Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2013-11-02 Thread Isaku Yamahata
Port profile is generic way of Neutron to pass plugin-specific data as dictionary. Cisco plugin uses it to pass VMEFX specific data. Robert, correct me if I'm wrong. thanks, --- Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:21:20PM +, Jiang, Yunhong

[openstack-dev] Manual to build an application on open stack

2013-11-02 Thread Krishanu Dhar
Hi, I wanted to build an application on openstack and wanted help on how do i go about doing it? Since i am absolutely new to the stack I was wondering if their is a developer's manual or something of that sort. All I have done so far is started the installation of devstack. I am typing this

Re: [openstack-dev] Manual to build an application on open stack

2013-11-02 Thread Denis Makogon
It depends on what kind of application your are building. There serveral way of developing something above openstack services. I hope this wikinpage would help you a bit https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation 2013/11/2 Krishanu Dhar rony.k...@gmail.com Hi, I wanted to build an

Re: [openstack-dev] Manual to build an application on open stack

2013-11-02 Thread Krishanu Dhar
Sorry for being vague in my previous email. Thanks for the link, I'll go through it. I am trying to build an app that resides on the cloud and would want to perform some basic storage management operations. On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Denis Makogon dmako...@mirantis.com wrote: It depends

[openstack-dev] Re : Re: Manual to build an application on open stack

2013-11-02 Thread Romain Hardouin
I am trying to build an app that resides on the cloud and would want to perform some basic storage management operations. br/br/So, you want to build an app atop Swift ?br/br/-Romainbr/___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] Manual to build an application on open stack

2013-11-02 Thread Denis Makogon
Ok, i got it. I'd suggest you to describe whole copcent of your application (if it is not commercial secret) and let community lead you to right direction. There simple rules of developing with OpenStack: 1. Python based. 2. Clinet/Server interaction 3. ReST 4. Test coverage. Inner test or

Re: [openstack-dev] Migrating to newer full projects from what used to be part of nova

2013-11-02 Thread Scott Devoid
Migrations from Essex to Grizzly/Havana ... I would find it entirely suitable to upgrade from Essex to Folsom, then migrate from nova-volume to cinder and from nova-network to quantum, then only to upgrade to Grizzly. We're in the same spot, upgrading an Essex deployment to Havana. We

Re: [openstack-dev] Migrating to newer full projects from what used to be part of nova

2013-11-02 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/01/2013 11:02 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: To clarify a bit, while deprecated, nova-network has not lost any functionality in Havana yet. It also hasn't gained much (if any), but it still works. The majority of the testing is performed using nova-network and not neutron (yet). It is also

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Some initial code copying for db/migration

2013-11-02 Thread Russell Bryant
On 11/01/2013 05:50 PM, Michael Still wrote: On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: I also would not use migrate. sqlalchemy-migrate is a dead upstream and we (OpenStack) have had to inherit it. For new projects, you should use alembic. That's actively

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Some initial code copying for db/migration

2013-11-02 Thread Russell Bryant
On 11/01/2013 12:46 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote: I was also going to throw in migrate as a dependency and put in the glue code for that based on common use from ironic/trove/heat. That'll pull in a few openstack common and config settings. Finally, was going to add a solum-dbsync command a la

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ceilometer] Network Notification plugin broken. Ceilometer bug #1243292

2013-11-02 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Sphoorti, Just copying the list with some pointers on this issue that I gave you on IRC. Running 'neutron router-update' show that the tenant ID is absent from the 'router.update.start' but present in the 'router.update.end' notification. Note that the logic to send the update.start

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Tracking technology choices using blue prints

2013-11-02 Thread Jay Pipes
On 11/01/2013 09:55 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: I was looking at the review [1]. And at that point I vaguely remembered a discussion on IRC about framework choice for WSGI. But those discussions are not captured in document and brought to conclusion. So, I think it will be great, if we create

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][keystone] Help with XML Tempest API tests

2013-11-02 Thread Adam Young
On 11/01/2013 04:58 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:40:46PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: snip I think it is safe to say that the trusts API is broken in XML. I added the following test: diff --git a/keystone/tests/test_v3_auth.py b/keystone/tests/test_v3_auth.py index

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Create a source repo for the API specification?

2013-11-02 Thread Jay Pipes
Hi all, One of the most important aspects in the early stages of Solum development will be the consensus building and stabilization of the Solum API specification. A solid API spec aid in the speeding up the pace of innovation in the Solum contributor community. One of the aspects of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Create a source repo for the API specification?

2013-11-02 Thread Christopher Armstrong
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, One of the most important aspects in the early stages of Solum development will be the consensus building and stabilization of the Solum API specification. A solid API spec aid in the speeding up the pace of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Create a source repo for the API specification?

