On 07/15/2015 01:30 PM, Auld, Will wrote:
Sean,
OK, moving thread to openstack-dev.
We'd like to help with this work if there is more to do. What are the next
steps and what areas need help?
Thanks,
Will
Thanks. Here is the current status:
Grenade has been updated to have a
; Auld, Will; Troyer, Dean; mtrein...@kortar.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade] future direction on partial upgrade
support
Yes, they would. However, can we do this conversation on openstack-dev?
It was started on an open list orginally, and that's where it should continue
to
evolve
On 6 July 2015 at 13:13, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-07-06 11:54:45 -0700 (-0700), Armando M. wrote:
[...]
For what I can tell, Joe was kind to set the infra to start
gathering data on the reliability of the multi-node jobs, but they
are clearly flaky [1], and
On 2015-07-06 11:54:45 -0700 (-0700), Armando M. wrote:
[...]
For what I can tell, Joe was kind to set the infra to start
gathering data on the reliability of the multi-node jobs, but they
are clearly flaky [1], and currently broken.
[...]
Well, a check-.* pass rate of 25% is likely explained
Hi,
Not sure if we reached any conclusion with this thread, and I would like to
resume it so that we don't derail the initial plan set forth by Russell and
agreed during the Liberty summit, among other things.
If I look at the thread I think this can be summarized as follow. Please
correct me if
I'd also like to chime in - we've had some discussions on -infra today
about the partial upgrade issue, and collected the following notes on an
etherpad.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-partial-upgrades
One of the things identified, was the complexity of the DVR feature in
Neutron, and
Thanks Sean, comments inline.
On 6 July 2015 at 16:58, Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com wrote:
I'd also like to chime in - we've had some discussions on -infra today
about the partial upgrade issue, and collected the following notes on an
etherpad.
On 07/06/2015 09:02 PM, Armando M. wrote:
Thanks Sean, comments inline.
On 6 July 2015 at 16:58, Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com wrote:
I'd also like to chime in - we've had some discussions on -infra today
about the partial upgrade issue, and collected the following notes on an
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/24/2015 01:41 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague
No
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/24/2015 01:41 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 06/24/2015 01:31
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
Back when Nova first wanted to test partial upgrade, we did a bunch
of
On 06/24/2015 01:41 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
Back when Nova first wanted to test partial upgrade, we did a bunch of
slightly odd conditionals inside of
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
Back
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Back when Nova first wanted to test partial upgrade, we did a bunch of
slightly odd conditionals inside of grenade and devstack to make it so
that if you were very careful, you could just not stop some of the old
services on a
On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
Back when Nova first wanted to test partial upgrade, we did a bunch of
slightly odd conditionals inside of grenade and devstack to make it so
If multi-node isn't reliable more generally yet, do you think the
simpler implementation of partial-upgrade testing could proceed? I've
already done all of the patches to do it for Neutron. That way we could
quickly get something in place to help block regressions and work on the
On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
Back when Nova first wanted to test partial upgrade, we did a bunch of
slightly odd conditionals inside of grenade and devstack to make it so
On 06/24/2015 01:49 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
If multi-node isn't reliable more generally yet, do you think the
simpler implementation of partial-upgrade testing could proceed? I've
already done all of the patches to do it for Neutron. That way we could
quickly get something in place to help
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/24/2015 01:41 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
Back when Nova first wanted to test
On 2015-06-16 12:58:18 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
[...]
I think the only complexity here is the fact that grenade.sh
implicitly drives stack.sh. Which means one of:
1) devstack-gate could build the worker first, then run grenade.sh
2) we make it so grenade.sh can execute in parts
21 matches
Mail list logo
