As action items, I've moved API spec to google-doc
until stackforge repo is created.
Here is the link
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10v818QsHWw5lSpiCMfh908PAvVzkw7_ZUL0cgDiH3Vk/edit?usp=sharing
thanks,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:25:03PM +0900,
Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
When deleting role assignments, not only tokens that are related with
deleted role assignments but also other tokens that the(same) user has are
invalidated in stable/icehouse(2014.1.1).
For example,
A) Role assignment between domain and user by OS-INHERIT(*1)
1. Assign a role(For
Hi all,
Recently, some of my instances were stuck in task_state 'None' during VM
creation in my environment.
So I checked found there's a 'None' task_state between 'SCHEDULING'
'BLOCK_DEVICE_MAPPING'.
The related codes are implemented like this:
#def _start_building():
#
Minutes are at
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2014/tripleo.2014-06-25-06.59.html
(or
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2014/tripleo.2014-06-25-06.59.txt
if you prefer plain-text). For your convenience I've pasted them below.
During the meeting it was suggested we
Until https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83250/, the setup-*-password scripts
used to drop password files into $CWD, which meant that if you ran the
script from a different location next time, your old passwords wouldn't be
found.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83250/ changed this so that the
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:59:17PM -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Before I get punted onto the operators list, I post this here because
this is the default config and I'd expect the defaults to just work.
Running devstack inside a VM with a single NIC configured and this in
localrc:
Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 13:56 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Mark McLoughlin's message of 2014-06-24 12:49:52 -0700:
However, there is a debate, and thus I would _never_ block a patch
based on this rule. It was feedback.. just as sometimes
So just to keep the ML up with some of the discussion we had in IRC
the other day...
Most resources in Nova are owned by a particular nova-compute. So the
locks on the resources are effectively held by the nova-compute that
owns the resource.
We already effectively have a cross nova-compute lock
Hello Joe,
Thanks for your quick reply, here's what we're trying to do :
In the scheduling process of a virtual machine we need to be able to
choose the best Host (which is a cinder-volume and nova-compute host at
the same time) that has enough volume space so that we can launch the VM
then
I like the current behavior of not changing the VM state if nova-compute
goes down.
The cloud operators can identify the issue in the compute node and try to
fix it without users noticing. Depending in the problem I can inform users
if instances are affected and change the state if necessary.
I
Hi:
In current DVR design, SNAT is north/south direction, but packets have
to go west/east through the network node. If every compute node is
assigned a public ip, is it technically able to improve SNAT packets
w/o going through the network node ?
SNAT versus floating ips, can save tons of
Hello Joe,
Thanks for your quick reply, here's what we're trying to do :
In the scheduling process of a virtual machine we need to be able to
choose the best Host (which is a cinder-volume and nova-compute host at
the same time) that has enough volume space so that we can launch the VM
then
The post_commit methods occur outside of the transactions. You should be
able to perform the necessary database calls there.
If you look at the code snippet in the email you provided, you can see that
the 'try' block surrounding the postcommit method is at the same
indentation-level as the 'with'
Looks like we will stick to #2 option, as most reliable one.
- we have no way to know that openrc is changed, even if some scripts
relies on it - ostf should not fail with auth error
- we can create ostf user in post-deployment stage, but i heard that some
ceilometer tests relied on admin user,
Seems like we all agree on the basic idea here, which is great.
I think just not concentrating on nova-spec reviews is fine, at least,
it is the simplest way to implement the freeze (as Russell pointed
out).
I so worry about setting the right expectations for the poor souls
who's specs might
As previously (quietly) announced, today we are trying to do a push on
nova-specs reviews.
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova-specs,n,z
The hope is we get through some of the backlog, with some interactive
chat on IRC in #openstack-nova
If someone has better
On 25/06/14 10:52, James Polley wrote:
Until https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83250/, the setup-*-password scripts
used to drop password files into $CWD, which meant that if you ran the
script from a different location next time, your old passwords wouldn't be
found.