2013-11-02 Thread Adrian Otto
Jay, On Nov 2, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, One of the most important aspects in the early stages of Solum development will be the consensus building and stabilization of the Solum API specification. A solid API spec aid in the speeding up the pace of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Create a source repo for the API specification?

2013-11-02 Thread Clayton Coleman
+1 - with the level of interest among existing vendors I think this will help others who want to be API compatible with Solum (above and beyond normal benefits) On Nov 2, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, One of the most important aspects in the early stages

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Call for participation: Breakout meeting for API deep-dive

2013-11-02 Thread Adrian Otto
Team, The dates have been chosen based on your feedback: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/BreakoutMeetings#Solum_API_Deep_Dive Please mark your calendars for 2100 UTC on 2013-11-13 and 2013-11-15. We will meet in #solum. Thanks, Adrian On Oct 31, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Adrian Otto

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Create a source repo for the API specification?

2013-11-02 Thread Rajesh Ramchandani
+1 Couldn't agree more. Christopher Armstrong chris.armstr...@rackspace.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.commailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, One of the most important aspects in the early stages of Solum development will be the consensus building

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [qa] gate-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron-pg-isolated failing 45% of the time

2013-11-02 Thread Sean Dague
Thanks for diving into this one guys! Very much appreciated. -Sean On 11/02/2013 02:22 AM, Armando Migliaccio wrote: I think/hope I nailed it down. Once more patch coming right up! On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.comwrote: Hi Sean, I looked

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Choice of API infrastructure

2013-11-02 Thread Russell Bryant
On 11/02/2013 11:54 AM, Adrian Otto wrote: Noorul, I agree that key decisions should be tracked in blueprints. This is the one for this decision which was made in our 2013-10-18 public meeting. Jay's submission is consistent with the direction indicated by the team.

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][Nova][Discussion]Blueprint : Auto VM Discovery in OpenStack for existing workload

2013-11-02 Thread Russell Bryant
On 10/30/2013 11:35 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:20:34AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: On 10/30/2013 03:13 AM, Alex Glikson wrote: Maybe a more appropriate approach could be to have a tool/script that does it, as a one time thing. For example, it could make sense in

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][Nova][Discussion]Blueprint : Auto VM Discovery in OpenStack for existing workload

2013-11-02 Thread Russell Bryant
On 10/30/2013 11:51 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote: Swapnil Kulkarni swapnilkulkarni2...@gmail.com wrote on 10/30/2013 02:36:37 AM: I had a discussion with russellb regarding this for yesterday, I would like to discuss this with the team regarding the blueprint mentioned in subject.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Do we need to clean up resource_id after deletion?

2013-11-02 Thread Randall Burt
My thoughts exactly. I meant to dig into the soft-delete code to see if those changes handled resource_id differently but I got to traveling and forgot. IMO, if it universally needs doing, then it should be done in resource.Resource and be cognizant of deletion policy.

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][Nova][Discussion]Blueprint : Auto VM Discovery in OpenStack for existing workload

2013-11-02 Thread Russell Bryant
On 10/31/2013 04:45 AM, Alan Kavanagh wrote: Sorry Russell but I have to ask, what is the different you see between traditional datacenter virtualization and cloud. IMHO the two co-exist and Cloud (the buzz word that it is) is the umbrella for all encompassing data center. That said im

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Logging Blueprint Approval

2013-11-02 Thread Russell Bryant
On 11/02/2013 01:42 AM, Adrian Otto wrote: Team, We have a blueprint for logging architecture within Solum, which is an important feature to aid in debugging at runtime: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/logging The Implementation field of the blueprint says Needs Code Review,

[openstack-dev] Congress: an open policy framework

2013-11-02 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Hi OpenStackers, We've been working on an open policy framework for OpenStack that we're calling Congress. We've been talking with OpenStack users and several of our partners to understand the kinds of rules and regulations they envision enforcing with a policy-based management framework.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Network topologies

2013-11-02 Thread Edgar Magana
Zen, Kevin, Aaron, Salvatore et al, Thank you so much for taking some time and reviewing this proposal. I couldn't get any time slot neither in Neutron nor Heat track to have a deep discussion about this proposal. My conclusions are the following: - This API should be allocated in Heat project,

Re: [openstack-dev] Manual to build an application on open stack

2013-11-02 Thread Krishanu Dhar
Thanks Denis. So,this is what I am planning. An application; I was thinking of writing it up in java 'coz I ain't that good in python. It could be accessed either via a web browser or an app could be downloaded to a desktop. Brief set of functionalities... 1. A db backend to store information