[openstack-dev] Network Tagging Blueprint

2014-03-21 Thread Vinay Bannai
Hello Folks, Please see a blueprint that we (eBay Inc) would like to propose for the Juno summit. This blueprint addresses the feature of network tagging allowing one to tag network resources with key value pairs as explained in the specification URL. We at eBay have a version of this feature

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Network Tagging Blueprint

2014-03-21 Thread Vinay Bannai
Hello Folks, Please see a blueprint that we (eBay Inc) would like to propose for the Juno summit. This blueprint addresses the feature of network tagging allowing one to tag network resources with key value pairs as explained in the specification URL. We at eBay have a version of this feature

Re: [openstack-dev] Disaster Recovery for OpenStack - call for stakeholder - discussion reminder

2014-03-21 Thread Deepak Shetty
Bruce, Thanks, it helps clarify. thanx, deepak On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Bruce Montague bruce_monta...@symantec.com wrote: HI, Deepak. With the caveat that both the etherpad and Ron's presentation are pretty high-level, my guess is: 1) DR middleware refers to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Resource dependencies

2014-03-21 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Shaunak Kashyap shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com wrote on 21/03/2014 05:26:50: From: Shaunak Kashyap shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 21/03/2014 05:29 Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Resource dependencies Hi, In a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Backwards incompatible API changes

2014-03-21 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:31:43 -0700 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, So it turns out that we have made a backwards incompatible change to the V2 API in Icehouse. Previously when creating a private

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Backwards incompatible API changes

2014-03-21 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:45:11 -0700 Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote: I know that our primary delivery mechanism is releases right now, and so if we decide to revert before this gets into a release, that's cool. However, I think we need to be looking at CD as a very important use-case and I

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] OVS 2.1.0 is available but not the Neutron ARP responder

2014-03-21 Thread Édouard Thuleau
Hi, Just to inform you that the new OVS release 2.1.0 was done yesterday [1]. This release contains new features and significant performance improvements [2]. And in that new features, one [3] was use to add local ARP responder with OVS agent and the plugin ML2 with the MD l2-pop [4]. Perhaps,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral][TaskFlow] Long running actions

2014-03-21 Thread Stan Lagun
Don't forget HA issues. Mistral can be restarted at any moment and need to be able to proceed from the place it was interrupted on another instance. In theory it can be addressed by TaskFlow but I'm not sure it can be done without complete redesign of it On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:33 AM, W Chan

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][rootwrap] Performance considerations, sudo?

2014-03-21 Thread Thierry Carrez
Yuriy Taraday wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo majop...@redhat.com mailto:majop...@redhat.com wrote: If this coupled to neutron in a way that it can be accepted for Icehouse (we're killing a performance bug), or that at least it can be y backported,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][rootwrap] Performance considerations, sudo?

2014-03-21 Thread Thierry Carrez
Yuriy Taraday wrote: Benchmark included showed on my machine these numbers (average over 100 iterations): Running 'ip a': ip a : 4.565ms sudo ip a : 13.744ms sudo rootwrap

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral][TaskFlow] Long running actions

2014-03-21 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Valid concerns. It would be great to get Joshua involved in this discussion. If it’s possible to do in TaskFlow he could advise on how exactly. Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. On 21 Mar 2014, at 16:23, Stan Lagun sla...@mirantis.com wrote: Don't forget HA issues. Mistral can be restarted at

[openstack-dev] We need a new version of hacking for Icehouse, or provide compatibility with oslo.sphinx in oslosphinx

2014-03-21 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, The current version of python-hacking wants python-oslo.sphinx, but we're moving to python-oslosphinx. In Debian, I made python-oslo.sphinx as a transition empty package that only depends on python-oslosphinx. As a consequence, python-hacking needs to be updated to use python-oslosphinx,

[openstack-dev] Taskflow retry controllers - how to?

