[openstack-dev] [tacker] Any volunteers to run next IRC weekly meeting ?

I'm out on a day long offsite next Tuesday and won't be able to run our weekly irc meeting. Any volunteers to pick it up for next week? - Sridhar __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Plans on networking modularisation

Hi Ryan, Thank you. We had a talk with Evgeniy. As a preliminary plan, we will have meetings with all interested people from Networking team. Regards, Aleksey Kasatkin On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ryan Moe wrote: > Hi Aleksey, > > > >> What is the status of making

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] RBAC: Fix port query and deletion for network owner

Thanks! Much appreciated. Will check From: Kevin Benton > Reply-To: OpenStack List > Date: Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 1:09 PM To: OpenStack List

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Proposing Tony Breeds for stable-maint-core

-1 He talks funny. Best, -jay On 03/18/2016 04:11 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: I'd like to propose tonyb for stable-maint-core. Tony is pretty much my day to day guy on stable, he's generally in every stable team meeting (which is not attended well so I appreciate it), and he's as proactive as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Run unit/functional tests

git clone tricircle. cd tricircle, where you can find tox.ini run command: sudo tox -epy27 Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice 发件人：khayam.gondal 收件人：openstack-dev, 抄送：黄朝意,luckyvega.g, 时间：2016-03-17 18:13:08 主题:[Tricircle] Run unit/functional tests How to run tests in /tricircle/test/functional *... .

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

(Sorry for the top post. It was this or bottom post because of company choice of email systems) Integration tests, corner cases, negative tests. Lots of names that don't have clear definitions in this discussion. But, it seems like the collection of "negative tests" include both functional

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Packaging CI for Fuel

Are they any effort on OpenStack packaging? http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/packaging-deb.html http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/packaging-rpm.html I would like to see packaging built & tested by OpenStack Infra, so downstream CI (Fuel, Puppet OpenStack,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder to move implemented nova specs from mitaka

Markus Zoeller/Germany/IBM wrote on 03/18/2016 11:46:01 AM: > From: Markus Zoeller/Germany/IBM > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)" > > Date: 03/18/2016 11:46 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder to move

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Does the OpenStack community(or Cinder team) allow one driver to call another driver's public method?

Hi Cinder team, We are going to implement storage-assisted volume migrate in our driver between different backend storage array or even different array of different vendors. This is really high-efficiency than the host-copy migration between different array of different vendors. To implement

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Packaging CI for Fuel

On 03/16/2016 06:22 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Are they any effort on OpenStack packaging? > > http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/packaging-deb.html > http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/packaging-rpm.html > > I would like to see packaging built & tested by

[openstack-dev] [release][zaqar] zaqar mitaka rc1 available

Hello everyone, Zaqar is the most recent milestone-based project to produce a release candidate for the end of the Mitaka cycle! You can find the RC1 source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/zaqar/zaqar-2.0.0.0rc1.tar.gz Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] High Availability

  -Original Message- From: Hongbin Lu Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: March 17, 2016 at 20:48:59 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] RBAC: Fix port query and deletion for network owner

Hi, The review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255285/ breaks our CI. Since this has landed we are getting failed tests with the: "Details: {u'message': u"Quota exceeded for resources: ['port'].", u'type': u'OverQuota', u'detail': u’’}" When I revert the patch and run our CI without it the

Re: [openstack-dev] [jacket] Introduction to jacket, a new project

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:58 PM, zs wrote: > Hi Gordon, > > Thank you for your suggestion. > > I think jacket is different from tricircle. Because tricircle focuses on > OpenStack deployment across multiple sites, but jacket focuses on how to > manage the different clouds just

[openstack-dev] [magnum] PTL Candidacy

I announce my candidacy [1] for, and respectfully respect your support to continue as your Magnum PTL. Here are are my achievements and OpenStack experience and that make me the best choice for this role: * Founder of the OpenStack Containers Team * Established vision and specification for

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Proposing Tony Breeds for stable-maint-core

+1 for Tony! (my vote does not count, but still wanted to cheer!) -- Dims On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 03/18/2016 04:11 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> I'd like to propose tonyb for stable-maint-core. Tony is pretty much my >> day to day guy on

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] eventlet in the py34 unit tests

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Chris Dent wrote: This review demonstrates a fix for the py34 unit tests sometimes taking an age in the gate and eventually timing out: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/293372/ The changed test, without the change, will block in epoll() for a rather long time (900s),

[openstack-dev] [release][stable][oslo] oslo.db 1.7.4 release (kilo)

