On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:12:54PM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
Please have a vote +1/-1
+1
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:19:13PM -0700, Edgar Magana wrote:
Hello Folks,
Thank you Zane, Steven and Clint for you input.
Our main goal in this BP is to provide networking users such as Heat (we
consider it as a neutron user) a better and consolidated network building
block in terms of
+1 !
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 12:12 -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose Randall Burt for Heat Core. He has shown
interest in Heat by participating in IRC and providing high quality
reviews. The most important aspect in my mind of joining Heat Core is
output and quality of
The Instance Group API document is now updated with a simple example request
payload of a nested group, and some description of how the API implementation
should handle the registration of the components of a nested instance group.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 04:48:45PM -0400, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 10/28/2013 04:24:30 PM:
On 10/29/2013 02:53 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
...
Can anyone provide me with a clear argument for what the fundamental
differences actually are?
...
Since
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 02:34:44PM -0700, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
I believe we had a discussion about difference between declarative approach
and workflows. A component approach is consistent with declarative format
as all actions\operations are hidden inside the service. If you want to
The list of Etherpads for the design summit sessions for Trove is now
posted at:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Icehouse/Etherpads#Trove
Feel free to add any relevant notes to the Etherpads.
Thanks,
Cheers,
-Nikhil
___
OpenStack-dev mailing
I had the same concern, and only ended up exporting my Sched.org agendas
(the sessions I starred) to my own Google agenda (using iCal) in order
to see the conflicts.
Hope it can helps,
-Sylvain
Le 29/10/2013 04:08, Lu, Lianhao a écrit :
Hi all,
Looks like we have
There is no such mixed calendar. It was made, as far as I remember, because
design and summit talks are very different and should be separated.
But still, it is not really comfortable.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@bull.netwrote:
I had the same concern, and
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the reply.
Le 28/10/2013 17:47, Bob Ball a écrit :
Hi Simon,
Yes, I believe you are right.
We were already planning to discuss this very topic at the XenAPI roadmap
session at the summit. Hopefully someone will take on tying up this loose end
there.
Security group
Hi all!
I proposed 'Idempotency for OpenStack API' as before.
In this time, I rewrote BP(
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/idempotentcy-client-token ) and
I implemented proto of it.
I image below use-case.
User can't know instance ID when the client has gone away before user get
Greetings,
Here[0] you can find Marconi's etherpads for the Icehouse Design Summit.
[0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Icehouse/Etherpads#Marconi
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi folks,
Currently there are two attributes of vips/pools/members that represent a
status: 'status' and 'admin_state_up'.
The first one is used to represent deployment status and can be
PENDING_CREATE, ACTIVE, PENDING_DELETE, ERROR.
We also have admin_state_up which could be True or False.
I'd
Hi,
I am trying to use Openstack Havana to control XCP hypervisor with neutron
OVS plugin. I can launch instances normally but unable to logging to guest
console. Please see the below log from nova compute to get a clear idea.
Log:
2013-10-29 14:09:10.203 954 AUDIT nova.compute.manager
Hi Yathi,
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17OIiBoIavih-1y4zzK0oXyI66529f-7JTCVj-BcXURA/edit
Would it be possible to provide an alternate link to the doc? The GFW blocks
google docs :(.
Thanks.
--
Koo
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
One week before the OpenStack Summit in Hong-Kong, this meeting should
be short. We will focus on solving the last conflicts with the tentative
Design Summit schedule and make it official.
Feel free to add extra topics to the agenda:
[1] http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting
All
Hi Irena,
Thank you very much for your comments. See inline.
--Robert
On 10/27/13 3:48 AM, Irena Berezovsky
ire...@mellanox.commailto:ire...@mellanox.com wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thank you very much for sharing the information regarding your efforts. Can you
please share your idea of the end to end
Robert, is it possible to have a IRC meeting? I'd prefer to IRC meeting because
it's more openstack style and also can keep the minutes clearly.
To your flow, can you give more detailed example. For example, I can consider
user specify the instance with -nic option specify a network id, and
Hi Rob,
I think it looks like a good option - but I'd like to see it exposed as such
to the user rather than a change in the default behavior as such. I.e.
rebuild --keep-ephemenral=True
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net]
Sent:
On 28 October 2013 15:39, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:24 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
Here is a really bad attempt at codifying what I think about features vs
bugs:
1) If its a new API call, or a change in behaviour, or a new config
setting,
Hi Jiang, Robert,
IRC meeting option works for me.
