf. In this case it looks like you would need two cinder nodes, one for Brocade fabric and one for Cisco fabric. Thanks, Danny On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Chenying (A) ying.c...@huawei.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Cinder creates encrypted volume from image

2015-08-12 Thread Duncan Thomas
That's a bug! I'm not aware of anybody working on it, and I don't see any old bugs open for it. A suitable fix would be very welcome On 12 Aug 2015 14:54, Li, Xiaoyan xiaoyan...@intel.com wrote: Hi all, Currently when cinder creates a volume with an encrypted volume type from an image(which

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Brocade CI

2015-08-12 Thread Nagendra Jaladanki
Mike, Thanks for your feedback and suggestions. I had send my response yesterday but looks like didn't get posted on the lists.openstack.org. Hence posting it here again. We reviewed your comments and following issues were identified and some of them are fixed and some fix plans in progress: 1)

[openstack-dev] [cinder]Cinder creates encrypted volume from image

2015-08-12 Thread Li, Xiaoyan
Hi all, Currently when cinder creates a volume with an encrypted volume type from an image(which is unencrypted), it just reads data from image, and writes them Into the volume. As a result the encrypted volume contains unencrypted data, and Nova fails to boot from the volume.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have plan for restoring on-line volume?

2015-08-11 Thread hao wang
Yes, John, It's for boot from volume case. We can't restore the instance root disk now with backups, although we can make backup with in-use volumes. Snapshot is same, we can take a snapshot for in-use volumes, but we only can create a new volume from it. You know in some cases users don't want

[openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] Cinder and Nova availability zones

2015-08-10 Thread Dulko, Michal
Hi, In Kilo cycle [1] was merged. It started passing AZ of a booted VM to Cinder to make volumes appear in the same AZ as VM. This is certainly a good approach, but I wonder how to deal with an use case when administrator cares about AZ of a compute node of the VM, but wants to ignore AZ of

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] Cinder and Nova availability zones

2015-08-10 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com wrote: Hi, In Kilo cycle [1] was merged. It started passing AZ of a booted VM to Cinder to make volumes appear in the same AZ as VM. This is certainly a good approach, but I wonder how to deal with an use case when

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Brocade CI

2015-08-10 Thread Tim O'Konski
Mike: We are looking into the CI issues now, thank you for bringing to our attention. Tim -Original Message- From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2015 5:35 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Cc:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have plan for restoring on-line volume?

2015-08-10 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:47 AM, hao wang sxmatch1...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry if I missed something, since now we have supported backup in-use volumes in L, so I wonder is there some plan or design to support restoring on-line volumes. Thanks. -- Best Wishes For You!

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have plan for restoring on-line volume?

2015-08-10 Thread hao wang
@Duncan and John, thank you both and I have understood this. The reason I ask this question is we can't restore the boot volume of instance which is boot-from-volume, since Nova can't detach the boot disk now. So we need to figure out a way to solve this issue. Maybe we should let nova can

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have plan for restoring on-line volume?

2015-08-10 Thread hao wang
@Duncan and John, I have a idea about this issue, if volume is in-use but the instance which it's attached to is power-off, so can we avoid data corruption? If it's true, cinder could free the available restriction, let user decide if they want to restore the boot disk, and they should shut down

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have plan for restoring on-line volume?

2015-08-10 Thread Duncan Thomas
Does restoring a volume online make any logical sense? Generally operating systems don't like it when a mounted volume changes contents, and a restore, being a slow sequential write is likely to be even worse. Since you have to unmount anyway, attaching a new volume should not be an issue. Just

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Brocade CI

2015-08-09 Thread Mike Perez
People have asked me at the Cinder midcycle sprint to look at the Brocade CI to: 1) Keep the zone manager driver in Liberty. 2) Consider approving additional specs that we're submitted before the deadline. Here are the current problems with the last 100 runs [1]: 1) Not posting success or

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova][ci] Tintri Cinder CI failures after Nova change

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/6/2015 3:30 PM, Skyler Berg wrote: After the change cleanup NovaObjectDictCompat from virtual_interface [1] was merged into Nova on the morning of August 5th, Tintri's CI for Cinder started failing 13 test cases that involve a volume being attached to an instance [2]. I have verified

