+1
2013/10/8 Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com:
Hey!
Got a question on IRC which seemed fair game for a quick mailing list post:
Q: I see both addCleanup and tearDown in nova's test suite - which one
should I use for new code?
A: addCleanup
All new code should 100% of the time use
Hi Rudra
Thanks!
Some questions and comments
- name and fq_name
How we use name and fq_name ?
IMO, we should prevent to use shorten name.
- src_ports: [80-80],
For API consistency, we should use similar way of the security groups
Sure, basically a way around this is to do migration of the VM's on the
host u are doing maintenance on.
That¹s one way y! has its ops folks work around this.
Another solution is just don't do local_deletes :-P
It sounds like your 'zombie' state would be useful as a way to solve this
also.
To
+1 to what Chris suggested. Zombie state that doesn't affect quota, but
doesn't create more problems by trying to reuse resources that aren't
available. That way we can tell the customer that things are deleted, but
we don't need to break our cloud by screwing up future schedule requests.
-Mike
Hi Nachi,
Please see inline:
On Oct 8, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi Rudra
Thanks!
Some questions and comments
- name and fq_name
How we use name and fq_name ?
IMO, we should prevent to use shorten name.
[Rudra] 'name' meets all the current Neutron
Clint and Monty,
thank you for such good responses. I am new in TripleO team indeed and I
was mostly concerned by the line in the sand. Your responses shed some
more light on the issue for me and i hope we'll be heading the right way :)
Thanks
Jiri
Hi All,
Based on initial feedback from Nachi and others I have split the blueprints.
Please review the policy and ipam blueprints.
Policy
Blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/policy-extensions-for-neutron
Spec:
On 10/08/2013 02:19 PM, Mike Wilson wrote:
+1 to what Chris suggested. Zombie state that doesn't affect quota, but
doesn't create more problems by trying to reuse resources that aren't
available. That way we can tell the customer that things are deleted,
but we don't need to break our cloud by
I'd like to announce my candidacy for the TC.
About Me
I have been involved with OpenStack since the Bexar development cycle, and have
contributed to most of the programs along the way. I have also been in
attendance at every summit since the Cactus summit. My focus in OpenStack has
Confirmed.
Justin Shepherd wrote:
I'd like to announce my candidacy for the TC.
About Me
I have been involved with OpenStack since the Bexar development cycle, and
have contributed to most of the programs along the way. I have also been in
attendance at every summit since the
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
l...@princessleia.com wrote:
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday October 8th, at 19:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting
Minutes:
Hello,
I am attempting to test the Havana v3 OS-EP-FILTER extension with the latest
RC1 bits and I get a 404 error response.
The documentation actually shows 2 different URIs for this API:
- GET /OS-EP-FILTER/projects/{project_id}/endpoints and
Here is the response from Fabio:
Mark,
Please have a look at the configuration.rst in the contrib/endpoint-filter
folder.
I pasted here for your convenience:
==
Enabling Endpoint Filter Extension
==To enable the endpoint filter
Hi Glance folks,
We will have a team meeting this Thursday October 10th at 14:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting-alt. All are welcome to attend.
For time information in your timezone, see
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20131010T14ah=1
The agenda can be found at
Hello!
I am an engineer from Murano team. Murano is an OpenStack project built
around Windows components deployment. Currently we (Murano team) are
working on improving Murano architecture to fit better in OpenStack
ecosystem and reuse more functionality from the other projects. As part of
that
Slightly adjusted instructions after testing:
To enable the endpoint filter extension:
1. Add the new [endpoin_ filter] section ton ``keystone.conf``.
example:
[endpoint_filter]
# extension for creating associations between project and endpoints in order to
# provide a tailored catalog for
Hello,
I’m one of the engineer working on Murano project. Recently we started a
discussion about Murano and Heat Software orchestration and I want to
continue this discussion with more technical details.