Discussing at the meet-up if fine with me
-Original Message-
From: Michael Still [mailto:mi...@stillhq.com]
Sent: 25 June 2014 00:48
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Timeline for the rest of the Juno release
Your
Dmitry,
Fields or field? Do we need to provide password only or other credentials
are needed?
2014-06-25 13:02 GMT+04:00 Dmitriy Shulyak dshul...@mirantis.com:
Looks like we will stick to #2 option, as most reliable one.
- we have no way to know that openrc is changed, even if some scripts
Thanks a lot for your help.
Just a side note - we need to fill in the number of requested rooms, so
that we don't get charged for extra cost - we have a group discount price.
So for everybody, please, go forward and book your room here:
http://tinyurl.com/redhat-marriott
-- Jarda
On
Hi WingWJ,
I agree that we shouldn’t have a task state of None while an operation is in
progress. I’m pretty sure back in the day this didn’t use to be the case and
task_state stayed as Scheduling until it went to Networking (now of course
networking and BDM happen in parallel, so you have
It is possible to change everything so username, password and tenant fields
Also this way we will be able to run tests not only as admin user
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Vitaly Kramskikh vkramsk...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Dmitry,
Fields or field? Do we need to provide password only or
On 24 June 2014 16:40, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/24/2014 07:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:55:41AM +, Day, Phil wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
Sent: 23 June 2014 10:35
To: OpenStack
Hi,
for each compute node to have SNAT to Internet, I think we have the
drawbacks:
1. SNAT is done in router, so each router will have to consume one public
IP on each compute node, which is money.
2. for each compute node to go out to Internet, the compute node will have
one more NIC, which
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
-- Forwarded message --
From: afe.yo...@gmail.com afe.yo...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:53 PM
Subject: [nova] How can I obtain compute_node_id in nova
To: openst...@lists.openstack.org
I found a bug recently and reported it here
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:36:02PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:59:17PM -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
[. . .]
Examining my install log[2], I only see 3 ERRORs that looked legitimate:
(1) A fatal error about 'yaml.h' header file not found:
---
[.
Looking at this a bit deeper the comment in _start_buidling() says that its
doing this to “Save the host and launched_on fields and log appropriately “.
But as far as I can see those don’t actually get set until the claim is made
against the resource tracker a bit later in the process, so
I think there’s a bit more to it that just having an aggregate:
- Ironic provides its own version of the Host manager class for the
scheduler, I’m not sure if that is fully compatible with the non-ironic case.
Even in the BP for merging the Ironic driver back into Nova it still looks
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for your reply. Actually, it is not that straightforward.
Even if postcommit is outside the 'with' statement, the transaction is not
'truly' committed immediately. Because when I put my db code (reading and
writing ml2-related tables) in postcommit, db lock wait exception is
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, j...@ioctl.org wrote:
There's a bug on this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1321787?comments=all
We've got a potential eventlet fix here:
https://github.com/jan-g/eventlet/tree/wip
... testing it now. Certainly seems hopeful in the face of a 'multiple
Hi Steve,
The initial implementation of environment deletion (before 'destroy' method
was introduced in MuranoPL) was to deploy environment with empty
application list. So the code that deletes Heat stack was in 'deploy'. And
it is still there. Environment's 'destroy' will be executed only in
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Yongsheng Gong gong...@unitedstack.com wrote:
Hi,
for each compute node to have SNAT to Internet, I think we have the
drawbacks:
1. SNAT is done in router, so each router will have to consume one public IP
on each compute node, which is money.
SNAT can save
On 06/25/2014 04:28 AM, Belmiro Moreira wrote:
I like the current behavior of not changing the VM state if nova-compute
goes down.
