On 08/05/18 15:16, Matthew Treinish wrote:
Although, I don't think glance uses oslo.service even in the case where it's
using the standalone eventlet server. It looks like it launches eventlet.wsgi
directly:
https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/common/wsgi.py
and I don't see
On 03/05/18 15:49, Eric K wrote:
Question to the projects which send or consume webhook notifications
(telemetry, monasca, senlin, vitrage, etc.), what are your
supported/preferred authentication mechanisms? Bearer token (e.g.
Keystone)? Signing?
Signed URLs and regular Keystone auth are both
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 03:02:05PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message of 2018-05-08 13:55:43 -0400:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:34:11PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > >
> > > (added [glance] subject tag)
> > >
> > > Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message
Thanks, Thomas!
I see the point that it is impractical to configure a service with a fixed
keystone token to use in webhook notifications because they expire fairly
quickly.
I'm thinking about the situation where the sending service can obtain
tokens directly from keystone. In that case I'm
Hi,
This was discussed in the meeting this week too, but I wanted to send it
to the list as well for a little more visibility. We've started an
etherpad at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oslo-project-update-rocky
to collect any topics that folks want included in the Oslo project
update
Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message of 2018-05-08 13:55:43 -0400:
> On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:34:11PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >
> > (added [glance] subject tag)
> >
> > Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message of 2018-05-08 12:22:56 -0400:
> > > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:01:36PM
To clarify, one of the reasons I'd like to accept webhook notifications
authenticated with keystone tokens is that I don't want the access to
expire, but of course it's poor practice to use a signed URL that never
expires.
Eric
On 5/8/18, 12:29 PM, "Eric K" wrote:
Thank you, Zane for the discussion.
Point taken about sending webhook notifications.
Primarily I want Congress to consume webhook notifications from the
openstack services which already send them (monasca, vitrage, etc.). Most
of them do not currently support sending appropriate keystone tokens
Excerpts from Lance Bragstad's message of 2018-05-04 15:16:09 -0500:
>
> On 05/04/2018 02:55 PM, Harry Rybacki wrote:
> > Greetings All,
> >
> > After a discussion in #openstack-tc[1] earlier today, the Keystone
> > team is adjusting its approach in proposing default roles[2].
> > Subsequently, I
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 2:23 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> (I added the [qa] topic tag for the QA team, since they own hacking, and
> [requirements] for that team since I have a question about capping.)
>
> Excerpts from Julia Kreger's message of 2018-05-08 12:43:07 -0400:
>>
Greetings,
The TripleO squads for CI and Tempest have just completed Sprint 12. The
following is a summary of activities during this sprint. Details on our
team structure can be found in the spec [1].
---
# Sprint 12 Epic (CI): Libvirt Reproducer
* Epic Card:
Time is up. And welcome mgoddard to the team :D
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Goutham Pratapa
wrote:
> +1 for `mgoddard`
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 1:21 PM, duon...@vn.fujitsu.com <
> duon...@vn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry for my late reply, thank
Hi team,
Let's make use of the team meeting on Wed to kickstart a whole day of
concentration of review of the critical Rocky specs [0] and try to get them
done as much as possible.
We start with the meeting and folks in US and Europe could carry on til the
end of the day when Asian devs could
Hi,
After a bit of silence here is the latest notification status.
Bugs
[Low] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1757407 Notification sending
sometimes hits the keystone API to get glance endpoints
Fix has been proposed has many +1s
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/564528/
[Medium]
Hi,
The oslo UUIDField emits a warning if the string used as a field value
does not pass the validation of the uuid.UUID(str(value)) call [3]. All
the offending places are fixed in nova except the nova-manage cell_v2
map_instances call [1][2]. That call uses markers in the DB that are
not
Thanks everyone for putting your trust in me!
On 8 May 2018 at 11:13, Jeffrey Zhang wrote:
> Time is up. And welcome mgoddard to the team :D
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Goutham Pratapa
> wrote:
>
>> +1 for `mgoddard`
>>
>> On Thu, May
Hi,
It has been decided that, in Debian, we'll switch to Django 2.0 after
Buster will be released. Buster is to be frozen next February. This
means that we have roughly one more year before Django 1.x goes away.
Hopefully, Horizon will be ready for it, right?
Hoping this helps,
Cheers,
Thomas
hi cboylan. Thanks for reply!
I have recheker several times but always the second time failed. The first time
always pass.
Is It maybe the reason in the below email luckyvega wrote.?
At 2018-05-06 18:20:47, "Vega Cai" wrote:
To test whether it's our new patch
If you're using the cinder CLI (aka python-cinderclient) then if you
run with --debug, then you can see the REST calls used.
I would assume the the unified openstack CLI client has a similar mode.
On 8 May 2018 at 12:13, Hari Prasanth Loganathan
wrote:
> Hi
Hi Matt,
My understanding is that this is being used by Rackspace.
