Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tripleo] Update on Kolla

Without taking anything away from this fine and sensible direction, where _would_ be a good place to discuss more radical container-based deployments? (I'm fine if the answer is "use ad-hoc communication channels for now") On Fri Feb 06 2015 at 7:24:12 AM Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > > On 2/5/1

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Hypervisor support matrix now in GIT

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:24:24AM -0600, Kurt Taylor wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Team Nova, > > > > > > This is a message to alert everyone to the fact that the old hypervisor

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tripleo] Update on Kolla

Angus, I think the appropriate place would be the openstack list, possibly with the [container] flag or [kolla] flag. Regards -steve From: Angus Lees mailto:g...@inodes.org>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Da

[openstack-dev] FFE request for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141012 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack/?searchtext=pass-flavor-capabilities-to-ironic-virt-driver

Hi, FFE request for the patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141012. This is required by other items in ironic namely: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/135228/6/specs/kilo/uefi-secure-boot.rst. Regards Nisha __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] looking for status of an old wiki page work item

I reckon the blueprint [1] supersedes the one in the old wiki page you found. It lies in abandoned status as it did not make the release plan for Kilo. I am sure the author and the other contributors working on it will resume it for the next release. Salvatore [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] stuck patches at the nova IRC meeting

Certainly it was my intent when I created that agenda item to cover reviews that wouldn't otherwise reach a decision -- either two cores wedged, or something else that we can't resolve trivially in gerrit. Now, I can see that people don't like reviews sitting for a long time, but that's probably t

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo.db][nova] TL; DR Things everybody should know about Galera

On Fri Feb 06 2015 at 4:25:43 AM Clint Byrum wrote: > > In a single thread, using a single database session, then a read after > successful commit is guaranteed to read a version of the database > that existed after that commit. > Ah, I'm relieved to hear this clarification - thanks. I'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo.db][nova] TL; DR Things everybody should know about Galera

Angus Lees wrote: On Fri Feb 06 2015 at 4:25:43 AM Clint Byrum mailto:cl...@fewbar.com>> wrote: In a single thread, using a single database session, then a read after successful commit is guaranteed to read a version of the database that existed after that commit. Ah, I'm relieved

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo.db][nova] TL; DR Things everybody should know about Galera

Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-02-06 01:26:25 +: > Angus Lees wrote: > > On Fri Feb 06 2015 at 4:25:43 AM Clint Byrum > > wrote: > > I'd also like to see consideration given to systems that handle > > distributed consistency in a more active mann

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Resource CREATE failed with TypeError

Hi, Just checked your template. It seems your SoftwareDeployment resource is not referencing the SoftwareConfig resource properly. A SoftwareDeployment 'binds' a SoftwareConfig to a Server. Without that 'binding', the template won't work as expected. I'll follow up on this checking if Heat sho

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo.db][nova] TL; DR Things everybody should know about Galera

On Fri Feb 06 2015 at 12:59:13 PM Gregory Haynes wrote: > Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-02-06 01:26:25 +: > > Angus Lees wrote: > > > On Fri Feb 06 2015 at 4:25:43 AM Clint Byrum > > > wrote: > > > I'd also like to see consideration given to syste

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo.db][nova] TL; DR Things everybody should know about Galera

Excerpts from Angus Lees's message of 2015-02-06 02:36:32 +: > On Fri Feb 06 2015 at 12:59:13 PM Gregory Haynes > wrote: > > > Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-02-06 01:26:25 +: > > > Angus Lees wrote: > > > > On Fri Feb 06 2015 at 4:25:43 AM Clint Byrum > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo.db][nova] TL; DR Things everybody should know about Galera

On 2015-02-05 9:36 PM, Angus Lees wrote: On Fri Feb 06 2015 at 12:59:13 PM Gregory Haynes mailto:g...@greghaynes.net>> wrote: Along those lines and in an effort to be a bit less doom-and-gloom, I spent my lunch break trying to find non-marketing documentation on the Galera replication protocol a

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Devstack error when running g-reg: 401 Unauthorized

Our CI get the following error when build devstack, begin from service ‘g-reg’ when uploading image: is_service_enabled g-reg 2015-02-05 03:14:54.966 | + return 0 2015-02-05 03:14:54.968 | ++ keystone token-get 2015-02-05 03:14:54.968 | ++ grep ' id ' 2015-02-05 03:14:54.969 | ++ get_field 2 2015

[openstack-dev] [nova] Request non-priority feature freeze exception for contrail vif driver

Hi folks May I request FFE for contrail vif driver? This is really tiny patch which has just about 100 line including unit test. also, it is really harmless code for the other part. This patch uploaded 1/21 but unfortunately we couldn't get attention for this patch. Code https://review.openstac

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-novaclient][nova] future of --os-compute-api-version option and whole api versioning

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Andrey Kurilin wrote: > First results is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152569/ > > > - if os-compute-api-version is not supplied don't send any header at all > > - it is probably worth doing a bit version parsing to see if it makes > sense eg of format: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][neutron][security] Rootwrap on root-intensive nodes

On 2/4/15, 10:24 AM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: >On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:10:06AM -0800, James E. Blair wrote: >> Thierry Carrez writes: >> >> > You make a good point when you mention "traditional distro" here. I >> > would argue that containers are slightly changing the rules of the >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo.db][nova] TL; DR Things everybody should know about Galera

On 5 February 2015 at 23:07, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Avishay Traeger's message of 2015-02-04 22:19:53 -0800: > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Robert Collins < > robe...@robertcollins.net> > > wrote: > > > > > On 5 February 2015 at 10:24, Joshua Harlow > wrote: > > > > How interest

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-cinderclient] Return request ID to caller

Hi Devs, This change is not backward compatible and to do not break OpenStack services which are using cinder-client, we need to first make provision in these consumer services to handle cinder-client return type change. To make this cinder-client change backward compatible we need to do changes

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Kilo-2 development milestone released

Hi, Mistral Kilo-2 dev milestone has been released Release pages for Mistral and Mistral Client: https://launchpad.net/mistral/kilo/kilo-2 https://launchpad.net/python-mistralclient/kilo/kilo-2

<    1   2