The cloud operators can identify the issue in the compute node and try
to fix it without users noticing. Depending in the problem I can inform
users if
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes:
On 06/25/2014 03:56 AM, Martin Geisler wrote:
In the Mercurial project we accept contributions sent as patches
only. There it's common for the core developers to fix the commit
message locally before importing a patch. That makes it quick to fix
these
Hi List,
I have created a new wikipage with the goal to document the steps
needed to setup DevStack with Manila on F20. Added some troubleshooting
tips based on my experience.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/docs/Setting_up_DevStack_with_Manila_on_Fedora_20
Pls have a look and provide
Are there any API changes that will make projects need to fix?
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Morgan Fainberg
morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote:
I expect that we will be releasing the 1.0.0 shortly here (or at the very
least an alpha so we can move forward) to make sure we have time get the new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 25/06/14 12:59, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/25/2014 03:56 AM, Martin Geisler wrote:
Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 13:56 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Mark McLoughlin's message of 2014-06-24
12:49:52
On 06/25/2014 07:53 AM, Martin Geisler wrote:
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes:
On 06/25/2014 03:56 AM, Martin Geisler wrote:
In the Mercurial project we accept contributions sent as patches
only. There it's common for the core developers to fix the commit
message locally before importing
I’m reasonably sure that nobody wants to intentionally relax compute host
security in order to add this new functionality. Let’s find the right short
term and long term approaches
From our discussions, one approach that seemed popular for long-term
support was to find a way to gracefully
Hi All,
I am observing a bit difference in manager.py file between these branches
stable/icehouse and master.
In stable/icehouse various driver mapped in manager.py but it is not in
master.
Please guide me, where i have to map my driver.
*Thanks Regards*,
Yogesh Prasad.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Angus Lees gusl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 02:46:33 PM Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Kyle Mestery
mest...@noironetworks.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Thanks for the response, I'll be there this Thursday.
Having the file in more than one place could me a nightmare if we have to
maintain consistency between them.
It could be good if we want to protect different properties than Glance.
Thanks,
Facundo
From: Brian Rosmaita
On Jun 25, 2014, at 12:26 AM, Manish Godara mani...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way in current neutron codebase that can be used to validate
the length of a string attribute against the max column size specified in
the schema for that attribute.
E.g. , in models_v2.py
class
That's easy; you don't. The mappings are their because we moved some
drivers round during a code cleanup and didn't want old config files
to break during an upgrade. The old names have been deprecated since
Falsom and finally now removed; new drivers don't need to do any
mapping at all.
On 25
Hi everyone,
Just a quick reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be
tomorrow Thursday, June 26th at 22:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel.
The agenda for tomorrow's meeting can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting
Anyone is welcome to
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Are there any API changes that will make projects need to fix?
There aren't any API changes. The code was just copy-pasted to the new
package. The changes to the projects are just 1) update the requirements
and 2)
If every compute node is
assigned a public ip, is it technically able to improve SNAT packets
w/o going through the network node ?
It is technically possible to implement default SNAT at the compute node.
One approach would be to use a single IP address per compute node as a
default SNAT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nova Network configuration allows guest VMs to connect to host services
- ---
### Summary ###
When using Nova Network to manage networking for compute instances,
instances are able to reach network services running on the host
system. This may be a
You should probably email the openstack-dev
mailing list (openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org) or better yet, ask for
help in #openstack-nova on IRC.
Regards,
Steve Martinelli
Software Developer - Openstack
Keystone Core Member
Phone:
1-905-413-2851
E-mail: steve...@ca.ibm.com
8200 Warden
Hi everyone,
A new change (https://review.openstack.org/101982) has been proposed to
improve vxlan pool initiation with an improvement on delete of obsolete
unallocated vnis using a unique delete SQL command.
I've tested performance with the following (delete only) scenario: vxlan
range is
Hi swift and trove devs,
In working on our automation to document the configuration options across
OpenStack, we uncovered a deficit in both trove and swift configuration
option descriptions.
Here's an example:
This is a known limitation of the token backend and the token revocation
list: we don't index tokens in the backend by roles (and we don't want to
iterate the token table to find matching tokens).
