Hi Carl,
It was great working with you..
Wishing you the best of luck for your future endeavours
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 3:56 PM, John Davidge
wrote:
> It’s been a pleasure to work with you these past few years, Carl. I wish
> you all the best in whatever’s next for you. Hopefully we’ll meet aga
Hi Yatin, fengbeihong,
I'm using CoreOS to create Kubernetes CoreOS cluster.
Thank you so much.
Best regards,
On 2016/11/22 13:07, Yatin Karel wrote:
Hi Yoshihiko atsumi,
<<< I'm using CoreOS-1010.3.0, Magnum 2.0.1.
Is CoreOS used as a base OS or guest OS.
If You are using CoreOS to Create ku
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 03:40:02AM +, jenk...@openstack.org wrote:
> Build failed.
>
> - heat-docs-ubuntu-xenial
> http://logs.openstack.org/71/71a4e63a6cf159a4e5e814a609eafaf5b447cf88/release/heat-docs-ubuntu-xenial/4f407d9/
> : FAILURE in 3m 10s
This is a known issue for heat It's being w
Hi Yoshihiko atsumi,
<<< I'm using CoreOS-1010.3.0, Magnum 2.0.1.
Is CoreOS used as a base OS or guest OS.
If You are using CoreOS to Create kubernetes CoreOS cluster, then
As you mentioned you are using Magnum 2.0.1(Mitaka),
In Mitaka, k8s-coreos cluster couldn't be created with multiple master
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2016-11-21 15:12:45 -0500:
> On 18/11/16 16:47, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2016-11-17 18:24:35 -0500:
> >> On 15/11/16 09:56, Monty Taylor wrote:
> > I know Monty said this, but I want to say it again: gRPC is just HTTP/2
> >
Hello Team,
A gentle reminder, as we discussed in the meeting last week, there will be
no weekly meeting this week on Thursday Nov 24th due to Thanksgiving
holiday in USA.
Regards,
Sahdev Zala
__
OpenStack Development M
Hi Rama,
Ironic inspector is a bit complicated. Different bridges are not a
problem, as log as there is layer 2
connection, and dhcp/tftp/http protocol are allowed.
I have some checkout for you.
1. Configure the baremetal node pxe boot first in bios.
2. Make sure dnsmasq is running on the inspec
Hi guys,
Karbor today's weekly irc meeting will be held at 09:00 UTC
#openstack-meeting.
Weclome to add your agenda at [1] and welcome to join the meeting.
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Karbor
Best Regards,
xiangxinyong
Hi all,
I'm late in sending this announement, but I'm glad to see several projects
have already requested EOL releases to make it trivial and obvious where to
apply the tag.
I'm proposing to EOL all projects that meet one or more of the following
criteria:
- The project is openstack-dev/devst
Hi atsumi,
Multiple masters must be created together with load balancer.
Create cluster template with `--master-lb-enabled`.
magnum cluster-template-create --name k8s-cluster-template --image-id
test.qcow2 \
--keypair-id testkey \
--external-network-id
Hi all,
Can I create the bay of Kubernetes which has multiple master?
I'm able to create the bay of Kubernetes single master, but failed in
creating the bay of Kubernetes multiple master.
I'm using CoreOS-1010.3.0, Magnum 2.0.1.
Best regards,
--
--
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 02:02:44PM +0100, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm formally proposing that the ironic-stable-maint team [1] adds Jay
> Faulkner. He's been consistently reviewing stable patches as shown by [2]. I
> fully trust that his operator experience will help his judgment on not
>
Hi SWGers,
Due to the fact that most of the group will be away for the US
Thanksgiving holiday, I'm cancelling our SWG meeting in
#openstack-meeting-3. See you all on December 8th, at 1400 UTC, and
have a great holiday!
-colette/gothicmindfood
Hi OpenStackers!
At the last Stewardship Working Group (SWG) meeting[0], we discussed a lot
of the feedback that we received in our cross project session and our panel
discussion in Barcelona from people who were wondering what, exactly, the
Stewardship Working Group is and what they do.
