[openstack-dev] Ocata - Ubuntu 16.04 - OVN does not work with DPDK

Guys, I manage to deploy Ocata on Ubuntu 16.04 with OVN for the first time ever, today! It looks very, very good... OVN L3 Router is working, OVN DHCP working... bridge mappings "br-ex" on each compute node... All good! Then, I've said: time for DPDK! I manage to use OVS with DPDK easily on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Tags for volumes

On 3/27/2017 9:59 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 27 March 2017 at 14:20, 王玺源 mailto:wangxiyuan1...@gmail.com>> wrote: I think the reason is quite simple: 1. Some users don't want to use key/value pairs to tag volums. They just need some simple strings. ...and some do. We can hide this

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] critical fix for ceph job

On 4/7/2017 9:43 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Ghanshyam Mann mailto:ghanshyamm...@gmail.com>> wrote: Thanks. I am not sure these kind of driver specific behavior on APIs side. This bring up question that should not cinder APIs be consistent from usage p

[openstack-dev] [election] [tc] TC Candidacy

I am announcing my candidacy [1] for a seat on the OpenStack Technical Committee. I've had the honor of working on and with OpenStack since it was conceived. Since our first Design Summit on July 13-16 2010, I have been thrilled to be a part of our movement together. We have come a long way sinc

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][kolla][openstack-helm][tripleo][all] Storing configuration options in etcd(?)

Excerpts from Emilien Macchi's message of 2017-04-07 11:16:34 -0400: > I've resurrected an old spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243114/ > - addressed some comments and put TODOs that Doug and I will work > together. > The target is set to Queens but we might provide some proof-of-concept > d

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] placement/resource providers update 18

On 4/7/2017 8:35 AM, Chris Dent wrote: There was a nova-specs sprint this week, so a lot of eyes were on specs but there continues to be regular progress on resource providers, the placement API and related work in the scheduler and resource tracker. If you're doing work that I haven't noticed a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] container jobs are unstable

On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 15:32 -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:01:08AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 03:08:57PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > > > To be fair, we discussed this on IRC yesterday, everyone agreed > > > infra > > > supported docker cache/r

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (04/07-04/13)

First, thanks to everyone who coded and reviewed the items identified as Pike milestone 1 priorities. They were merged yesterday and Hemanth, our release czar, proposed a patch to enable the release: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/454760/ Next, don't forget that the spec freeze is the end of th

[openstack-dev] [glance] call for comments on next operator survey draft

Hello Glancers, The topic of the April operators' survey is Glance cache usage. Any developers who are interested in the Glance cache should take a look and let me know if there are any questions that should be added/revised: https://goo.gl/forms/LvAq0anMiHRh7Hb32 Please respond before the next

Re: [openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG, we hardly knew ye..

Excerpts from lebre.adrien's message of 2017-04-07 15:50:05 +0200: > Dear Clint, Dear all, > > It is indeed unfortunate that the WG ends. > > From our side (Inria folks from the Discovery initiative [1]), we had planned > to join the effort after the Boston Summit as we are currently addressing

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] os-cloud-config retirement

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-04-07 18:55, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> os-cloud-config has been retired in Infra and in the repo. >> RDO packaging has also been updated. >> Now waiting for final approval in Governance: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451096/ >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] os-cloud-config retirement

On 2017-04-07 18:55, Emilien Macchi wrote: > os-cloud-config has been retired in Infra and in the repo. > RDO packaging has also been updated. > Now waiting for final approval in Governance: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451096/ > > If bug fixes has to happen, please submit to stable branches

[openstack-dev] [tosca-parser][heat-translator] Meeting Time change

The combined tosca-parser/heat-translator weekly IRC meeting has been on Thursdays at 1600UTC in #openstack-heat-translator. Due to scheduling conflicts I need to change the meeting time, and I'd like to propose Thursdays at 1400UTC. Please reply with any questions/concerns/counter-proposal

[openstack-dev] [election][tc] TC candidacy

Hello! I am once again announcing my candidacy for a position on the OpenStack Technical Committee. For those who do not know me, I'm easy to find. My name is Ed Leafe; I'm 'edleafe' on IRC, and @edleafe on Twitter. I have been involved with OpenStack since the very beginning, when I was workin

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] os-cloud-config retirement

os-cloud-config has been retired in Infra and in the repo. RDO packaging has also been updated. Now waiting for final approval in Governance: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451096/ If bug fixes has to happen, please submit to stable branches directly and let us know on #rdo, we'll update the pin

[openstack-dev] [infra][docker] registry-1.docker.io to reverse proxy cache

Greetings, In an effort to help projects depending on docker infrastructure, we've setup a reverse proxy cache for http://registry-1.docker.io. Please see the instructions in 453811[1] on how to configure dockerd to use them. While testing, I did run into an issue with docker 17.04 so suggest you

[openstack-dev] [ironic] potential virtual meetup (like previous virtual midcycle, but not in the middle of the cycle)

Hi all! Our virtual midcycle last cycle was apparently a success, and I've heard certain folks suggesting having more such virtual meetups. I wonder if it's time to have one relatively soon. Depending on how many things we want to discuss, we could take only 1 or 2 days (instead of 3 for the m

[openstack-dev] [openstack-docs] [OpenStack-I18n] [dev] What's up, doc?

Team, This week I have still been working on drafting a governance tag for our guides called "docs:follows-policy". I have been working with Doug Hellmann (dhellmann) in the last week to change to draft dramatically, so it would be good for doc people and doc liaisons to review. We are trying t

Re: [openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG, we hardly knew ye..