2014-03-21 Thread Anastasia Karpinska
Hi, I want to let your know about the Retry. This is a new feature in Taskflow. Retry allows to execute a flow or a part of a flow several times if it fails. Retry is very similar to task and it can be executed or reverted, it accepts and returns values in the similar way as a Task. And it has

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Local vs. Scalable Engine

2014-03-21 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Alright, thanks Winson! Team, please review. Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. On 21 Mar 2014, at 06:43, W Chan m4d.co...@gmail.com wrote: I submitted a rough draft for review @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/81941/. Instead of using the pecan hook, I added a class property for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Marconi][TC] Withdraw graduation request

2014-03-21 Thread Thierry Carrez
Flavio Percoco wrote: [...] 4. We've seen the value - and believe in it - of OpenStack's incubation period. During this period, the project has gained maturity in its API, supported drivers and integration with the overall community. [...] Thanks Flavio, I think that's the right choice.

[openstack-dev] [nova][PCI] problem about PCI SRIOV

2014-03-21 Thread Gouzongmei
Hi, I have a problem when reading the wiki below, which is based on the latest SRIOV design. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PCI_passthrough_SRIOV_support#API_interface My problem is about the PCI SRIOV with tagged flavor part. In pci_information = { { 'device_id': 8086, 'vendor_id': 000[1-2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] OVS 2.1.0 is available but not the Neutron ARP responder

2014-03-21 Thread Mathieu Rohon
Hi edouard, thanks for the information. I would love to see your patch getting merged to have l2-population MD fully functional with an OVS based deployment. Moreover, this patch has a minimal impact on neutron, since the code is used only if l2-population MD is used in the ML2 plugin.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][rootwrap] Performance considerations, sudo?

2014-03-21 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo
On 03/21/2014 10:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Yuriy Taraday wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo majop...@redhat.com mailto:majop...@redhat.com wrote: If this coupled to neutron in a way that it can be accepted for Icehouse (we're killing a performance bug),

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][rootwrap] Performance considerations, sudo?

2014-03-21 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo
On 03/21/2014 11:01 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Yuriy Taraday wrote: Benchmark included showed on my machine these numbers (average over 100 iterations): Running 'ip a': ip a : 4.565ms sudo ip a :

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Backwards incompatible API changes

2014-03-21 Thread Thierry Carrez
Christopher Yeoh wrote: I don't want to cause issues for the CD people, but perhaps it won't be too disruptive for them (some direct feedback would be handy). The initial backwards incompatible change did not result in any bug reports coming back to us at all. If there were lots of users using

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-21 Thread Sean Dague
On 03/20/2014 06:18 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Alexei Kornienko alexei.kornie...@gmail.com mailto:alexei.kornie...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, We've done some profiling and results are quite interesting: during 1,5 hour ceilometer inserted 59755

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] OVS 2.1.0 is available but not the Neutron ARP responder

2014-03-21 Thread Édouard Thuleau
Thanks Mathieu for your support and work onto CI to enable multi-node. I wrote a blog post about how to run devstack development environment with LXC. I hope it will be publish next week. Just add a pointer about OVS support network namespaces since 2 years ago now [1]. [1]

[openstack-dev] panel not getting registered.

2014-03-21 Thread Roel Van Nyen
Hi, I`m trying to create a custom dashboard with a panel. I`ve created the dashboard and with a panel under /openstack_dashboard/dashboards/. Then I`ve added this to setting.py under INSTALLED_APPS. 'openstack_dashboard.dashboards.mycustomdashboard', Howhever if I try to connect to horizon I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Backwards incompatible API changes

2014-03-21 Thread Alex Xu
On 2014年03月21日 17:04, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:45:11 -0700 Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote: I know that our primary delivery mechanism is releases right now, and so if we decide to revert before this gets into a release, that's cool. However, I think we need to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-21 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Sean, Absolutely agree with you. It's not the same to execute query and get plain text, and execute query and get hierarchy of python objects. Plus I disagree when I hear that SQLAlchemy is slow. It's slow when you are using it wrong. Like in Nova Scheduler [1] we were fetching full 3 tables

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][rootwrap] Performance considerations, sudo?