I though
Hi,
I am attempting inspecting a physical node in a devstack environment with
Ironic and Ironic Inspector. I have a two server setup with IPMI connectivity
and IP addresses. My devstack environment setup is same as the one for
Ironic/Ironic-Inspector in the docs with agent_ipmitool driver. I wa
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a POC patch[1] up to demonstrate the use of the tripleo-repos tool
> [2] as a replacement for most of tripleo.sh --repo-setup. It has now passed
> all of the CI jobs so I wanted to solicit some feedback.
>
> There are a few change
On 11/21/2016 03:36 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 18/11/16 16:56, Clint Byrum wrote:
>> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2016-11-18 14:24:43 -0500:
>>> So, say that I want to create my servers in Heat so that I can use Heat
>>> software deployments for orchestration. How would I go about e.g. m
On 11/21/2016 03:25 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
>>I'm not saying that you have to supply any IP addresses to the pool.
> Just that only the wilfully contrary should call the internet anything
> other than "internet", and that we should ensure this *in code* instead
> of just hoping that everyone will c
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 07:53:46AM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> I've added Lee Yarwood to the nova-stable-maint core team:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/540,members
>
> Lee has done a great job the last few months of proposing backports and
> reviewing changes to nova on the s
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> Steve, thanks for all the hard work and dedication over the last 3 cycles.
> I hope you have a nice break and I look forward to working with you on Pike!
>
I could not say better! Thanks for everything Steve.
>
> Enjoy you're evenings :)
Hi,
I have a POC patch[1] up to demonstrate the use of the tripleo-repos
tool [2] as a replacement for most of tripleo.sh --repo-setup. It has
now passed all of the CI jobs so I wanted to solicit some feedback.
There are a few changes related to repo naming because the tool names
repo files
On 2016-11-21 15:12:45 -0500 (-0500), Zane Bitter wrote:
[...]
> (Also, the point of floating IPs with access to only the control plane is
> not so instances can access the control plane; it's so that the control
> plane can access the instances without everyone on the internet - or
> whatever othe
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 18/11/16 16:56, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2016-11-18 14:24:43 -0500:
>>
>>> So, say that I want to create my servers in Heat so that I can use Heat
>>> software deployments for orchestration. How would I
Hi,
We are nonpareil in presenting this week's priorities and subteam report for
Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and
formatted.
This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting)
1. portgroup:
On 18/11/16 16:56, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2016-11-18 14:24:43 -0500:
So, say that I want to create my servers in Heat so that I can use Heat
software deployments for orchestration. How would I go about e.g. making
sure that the servers are always connected to t
HTML version:
http://www.openstack.org/blog/2016/11/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-20161118/
SuccessBot Says
===
* mriedem: We’re now running neutron by default in Ocata CI jobs [1].
* stevemar: fernet token format is now the default format in keystone! thanks
lbragstad sam
>I'm not saying that you have to supply any IP addresses to the pool. Just
that only the wilfully contrary should call the internet anything other
than "internet", and that we should ensure this *in code* instead of just
hoping that everyone will coincidentally choose the same thing (spoiler:
they
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Kurt Taylor wrote:
> Hey everyone, due to projected low turnout for this weeks ironic-qa meeting,
> it will be canceled. I will update the wiki meeting page to reflect this.
>
> FYI, I brought up a proposal last week to merge this meeting back into the
> main Monda
Hey everyone, due to projected low turnout for this weeks ironic-qa
meeting, it will be canceled. I will update the wiki meeting page to
reflect this.
FYI, I brought up a proposal last week to merge this meeting back into the
main Monday ironic meeting, and handle any work via sub team reports.
Co
Steve, thanks for all the hard work and dedication over the last 3 cycles.
I hope you have a nice break and I look forward to working with you on Pike!
Enjoy you're evenings :)
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Steve Martinelli
wrote:
> one of these days i'll learn how to spell :)
>
> On Mon,
Good day OpenStack Charmers,
Project-config change proposed, ready for review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/399299/
To address bug:
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1642981
Which is preventing landing of even trivial changes in the source/layer
repos:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:update-
On 18/11/16 16:47, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2016-11-17 18:24:35 -0500:
On 15/11/16 09:56, Monty Taylor wrote:
Hey everybody!