In our project we do deployment of complex multi-instance Windows services.
Those services
Hi!
I just forgot to ask about the best way for discussion: what will it be? We
have an IRC channel #murano at FreeNode, so you can find someone from our
team here. The best way probably will be a Google hangout or Webex meeting
for a live discussion and document sharing.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at
Hi Folks,
I am also very much curious about this. Earlier this bp had a dependency on
query scheduler, which is now merged. It will be very helpful if anyone can
throw some light on the fate of this bp.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Syed Armani
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Chris Friesen
I'd like to counter-propose :)
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TaskFlow
Taskflow is a lower level library that also has an engine, but not only does it
have the underlying engine, it also has key fundamental components such as
state persistence, resumption, reverting.
The workflow definition
Seems that this can be broken into 3 incremental pieces. First, would be
great if the ability to schedule a single 'evacuate' would be finally
merged (
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/find-host-and-evacuate-instance
). Then, it would make sense to have the logic that evacuates an
On 09/10/13 00:53 +0400, Stan Lagun wrote:
Hello,
I’m one of the engineer working on Murano project. Recently we started a
discussion about Murano and Heat Software orchestration and I want to
continue this discussion with more technical details.
I hope you are going to be at summit, as I
Hi,
Re: blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/adv-services-in-vms
Before going into more detail on the mechanics, would like to nail down use
cases.
Based on input and feedback, here is what I see so far.
Assumptions:
- a 'Service VM' hosts one or more 'Service
On 9 October 2013 07:24, Jiří Stránský ji...@redhat.com wrote:
Clint and Monty,
thank you for such good responses. I am new in TripleO team indeed and I was
mostly concerned by the line in the sand. Your responses shed some more
light on the issue for me and i hope we'll be heading the right
I was working on
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/find-host-and-evacuate-instance.
Hadn't looked at it because of FF, will restore the patch soon.
Thanks
Mahesh
Developer | ThoughtWorks | +1 (210) 716 1767
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Alex Glikson glik...@il.ibm.com wrote:
Seems
Hi Angus,
We will have representatives from our Team . Alex Tivelkov and I will be on
summit. We definitely will participate in design sessions for these hot
topics.
Before the summit we will work in etherpads to add necessary technical
information to have a solid background for discussions. We
On 10/08/2013 03:20 PM, Alex Glikson wrote:
Seems that this can be broken into 3 incremental pieces. First, would be
great if the ability to schedule a single 'evacuate' would be finally
merged
(_https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/find-host-and-evacuate-instance_).
Agreed.
Then, it
Hi Greg,
Is there any discussion so far on the scaling of VMs as in launching multiple
VMs
for the same service. It would also have impact on the VIF scheme.
How can we plug these services into different networks - is that still being
worked
on?
Thanks,
Rudra
On Oct 8, 2013, at 2:48 PM,
Sorry to send this out again, but I wrote too soon. I was missing one driver
entry in keystone.conf. Here are my working settings:
File keystone.conf:
[catalog]
# dynamic, sql-based backend (supports API/CLI-based management commands)
#driver = keystone.catalog.backends.sql.Catalog
driver =
Hello Greg,
Blueprint you have put together is very much in line what we have done in
openContrail virtual services implementation.
One thing that we have done is Service instance is a single type of
service provided by virtual appliance.
e.g. firewall or load-balancer etc
Service instance
Hi Sylvain,
Thanks for your comments. I can see that Climate is aiming to provide a
reservation service for physical and now virtual resources also like you
mention.
The Instance-group [a][b] effort (proposed during the last summit, and good
progress has been made so far) attempts to
Mike, Sylvain,
I think some of Mike's questions were answered during today's scheduler team
meeting.
Mike:
Thanks. I have a few questions. First, I am a bit stymied by the style of
API documentation used in that document and many others: it shows the first
line of an HTTP request but
Excerpts from Stan Lagun's message of 2013-10-08 13:53:45 -0700:
Hello,
I’m one of the engineer working on Murano project. Recently we started a
discussion about Murano and Heat Software orchestration and I want to
continue this discussion with more technical details.