However, if we land support for token revocation events [1] in the
auth_token [2] middleware, we'll
Hi All,
When I boot an instance from volume and the take snapshot of that instance it
creates a volume snapshot and also an image of 0 byte.
I can boot a new instance using this 0 byte image, but I am not sure why this
image with 0 byte is created here?
Can someone please help me to understand
Hi Afe,
Le 25/06/2014 12:01, afe.yo...@gmail.com a écrit :
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
-- Forwarded message --
From: *afe.yo...@gmail.com mailto:afe.yo...@gmail.com*
afe.yo...@gmail.com mailto:afe.yo...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:53 PM
Subject: [nova]
Hi,
I got a jenkins failure on that small fix [1] on OpenContrail.
Here the last lines console output:
2014-06-25 07:02:55
RunUnitTest([build/debug/bgp/rtarget/test/rtarget_table_test.log],
[build/debug/bgp/rtarget/test/rtarget_table_test])
2014-06-25 07:02:56
On 06/25/2014 12:07 PM, Édouard Thuleau wrote:
Hi,
I got a jenkins failure on that small fix [1] on OpenContrail.
Here the last lines console output:
2014-06-25 07:02:55
RunUnitTest([build/debug/bgp/rtarget/test/rtarget_table_test.log],
[build/debug/bgp/rtarget/test/rtarget_table_test])
Sean asked me to jot some thoughts down on how we can automate some of
our common review criteria for elastic-recheck queries, so that's here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/elastic-recheck-testing
There is some low-hanging-fruit in there I think, but the bigger / more
useful change is
On 06/16/2014 11:14 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Gregory Haynes's message of 2014-06-16 14:04:19 -0700:
Excerpts from Jan Provazník's message of 2014-06-16 20:28:29 +:
Hi,
MariaDB is now included in Fedora repositories, this makes it easier to
install and more stable option for
Hey Andres,
Sorry for the late reply. I was out of town all last week. I would suggest
continuing the email thread before we put this on a wiki somewhere so others
can chime in.
Cheers,
--Jorge
From: Buraschi, Andres
andres.buras...@intel.commailto:andres.buras...@intel.com
Reply-To:
Could u expand on this and how it would work.
I'm pretty skeptical of new ad-hoc locking implementations so just want to
ensure it's flushed out in detail.
What would the two local locks be, where would they be, what would the
'conducting' being doing to coordinate?
-Original Message-
I think the plan is to create a Dogtag instance so that integration
tests can be run whenever code is checked in (both with and without a
Dogtag backend).
Dogtag isn't that difficult to deploy, but being a Java app, it does
bring in a set of dependencies that developers may not want to deal with
Is $179/day the expected rate?
Thanks,
Chuck
On Jun 25, 2014, at 2:34 AM, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote:
Thanks a lot for your help.
Just a side note - we need to fill in the number of requested rooms, so that
we don't get charged for extra cost - we have a group discount price.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 25 June 2014 11:49
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we have a stale data indication in
nova list/show?
On 06/25/2014 04:28 AM, Belmiro
On 25/06/14 18:20 +, Carlino, Chuck (OpenStack TripleO, Neutron) wrote:
Is $179/day the expected rate?
Thanks,
Chuck
Yes, that's the best rate available from both of the downtown
(walkable) hotels.
--
Jordan O'Mara jomara at redhat.com
Red Hat Engineering, Raleigh
pgpq2YbXSIITm.pgp
On 06/24/2014 09:51 PM, Steve Kowalik wrote:
On 25/06/14 07:26, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
There's two sides to this coin - concern about alienating
non-english-as-a-first-language speakers who feel undervalued because
their language is nitpicked to death and concern about alienating
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 25 June 2014 11:49
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we have a stale
From: Brian Rosmaita [mailto:brian.rosma...@rackspace.com]
Or you can just use it as the basis of a Cinder property protection config
file,
because I wonder whether in the general case, you'll always want volume
properties protected exactly the same as image properties. If not, the new
API call
Le 2014-06-25 14:26, Day, Phil a écrit :
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 25 June 2014 11:49
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] should we have a stale data indication in
nova list/show?