2014-03-21 Thread Sean Dague
On 03/21/2014 05:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Yuriy Taraday wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo majop...@redhat.com mailto:majop...@redhat.com wrote: If this coupled to neutron in a way that it can be accepted for Icehouse (we're killing a performance bug), or

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Network Tagging Blueprint

2014-03-21 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi Vinay, I left a few comments on the specification document. While I understand this is functional for the VPC use case, there might be applications also outside of the VPC. My only concern is that, at least in the examples in the document, this appear to be violating a bit the tenet of neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] OVS 2.1.0 is available but not the Neutron ARP responder

2014-03-21 Thread Kyle Mestery
Getting this type of functional testing into the gate would be pretty phenomenal. Thanks for your continued efforts here Mathieu! If there is anything I can do to help here, let me know. One other concern here is that the infra team may have issues running a version of OVS which isn't packaged

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack/GSoC

2014-03-21 Thread Victoria Martínez de la Cruz
Hi all, I just submitted my proposal to Melange and I'm finishing my student page in OpenStack wiki. Let me know if there is something missing. Let's the waiting begin, good luck for all! Thanks, Victoria 2014-03-20 18:38 GMT-03:00 Chenchong Qin qinchench...@gmail.com: Hi! I've submitted

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][rootwrap] Performance considerations, sudo?

2014-03-21 Thread Thierry Carrez
Sean Dague wrote: Sounds great. One of the things I hope happens with this is a look at some place rootwrap is used with such an open policy, that it's completely moot. For instance the nova-cpu policy includes tee dd with no arg limitting (which has been that way forever from my look in git

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Resource dependencies

2014-03-21 Thread Shaunak Kashyap
Thanks for the explanation, Thomas. Appreciate it! Shaunak On Mar 21, 2014, at 12:37 AM, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com wrote: Shaunak Kashyap shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com wrote on 21/03/2014 05:26:50: From: Shaunak Kashyap shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Backwards incompatible API changes

2014-03-21 Thread Chris Friesen
This is sort of off on a tangent, but one of the things that resulted in this being a problem was the fact that if someone creates a private flavor and then tries to add access second flavor access call will fail because the the tenant already is on the access list. Something I was

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Resource dependencies

2014-03-21 Thread Jason Dunsmore
This is what you're looking for: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/glossary.html#term-dependency On Thu, Mar 20 2014, Shaunak Kashyap wrote: Hi, In a Heat template, what does it mean for a resource to depend on another resource? As in, what is the impact of creating a dependency? I

Re: [openstack-dev] User mailing lists for OpenStack projects

2014-03-21 Thread Jason Dunsmore
Here is the mailing list for openstack usage questions (for all projects): http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack On Thu, Mar 20 2014, Shaunak Kashyap wrote: Hi folks, I am relatively new to OpenStack development as one of the developers on the unified PHP SDK for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] instances stuck with task_state of REBOOTING

2014-03-21 Thread Solly Ross
Well, if messages are getting dropped on the floor due to communication issues, that's not a good thing. If you have time, could you determine why the messages are getting dropped on the floor? We shouldn't be doing things that require both the controller and compute nodes until we have a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Marconi][TC] Withdraw graduation request

2014-03-21 Thread Malini Kamalambal
Flavio has very well summarized the Marconi team's thoughts. We appreciate all the frank opinions in the discussions that are going on. Keep those thoughts coming! We look forward to building a better Marconi and a stronger community. On 3/20/14 7:30 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [Marconi][TC] Withdraw graduation request

2014-03-21 Thread Monty Taylor
On 03/20/2014 07:40 PM, Kurt Griffiths wrote: I'd also like to thank the team and the overall community. The team for its hard work during the last cycle and the community for being there and providing such important feedback in this process. +1, thanks again everyone for participating in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Marconi][TC] Withdraw graduation request