Sad to see it go, but I understand the reasoning about why. Back to the coal mines :-P -Josh Clint Byrum wrote: I'm going to be blunt. I'm folding the Architecture Working Group immediately following our meeting today at 2000 UTC. We'll be using the time to discuss continuity of the base-servi

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][kolla][openstack-helm][tripleo][all] Storing configuration options in etcd(?)

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Emilien Macchi's message of 2017-04-06 18:17:59 -0400: >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: >> > On 15/03/17 15:40 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> >> >> >> Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-03-15

[openstack-dev] [election] [tc] TC candidacy (dims)

Team, Please consider my candidacy for another term on the OpenStack Technical Committee. In my previous candidacy statement[1], i had mentioned the following challenges - "balance stability/innovation, fostering new talent, target our limited resources to make OpenStack even better". This is as t

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] critical fix for ceph job

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > Thanks. I am not sure these kind of driver specific behavior on APIs > side. This bring up question that should not cinder APIs be consistent > from usage point. In this case[1], create backup API can accept > 'container' param and do/don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] critical fix for ceph job

Thanks. I am not sure these kind of driver specific behavior on APIs side. This bring up question that should not cinder APIs be consistent from usage point. In this case[1], create backup API can accept 'container' param and do/don't create pool as per configured driver? Then have better documenta

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Risk prediction model for OpenStack

Hi Zoey Lin, thanks a lot for sharing your analysis. I agree with you, diversity and turnover of developers could be a good predictor for risk. Anyway there's an important point that should be considered: who's reviewing the code? A developer that has experience in a specific module might stop con

Re: [openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG, we hardly knew ye..

Dear Clint, Dear all, It is indeed unfortunate that the WG ends. From our side (Inria folks from the Discovery initiative [1]), we had planned to join the effort after the Boston Summit as we are currently addressing two points that are/were closely related to the Arch WG (at least from our u

[openstack-dev] amrith candidacy for OpenStack Technical Committee

My name is Amrith Kumar, I've been around OpenStack since a little before the IceHouse release (about 3 years ago). During this time, I've worked mostly on Trove, and a little bit on other projects but mostly in service of Trove. I've also served as a member of the Stewardship Working Group, and ha

[openstack-dev] [nova] placement/resource providers update 18

There was a nova-specs sprint this week, so a lot of eyes were on specs but there continues to be regular progress on resource providers, the placement API and related work in the scheduler and resource tracker. If you're doing work that I haven't noticed and reported in here that you think shoul

[openstack-dev] [election][tc] Nominating for Technical Committee

Howdy, My name is Joshua Hesketh and I would like to self nominate for the Technical Committee. I work for Rackspace Australia and have been involved in the OpenStack community since the Havana release circa 2013. I have been primarily working on the Infrastructure (infra) project where I am both

[openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] critical fix for ceph job

I just posted a critical fix the ceph job [1]. I'm anxious to get this landed so I can start working on the other intermittent failures in the gate. Any feedback is much appreciated. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/454321/ -- Jon __

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Last days for TC candidate announcements

Folks, There's just 5 candidates so far.. So please consider throwing your hat in the ring. https://governance.openstack.org/election/#pike-tc-candidates Thanks, Dims On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: > A quick reminder that we are in the last days for TC candidate > anno

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Manila]share or volume's size unit

Cinder will store the volume as 1G in the database (and quota) even if the volume is only 500M. It will stay as 500M when it is attached though. It's a side effect of importing volumes, but that's usually a pretty uncommon thing to do, so shouldn't affect many people or cause a huge amount of troub

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] version document for project navigator

On 04/06/2017 03:51 PM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: Cool. Thanks Monty! Monty Taylor April 6, 2017 at 3:21 PM On 04/06/2017 11:58 AM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: Assuming this format is accepted, do you all have any sense of when this data will be complete for all projects?

[openstack-dev] [nova][api] quota-class-show not sync to quota-show

Version 2.35 removed most deprecated output like floating ip etc so we won't have following in quota-show output | floating_ips| 10| | fixed_ips | -1| | security_groups | 10| | security_group_rules| 20| however, quota-class-sho

[openstack-dev] [all] Last days for TC candidate announcements

A quick reminder that we are in the last days for TC candidate announcements. If you want to stand for the TC, don't delay, follow the instructions at [1] to make sure the community knows your intentions. Make sure your candidacy has been submitted to the openstack/election repository and approv

[openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-20, April 10-14

Welcome to our regular release countdown email! Development Focus - Teams should be wrapping up Pike-1 work. Actions --- Next week is the Pike-1 deadline for cycle-with-milestones projects. That means that before EOD on Thursday all milestone-driven projects should propose a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] pingtest vs tempest

Hi Diarmuid, Even in our setup Sravanthi by mistake has deleted all the ports we are trying to bring up again, if it is done today wil ping you and schedule again Otherwise i will schedule for Monday Thanks, Ravi - Original Message - From: jtale...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.ope

[openstack-dev] [Cinder][Manila]share or volume's size unit

Hi guys, We know the share's size unit is in gigabiyte in manila, and volume's size unit is also in gigabiyte in cinder, But there is a question that the size is not exactly after we migrate tradition enviroment to OpenStack. For example: 1.There is original volume(vol_1) with 500MB size in tradit

Re: [openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG, we hardly knew ye..

Clint Byrum wrote: > I'm going to be blunt. I'm folding the Architecture Working Group > immediately following our meeting today at 2000 UTC. We'll be using the > time to discuss continuity of the base-services proposal, and any other > draw-down necessary. After that our meetings will cease. > >