In our project we do
hi i was going through code of nova on github...but there are no readme
files available regarding code organization of nova. Can anyone provide me
with a link from where i can begin reading the code ? or if anyone can help
me by indicators on from which files / folders the nova begins its
Hi All,
We had a VPNaaS meeting yesterday and it was felt that we should have a
separate meeting to discuss the topics common to all services. So, in
preparation for the Icehouse summit, I am proposing an IRC meeting on Oct
14th 22:00 UTC (immediately after the Neutron meeting) to discuss common
it seems that we didn't log this channel in here:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2013/
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Today in the project/release status meeting, we are 9 days before
release ! We'll look in particular
Hi All,
Recently we had a bug where page-size parameter was not passed in from nova
while making a call to glance for image list. This was addressed by
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/43262/.
As a result, I also thought that it might make sense to have a default page
size configurable for image
Yes, that helps. Please, guys, do not interpret my questions as
hostility, I really am just trying to understand. I think there is some
overlap between your concerns and mine, and I hope we can work together.
Sticking to the physical reservations for the moment, let me ask for a
little more
Any comments on the below from community using OVS will be helpful.
Regards,
Balaji.P
-Original Message-
From: P Balaji-B37839
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 2:31 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List; Addepalli Srini-B22160
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] OVS Agent and
Sylvain: please do not interpret my questions as hostility. I am only
trying to understand your proposal, but I am still confused. Can you
please walk through a scenario involving Climate reservations on virtual
resources? I mean from start to finish, outlining which party makes which
I have proposed the summit design session for Hong Kong
(http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/103) to discuss exactly these sort of
points. We have the low level Nova commands but need a service to automate the
process.
I see two scenarios
- A hardware intervention needs to be scheduled,
Thanks for the clue about where the request/response bodies are
documented. Is there any convenient way to view built documentation for
Havana right now?
You speak repeatedly of the desire for clean interfaces, and nobody
could disagree with such words. I characterize my desire that way too.
Hi everyone.
I am playing Openstack with lates code version.
I want to know your ideas about below case.
Now, when I boot VM from volume with down of cinder-api, openstack returns
400.
It seems incompatibility in this case.
When HTTPClient exception ocuured, it should return 500Internal server
Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core responsibilities.
Please see Russell's excellent stats:
Hi Yathi,
Le 08/10/2013 05:10, Yathiraj Udupi (yudupi) a écrit :
Hi,
Based on the discussions we have had in the past few scheduler
sub-team meetings, I am sharing a document that proposes an
updated Instance Group Model and API extension model.
This is a work-in-progress draft version, but
Just an fyi, tomas-8c8 on the reviewers list is yours truly. That's
the name I got assigned when I registered to Gerrit and apparently, it
can't be changed.
Thanks for the heads-up, will be doing more reviews.
T.
On 07/10/13 21:03, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi, like most OpenStack projects we
Thanks, will submit a patch to reviewerstats updating it for you.
-Rob
On 8 October 2013 21:14, Tomas Sedovic tsedo...@redhat.com wrote:
Just an fyi, tomas-8c8 on the reviewers list is yours truly. That's the
name I got assigned when I registered to Gerrit and apparently, it can't be
changed.
Hi,
Current OVS Agent is creating tunnel with dst_port as the port configured in
INI file on Compute Node. If all the compute nodes on VXLAN network are
configured for DEFAULT port it is fine.
When any of the Compute Nodes are configured for CUSTOM udp port as VXLAN UDP
Port, Then how does
On 08/10/13 01:01, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 10/07/2013 06:34 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
There is a configuration option stating what to do with instances that are
still in the hypervisor but have been deleted from the database. I think you
want:
running_deleted_instance_action=reap
On 07/10/13 20:03, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core responsibilities.