2014-03-21 Thread Sean Dague
On 03/21/2014 10:49 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 03/20/2014 07:40 PM, Kurt Griffiths wrote: I'd also like to thank the team and the overall community. The team for its hard work during the last cycle and the community for being there and providing such important feedback in this process. +1,

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-qa] Graduation Requirements + Scope of Tempest

2014-03-21 Thread Malini Kamalambal
I have an etherpad started to document QA requirements https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Tempest-Graduation-Criteria I hope Sean and the rest of QA team can add their thoughts here. I am also looking for inputs from the Sahara team, while the path to graduation is still fresh in their minds. We can

[openstack-dev] [Marconi] Proposal to add Malini Kamalambal to the marconi-core team

2014-03-21 Thread Flavio Percoco
Greetings, I'd like to propose adding Malini Kamalambal to Marconi's core. Malini has been an outstanding contributor for a long time. She's taken care of Marconi's tests, benchmarks, gate integration, tempest support and way more other things. She's also actively participated in the mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Marconi] Proposal to add Malini Kamalambal to the marconi-core team

2014-03-21 Thread Amit Gandhi
+1 On 3/21/14, 11:17 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: Greetings, I'd like to propose adding Malini Kamalambal to Marconi's core. Malini has been an outstanding contributor for a long time. She's taken care of Marconi's tests, benchmarks, gate integration, tempest support and way more

Re: [openstack-dev] We need a new version of hacking for Icehouse, or provide compatibility with oslo.sphinx in oslosphinx

2014-03-21 Thread Doug Hellmann
There is quite a list of un-released changes to hacking: * Make H202 check honor pep8 #noqa comment * Updated from global requirements * Updated from global requirements * Switch over to oslosphinx * HACKING.rst: Fix odd indentation in an example code * Remove tox locale overrides * Updated from

[openstack-dev] [Climate] Meeting minutes

2014-03-21 Thread Dina Belova
Hello stackers! Thanks everyone who was attending our meeting :) Meeting minutes are: Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2014/climate.2014-03-21-15.00.html Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2014/climate.2014-03-21-15.00.txt Log:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Marconi] Proposal to add Malini Kamalambal to the marconi-core team

2014-03-21 Thread Sriram Madapusi Vasudevan
+1 Best, Sriram Madapusi Vasudevan From: Amit Gandhi [amit.gan...@rackspace.com] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 10:35 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Marconi] Proposal to add Malini

Re: [openstack-dev] [Marconi] Proposal to add Malini Kamalambal to the marconi-core team

2014-03-21 Thread Kurt Griffiths
+1 million. I’ve been super impressed by Malini’s work and thoughtful comments on multiple occasions. On 3/21/14, 10:35 AM, Amit Gandhi amit.gan...@rackspace.com wrote: +1 On 3/21/14, 11:17 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: Greetings, I'd like to propose adding Malini Kamalambal to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Marconi] Proposal to add Malini Kamalambal to the marconi-core team

2014-03-21 Thread Allan Metts
+1 Allan Metts @ametts -Original Message- From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:18 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [Marconi] Proposal to add Malini Kamalambal to the marconi-core team Greetings, I'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] test environment requirements

2014-03-21 Thread Derek Higgins
On 13/03/14 16:12, James Slagle wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: So we already have pretty high requirements - its basically a 16G workstation as minimum. Specifically to test the full story: - a seed VM - an undercloud VM (bm deploy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-21 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/20/2014 06:18 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Alexei Kornienko alexei.kornie...@gmail.com mailto:alexei.kornie...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, We've done some profiling and results

Re: [openstack-dev] [Marconi] Proposal to add Malini Kamalambal to the marconi-core team

2014-03-21 Thread Victoria Martínez de la Cruz
+1 I also want to add that she is an excellent mentor, she helped me a lot when I first joined Marconi. Thanks malini, you are great! 2014-03-21 12:35 GMT-03:00 Amit Gandhi amit.gan...@rackspace.com: +1 On 3/21/14, 11:17 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: Greetings, I'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] test environment requirements