At this past OpenStack Summit the results of the Interop Challenge were
shown on stage. It was pretty awesome - 17 different people from
one of these days i'll learn how to spell :)
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Steve Martinelli
wrote:
> Keystoners,
>
> I do not intend to run for the PTL position of the Pike development cycle.
> I'm sending this out early so I can work with folks interested in the role,
> If you intend to run
On 11/21/2016 08:25 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> Just thinking about all the documentation rework that would be necessary…
> Perhaps it just confuses me ;) I think the short term result would be mass
> confusion as we sort out the next iteration of the documentation in this
Andreas,
Just thinking about all the documentation rework that would be necessary…
Perhaps it just confuses me ;) I think the short term result would be mass
confusion as we sort out the next iteration of the documentation in this
structure since the docs are well tested at present and I’m a
The topic wasn't very clear. Fixing that...
-Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Hallisey"
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 1:48:51 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kubernetes] kolla slack channel
Hey folks,
I sp
Hey folks,
I spoke with the Kubernetes community manager about the interop
between Openstack and Kubernetes with respect to Kolla. We agreed
that it would make sense to have a channel in the Kubernetes Slack
group for kolla.
In addition, we talked about mirroring the slack and irc channels
essen
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016, at 03:30 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016, at 01:48 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > The infra team would really like to get the Ubuntu Xenial for testing
> > transition completed early this cycle. We are planning to switch any
> > jobs that re
Keystoners,
I do not intend to run for the PTL position of the Pike development cycle.
I'm sending this out early so I can work with folks interested in the role,
If you intend to run for PTL in Pike and are interested in learning the
ropes (or just want to hear more about what the role means) the
On 11/18/2016 04:56 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2016-11-18 14:24:43 -0500:
>> On 17/11/16 19:01, Monty Taylor wrote:
>>> On 11/17/2016 05:24 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 15/11/16 09:56, Monty Taylor wrote:
> Hey everybody!
>
> At this past OpenStack
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia -
HU/Budapest) wrote:
> Is there any way to configure allowed-address-pairs in osc?
These options are under review in
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356219/ and should be merged soon.
dt
--
Dean Troyer
dtro...@gmail.com
_
Hi Yipei,
That error means the controller worker process was not able to reach
the amphora REST API.
I am guessing this is the issue with diskimage-builder which we have
patches up for, but not all of them have merged yet [1][2].
Try running my script:
https://gist.github.com/michjohn/a7cd582fc1
Hi,
Is there any way to configure allowed-address-pairs in osc?
Thanks,
Gerg0
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://l
On 7 November 2016 at 16:20, Dougal Matthews wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We want to make sure that the Mistral meeting time is as good as possible,
> so that everyone interested can attend. To do that, please add your
> name/nick and the times that suit you to this etherpad:
>
> https://etherpad.opensta
On 11/21/2016 07:43 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 2016-11-21 13:24, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Pete,
The main problem with that is publishing docs to docs.oo which would
then confuse the reader even more then they are already confused by
reading our docs ;)
Regards
-steve
From: Pete Birley m
On 2016-11-21 13:24, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Pete,
>
> The main problem with that is publishing docs to docs.oo which would
> then confuse the reader even more then they are already confused by
> reading our docs ;)
>
> Regards
> -steve
>
>
> From: Pete Birley mailto:pete@port.direct>>
>
On 2016-11-21 13:00, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Yup this is a real challenge to sort out properly. I’ve included infra for
> their guidance (thanks people :).
>
> Here is the issue
>
> Each package should include enough docs that it stands alone after a git
> checkout (IMO). We also publis
Hi infra team,
would you mind adding myself (andreas.scheur...@de.ibm.com) to the
following gerrit groups?
- networking-dpm-core
- networking-dpm-release
Thanks a lot!