If I understand your question below, you are looking for a way to tie up
between requested virtual network(s) and requested PCI device(s). The way we
did it in our solution is to map a provider:physical_network to an interface
that represents
On 29 October 2013 23:06, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
I think it looks like a good option - but I'd like to see it exposed as such
to the user rather than a change in the default behavior as such. I.e.
rebuild --keep-ephemenral=True
Oh, I must not have been clear.
John Garbutt wrote:
On 25 October 2013 11:52, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't have the numbers but I have a feeling that what happened in
Havana was that a lot of blueprints slipped until the time for feature
freeze. Reviewers thought it was a worthwile feature at that point
Dina Belova wrote:
There is no such mixed calendar. It was made, as far as I remember,
because design and summit talks are very different and should be separated.
But still, it is not really comfortable.
Yes, it's a bit of a trade-off...
In the past we had a lot of people, attracted by
On 29 October 2013 10:20, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 29 October 2013 23:06, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
I think it looks like a good option - but I'd like to see it exposed as
such to the user rather than a change in the default behavior as such. I.e.
Andrew Laski correctly called us out for not really proving enough
information n the python-novaclient revert yesterday -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54108/. Appologies there. At the time
we were dealing with a gate that grenade was failing every change (for
the prior 6 hours), we were
I would love to see a symmetry between Cinder local volumes and
Neutron PCI passthrough VIFs.
Not entirely sure I have that clear in my head right now, but I just
wanted to share the idea:
* describe resource external to nova that is attached to VM in the API
(block device mapping and/or vif
So after over 20 messages in this thread, now what?
From my count we have 3 -, and 12 +1s. Is that enough for consensus? Do we
move modelines lines to the bottom? Put them in every file? Or just remove
them?
Hi Joe!
Thank you for your reply and sharing the information.
I am going to rewrite blueprint from many point of view.
Sincerely,
Haruka Tanizawa
2013/10/29 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:50 AM, haruka tanizawa harube...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all!
I proposed
On 28 October 2013 23:54, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
We don't just gate without telling people, the first two items in hacking
are read pep8
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/hacking/
The gate is super useful, but it's reactive, not proactive. And good
documentation isn't a
On 29 October 2013 06:46, Yathiraj Udupi (yudupi) yud...@cisco.com wrote:
The Instance Group API document is now updated with a simple example request
payload of a nested group, and some description of how the API
implementation should handle the registration of the components of a nested
On 28 October 2013 23:40, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:22 AM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
As I looked at the havana release notes that talk about the v3 api, and as
I was reviewing
port test_images and test_server_actions into v3 part2
Hi Joe!
Thank you for your help.
I wrote BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/idempotentcy-
client-token again.
Could you review it when you have time.
I like the idea but two comments:
* Can you fill out the questions found in
On 25 October 2013 23:23, Chris Behrens cbehr...@codestud.com wrote:
On Oct 25, 2013, at 3:46 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
We're very occasionally seeing problems where a thread processing a create
hangs (and we've seen when taking to Cinder and Glance). Whilst those
Going back to Joe's comment:
Can both of these cases be covered by configuring the keystone catalog?
+1
If both v1 and v2 are present, pick v2, otherwise just pick what is in
the catalogue. That seems cool. Not quite sure how the multiple glance
endpoints works in the keystone catalog, but
On 29 October 2013 11:56, haruka tanizawa harube...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joe!
Thank you for your help.
I wrote BP
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/idempotentcy-client-token again.
Could you review it when you have time.
I like the idea but two comments:
* Can you fill out the
On 28/10/13 04:23, Lakshminaraya Renganarayana wrote:
Sorry, Re-posting this with [Heat] in the subject line, because many of
us have filters based on [Heat] in the subject line.
Hello,
A few us at IBM studied Steve Baker's proposal on HOT Software
Configuration. Overall the proposed
On 28/10/13 14:53, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:23:20PM -0400, Lakshminaraya Renganarayana wrote:
A few us at IBM studied Steve Baker's proposal on HOT Software
Configuration. Overall the proposed constructs and syntax are great -- we
really like the clean syntax and concise
I haven't look at the review proposed yet one week ago, but some time ago,
we needed something similar for Ironic (nova, ironic and cinder share
almost the same code for the glance driver), but didn't make it.
In case someone wants to take a look:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33327/
I'll
Hi there,
I've been working on this bug [1,2] related with the pluggable external
authentication support in Havana. For those not familiar with it,
Keystone can rely on the usage of the REMOTE_USER env variable, assuming
that the user has been authenticated upstream (by an httpd server). This
On 10/28/2013 06:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
I can't make the Wed 2:50 session -- I'm presenting at that time -- but
I don't think it's essential for me to be there anyway. Everything else
LGTM. Thanks!