2014-03-21 Thread Derek Higgins
On 13/03/14 09:51, Robert Collins wrote: So we already have pretty high requirements - its basically a 16G workstation as minimum. Specifically to test the full story: - a seed VM - an undercloud VM (bm deploy infra) - 1 overcloud control VM - 2 overcloud hypervisor VMs 5

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack/GSoC

2014-03-21 Thread Andronidis Anastasios
Hello, just finished with my proposal too. Let me know if there is something missing. GL to all! Anastasios Andronidis On 21 Μαρ 2014, at 2:27 μ.μ., Victoria Martínez de la Cruz victo...@vmartinezdelacruz.com wrote: Hi all, I just submitted my proposal to Melange and I'm finishing my

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-qa] Graduation Requirements + Scope of Tempest

2014-03-21 Thread David Kranz
On 03/20/2014 04:19 PM, Rochelle.RochelleGrober wrote: -Original Message- From: Malini Kamalambal [mailto:malini.kamalam...@rackspace.com] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:13 PM 'project specific functional testing' in the Marconi context is treating Marconi as a complete system,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Marconi] Proposal to add Malini Kamalambal to the marconi-core team

2014-03-21 Thread Balaji Iyer
+1 On 3/21/14, 11:35 AM, Amit Gandhi amit.gan...@rackspace.com wrote: +1 On 3/21/14, 11:17 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: Greetings, I'd like to propose adding Malini Kamalambal to Marconi's core. Malini has been an outstanding contributor for a long time. She's taken care of

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] test environment requirements

2014-03-21 Thread Derek Higgins
On 14/03/14 20:16, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2014-03-13 11:12, James Slagle wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: So we already have pretty high requirements - its basically a 16G workstation as minimum. Specifically to test the full story: - a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] test environment requirements

2014-03-21 Thread Dan Prince
- Original Message - From: Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 5:51:30 AM Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] test environment requirements So we already have pretty high

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][rootwrap] Performance considerations, sudo?

2014-03-21 Thread Yuriy Taraday
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: Yuriy Taraday wrote: Benchmark included showed on my machine these numbers (average over 100 iterations): Running 'ip a': ip a : 4.565ms

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-qa] Graduation Requirements + Scope of Tempest

2014-03-21 Thread Malini Kamalambal
On 3/21/14 12:01 PM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/20/2014 04:19 PM, Rochelle.RochelleGrober wrote: -Original Message- From: Malini Kamalambal [mailto:malini.kamalam...@rackspace.com] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:13 PM 'project specific functional testing' in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] test environment requirements

2014-03-21 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2014-03-21 10:57, Derek Higgins wrote: On 14/03/14 20:16, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2014-03-13 11:12, James Slagle wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: So we already have pretty high requirements - its basically a 16G workstation as minimum.

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack/GSoC

2014-03-21 Thread Davanum Srinivas
FYI, Latest list of projects: Implement a re-usable shared library for VMware(oslo.vmware) Masaru Nomura A pre-caching system for OpenStack Anastasis Andronidis Proposal for Implementing an application-level FWaaS driver (Zorp) Dániel Csubák Openstack-OSLO :Add a New Backend to Oslo.Cache sai

Re: [openstack-dev] We need a new version of hacking for Icehouse, or provide compatibility with oslo.sphinx in oslosphinx

2014-03-21 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote: There is quite a list of un-released changes to hacking: * Make H202 check honor pep8 #noqa comment * Updated from global requirements * Updated from global requirements * Switch over to oslosphinx *

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] instances stuck with task_state of REBOOTING

2014-03-21 Thread Chris Friesen
On 03/21/2014 08:41 AM, Solly Ross wrote: Well, if messages are getting dropped on the floor due to communication issues, that's not a good thing. If you have time, could you determine why the messages are getting dropped on the floor? We shouldn't be doing things that require both the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Backwards incompatible API changes