AFAIK the change isn't upstream because there was no sensible way to permit
reboot of a rescued instance for XenAPI users but prevent it for other drivers.
I'd be hesitant to permit reboot-from-rescue for all drivers as I'm not
Hi Team,
1) I am able to list all the project using the OpenStack REST API,
http://{IP_ADDRESS}:5000/v3/auth/projects/
But as per the documentation of /v3/ API's in OpenStack (
https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/block-storage/v3/index.html#volumes-volumes
),
I need API's to
i) list all
On 5/8/2018 7:41 AM, Bob Ball wrote:
I'd be hesitant to permit reboot-from-rescue for all drivers as I'm not sure
the drivers would have consistent (or perhaps working!) behaviours? Is there a
way to enable this when using XenAPI?
Off the top of my head the virt driver could report a
On 08/05/18 16:09, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 30/04/18 17:16, Ben Nemec wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-04-25 16:54:46 -0400:
1. Fix oslo.service functional tests -- the Oslo team needs help
maintaining this library. Alternatively, we could move all
Excerpts from Graham Hayes's message of 2018-05-08 16:28:46 +0100:
> On 08/05/18 16:09, Zane Bitter wrote:
> > On 30/04/18 17:16, Ben Nemec wrote:
> >>> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-04-25 16:54:46 -0400:
> 1. Fix oslo.service functional tests -- the Oslo team needs help
>
On 30/04/18 17:16, Ben Nemec wrote:
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-04-25 16:54:46 -0400:
1. Fix oslo.service functional tests -- the Oslo team needs help
maintaining this library. Alternatively, we could move all
services to use cotyledon
W dniu 18.04.2018 o 11:02, Michel Peterson pisze:
> How can we fix this?
Any update on it? Would like to get rid of current workarounds.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 12:18:36PM +0100, Duncan Thomas wrote:
> If you're using the cinder CLI (aka python-cinderclient) then if you
> run with --debug, then you can see the REST calls used.
>
> >
> > I need API's to
> > i) list all the Volume types in the OpenStack
> > ii) I need API's to
Welcome to the twentieth edition of a weekly update in TripleO world!
The goal is to provide a short reading (less than 5 minutes) to learn
what's new this week.
Any contributions and feedback are welcome.
Link to the previous version:
(I added the [qa] topic tag for the QA team, since they own hacking, and
[requirements] for that team since I have a question about capping.)
Excerpts from Julia Kreger's message of 2018-05-08 12:43:07 -0400:
> About two hours ago, we started seeing Ironic CI jobs failing pep8
> with new
Hi all,
The Cyborg compute node specification has been published:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/566798/ . Please review it.
The main factors defined in this spec are:
* The behavior with respect to accelerators when various Compute API [1]
operations are applied. E.g. On a
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-05-07 10:53:04 -0400:
[snip]
> The Adjutant project application [10] is still under review, and
> the only votes registered are opposed. I anticipate having the topic
> of how we review project applications as one of several items we
> discuss during
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:01:36PM +0100, Graham Hayes wrote:
> On 08/05/18 16:53, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Graham Hayes's message of 2018-05-08 16:28:46 +0100:
> >> On 08/05/18 16:09, Zane Bitter wrote:
> >>> On 30/04/18 17:16, Ben Nemec wrote:
> > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's
Excerpts from Graham Hayes's message of 2018-05-08 17:01:36 +0100:
> On 08/05/18 16:53, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Graham Hayes's message of 2018-05-08 16:28:46 +0100:
> >> On 08/05/18 16:09, Zane Bitter wrote:
> >>> On 30/04/18 17:16, Ben Nemec wrote:
> > Excerpts from Doug
This was discussed in today's meeting and it was pretty clear that we
should still do this for Rocky [0].
Updating this thread to include documentation of the discussion. Thanks,
Harry.
[0]
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2018/keystone.2018-05-08-16.00.log.html#l-15
On
On 08/05/18 16:53, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Graham Hayes's message of 2018-05-08 16:28:46 +0100:
>> On 08/05/18 16:09, Zane Bitter wrote:
>>> On 30/04/18 17:16, Ben Nemec wrote:
> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-04-25 16:54:46 -0400:
>> 1. Fix oslo.service
About two hours ago, we started seeing Ironic CI jobs failing pep8
with new errors[1]. For some of our repositories, it just seems to be
a couple of lines that need to be fixed. On ironic itself, supporting
this might have us dead in the water for a while to fix the code in
accordance with what
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:34:11PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> (added [glance] subject tag)
>
> Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message of 2018-05-08 12:22:56 -0400:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:01:36PM +0100, Graham Hayes wrote:
> > > On 08/05/18 16:53, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > > >
(added [glance] subject tag)
Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message of 2018-05-08 12:22:56 -0400:
> On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:01:36PM +0100, Graham Hayes wrote:
> > On 08/05/18 16:53, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > > Excerpts from Graham Hayes's message of 2018-05-08 16:28:46 +0100:
> > >> On
38 matches
Mail list logo