We are content to announce the release of: oslo.db 1.7.4: oslo.db library This release is part of the kilo stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.db Please report issues through launchpad: http://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.db For

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

On 2016-03-16 11:09:12 -0400 (-0400), Paul Belanger wrote: [...] > I know personally, I'd love to see some sort of reminder > functionality added into an IRC bot, which pings me each time > there is some sort of IRC meeting I need to attend. For this, you could just add client highlight matches

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [ironic] [inspector] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 07:26:03PM +0300, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote: > >Well, there's a number of reasons. Ironic is not meant only for an > >"undercloud" (deploying OpenStack on ironic instances). There are both > >public and private cloud deployments of ironic in production today, that > >make

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] revert new gerrit

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 03/18/2016 08:31 AM, Andrey Kurilin wrote: > >> Hi all! >> >> I want to start this thread because I'm tired. I spent a lot of time, >> but I can't review as easy as it was with old interface. New Gerrit is >> awful.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [ironic] [inspector] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 05:26:13PM +0300, Evgeniy L wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > > On 03/16/2016 01:39 PM, Evgeniy L wrote: > > > >> Hi Dmitry, > >> > >> I can try to provide you description on what current Nailgun agent is, > >> and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Nomination Oleksii Chuprykov to Heat core reviewer

+1 :) Dr. Pavlo Shchelokovskyy Senior Software Engineer Mirantis Inc www.mirantis.com On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Rabi Mishra wrote: > > Hi Heaters, > > > > The Mitaka release is close to finish, so it's good time for reviewing > > results of work. > > One of this

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Triaging and resolution of rc2 bugs.

Kolla developers and bug triagers, Our Mitaka rc2 is scheduled for April 1st. It would be fantastic if anyone that wants to contribute to Kolla in the next two weeks could do the following: 1. Confirm bugs in the "Triaged" state if not the original reporter - that way a developer can

[openstack-dev] [trove] OpenStack Trove meeting minutes (2016-03-16)

Minutes of the OpenStack Trove meeting held today are at: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/trove/2016/trove.2016-03-16-18.00.html If there are topics you would like to suggest for the summit, please do that soon so we can start consolidating and making a schedule that will accommodate as

[openstack-dev] [freezer] mid-cycle meetup for freezer team etherpads

Hello everyone, freezer team recently had a mid-cycle meeting hosted in Galway Ireland. The topics and resolution we arrive are included in the following etherpad, feel free to contribute and give feedback. Related etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/freezer_midcycle_meetup Regards

Re: [openstack-dev] [cross-project] [all] Quotas -- service vs. library

On 16/03/2016 7:10 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote: > > NO : For any kind of extra quota service. > > In other places I saw other reasons for a quota service or similar, > the actual cost of this approach is higher than most people would think so > NO. > > > Maybe Library, > But I do not want to see

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

2016-03-18 1:50 GMT-07:00 Masayuki Igawa : > From: GHANSHYAM MANN > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from > Tempest > Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:05:39 +0900 > >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Ken'ichi

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Does the OpenStack community(or Cinder team) allow one driver to call another driver's public method?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:05 PM, liuxinguo wrote: > Hi Cinder team, > > > > We are going to implement storage-assisted volume migrate in our driver > between different backend storage array or even different array of > different vendors. > > This is really high-efficiency

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

On 03/16/2016 09:20 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: Hi I have one proposal[1] related to negative tests in Tempest, and hoping opinions before doing that. Now Tempest contains negative tests and sometimes patches are being posted for adding more negative tests, but I'd like to propose removing

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Wishlist bugs == (trivial) blueprint?

Top post as I summarize below what was said. At the end is a proposal of actions. TL;DR: Use the openstack-dev ML and discuss the most wanted RFEs at the summit? The two diametral points are: * The ops like to have a frictionless way for RFEs which need to be resolved explicitely

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Newton Summit Sessions

Hey everyone, This was announced in our weekly meeting, but putting it out here to get a wider audience and make sure it's seen. I probably should have start here. We have started an etherpad [1] for planning out our design summit sessions. Please feel free to add any additional topics there. If

[openstack-dev] [all] Reproducible builds: please don't overwrite html_last_updated_fmt

Hi there! tl;dr: html_last_updated_fmt is already set by your buddy doing Debian packages, please don't overwrite it in doc/conf.py, or the build becomes not-reproducible, which is very frustrating for everyone working on reproducible builds in Debian. Longer version: If you aren't aware of it,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Packaging CI for Fuel