2014-03-21 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:45:11 -0700 Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote: I know that our primary delivery mechanism is releases right now, and so if we decide to revert before this gets into a release, that's cool.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] A ramdisk agent

2014-03-21 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Guys, I've read comments from JoshNang here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicPythonAgent. And it looks like we are still not on the same page about architecture of agent. I'd like us to avoid having hard coded logic in agent at all. If we need, then let's implement it as a driver. I mean it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] A ramdisk agent

2014-03-21 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
And here is scheme https://drive.google.com/a/mirantis.com/file/d/0B-Olcp4mLLbvRks0eEhvMXNPM3M/edit?usp=sharing Vladimir Kozhukalov On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov vkozhuka...@mirantis.com wrote: Guys, I've read comments from JoshNang here

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnetodb] Using gevent in MagnetoDB. OpenStack standards and approaches

2014-03-21 Thread Dmitriy Ukhlov
Doug and Ryan, Thank you for your opinion! It is very important for us to gather experience as more as we can for passing OpenStack incubation painlessly. Also I would be glad to see you and everyone who is interested in MagnetoDB project on MagnetoDB design session MagnetoDB, key-value storage.

[openstack-dev] [depfreeze] Dependency freeze coming up (EOD Tuesday March 25)

2014-03-21 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, As we get closer to tagging the first Icehouse release candidates, we'll be freezing dependencies on Tuesday, March 25 after the 21:00 UTC release meeting. The rationale behind this freeze is to facilitate the work of packagers (especially distribution packagers) so that they can be

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Backwards incompatible API changes

2014-03-21 Thread David Kranz
On 03/21/2014 05:04 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:45:11 -0700 Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote: I know that our primary delivery mechanism is releases right now, and so if we decide to revert before this gets into a release, that's cool. However, I think we need to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] A ramdisk agent

2014-03-21 Thread Jay Faulkner
On 3/21/14, 10:18 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote: And here is scheme https://drive.google.com/a/mirantis.com/file/d/0B-Olcp4mLLbvRks0eEhvMXNPM3M/edit?usp=sharing Vlamimir, can you recreate this drawing in a format that doesn't require an additional browser plugin? Thanks. -Jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Network Tagging Blueprint

2014-03-21 Thread Vinay Bannai
Salvatore, Thanks for your comments. I did have a conversation with Kyle and Mark (at the ODL) regarding this feature. Any suggestions that have to make it technology-agnostic would be appreciated. Vinay On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:54 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.comwrote: Hi Vinay,

Re: [openstack-dev] [depfreeze] Dependency freeze coming up (EOD Tuesday March 25)

2014-03-21 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: Hi everyone, As we get closer to tagging the first Icehouse release candidates, we'll be freezing dependencies on Tuesday, March 25 after the 21:00 UTC release meeting. The rationale behind this freeze is to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Backwards incompatible API changes

2014-03-21 Thread Chris Behrens
FWIW, I’m fine with any of the options posted. But I’m curious about the precedence that reverting would create. It essentially sounds like if we release a version with an API bug, the bug is no longer a bug in the API and the bug becomes a bug in the documentation. The only way to ‘fix' the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano][Heat] MuranoPL questions?

2014-03-21 Thread Zane Bitter
I completely agree with Georgy, but you raised some questions about Heat that I want to answer in the interests of spreading knowledge about how Heat works. A heavily-snipped response follows... On 21/03/14 05:11, Stan Lagun wrote: 3. Despite HOT being more secure on the surface it is not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Updates to Juno blueprint review process

2014-03-21 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On 03/20/2014 03:50 PM, Jay Lau wrote: It is better that we can have some diagram workflow just like Gerrit_Workflow https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gerrit_Workflow to show the new process. Indeed, I think it would help. While I'm here, and for the records, I think that creating a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Updates to Juno blueprint review process