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-07 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 5 Aug 2015, at 1:34 am, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote: Philipp Marek wrote: If we end up using a DLM then we have to detect when the connection to the DLM is lost on a node and stop all ongoing operations to prevent data corruption. It may not be trivial to do, but we will

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova][ci] Tintri Cinder CI failures after Nova change

2015-08-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/7/2015 8:38 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/6/2015 3:30 PM, Skyler Berg wrote: After the change cleanup NovaObjectDictCompat from virtual_interface [1] was merged into Nova on the morning of August 5th, Tintri's CI for Cinder started failing 13 test cases that involve a volume being

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova][ci] Tintri Cinder CI failures after Nova change

2015-08-07 Thread Skyler Berg
As Matt found, it the problem was with out of date requirements. Going forward I would advise any third party CI that is not spinning up a new VM for every job to purge all python packages after each run. This will make devstack reinstall everything, avoid this type of problem. Though the problem

[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova][ci] Tintri Cinder CI failures after Nova change

2015-08-06 Thread Skyler Berg
After the change cleanup NovaObjectDictCompat from virtual_interface [1] was merged into Nova on the morning of August 5th, Tintri's CI for Cinder started failing 13 test cases that involve a volume being attached to an instance [2]. I have verified that the tests fail with the above mentioned

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-05 Thread Mike Perez
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 05:47:44AM +1000, Morgan Fainberg wrote: On Aug 4, 2015, at 01:42, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-05 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 04/08/15 23:39 -0700, Mike Perez wrote: On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 05:47:44AM +1000, Morgan Fainberg wrote: On Aug 4, 2015, at 01:42,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-05 Thread Philipp Marek
Well, is it already decided that Pacemaker would be chosen to provide HA in Openstack? There's been a talk Pacemaker: the PID 1 of Openstack IIRC. I know that Pacemaker's been pushed aside in an earlier ML post, but IMO there's already *so much* been done for HA in Pacemaker that Openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-05 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 08:30:17AM -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote: Duncan Thomas wrote: On 3 August 2015 at 20:53, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com mailto:cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2015-08-03 08:53:21 -0700: Also on a side note, I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-05 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 08:40:13AM -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2015-08-03 08:53:21 -0700: On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:41 AM Joshua Harlowharlo...@outlook.com wrote: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-05 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-08-05 09:10:30 +0200 (+0200), Philipp Marek wrote: [...] Pacemaker is *the* Linux HA Stack. [...] Can you expand on this assertion? It doesn't look to me like it's part of the Linux source tree and I see strong evidence to suggest it's released and distributed completely separately from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-05 Thread Philipp Marek
[...] Pacemaker is *the* Linux HA Stack. [...] Can you expand on this assertion? It doesn't look to me like it's part of the Linux source tree and I see strong evidence to suggest it's released and distributed completely separately from the kernel. If you read Linux as GNU/Linux or Linux

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-05 Thread Mike Perez
On 17:03 Aug 05, Flavio Percoco wrote: snip That said, you may want to sync with Joshua since he's going to work on a cross-project spec as well (as he mentioned in the other thread).[0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-August/071441.html -- Mike Perez

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-05 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-08-05 14:36:37 +0200 (+0200), Philipp Marek wrote: [...] Pacemaker is *the* Linux HA Stack. [...] Can you expand on this assertion? It doesn't look to me like it's part of the Linux source tree and I see strong evidence to suggest it's released and distributed completely

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Quobyte Cinder Driver revert?

2015-08-05 Thread Robert Döbbelin
Hi all! Thank you Mike for proposing the revert of the revert. Today I prepared a change that tackles the docstring issues. As being new to the OpenStack development process, I didn't manage to upload it to Gerrit today. Most likely I'll get it uploaded tomorrow. Best regards, Robert Doebbelin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-05 Thread Philipp Marek
[...] Pacemaker is *the* Linux HA Stack. [...] Can you expand on this assertion? It doesn't look to me like it's part of the Linux source tree and I see strong evidence to suggest it's released and distributed completely separately from the kernel. If you read Linux as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-05 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-08-05 15:31:03 +0200 (+0200), Philipp Marek wrote: [...] Pacemaker is *the* Linux HA Stack. [...] Can you expand on this assertion? It doesn't look to me like it's part of the Linux source tree and I see strong evidence to suggest it's released and distributed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-05 Thread Philipp Marek
Well, SUSE and Redhat (7) use Pacemaker by default, Debian/Ubuntu have it (along with others)... That gives it quite some market share, wouldn't you think? Yes, I guess the most popular meaning is a good match here. I see, so in the same way that nano is *the* Linux text editor