On 03/17/2016 03:11 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 03/16/2016 06:22 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Are they any effort on OpenStack packaging? http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/packaging-deb.html http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/packaging-rpm.html I would like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Clarification of expanded mission statement

Hi Russell, Thanks for starting this thread, i have been wanting to do so myself. First, to me Kuryr is much more then just providing a "libnetwork driver" or a "CNI driver" in the networking part. Kuryr goal (to me at least) is to simplify orchestration, management and performance and avoid

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] High Availability

From: Hongbin Lu > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > Date: Saturday 19 March 2016 at 04:52 To: "OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

On 03/14/2016 03:28 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Ian, > > +1 to get rid of that dependency if possible. +1 for any action aiming toward removing *any* dependency. We don't have enough of such actions, and we have a way too many dependencies, with many duplicate functionalities too. Just to

Re: [openstack-dev] [cross-project] [all] Quotas -- service vs. library

Nikhil, thank you for the very timely posting. This is a topic that has been discussed quite a bit recently within the Trove team. I've read the document you reference as [1] and I have not been part of earlier conversations on this subject so I may be missing some context here. I feel that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] Proposal of Dashboard for TaaS

Hi, Thank you for your comment. Yes, I know the Network Topology view was changed dramatically since Liberty. My design proposal is based on Kilo, currently. I personally prefer the view in Kilo because I can intuitively recognize tiered topology. Regards, Soichi On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] How do we move forward with xstatic releases?

On 17/03/16 08:59, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> >> Horizon, for example, currently does *not* use the upper-constraints >> pinning in its test suite or installation, so we're vulnerable to, say, >> a python-*client release that's not compatible. I have a patch in the >> works to address this, but it

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

2016-03-16 19:29 GMT-07:00 Adam Young : > On 03/16/2016 09:20 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I have one proposal[1] related to negative tests in Tempest, and >> hoping opinions before doing that. >> >> Now Tempest contains negative tests and sometimes patches are

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [ironic] [inspector] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 03/16/2016 01:39 PM, Evgeniy L wrote: > >> Hi Dmitry, >> >> I can try to provide you description on what current Nailgun agent is, >> and what are potential requirements we may need from HW discovery system. >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] High Availability

Hongbin, One alternative we could discuss as an option for operators that have a good reason not to use Barbican, is to use Keystone. Keystone credentials store: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-specs/api/v3/identity-api-v3.html#credentials-v3-credentials The contents are stored

[openstack-dev] [stable] Proposing Tony Breeds for stable-maint-core

I'd like to propose tonyb for stable-maint-core. Tony is pretty much my day to day guy on stable, he's generally in every stable team meeting (which is not attended well so I appreciate it), and he's as proactive as ever on staying on top of gate issues when they come up, so he's well

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

On 2016-03-16 15:44:41 + (+), Chris Dent wrote: [...] > However, I'd really like to avoid having one bot uber alles. > > We should have different bots for different tasks. Microbots or > what have you. [...] Yep, I can get behind that logic. Though having all our official bots use a

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Ivan Kolodyazhny PTL Candidacy

Hello Team, It's a big honor for me be a part of the our Cinder community and I do my best to make Cinder better. That's why I'm I'm announcing my candidacy for Cinder PTL for the Mitaka release. That doesn't mean that I'm working at half strength now. It means that I would like to give as much

[openstack-dev] [kolla][release] Announcement of release of Mitaka rc1!

The Kolla community is pleased to announce the release of Mitaka milestone RC1. This may look like a large list of features, but really it was finishing the job on 1 or 2 services that were missing for each of our major blueprints for Mitaka. Mitaka RC1 Features: * MariaDB lights out

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] RBAC: Fix port query and deletion for network owner

Bug for this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1558827 This is something we need to get fixed for Mitaka. On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: > Oh, I understand the issue now. I was thrown off because the quota engine > doesn't log anything on that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Nomination Oleksii Chuprykov to Heat core reviewer

+ 1 :) > On Mar 16, 2016, at 18:57, Sergey Kraynev wrote: > > Hi Heaters, > > The Mitaka release is close to finish, so it's good time for reviewing > results of work. > One of this results is analyze contribution results for the last release > cycle. > According to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cross-project] [all] Quotas -- service vs. library

On 16 March 2016 at 10:09, Sean Dague wrote: > On 03/16/2016 05:46 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: >> On 16 March 2016 at 09:15, Tim Bell > > wrote: >> >> Then, there were major reservations from the PTLs at the impacts in >> terms of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] working on bug reports; what blocks you?