2014-03-21 Thread Russell Bryant
On 03/21/2014 02:55 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: On 03/20/2014 03:50 PM, Jay Lau wrote: It is better that we can have some diagram workflow just like Gerrit_Workflow https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gerrit_Workflow to show the new process. Indeed, I think it would help. While I'm here, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about Raw Device Mapping

2014-03-21 Thread Duncan Thomas
In general, abstracting the offload of snapshot, backup etc the a SAN is exactly the job of cinder. RDM has, in the general cloud case, a bunch of security issues (raw sector reads outside of what is being presented, firmware updates, etc) that need carefully looking at. On 18 March 2014 09:33,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Updates to Juno blueprint review process

2014-03-21 Thread Tim Bell
I am a strong advocate of the Blueprint-on-Blueprints process we discussed in the operator mini-summit so that experienced cloud administrators can give input before lots of code is written (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/operators-feedback-mar14) but we need to be aware that these people

[openstack-dev] What's Up Doc? Mar 21, 2014

2014-03-21 Thread Anne Gentle
1. In review and merged this past week: Lots of work to get the latest configuration reference groups for glance, cinder, neutron, ceilometer, and trove. Thanks Gauvain for the efforts! You can read more about the latest in his mailing list post, Config reference news. [1] Adding to our group of

[openstack-dev] Preparing for 2013.2.3 -- branches freeze March 27th

2014-03-21 Thread Adam Gandelman
Hi All- We'll be freezing the stable/havana branches for integrated projects this Thursday March 27th in preparation for the 2013.2.3 stable release on Thursday April 3rd. You can view the current queue of proposed patches on gerrit [1]. I'd like to request all interested parties review current

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] non-persistent storage(after stopping VM, data will be rollback automatically), do you think we shoud introduce this feature?

2014-03-21 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 17 March 2014 11:34, Yuzhou (C) vitas.yuz...@huawei.com wrote: Hi Duncan Thomas, Maybe the statement about approval process is not very exact. In fact in my mail, I mean: In the enterprise private cloud, if beyond the quota, you want to create a new VM ,that needs to wait for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Updates to Juno blueprint review process

2014-03-21 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote: I am a strong advocate of the Blueprint-on-Blueprints process we discussed in the operator mini-summit so that experienced cloud administrators can give input before lots of code is written (

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Updates to Juno blueprint review process

2014-03-21 Thread Russell Bryant
On 03/21/2014 03:16 PM, Tim Bell wrote: I am a strong advocate of the Blueprint-on-Blueprints process we discussed in the operator mini-summit so that experienced cloud administrators can give input before lots of code is written (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/operators-feedback-mar14)

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-qa] Graduation Requirements + Scope of Tempest

2014-03-21 Thread Rochelle.RochelleGrober
From: Malini Kamalambal [mailto:malini.kamalam...@rackspace.com] snip We are talking about different levels of testing, 1. Unit tests - which everybody agrees should be in the individual project itself 2. System Tests - 'System' referring to ( limited to), all the components that make

Re: [openstack-dev] [Marconi] Proposal to add Malini Kamalambal to the marconi-core team

2014-03-21 Thread Ozgur Akan
+2 On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Balaji Iyer balaji.i...@rackspace.comwrote: +1 On 3/21/14, 11:35 AM, Amit Gandhi amit.gan...@rackspace.com wrote: +1 On 3/21/14, 11:17 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: Greetings, I'd like to propose adding Malini Kamalambal to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Updates to Juno blueprint review process

2014-03-21 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/21/2014 03:16 PM, Tim Bell wrote: I am a strong advocate of the Blueprint-on-Blueprints process we discussed in the operator mini-summit so that experienced cloud administrators can give input before lots of

Re: [openstack-dev] We need a new version of hacking for Icehouse, or provide compatibility with oslo.sphinx in oslosphinx

2014-03-21 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
++ for having 0.8.1 with oslospinx del fixed. P.S. The 0.9.0 release will find some style issues in mostly all projects I think, so, it's better to release it after Icehouse release or at least RC1. On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 21, 2014

