Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

Please vote again: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445617/ We keep dib-utils for now until we have a plan. On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Here's the proposal that will move DIB to Infra umbrella: > https://review.openstack.org/445617 > > Let's move

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

Here's the proposal that will move DIB to Infra umbrella: https://review.openstack.org/445617 Let's move forward and vote on this proposal. Thanks all, On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Gregory Haynes wrote: > On Sat, Mar 4, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Andre Florath wrote: >> Hello!

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On Sat, Mar 4, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Andre Florath wrote: > Hello! > > Thanks Greg for sharing your thoughts. The idea of splitting off DIB > from OpenStack is new for me, therefore I collect some pros and > cons: > > Stay in OpenStack: > > + Use available OpenStack infrastructure and methods > +

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Andre Florath wrote: > Hello! > > Thanks Greg for sharing your thoughts. The idea of splitting off DIB > from OpenStack is new for me, therefore I collect some pros and > cons: > > Stay in OpenStack: > > + Use available OpenStack infrastructure

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

, 2017 3:02 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder On 03/03/2017 03:25 AM, Ligong LG1 Duan wrote: > I am wondering whether DIB can become a component of Glance, as DIB is u

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

Hello! Thanks Greg for sharing your thoughts. The idea of splitting off DIB from OpenStack is new for me, therefore I collect some pros and cons: Stay in OpenStack: + Use available OpenStack infrastructure and methods + OpenStack should include a possibility to create images for ironic, VMs

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On 2017-03-03 13:27:16 -0600 (-0600), Gregory Haynes wrote: [...] > I hadn't heard anything to the effect of infra not wanting us, but > AFAIK none of us has stepped up to really ask. One issue with > infra is that, typically, OpenStack projects do not depend > directly on infra projects. I am

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

Hello, Thanks for bringing this back to life. As I am sure some are aware I have been mostly absent from DIB lately, so don't let me stop you all from going forward with this or any of the other plans. I just wanted to do a bit of a braindump on my thought process from a while back on why I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On 03/03/2017 03:25 AM, Ligong LG1 Duan wrote: I am wondering whether DIB can become a component of Glance, as DIB is used to create OS images and Glance to upload OS images. I see a big difference between creating images and storing them. I can't imagine Glance would have any interest in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On 03/02/2017 03:31 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote: From my point of view, i've been using that either on infra with puppet-infracloud, glean.. and now with TripleO. So in my opinion, it shall be an independent

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder On 03/02/2017 03:31 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> 1) Move diskimage-builder into own (big tent?) project. Setup a new >>> PTL, etc. > Let's move forward with this on

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

Emilien Macchi writes: > DIB folks: please confirm on this thread that you're ok to move out > DIB from TripleO and be an independent project. As a DIB user (and occasional contributor of patches in the past) and TripleO non-user, I'm in favor of the separation. > Also please decide if we want

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

As user and contributor for diskimage-builder, i think that being an independent project, and moving to the big tent, will benefit it. +1 from my side On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 03/02/2017 03:31 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >>> 1) Move

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On 03/02/2017 03:31 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> 1) Move diskimage-builder into own (big tent?) project. Setup a new PTL, >>> etc. > Let's move forward with this one if everybody agrees on that. > > DIB folks: please confirm on this thread that you're ok to move out > DIB from TripleO and be an

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote: > From my point of view, i've been using that either on infra with > puppet-infracloud, glean.. and now with TripleO. So in my opinion, it shall > be an independent project, with core contributors from both sides. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

>From my point of view, i've been using that either on infra with puppet-infracloud, glean.. and now with TripleO. So in my opinion, it shall be an independent project, with core contributors from both sides. On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 02:11:42PM -0500, James Slagle wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Paul Belanger > > wrote: > >> Greetings, > >> > >> With the containerization[1] of tripleo, I'd

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> With the containerization[1] of tripleo, I'd like to know more about the >> future of >> diskimage-builder as it relates

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > With the containerization[1] of tripleo, I'd like to know more about the > future of > diskimage-builder as it relates to the tripleo project. > > Reading the recently approved spec for containers,