Andreas
IRC: andreas_s
__
OpenStack Development Mail
Pete,
The main problem with that is publishing docs to docs.oo which would then
confuse the reader even more then they are already confused by reading our docs
;)
Regards
-steve
From: Pete Birley mailto:pete@port.direct>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
I think Jeffrey's raised a good point here. Though I agree we should keep
the development side under a single umbrella/namespace, to better
co-ordinate our efforts, I think it makes more sense to move the end-user
documentation and to the repo that it's associated with. I feel this is the
right app
Yup this is a real challenge to sort out properly. I’ve included infra for
their guidance (thanks people :).
Here is the issue
Each package should include enough docs that it stands alone after a git
checkout (IMO). We also publish docs to docs.oo which should IMO contain one
set of docs for
Dims, thanks!
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Andrey, Folks,
>
> I've fast-tracked the black list:
> https://review.openstack.org/400183
>
> Thanks,
> Dims
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Andrey Kurilin
> wrote:
> > hi folks!
> >
> > Neutron gates are broken
Andrey, Folks,
I've fast-tracked the black list:
https://review.openstack.org/400183
Thanks,
Dims
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Andrey Kurilin wrote:
> hi folks!
>
> Neutron gates are broken again. New failure relates to issue with heatclient
> [*] .
>
> [*] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/py
> On 21 Nov 2016, at 12:38, Alan Pevec wrote:
>
>> 1. Final stable/liberty releases should happen next week, probably by
>> Thursday 11/17.
>
> I see only Cinder did it https://review.openstack.org/397282
> and Nova is under review https://review.openstack.org/397841
>
> Is that all or other p
Hi,
We’ll have a team meeting today at #openstack-mistral at 16.00 UTC as usually.
Agenda:
Review action items
Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans)
Custom Actions API update
Open discussion
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
___
> 1. Final stable/liberty releases should happen next week, probably by
> Thursday 11/17.
I see only Cinder did it https://review.openstack.org/397282
and Nova is under review https://review.openstack.org/397841
Is that all or other project are not aware Liberty is EOL now?
Cheers,
Alan
___
hi folks!
Neutron gates are broken again. New failure relates to issue with
heatclient [*] .
[*] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-heatclient/+bug/1643507
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Andrey Kurilin
wrote:
> Hi stackers!
>
> Imo, there is a better solution - just turn off telemetry se
It's been a pleasure to work with you these past few years, Carl. I wish you
all the best in whatever's next for you. Hopefully we'll meet again soon in the
not so distant future.
There will forever be a Carl-shaped hole in our codebase.
John
From: Carl Baldwin mailto:c...@ecbaldwin.net>>
Repl
Then what's the case of kolla-kubernetes?
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Paul Bourke wrote:
> Propose all docs stay under the kolla namespace
> (http://docs.openstack.org/developer/kolla).
>
> Steve mentioned that we should try to keep all components (e.g. mailing list
> tags) under the same um
Propose all docs stay under the kolla namespace
(http://docs.openstack.org/developer/kolla).
Steve mentioned that we should try to keep all components (e.g. mailing
list tags) under the same umbrella which I agree with.
On 21/11/16 08:05, Jeffrey Zhang wrote:
After the split, we have two pro
Hi James
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 at 20:05 James Beedy wrote:
> Is there a specific reason the barbican charm doesn't have the
> os-{internal,private}-hostname config params?
>
The layers and charms.openstack don't currently have support for the
os-*-hostname configuration options yes - barbican, a
Hi,
TaaS IRC meeting on this week being canceled
because of national holiday in Japan.
Regards,
Soichi
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.ope
Kolla project provides a good example on the documentation,
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/kolla
https://github.com/openstack/kolla/tree/master/doc
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
From: joehuang
Sent: 17 November 2016 15:18
To: openstack-dev
Subject: [
After the split, we have two projects and two develop docs[0][1].
These two sites have lots of duplicated lines.
So will we split the doc site?
if so, we need to remove the duplicated doc in the repos.
if not, we need to remove one site's doc.
[0] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/kolla
[1] htt
64 matches
Mail list logo