Please see
On 8 October 2013 22:44, Martyn Taylor mtay...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/13 20:03, Robert Collins wrote:
Whilst I can see that deciding on who is Core is a difficult task, I do feel
that creating a competitive environment based on no. reviews will be
detrimental to the project.
I'm not
On 10/08/2013 10:27 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
Perhaps the best thing to do here is to get tuskar-ui to be part of
the horizon program, and utilise it's review team?
This is planned. But it wont happen soon.
On 8 October 2013 19:31, Tzu-Mainn Chen tzuma...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi, like most
Today in the project/release status meeting, we are 9 days before
release ! We'll look in particular into how far away Swift RC1 is, the
status of already-opened RC2 windows, and review havana-rc-potential
bugs to evaluate the need to open other ones.
Feel free to add extra topics to the agenda:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:07:23AM -0700, Ravi Chunduru wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I will modify the blueprint as per your suggestions. Actually, we can use
state_path in nova.conf if set or the default location.
This set of config vars:
- Enable unix channels
- No of Unix Channels
- Target
Hi,
seems like not all people agrees on what should be the 'metric' of a
core reviewer.
Also what justify us to give +1 or +2.
Could it be a topic on today's meeting?
Ladislav
On 10/07/2013 09:03 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up
Hi Robert,
I have few concerns regarding metrics and core-team. To sum up, I think
that there needs to be more metrics and core-reviewers for particular
project (not one group). More details follow:
Measures:
* Only number of reviews shouldn't be the only indicator - you can get
On Oct 7, 2013, at 10:02 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Jon Maron jma...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the keystone client code in savanna/utils/openstack but
my attempt to sue it yield:
'Api v2.0 endpoint not found
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Jon Maron jma...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On Oct 7, 2013, at 10:02 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Jon Maron jma...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use the keystone client code in
Hi,
Ideas for an agenda:
1. Following last weeks meeting the following document was drawn up:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17OIiBoIavih-1y4zzK0oXyI66529f-7JTCVj-BcXURA/edit?usp=sharing
2. Open issues
See you at the end of the hour
Thanks
Gary
___
On 2013-10-08 05:03, Robert Collins wrote:
On 8 October 2013 22:44, Martyn Taylor mtay...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/13 20:03, Robert Collins wrote:
Whilst I can see that deciding on who is Core is a difficult task, I
do feel
that creating a competitive environment based on no. reviews
I don't meant to pick on you personally Jiří, but I have singled this
message out because I feel you have captured the objections to Robert's
initial email well.
Excerpts from Jiří Stránský's message of 2013-10-08 04:30:29 -0700:
On 8.10.2013 11:44, Martyn Taylor wrote:
Whilst I can see that
Hey!
Got a question on IRC which seemed fair game for a quick mailing list post:
Q: I see both addCleanup and tearDown in nova's test suite - which one
should I use for new code?
A: addCleanup
All new code should 100% of the time use addCleanup and not tearDown -
this is because addCleanups
On 10/08/2013 11:22 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
I don't meant to pick on you personally Jiří, but I have singled this
message out because I feel you have captured the objections to Robert's
initial email well.
Darn. My pop-up window showed I don't meant to pick on you personally
so I rushed to go
Hi All,
The hyper-v meeting today will be canceled. We will reconnect next week at
the usual time.
p
Peter J. Pouliot, CISSP
Senior SDET, OpenStack
Microsoft
New England Research Development Center
One Memorial Drive,Cambridge, MA 02142
ppoul...@microsoft.commailto:ppoul...@microsoft.com |
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Thomas Maddox
thomas.mad...@rackspace.comwrote:
On 10/7/13 3:49 PM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Thomas Maddox thomas.mad...@rackspace.com
wrote:
On 10/7/13 1:55 PM, Doug Hellmann
65 matches
Mail list logo