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral][TaskFlow] Long running actions

2014-03-21 Thread Joshua Harlow
Will advise soon, out sick with not so fun case of poison oak, will reply next week (hopefully) when I'm less incapacitated... Sent from my really tiny device... On Mar 21, 2014, at 3:24 AM, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.commailto:rakhme...@mirantis.com wrote: Valid concerns. It would be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Updates to Juno blueprint review process

2014-03-21 Thread Matt Van Winkle
From: Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.commailto:mest...@noironetworks.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Friday, March 21, 2014 2:49 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Backwards incompatible API changes

2014-03-21 Thread David Kranz
On 03/21/2014 02:18 PM, Chris Behrens wrote: FWIW, I'm fine with any of the options posted. But I'm curious about the precedence that reverting would create. It essentially sounds like if we release a version with an API bug, the bug is no longer a bug in the API and the bug becomes a bug in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-21 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/20/2014 06:18 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Alexei Kornienko alexei.kornie...@gmail.com mailto:alexei.kornie...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, We've done some profiling and results

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-21 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote: On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/20/2014 06:18 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Alexei Kornienko alexei.kornie...@gmail.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-21 Thread Alexei Kornienko
Hello, Please see some comments inline. Best Regards, Alexei Kornienko On 03/21/2014 11:11 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/20/2014 06:18 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-21 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/20/2014 06:18 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Mar

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] non-persistent storage(after stopping VM, data will be rollback automatically), do you think we shoud introduce this feature?

2014-03-21 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) zhangleiqi...@huawei.com wrote: From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 2:28 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

[openstack-dev] requirements repository core reviewer updates

2014-03-21 Thread Doug Hellmann
In the last project meeting, we discussed updating the list of core reviewers on the global requirements project. The review stats for the last 90 days on the project show that several current core reviewers haven't been active, so as a first step before adding new cores I propose that we make

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano][Heat] MuranoPL questions?

2014-03-21 Thread Stan Lagun
Zane, I appreciate your explanations on Heat/HOT. This really makes sense. I didn't mean to say that MuranoPL is better for Heat. Actually HOT is good for Heat's mission. I completely acknowledge it. I've tried to avoid comparison between languages and I'm sorry if it felt that way. This is not

Re: [openstack-dev] We need a new version of hacking for Icehouse, or provide compatibility with oslo.sphinx in oslosphinx

2014-03-21 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote: ++ for having 0.8.1 with oslospinx del fixed. Hacking 0.8.1 has just been released. http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/hacking/tag/?id=0.8.1 P.S. The 0.9.0 release will find some style issues in mostly

[openstack-dev] Jenkins test logs and their retention period

2014-03-21 Thread Clark Boylan
Hello everyone, Back at the Portland summit the Infra team committed to archiving six months of test logs for Openstack. Since then we have managed to do just that. However, more recently we have seen the growth rate on those logs continue to grow beyond what is a currently sustainable level.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Updates to Juno blueprint review process

2014-03-21 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - We recently discussed the idea of using gerrit to review blueprint specifications [1]. There was a lot of support for the idea so we have proceeded with putting this together before the start of the Juno development cycle. We now have a new project set up,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Using Python-Neutronclient from Python - docstrings needed?

2014-03-21 Thread Rajdeep Dua
Sean, If you can point me to the project file in github which needs to be modified , i will include these docs Thanks Rajdeep On Sunday, February 9, 2014 9:04 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Do you have plans to submit these back upstream? It would be a great first

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-docs] What's Up Doc? Mar 21, 2014

2014-03-21 Thread Lana Brindley
On 22 Mar 2014, at 5:18 am, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote: anip On April 16, the APAC OpenStack docs writers will hold a face-to-face meeting. Check out the latest docs team meeting for details or contact Lana Brindley. [4] Just a quick note that this has moved to 2 April, to

  1   2   >