On 3/17/2016 11:41 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: What are the various reasons which block you to work on bug reports? This question goes especially to the new contributors but also to the rest of us. For me, personally, it's that most bug reports miss the steps to reproduce which allow me to see

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On 03/17/2016 01:13 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:59:22AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: >> On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >>> On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: This seems to be the week people want to pile it on TripleO. Talking

[openstack-dev] [magnum] PTL candidacy

Hi, I would like to announce my candidacy for the PTL position of Magnum. To introduce myself, my involvement in Magnum began in December 2014, in which the project was at a very early stage. Since then, I have been working with the team to explore the roadmap, implement and refine individual

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Mitaka RC1 available

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 09:41:31AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Cinder is the next project team to produce a release candidate for > the end of the Mitaka cycle! You can find the RC1 source code > tarball at: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] oslo.messaging dispatching into private/protected methods?

Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2016-03-17 15:44:06 -0700: > In a follow-up to this. > > Seems like the patch to disable/disallow this itself found some > 'violations' @ >

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][all][ptl] preparing to create stable/mitaka branches for libraries

python-barbicanclient 4.0.0 is ready to be branched. - Douglas Mendizábal On 3/9/16 11:26 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > It's time to start opening the stable branches for libraries. I've > prepared a list of repositories and the proposed versions from which > we will create stable/mitaka branches,

Re: [openstack-dev] [zaqar-ui][zaqar] Nominating Thai Tran for zaqar-ui core

On 03/18/2016 06:24 AM, Fei Long Wang wrote: Hi team, I would like to propose adding Thai Tran(tqtran) for the Zaqar UI core team. Thai has done amazing work since the beginning of Zaqar UI project. He is currently the most active contributor on Zaqar UI projects for the last 90 days[1]. If no

[openstack-dev] Unable to change environment Variables for demo or admin tenant during runtime

Unable to set Environment variables like *OS_USERNAME, OS_PASSWORD, OS_TENANT_NAME, OS_REGION_NAME, OS_AUTH_URL* during run time through for example *os.system("source openrc demo demo")* ,in order to run commands for demo project like *ceilometer event-list*. Actually I am unable to get demo's

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovn][Neutron] OVN support for routed networks(plugin interface for host mapping)

Hi Russell. Since the "ovn-bridge-mapping" will become accessible in OVN Southbound DB, do you meant that neutron plugin can read those bridge mappings from the OVN Southbound DB? I didn't think in that way because I thought networking-ovn will only transact data with OVN Northbound DB. Also,

Re: [openstack-dev] [cross-project] [all] Quotas -- service vs. library

On 03/16/2016 10:04 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: To complete the context: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/132127/ https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-oslo-common-quota-library (from https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Kilo/Etherpads) -- Dims On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Doug

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

On 2016-03-16 13:55:56 + (+), Chris Dent wrote: > > I built an IRC bot > > https://anticdent.org/purple-irc-bot.html [...] Oof, a gerritbot derivative... at least it's not based on supybot/twisted so doesn't suffer the IPv6+SSL issue we have on meetbot and statusbot. Still, I've

[openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL Voting is now open

Elections are underway and will remain open for you to cast your vote until 2016-03-24, 23:59 UTC We are having elections for Cinder, Fuel, Glance, Heat, Infrastructure, Keystone, Kolla, Magnum, Packaging-Rpm, and Telemetry. If you are a Foundation individual member and had a commit in one of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder to move implemented nova specs from mitaka

On 3/16/2016 4:20 PM, Michael Still wrote: I normally do this in one big batch, but haven't had a chance yet. I'll do that later this week. Michael On 17 Mar 2016 7:50 AM, "Matt Riedemann" > wrote: Specs are proposed to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] High Availability

Adrian, I think we need a boarder set of inputs in this matter, so I moved the discussion from whiteboard back to here. Please check my replies inline. > I would like to get a clear problem statement written for this. > As I see it, the problem is that there is no safe place to put certificates

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: >> This seems to be the week people want to pile it on TripleO. Talking >> about upstream is great but I suppose I'd rather debate major changes >> after we branch Mitaka. :/ > [...] > > I

[openstack-dev] [glance] Summit sessions brainstorm

Greetings, Hey Folks, Now that RC1 is out (YAY!), we should start looking forward to Glance's Newton plans. More specifically, I'd like us to speed up our brainstorm on summit topics. I've set up an etherpad for it and we've got some interesting topics listed already. But there's more, there

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

Most negative test supposed to be very simple and we should not spend too much time in them. The right question: Are we able to run 100 negative test/sec ? Where is the time spent ? If we are able to solve the main issue, probably we do not need to worry about how many negative test we have.

[openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on the wiki[0]. There are 3 projects without candidates, so according to this resolution[1], the TC we'll have to appoint a new PTL for Ec2-Api, Stable_Branch_Maintenance and Winstackers There are 10 projects that will have an

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Developer Mailing List Digest March 12-18

HTML version: http://www.openstack.org/blog/2016/03/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-20160318/ SuccessBot Says === * Bknudson: we got rid of keystone CLI [in favor of OpenStack Client] * jrichli: it has been shown that Swift encryption can pass all functional tests. * Bauzas:

[openstack-dev] 答复: [Heat] Nomination Oleksii Chuprykov to Heat core reviewer

+1 ：） -邮件原件- 发件人: Sergey Kraynev [mailto:skray...@mirantis.com] 发送时间: 2016年3月16日 18:58 收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 主题: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Nomination Oleksii Chuprykov to Heat core reviewer Hi Heaters, The Mitaka release is close to finish, so

[openstack-dev] [openstack][release][keystone] Mitaka RC1 available

Hello everyone, Keystone's release candidate for the end of Mitaka is available. You can find the RC1 source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/keystone/keystone-9.0.0.0rc1.tar.gz Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this RC1 will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [cross-project] [all] Quotas -- service vs. library

To complete the context: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/132127/ https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-oslo-common-quota-library (from https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Kilo/Etherpads) -- Dims On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleO][Neutron] neutron-lbaas agent service placement

On 03/16/2016 05:29 AM, Qasim Sarfraz wrote: > Thanks Ben. > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Ben Nemec > wrote: > > On 03/14/2016 10:18 AM, Qasim Sarfraz wrote: > > Hi Triple-O folks, > > > > I was planning to enable

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Nomination Oleksii Chuprykov to Heat core reviewer

Of course +1. 2016-03-16 14:12 GMT+03:00 Steven Hardy : > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 01:57:34PM +0300, Sergey Kraynev wrote: > > Hi Heaters, > > > > The Mitaka release is close to finish, so it's good time for reviewing > > results of work. > > One of this results is analyze

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 01:55:24PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 03/17/2016 01:13 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:59:22AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > >> On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > >>> On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: > This

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [ironic] [inspector] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

Hi Dmitry, I can try to provide you description on what current Nailgun agent is, and what are potential requirements we may need from HW discovery system. Nailgun agent is a one-file Ruby script [0] which is periodically run under cron. It collects information about HW using ohai [1], plus it

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] revert new gerrit

On 19 March 2016 at 02:35, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 03/18/2016 08:31 AM, Andrey Kurilin wrote: > >> Hi all! >> >> I want to start this thread because I'm tired. I spent a lot of time, >> but I can't review as easy as it was with old interface. New Gerrit is >> awful. Here

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

On 03/16/2016 03:50 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Paul Belanger wrote: > >> So, I cannot comment on the how useful the bot is but if projects are >> in fact >> using it I would like to see it added to openstack-infra so we can >> properly >> manage it. > > I was waiting to see if

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-2, Mar 21-25

Sahara Mitaka RC1 - https://review.openstack.org/294295 Regarding sahara-tests, I expect we'll have a final release for Mitaka as well. On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > We're almost to the finish line with Mitaka! > > Focus > - > > Project

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Artifacts] Current status of Glance artifacts

Thank you Mikhail for your response. -Deepti From: Mikhail Fedosin [mailto:mfedo...@mirantis.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 8:01 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Artifacts] Current

[openstack-dev] [trove] notes for Newton about the release process, learnings from Mitaka thus far

Folks on the Trove team, I've certainly learnt a lot of things going through the Mitaka release process thus far, and I'm sure there are more things that I will learn as well. But, I want to send this to all so that we don't 'learn' the same things again in Newton. 1. The release calendar

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] High Availability

I have trouble understanding that blueprint. I will put some remarks on the whiteboard. Duplicating Barbican sounds like a mistake to me. -- Adrian > On Mar 17, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > > The problem of missing Barbican alternative implementation has been

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Does the OpenStack community(or Cinder team) allow one driver to call another driver's public method?

On 03/18/2016 10:01 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:05:34AM +, liuxinguo wrote: >> Hi Cinder team, >> >> We are going to implement storage-assisted volume migrate in our driver >> between different backend storage array or even different array of different >> vendors.