Would you rather be able to attend that one (Smarter resource placement
for
I am out of the office until 31/10/2013.
I am out of office. If required, please contact my manager Dalit Naor
(da...@il.ibm.com).
For matters related to the VISION project, please contact Hillel Kolodner
(kolod...@il.ibm.com).
Note: This is an automated response to your message Re:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
On 28 October 2013 23:54, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
We don't just gate without telling people, the first two items in hacking
are read pep8
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/hacking/
The
Hi Yathi,
Thank you for yor example. I have some remarks concerning the JSON format:
1) Member of a group is recursive. A member can be group or an instance. In
this case there are two different declaration formats for members, as with
http-server-group-1 (name, policy, edge) and Http-Server-1
On 10/29/13 at 10:53am, Joe Gordon wrote:
So after over 20 messages in this thread, now what?
From my count we have 3 -, and 12 +1s. Is that enough for consensus? Do we
move modelines lines to the bottom? Put them in every file? Or just remove
them?
I have no strong feeling either way on
On 10/28/2013 06:17 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
Is there a reason why you could not just use a Cinder Volume for your
data, in this case?
Yeah, he was saying that's the long term goal, and an Ironic-targeted
feature.
While at a first glance, it feels rather wrong, and un-cloudy, I do
see
Hey y'all,
Here are a few notes I put together around some ideas for alarm improvements.
In order to set it up I spent a little time talking about the Ceilometer
architecture in general, including some of the things we have planned for
IceHouse.
I think Parts 1-3 will be useful to anyone
Hi,
sounds like there are enough interests for an IRC meeting before the summit. Do
you guys know how to schedule a #openstack IRC meeting?
thanks,
Robert
On 10/29/13 6:17 AM, Irena Berezovsky
ire...@mellanox.commailto:ire...@mellanox.com wrote:
Hi Jiang, Robert,
IRC meeting option works for
Whilst on this topic, perhaps we should also expand it to discuss
support for external authz as well. I know that Adam at Red Hat is
working on adding additional authz attributes as env variables so that
these can be used for authorising the user in keystone. It should be the
same module in
Hi Yunhong,
I haven't looked at Mellanox in much detail. I think that we'll get more
details from Irena down the road. Regarding your question, I can only answer
based on my experience with Cisco's VM-FEX. In a nutshell:
-- a vNIC is connected to an external switch. Once the host is booted
Hi John,
Great to hear from you on Cinder with pcipassthrough. I thought that it
would be coming. I like the idea.
thanks,
Robert
On 10/29/13 6:46 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
I would love to see a symmetry between Cinder local volumes and
Neutron PCI passthrough VIFs.
Not
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
*) They help casual contributors *more* than long time core
contributors : and those are the folk that are most likely to give up
and walk away. Keeping barriers to entry low is an important part of
making
Hi
It feels like a driver specific topic.
So I am not sure we can come to a generic solution in the lbaas core code.
Thanks
Avishay
From: Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 11:19 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev]
I'm pulling this conversation out of the gerrit review as I think it needs
more discussion.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53499/
I want to discuss the design decision to not use Jinja templates for the
heat templates. My arguments for using Jinja for heat as well are:
1. We have to rewrite
Lots of great info and discussion going on here.
One additional thing I would like to mention is regarding PF and VF usage.
Normally VFs will be assigned to instances, and the PF will either not be
used at all, or maybe some agent in the host of the compute node might have
access to the PF for
Robert, i also have thoughts about templates.
Your suggestion is rather complex. Let me explain why is it so:
With new datastore support you should update PackageLoader and
FilesystemLoader with new filesystem path and package path. I would prefe
more easy configuration and store it in next
Hi Edgar,
It seems like this blueprint is related more to building an api that
manages a network topology more than one that needs to build out the
dependencies between resources to help create the network topology. If we
are talking about just an api to save, duplicate, and share these
network
On 10/25/2013 03:12 PM, Steven Dake wrote:
I would like to propose Randall Burt for Heat Core.
Please have a vote +1/-1 and take into consideration:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/CoreTeam
[1]http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-reviewers-180.txt
+1
(except possibly for the environmental variables portion, which could and
perhaps should be handled through provisioning).
On Oct 29, 2013, at 8:35 AM, David Chadwick d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk wrote:
Whilst on this topic, perhaps we should also expand it to discuss support for
external
Hi Steve,
I am sorry for my confusing message.
Just for clarification, I am against adding new abstracts to the HOT
template. I just wanted to highlight that in Lakshminarayana proposal there
are multiple steps which represent the same component in different stages.
