Dear Developers
I have one question.
Can be create instance and network by RESTful API ?
I would like to know “How to create Instance and Network” by RESTful API.
Figure.
[External Linux-based Server] -- OpenStack RESTful API [OpenStack
Controller Server]
If you have ideas, please
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:48:16PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 06/20/2013 10:36 AM, Giorgio Franceschi wrote:
Hello, I created a blueprint for the implementation of:
A tool for pinning automatically each running virtual CPU to a physical
one in the most efficient way, balancing load
Hello,
We have discussed this some time ago to remove the OS_AUTH_SYSTEM from
novaclient since this was implemented for RAX and these days RAX has
moved to pyrax.
Since last time I have looked into this it seems that there was some
updates to it :
Hello Sean, all,
Currently there are ~30 test classes in DB API tests, containing ~370 test
cases. setUpClass()/tearDownClass() would be definitely an improvement, but
applying of all DB schema migrations for MySQL 30 times is going to take a
long time...
Thanks,
Roman
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at
Hi,
I have some questions regarding the Consolidate CLI Authentication
(https://etherpad.openstack.org/keystoneclient-cli-auth and
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21942/).
It looks like that the code for keystone client is almost ready for merge. What
are the plans for the other clients
Hi,
Referring to the Jenkins failure logs on
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32549/3,
Log at
http://logs.openstack.org/32549/3/check/gate-nova-python27/25158/console.html
The command that the test tried to execute using nova's rootwrap was:
Thierry Carrez wrote:
A script will automatically and regularly align series goal with
target milestone, so that the series and milestone views are
consistent (if someone sets target milestone to havana-3 then the
series goal will be set to havana).
Now if the Launchpad API was exporting the
For the list, I'll post the same response i gave you when you pinged me
off-list about this:
t was a long time ago when I wrote that, and the original goal was to use a
single bridge, but there some something about how OVS worked at the time
that required the two bridges. I think it was related
This is a quick note to announce that the OpenStack gerrit system supports
a SecurityImpact tag. If you are familiar with the DocImpact tag, this
works in a similar fashion.
Please use this in the commit message for any commits that you feel would
benefit from a security review. Commits with
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:08:43PM -0400, Yun Mao wrote:
Interesting. Does it automatically make the commit in stealth mode so
that it's not seen in public? Thanks,
This tag is about asking for design input / code review from people with
security expertize for new work. As such the code is all
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 09:16 -0700, Armando Migliaccio wrote:
In my view a cell should only know about the queue it's connected to,
and let the 'global' message queue to do its job of dispatching the
messages to the right recipient: that would solve the problem
altogether.
There is no global
On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Armando Migliaccio amigliac...@vmware.com wrote:
In my view a cell should only know about the queue it's connected to, and let
the 'global' message queue to do its job of dispatching the messages to the
right recipient: that would solve the problem altogether.
I reckon the admin guide [1] contains sufficiently up-to-date information
for the grizzly release.
Please let me know if you find it lacks important information. We'll be
more than happy to make the necessary amendments.
Your scenario appears to be fairly simple. On the compute node you will
need
On 21/06/13 07:49, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On 20/06/13 22:19 -0400, cbjc...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
So anyway, let's get back to the topic this thread was discussing
about - passing meta data into provider stacks.
It seems that we have all reached an agreement that deletepolicy and
Dear All,
I'd like to have some confirmation about the mechanism that is going to
be used to inform Heat's clients about instance create and destroy in an
auto-scaling group. I am referring to the wiki page at
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/AutoScaling.
I assume, but I may be wrong,
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 09:30 -0700, Chris Behrens wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
wrote:
I don't know whether I like it yet or not, but here's how it might
look:
[cells]
parents = parent1
children = child1, child2
[cell:parent1]
Thanks Salvatore. That's right, the configuration for server and port
resides in:
etc/quantum/plugins/bigswitch/restproxy.ini
Let us know if you need further help.
~Sumit.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
Hi Julio,
If I get your message correctly,
It seems that numad is libvirt specific - is that the case?
Hi, Hyper-V 2012 supports NUMA as well. It'd be great to plan an hypervisor
independent solution from the start.
On 21.06.2013, at 11:13, Bob Ball bob.b...@citrix.com wrote:
It seems that numad is libvirt specific - is that the
Hello all,
Included here is a link to a Celery wiki, explaining what the Celery project is
and how it works. Currently, celery is being used in a distributed pattern for
the WIP task flow project. As such, links to both the distributed project, and
its' parent task flow project have been
It sounds like the censuses in this thread is:
In the long run, we want to kill run_tests.sh in favor of explaining how to
use the underlying tools in a TESTING file.
But in the short term, we should start moving toward using a TESTING file
(such as https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33456/) but
Sweet, thanks jessica for the awesome docs and work.
From: Jessica Lucci
jessica.lu...@rackspace.commailto:jessica.lu...@rackspace.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Friday, June 21, 2013 10:33 AM
To:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/21/2013 01:44 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
It sounds like the censuses in this thread is:
In the long run, we want to kill run_tests.sh in favor of
explaining how to use the underlying tools in a TESTING file.
I agree. I'd like to add that 'long
From: Adam Young [mailto:ayo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 6:30 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] FW: [Keystone][Folsom] Token re-use
On 06/20/2013 04:50 PM, Ali, Haneef wrote:
1) I'm really not sure how that will solve the original issue
On 06/19/2013 09:14 AM, Mark McClain wrote:
The OpenStack Networking team is happy to announce that the Quantum
project will be changing its name to Neutron. You'll soon see Neutron
in lots of places as we work to implement the name change within
OpenStack.
Congratulations for the cool name.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/20/2013 12:00 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Christopher Yeoh wrote:
Just wondering what people thought about how necessary it is to keep XML
support for the Nova v3 API, given that if we want to drop it doing so
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jun 20, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Brant Knudson b...@acm.org wrote:
How about a mapping of JSON concepts to XML like:
collections:
object pair name=pair-name the-value /pair ... /object
array element the-value
There will be a deployment option where you can configure the default IP
allocator. Additionally, the allocator will be configurable at subnet creation
time.
mark
On Jun 20, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote:
Could it be possible to add a flag to disable the
I'm moving a thread we had with some vmware guys to this list to make it
public.
We had a problem with quantum deadlocking when it got several requests in
quick
succession. Aaron suggested we set sql_dbpool_enable = True. We did and it
seemed to resolve our issue.
What are the downsides of
On Jun 21, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jun 20, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Brant Knudson b...@acm.org wrote:
How about a mapping of JSON concepts to XML like:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jun 21, 2013, at 12:38 PM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jun 20, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Brant Knudson
Hello all,
Included here is a link to a Celery wiki (distributed task queue) explaining
what the Celery project is and how it works. Currently, celery is being used in
a distributed pattern for the WIP task flow project. As such, links to both the
distributed project, and its' parent task flow
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@enovance.comwrote:
Hello,
[moving on the public mailing list since this bug is anyway public]
On 3 Jun 2013, at 17:25, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies for the delayed response on this. We have several related
32 matches
Mail list logo