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-05 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-08-05 15:48:52 +0200 (+0200), Philipp Marek wrote: [...] How many cluster stack alternatives can you see in SUSE? How many cluster stack alternatives are available in _every_ major distribution? I think it depends a lot on how you define cluster stack and whether the solution to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-05 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Philipp Marek's message of 2015-08-05 00:10:30 -0700: Well, is it already decided that Pacemaker would be chosen to provide HA in Openstack? There's been a talk Pacemaker: the PID 1 of Openstack IIRC. I know that Pacemaker's been pushed aside in an earlier ML post, but IMO

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Quobyte Cinder Driver revert?

2015-08-05 Thread Mike Perez
On 14:37 Aug 03, Matt Riedemann wrote: I guess there isn't a quobyte connector in os-brick yet, but just a reminder that there is a libvirt volume driver in nova for talking to quobyte [1]. It'd be good to get a heads up on the nova side when the cinder team is removing drivers so that we can

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Deadlines for Liberty Blueprint/specs

2015-08-05 Thread Mike Perez
* Spec/blueprint approval deadline: July 28th [1] * Code attached to an approved blueprint/spec must be submitted and passing jenkins before: August 24th * Feature Code freeze: September 1st [1] After September 1st, we will only be accepting bug fixes and focusing on testing Cinder. [1] -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-04 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 3 August 2015 at 20:53, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2015-08-03 08:53:21 -0700: Also on a side note, I think Cinder's need for this is really subtle, and one could just accept that sometimes it's going to break when it does two

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-04 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 04/08/15 10:50 +0200, Philipp Marek wrote: If we end up using a DLM then we have to detect when the connection to the DLM is lost on a node and stop all ongoing operations to prevent data corruption. It may not be trivial to do, but we will have to do it in any solution we use, even on my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-04 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:32:40AM +0300, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 3 August 2015 at 20:53, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2015-08-03 08:53:21 -0700: Also on a side note, I think Cinder's need for this is really subtle, and one could

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-04 Thread Gorka Eguileor
...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 1:43 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:22:42AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Flavio Percoco

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-04 Thread Gorka Eguileor
on this thread. Cheers, Gorka. Thanks, Kevin From: Gorka Eguileor Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 1:39:07 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active On Mon

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-04 Thread Gorka Eguileor
...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 10:48 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:42:48PM +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: I'm usually for abstraction

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-04 Thread Philipp Marek
If we end up using a DLM then we have to detect when the connection to the DLM is lost on a node and stop all ongoing operations to prevent data corruption. It may not be trivial to do, but we will have to do it in any solution we use, even on my last proposal that only uses the DB in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-04 Thread Fox, Kevin M
: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 06:12:23PM +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: For example, to parallel the conversation with databases: We want a database. Well, that means mongodb, postgres, mysql, berkeleydb, etc Oh, well, I need

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-04 Thread Joshua Harlow
Duncan Thomas wrote: On 3 August 2015 at 20:53, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com mailto:cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2015-08-03 08:53:21 -0700: Also on a side note, I think Cinder's need for this is really subtle, and one could just

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-04 Thread Joshua Harlow
Philipp Marek wrote: If we end up using a DLM then we have to detect when the connection to the DLM is lost on a node and stop all ongoing operations to prevent data corruption. It may not be trivial to do, but we will have to do it in any solution we use, even on my last proposal that only

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-04 Thread Joshua Harlow
Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2015-08-03 08:53:21 -0700: On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:41 AM Joshua Harlowharlo...@outlook.com wrote: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message of 2015-08-02 15:49:46 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-04 Thread Fox, Kevin M
Ah. Ok. Thanks. Kevin From: Gorka Eguileor [gegui...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 6:33 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possiblesolutionfor HA

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Duncan Thomas's message of 2015-08-04 00:32:40 -0700: On 3 August 2015 at 20:53, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2015-08-03 08:53:21 -0700: Also on a side note, I think Cinder's need for this is really subtle, and one

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-04 Thread Morgan Fainberg
, August 03, 2015 1:43 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:22:42AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Flavio Percoco wrote: [...] So, to summarize

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Quobyte Cinder Driver revert?