This might be confusing,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:50:59PM +0100, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 28/10/13 14:53, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:23:20PM -0400, Lakshminaraya Renganarayana wrote:
A few us at IBM studied Steve Baker's proposal on HOT Software
Configuration. Overall the proposed constructs and
Hi Everyone.
Many of key individuals are preparing for the summit, and will not be able to
attend today, so it's best to postpone the meeting until after the summit.
p
Peter J. Pouliot, CISSP
Senior SDET, OpenStack
Microsoft
New England Research Development Center
One Memorial
Has the case been considered where REMOTE_USER is used with authentication
mechanisms where the username is an email address? It will have to keep the
@domain part because that's the only thing that makes it unique.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Álvaro López
John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com said:
Going back to Joe's comment:
Can both of these cases be covered by configuring the keystone catalog?
+1
If both v1 and v2 are present, pick v2, otherwise just pick what is in
the catalogue. That seems cool. Not quite sure how the multiple glance
Based on the current descriptions, I think Instance Group Model looks more
important for me. Current schedule appears fine for that.
-D
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/28/2013 06:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
I can't make the Wed 2:50
Zuul just caused my brain to overload ;) thx for the detailed explanation.
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Oct 29, 2013, at 3:42 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Andrew Laskicorrectly called us out for not really proving enough
information n the python-novaclient revert
We also need some standardisation on the command line options for the client
portion (such as --os-auth-method, --os-x509-cert etc.) . Unfortunately, this
is not yet in Oslo so there would be multiple packages to be enhanced.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Alan Sill
That's right, it is driver-specific, but we can come up with a generic
guideline for this.
Also, I'm interested in preferred solution for HAProxy.
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Avishay Balderman avish...@radware.comwrote:
Hi
It feels like a driver specific topic.
The trace below seems to be wanting to access the console log, rather than the
VNC console.
I believe there is a blog post about how to enable this, but basically you need
a cronjob to run in dom0 to rotate the logs. This is because the Xen console
logging is not ring-based, and therefore
So I guess the only contention point is to either store the templates by
type or by datastore. I don't see the use case where you'd have completely
different paths for templates, so there is really no need for two separate
template paths. My idea is to group the templates by data_store because as
What is the semantic of domain in the current implementation? Until we
know this we cant devise a solution.
Will the developed solution cater for me logging in via Google using my
kent email address (as opposed to my gmail one)? In this case there
could be 2 domains (depending upon the
I like simple. To me it is easier to break them out into dirs like Robert
suggested rather than eventually having a folder full of
num_datastore_types * 2 files. As for the structure, I find it more
intuitive to have the directories named for the datastore type. within
that dir you can have the
Excerpts from Robert Myers's message of 2013-10-29 07:54:59 -0700:
I'm pulling this conversation out of the gerrit review as I think it needs
more discussion.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/53499/
After reading the comments in that review, it seems to me that you
don't need a client side
+1 for idea suggested in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54315/.
We discussed to store heat templates at separate idea - so, here it is.
I think it's ok to store configs in separate dirs: one for configurations
and one for heat templates.
2013/10/29 Daniel Salinas imsplit...@gmail.com
I
Only trove administrator has access to heat templates, user cannot
manipulate templates, if he could we would not need trove at all. And idea
is to store only one template per datastore. And, i know that templates
could be parametrized. But, keep in mind, that we cannot inject in
templates
Sandy,
Does the framework account for customizable events?:
In my use case, I have a network (or some other proprietary way, e.g., some
special BUS protocol) attached device that does not fit into openstack node
structure. It can generate events. According to these events, Openstack
Hi,
Here is the log from today's meeting:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_advanced_services/2013/networking_advanced_services.2013-10-29-15.33.log.html
(some action items for a few folks who were present, we will follow up in
the next meeting.)
Thanks,
~Sumit.
On Mon, Oct
We have been considering this and have some notes on our concept, but we
haven't made a blueprint for it. I will speak amongst my group and find
out what they think of making it more public.
On 10/29/13 12:26 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Neutron devs,
Are there any plans to
Tim,
You statement building an api that manages a network topology more than
one that needs to build out the dependencies between resources to help
create the network topology
Is exactly what we are proposing, and this is why we believe this is not
under Heat domain.
This is why we are NOT
I am not a fan of all the specific talk to glance code we have in
nova, moving more of that into glanceclient can only be a good thing.
For the XenServer itegration, for efficiency reasons, we need glance
to talk from dom0, so it has dom0 making the final HTTP call. So we
would need a
On 10/29/2013 02:25 PM, Justin Hammond wrote:
We have been considering this and have some notes on our concept, but we
haven't made a blueprint for it. I will speak amongst my group and find
out what they think of making it more public.