Team -
Please see in-line for my thoughts/opinions on the topic:
From: Andrew Lazarev alaza...@mirantis.com
Subject: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Upgrade of Hadoop components inside
released version
Date: June 24, 2014 at 5:20:27 PM EDT
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Yes, the wrong mailing list.
Sorry for the noise.
Édouard.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 06/25/2014 12:07 PM, Édouard Thuleau wrote:
Hi,
I got a jenkins failure on that small fix [1] on OpenContrail.
Here the last lines console output:
Hi Stephen,
The entityentityassociations table name is consistent with the rest
of neutron's table names, as is not breaking the table name words up by
an underscore. I think this stems from the sqlalchemy models getting
the table name for free because of inheriting from a base model that
All,
During last summit, we were talking about the integration issues between
DVR and FWaaS. After the summit, I had one IRC meeting with DVR team. But
after that meeting I was tight up with my work and did not get time to
continue to follow up the issue. To not slow down the discussion, I'm
While building the patch in Jenkins, following exception reported in tempest.
2014-06-25
19:09:19.009http://logs.openstack.org/82/92782/17/check/check-tempest-dsvm-full/8aa24c6/console.html#_2014-06-25_19_09_19_009
|
2014-06-25
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Manickam, Kanagaraj
kanagaraj.manic...@hp.com wrote:
While building the patch in Jenkins, following exception reported in
tempest.
2014-06-25 19:09:19.009
This sounds like something which should be reported as a bug. You do
that at https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+filebug
Cheers,
Michael
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Agrawal, Ankit
ankit11.agra...@nttdata.com wrote:
Hi All,
When I boot an instance from volume and the take snapshot of that
Here is the scenario: We are looking to merge the Sahara (Data Processing)
dashboard into horizon. The 9 panels will live in a PanelGroup under Project
called Data Processing. In the spirit of code organization, it was suggested
that I put all 9 of the data processing panels into a
I'm not sure what you mean about it being 'truly committed' even though the
transaction has ended. When would it be committed? There are not more calls
to sqlalchemy after that. The only way it wouldn't be committed is if
another transaction was started before calling create_port.
Regardless, a
Ok, I’ll hack together a dev plugin over the next week or so, other work
notwithstanding. Where possible I’ll probably borrow from the dog tag
plugin as I’ve not looked closely at the plugin infrastructure in Barbican
recently.
Is this something you’d like a blueprint for first?
-Rob
On
On 06/25/2014 05:23 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
As previously (quietly) announced, today we are trying to do a push on
nova-specs reviews.
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova-specs,n,z
The hope is we get through some of the backlog, with some interactive
chat
Good to know. I think it's a good idea to implement a common compute
verifier after instances booted. Maybe we can define different checking
levels so that it can be leveraged by different test cases. I will see
what I can do.
On 24/06/14 22:27, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/24/2014 01:29 AM, Fei Long
Hi Anne:
Thanks for bringing this to our attention! This is definitely something
that we need to fix.
I've filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1334465 to track this
issue, and I'm hoping we'll be able to get to it during juno-2 (or
beginning of juno-3 at the latest).
Once we've got a
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:29 PM, McCann, Jack jack.mcc...@hp.com wrote:
If every compute node is
assigned a public ip, is it technically able to improve SNAT packets
w/o going through the network node ?
It is technically possible to implement default SNAT at the compute node.
One
Here's a code sample which can raise db lock wait exception:
def create_port_postcommit(self, context):
port_id = ...
with session.begin(subtransactions=True):
try:
binding = (session.query(models.PortBinding).
filter(models.PortBinding.port_id.startswith(port_id)).