2015-08-03 Thread Mike Perez
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: It was discussed on the mailing list, and at the weekly meeting. Mike had had no response on the issue from the listed contact email, and the CI was reporting failure for every patch for two months On 3 Jul 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
Morgan Fainberg wrote: Lets step back away from tooz. Tooz for the sake of this conversation is as much the same as saying zookeeper or consul or etcd, etc. We should be focused (as both Flavio and Thierry said) on if we need DLM and what it will solve. So IMHO part of the problem with just

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Fox, Kevin M
+1. From: Flavio Percoco [fla...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 12:30 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active On 03/08/15 00:49

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message of 2015-08-02 15:49:46 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gorka Eguileorgegui...@redhat.com wrote: I know we've all been looking at the HA Active-Active problem in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Fox, Kevin M
: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:22:42AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Flavio Percoco wrote: [...] So, to summarize, I love the effort behind this. But, as others have mentioned, I'd like us to take a step back, run

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Devananda van der Veen
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:41 AM Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message of 2015-08-02 15:49:46 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gorka Eguileorgegui...@redhat.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
Devananda van der Veen wrote: On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:41 AM Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com mailto:harlo...@outlook.com wrote: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message of 2015-08-02 15:49:46 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike Perez

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 03/08/15 08:32 -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote: Morgan Fainberg wrote: Lets step back away from tooz. Tooz for the sake of this conversation is as much the same as saying zookeeper or consul or etcd, etc. We should be focused (as both Flavio and Thierry said) on if we need DLM and what it will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:28:27AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message of 2015-08-02 15:49:46 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote: I know we've all

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 03/08/15 00:49 +0200, Gorka Eguileor wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote: I know we've all been looking at the HA Active-Active problem in Cinder and trying our best to figure out

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Morgan Fainberg
Lets step back away from tooz. Tooz for the sake of this conversation is as much the same as saying zookeeper or consul or etcd, etc. We should be focused (as both Flavio and Thierry said) on if we need DLM and what it will solve. Once we have all of that defined, the use of an abstraction such

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message of 2015-08-02 15:49:46 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote: I know we've all been looking at the HA Active-Active problem in Cinder and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:18:39PM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Mike Perez's message of 2015-07-31 10:40:04 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote: ...random thought here, skip as needed... in all honesty orchestration solutions like

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Ironic] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:47:34PM -0700, Joshua Harlow wrote: Joshua Harlow wrote: Mike Perez wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlowharlo...@outlook.com wrote: ...random thought here, skip as needed... in all honesty orchestration solutions like mesos

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Flavio Percoco wrote: [...] So, to summarize, I love the effort behind this. But, as others have mentioned, I'd like us to take a step back, run this accross teams and come up with an opinonated solution that would work for everyone. Starting this discussion now would allow us to prepare

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:22:42AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Flavio Percoco wrote: [...] So, to summarize, I love the effort behind this. But, as others have mentioned, I'd like us to take a step back, run this accross teams and come up with an opinonated solution that would work for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Julien Danjou
On Mon, Aug 03 2015, Thierry Carrez wrote: The last thing we want is to rush a solution that would only solve a particular project use case. Personally I'd like us to pick the simplest solution that can solve most of the use cases. Each of the solutions bring something to the table --

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] encryption is not supported in ceph volume

2015-08-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 7/30/2015 1:02 AM, Li, Xiaoyan wrote: Hi all, I created an encryption type, and create a volume in Ceph with the volume type. cinder encryption-type-create But failed to attach it to a VM. The error message shows that no device_path in connection_info. ^[[01;31m2015-07-30 05:55:57.117

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Devananda van der Veen's message of 2015-08-03 08:53:21 -0700: On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:41 AM Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote: Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Gorka Eguileor's message of 2015-08-02 15:49:46 -0700: On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:47:22AM -0700, Mike

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] A possible solution for HA Active-Active

2015-08-03 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 07:01:45PM +1000, Morgan Fainberg wrote: Lets step back away from tooz. Tooz for the sake of this conversation is as much the same as saying zookeeper or consul or etcd, etc. We should be focused (as both Flavio and Thierry said) on if we need DLM and what it will

<    10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   >