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

2016-03-16 19:41 GMT-07:00 Jim Rollenhagen : > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:20:11PM -0700, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have one proposal[1] related to negative tests in Tempest, and >> hoping opinions before doing that. >> >> Now Tempest contains negative tests and

[openstack-dev] [app-catalog] IRC Meeting Thursday March 17th at 17:00UTC

Join us Thursday for our weekly meeting, scheduled for March 17th at 17:00UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 NOTE: The time may be different for you due to US daylight savings time (it's probably an hour later for you if you're in the US) The agenda can be found here, and please add to if you want to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dvr]What does table 9 used for in br-tun?

Each DVR router has a unique MAC address that can be found in the Neutron DB in the dvr_host_macs table. Those will MACs will likely match what’s in the flow rules there. This presentation from the Paris summit (Page 19-20) breaks it down in some detail.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

On 03/18/2016 09:31 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17 2016, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> We don't have enough of such actions, and we have a way too many >> dependencies, with many duplicate functionalities too. Just to name a few: >> - oslo.concurrency vs lockfile > > You made me check,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [puppet] move puppet-pacemaker

I'd be happy to see more collaboration here as well, I'd like to hear from the maintainers on both sides identify some of what isn't implemented on each so we can better decide which one to continue from, develop feature parity and then switch to. On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:03 PM Emilien Macchi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of cluster status

On 03/16/2016 11:53 AM, Vladimir Kuklin wrote: > Folks > > As I generally support the idea of getting rid of cluster status, this > requires thorough design. My opinion here is that we should leave it as > a function of nodes state until we come up with a variant of better > calculation of

[openstack-dev] [manila] FFE for update_access implementation for Ganesha lib and GlusterFS

Hi, I'm asking for a Feature Free Exception for the update_access code for Ganesha library and the two GlusterFS drivers (glusterfs, glusterfs-native). This benefits the whole project in terms of getting closer to the point when the backward compatiblitly hooks for the old driver access API can

[openstack-dev] [sahara] Sahara Newton Summit

Hey folks, let's start collecting topics for the summit discussions. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-newton-summit Thanks. -- Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov Principal Software Engineer Mirantis Inc. __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

> On Mar 14, 2016, at 8:51 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > -Original Message- > From: Sean Dague > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:41:02 > To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Wishlist bugs == (trivial) blueprint?

How do other teams capture feature requests outside of the blueprint/spec process? I'm inclined to agree with the others about the bug queue not being the right place for it, as someone who has been assisting with bug queue maintenance. I also agree with the other points brought up that we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Nomination Oleksii Chuprykov to Heat core reviewer

+1 -- James Reeves Systems Engineer Openstack Development & Automation james_ree...@cable.comcast.com On 3/16/16, 6:57 AM, "Sergey Kraynev" wrote: >Hi Heaters, > >The Mitaka release is close to finish, so it's good time for reviewing >results of work. >One

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] revert new gerrit

There is a new web and android interface that's being developed by guys at Google however it's not available on our version of Gerrit. I think it probably won't be ready until Gerrit ver 2.13+ web interface (polymer+gerrit = polygerrit): This interface is already very usable in Gerrit 2.12.

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] High Availability

The problem of missing Barbican alternative implementation has been raised several times by different people. IMO, this is a very serious issue that will hurt Magnum adoption. I created a blueprint for that [1] and set the PTL as approver. It will be picked up by a contributor once it is

Re: [openstack-dev] [jacket] Introduction to jacket, a new project

Thank you for more explanation. It's not necessary for you to agree with me at all honestly -; I just wanted to clarify difference of concepts between both components. Cheers, Shinobu On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Kevin.ZhangSen wrote: > Hi Shinobu, > > Thanks for your

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Austin Summit preparation

Let's start preparing the Austin Summit! Our available room resources will be: 2 x 40 minutes Fishbowl 3 x 40 minutes Workroom 1/2 day Community session Please look at the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-design-puppet and add your name if you plan to attend the sessions. Also

Re: [openstack-dev] [jacket] Introduction to jacket, a new project

Agree with Kevin, Currently Tricircle mainly focuses on the API gateway and networking automation across multiple OpenStack instances. The hybrid cloud PoC is built based on Tricircle in Tokyo Summit:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Newton Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

Emilien Macchi wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Kirill Zaitsev wrote: Is it too late to ask for a half-day Contributors Meetup for murano? We had an extremely successful contributors meetup in Tokyo and I guess it is an error on our side, that we have not

<    1   2   3   4   >