OK, cool, glad to know I'm not the only one with tenants
Hi Edgar,
I definitely see the usecase for the idea that you propose. In my opinion,
I don't see the reason for moving the management of topology into neutron,
Heat already provides this functionality (besides for the part of taking
an existing deployment and generating a template file). Also, I
Alex Glikson glik...@il.ibm.com wrote on 10/29/2013 03:37:41 AM:
1. I assume that the motivation for rack-level anti-affinity is to
survive a rack failure. Is this indeed the case?
This is a very interesting and important scenario, but I am curious
about your assumptions regarding all the
Aaron,
Moving the management of topology?
I am not proposing nothing like that, actually could you explain me the
current workflow to save a network topology created by Neutron APIs, in
order to use it by a different tenant or the owner itself in a different
time?
Possibly, that is the part that
* describe resource external to nova that is attached to VM in the API
(block device mapping and/or vif references)
* ideally the nova scheduler needs to be aware of the local capacity,
and how that relates to the above information (relates to the cross
service scheduling issues)
I think
Khanh-Toan Tran khanh-toan.t...@cloudwatt.com wrote on 10/29/2013
09:10:00 AM:
...
1) Member of a group is recursive. A member can be group or an
instance. In this case there are two different declaration formats
for members, as with http-server-group-1 (name, policy, edge)
and
I hear you Clint. I'm not an expert on heat templates so it is possible to
do this all with one. However I don't want to use Jinja to replace the heat
template logic just for sane template loading. We are already using Jinja
templates to load custom config files. So it makes sense to re-use the
I count enough core +1s. Congrats Randall, well deserved!
On 10/26/2013 08:12 AM, Steven Dake wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose Randall Burt for Heat Core. He has shown
interest in Heat by participating in IRC and providing high quality
reviews. The most important aspect in my mind of
On 10/28/2013 10:28 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
2) Setting clearer expectations. Since we have so many blueprints for
Nova, I feel it's very important to accurately set expectations for how
the priority of different projects compare. In the last cycle,
priorities were mainly subjectively set
John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote on 10/29/2013 07:29:19 AM:
...
Its looking good, but I was thinking about a slightly different
approach:
* I would like to see instance groups be used to describe all
scheduler hints (including, please run on cell X, or please run on
hypervisor Y)
I
Your explanation of the virtual network and physical network is quite clear and
should work well. We need change nova code to achieve it, including get the
physical network for the virtual network, passing the physical network
requirement to the filter properties etc.
For your port method, so
Henry,why do you think the service VM need the entire PF instead of a VF? I
think the SR-IOV NIC should provide QoS and performance isolation.
As to assign entire PCI device to a guest, that should be ok since usually PF
and VF has different device ID, the tricky thing is, at least for some PCI
I should clarify my comment about invoking Heat to do the orchestration. I
think we have a choice between designing a 1-stage API vs a 2-stage API.
The 2-stage API goes like this: first the client defines the top-level
group and everything inside it, then the client makes more calls to create
Hi,
Is there a schedule published for the Neutron Icehouse design meetings
listed at http://summit.openstack.org/
Thanks,
-hemanth
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 10/29/2013 04:32 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
I should clarify my comment about invoking Heat to do the orchestration.
I think we have a choice between designing a 1-stage API vs a 2-stage
API. The 2-stage API goes like this: first the client defines the
top-level group and everything inside
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:54 PM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hey,
I wanted to propose Jay Bryant (AKA jsbryant, AKA jungleboy, AKA
:) ) for core membership on the Cinder team. Jay has been working on
Cinder for a while now and has really shown some dedication and
On 10/29/2013 04:24 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On 10/28/2013 10:28 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
2) Setting clearer expectations. Since we have so many blueprints for
Nova, I feel it's very important to accurately set expectations for how
the priority of different projects compare. In the last
On 10/29/2013 12:18 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
We also need some standardisation on the command line options for the client
portion (such as --os-auth-method, --os-x509-cert etc.) . Unfortunately, this
is not yet in Oslo so there would be multiple packages to be enhanced.
There is a OS client talk on
On 10/29/13 at 04:05pm, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Alex Glikson glik...@il.ibm.com wrote on 10/29/2013 03:37:41 AM:
1. I assume that the motivation for rack-level anti-affinity is to
survive a rack failure. Is this indeed the case?
This is a very interesting and important scenario, but I am curious
oslo.logging
oslo.db
Is there any ideas on introducing these libraries post-summit time?
Endre
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