?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Michael Hearn mrhe...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, May 2, 2014 at 9:21 AM
Subject: [Openstack] Glance - and the use of the project_id:%(project_id)
rule
To: openst...@lists.openstack.org openst...@lists.openstack.org
Having played with the policies and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/06/14 15:13, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Hello,
Solum has run into a constraint with the current scheme for requirements
management within the OpenStack CI system. We
Thx! I will pay close attension to this patch.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Afe,
Le 25/06/2014 12:01, afe.yo...@gmail.com a écrit :
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
-- Forwarded message --
From: afe.yo...@gmail.com
What is in the variable named 'query' that you are trying to merge into the
session? Can you include the full create_port_postcommit method? The line
raising the exception ends with {'port_id': port_id}) and that doesn't
matching anything included in your sample.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:53 PM,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Nikhil Manchanda nik...@manchanda.me
wrote:
Hi Anne:
Thanks for bringing this to our attention! This is definitely something
that we need to fix.
I've filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1334465 to track this
issue, and I'm hoping we'll be able to
On 06/25/2014 02:42 PM, Clark, Robert Graham wrote:
Ok, I’ll hack together a dev plugin over the next week or so, other work
notwithstanding. Where possible I’ll probably borrow from the dog tag
plugin as I’ve not looked closely at the plugin infrastructure in Barbican
recently.
My
On Jun 26, 2014 12:12 PM, Angus Salkeld angus.salk...@rackspace.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/06/14 15:13, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Hello,
Solum has run into a constraint with the
The link does not work for me!
Edgar
From: tfre...@redhat.commailto:tfre...@redhat.com
tfre...@redhat.commailto:tfre...@redhat.com
Organization: Red Hat
Reply-To: tfre...@redhat.commailto:tfre...@redhat.com
tfre...@redhat.commailto:tfre...@redhat.com, OpenStack Development Mailing
List (not
Hi,
I'm looking at creating a new python-new_project_nameclient and I was
wondering if there was any on going effort to share code between the
clients or not? I've looked at the code in python-novaclient and
python-neutronclient and both of them seem to have their own homegrown
HTTPClient and
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Aaron Rosen aaronoro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at creating a new python-new_project_nameclient and I was
wondering if there was any on going effort to share code between the
clients or not? I've looked at the code in python-novaclient and
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Aaron Rosen aaronoro...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking at creating a new python-new_project_nameclient and I was
wondering if there was any on going effort to share code between the
clients or not? I've looked at the code in python-novaclient and
Sorry, I was thought that the code was straightforward to understand. I can
explain what I wanna do.
I try to use postcommit to dynamically set some specific port attribute into
port binding when a certain port is created.
So, I write an example to see whether it is working or not. But,
def
Another approach would be to use a single IP address per router
per compute
node. This avoids the multi-tenant issue mentioned above, at the
cost of
consuming more IP addresses, potentially one default SNAT IP
address for each
VM on the compute server (which is the
Hi folks,
We'll be having the Sahara team meeting as usual in
#openstack-meeting-alt channel.
Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SaharaAgenda#Next_meetings
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Sahara+Meetingiso=20140626T18
--
Sincerely yours,
Sergey Lukjanov
Hi Chen,
I’m not an experienced developer, so , could you explain more about
“Perhaps the live_migrate task is passing the incorrect context in for
this database query?” ?
Sorry, I should have clarified that that question was for the developers
*out there*. (cc's the dev list now). I'm not
Dolph,
Thank you so much.
I understand that using OS-REVOKE Extension will solve these issues.
Regards,
Takashi Natsume
NTT Software Innovation Center
Tel: +81-422-59-4399
E-mail: natsume.taka...@lab.ntt.co.jp
From: Dolph Mathews [mailto:dolph.math...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014
There's a spec in progress related to this, I'd love to see your comments in
there:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94741/
Andrea
Sent from my tiny device
Daryl Walleck wrote
I really like this option, especially if it leaves a generic hook available for
validation. This could
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
