Hi stackers:
I found when a instance status become "error", I will see the detailed
fault info at times when I "show" the detail of Instance. And it is very
convenient for me to find the failed reason. Indeed, there is a
"nova.instance_faults" which stores the fault info.
Hi : ZhiQiang ,
Found this discussion after I filed the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1314372
Sorry for that.
More than happy to work with you on following BP to implement a more
advance and user friendly policy settings to ceilometer.
https://blueprints.launchpad
I'll be an alpha / beta tester, for sure!! :-D
I'm very interested on DNS for IPv6 in Neutron (and in Horizon too)... Hope
to see it in Juno!!
IPv6 (with a perfect DNS setup) is very important...
Best!
Thiago
On 29 April 2014 17:09, Carl Baldwin wrote:
> The design summit discussion topic I
On 04/29/2014 06:59 PM, Collins, Sean wrote:
Count me in!
+1
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Sorry, got it. Thanks.
于 2014-04-29 23:29, Ben Nemec 写道:
Please don't send review requests to the list. The preferred methods
are discussed here:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html
Thanks.
-Ben
On 04/29/2014 04:45 AM, sxmatch wrote:
Hi,guys:
Ther
Count me in!
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hi Carlos,
It looks like only the gerrit review has been marked abandoned because of a
week of inactivity.
Regards,
Vijay
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Carlos Garza wrote:
> This blueprint was marked abandoned.
>
> On Apr 29, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Vijay B
> wrote:
>
> Hi Sam, Evgeny,
>
Hi,
It looks like there are areas of common effort in multiple efforts that are
proceeding in parallel to implement SSL for LBaaS as well as VPN SSL in
neutron.
Two relevant efforts are listed below:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74031/ (
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL)
This blueprint was marked abandoned.
On Apr 29, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Vijay B
mailto:os.v...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Hi Sam, Evgeny,
I've reviewed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74031 with my comments. I am not
sure if there is a request with code newer than this link - please do let me
know if
On Apr 27, 2014, at 8:35 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
Speaking of SSL - we have a few few project-wise issues such as lack of secure
storage, lack of secure messaging, req
Hi German,
Thanks for bringing up the VPN SSL implementation - we just took a look at
the blueprint:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4kh-7VVPWlPOWlTM0QzNDJucjg/edit
and it matches the design we would take with the SSL entity portion of the
effort, in that we would like to make them first class
Hi, I thought I'd send out the link to the etherpad I've put together
for the summit session I proposed on TripleO and Docker. If there's
any initial discussion or something you'd like to see added, please
reply here or add directly to the etherpad.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-summit-tri
Hi Clint
Thank you for your suggestion. Your point get taken :)
> Kyle
This is also a same discussion for LBaaS
Can we discuss this in advanced service meeting?
> Zang
Could you join the discussion?
2014-04-29 15:48 GMT-07:00 Clint Byrum :
> Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-04-29 10
Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-04-29 10:58:53 -0700:
> Hi Kyle
>
> 2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery :
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
> >> Hi Zang
> >>
> >> Thank you for your contribution on this!
> >> The private key management is what I want to discus
Per decision in the the Solum weekly IRC meeting today, we will have the
environment working group discussion via ML/etherpad.
GOAL: develop a POV on
1. Which OpenStack program/projects should Environments live under
2. What projects does Environments depend on (Heat, Keystone, OpenStack
congre
Per Samuel's request, I have set my API proposal document to be edit-able
by all.
Also, my work priorities have changed somewhat in preparation for the
summit in two weeks, so I may not be able to add more use cases prior to
the summit.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Samuel Bercovici wrote:
>
Vijay,
SSL and certificate management is a major requirement from a cloud operator
perspective. The VPN part of Neutron is looking into using Barbican and I am
surprised that LB is going a different way/implementing their own store. Just
for the record I prefer Barbican ☺
Furthermore, we are s
Or have a check-mk.d directory and pull stuff on from there automatically
On 30 Apr 2014 04:03, "Gregory Haynes" wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have a patch in flight at the moment [0] to install check_mk server
> and compliment the already merged installation of check_mk agent [1] so my
> th
Stephen + Sam,
I have added some of the operator use cases. We also created a document earlier
(https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ar1FuMFYRhgadDVXZ25NM2NfbGtLTkR0TDFNUWJQUWc#gid=0)
listing all the features we consider essential (and everybody voted with real
world data) for the LB us
Also, a section for the API specification for the newly created SSL
extensions needs to be added to
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL.
Regards,
Vijay
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Vijay B wrote:
> Hi Sam, Evgeny,
>
> I've reviewed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74031 with
Hi Sam, Evgeny,
I've reviewed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74031 with my comments. I am
not sure if there is a request with code newer than this link - please do
let me know if that is the case.
Thanks,
Regards,
Vijay
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Eichberger, German <
german.eichber...@h
You may want to take a peek at this recent thread, there may be
information in it you'll find useful.
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/029408.html
--
John
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
ht
Ok, so, the May 1 meeting is canceled.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> We'll have one more meeting before the summit - May 8 :)
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Farrellee wrote:
>> On 04/25/2014 07:23 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey folks,
>>>
>>> May
A bit of background TripleO CI background:
At this point we've got two public CI overcloud which we can use to run
TripleO check jobs for CI. Things are evolving nicely and we've recently been
putting some effort into making things run faster by adding local distro and
Pypi mirrors. Etc. This
The design summit discussion topic I submitted [1] for my DNS
blueprints [2][3][4] and this one [5] just missed the cut for the
design session schedule. It stung a little to be turned down but I
totally understand the time and resource constraints that drove the
decision.
I feel this is an import
Hi Flavio,
Thanks! I also added some comments to the performance test plan at
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/marconi-benchmark-plans we talked about
yesterday.
Thanks,
Tomasz
On 4/29/14, 2:52 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote:
>On 28/04/14 17:41 +, Janczuk, Tomasz wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>Have any
I have exported the gettextutils code and related files to a new git
repository, ready to be imported as oslo.i18n. Please take a few
minutes to look over the files and give it a sanity check.
https://github.com/dhellmann/oslo.i18n
Thanks,
Doug
___
Ope
I would prefer to link to docs.openstack.org or the API reference pages
with specific links like this:
http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-blockstorage-v2.html,
http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-compute-v2.html, and so on.
The
issue I have with linking to the "specs" is that they are likely going
to m
Jay Pipes wrote on 04/29/2014 02:26:42 PM:
> From: Jay Pipes
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
> Date: 04/29/2014 02:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] cinder not support query
> volume/snapshot with regular expression
>
> On 04/29/2014 02:16 AM, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote:
>
On 04/29/2014 02:16 AM, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote:
Currently, Nova API achieve this feature based on the database’s REGEX
support. Do you have advice on alternative way to achieve it?
Hi Trump,
Unfortunately, REGEXP support in databases is almost always ridiculously
slow compared to prefix
> Aside from creating a sort of cyclic dependency between the two, it
> is my understanding that Neutron is meant to be a "stand alone"
> service capable of being consumed by other compute managers (i.e.
> oVirt). This breaks that paradigm.
> So my question is: Why use API and not RPC?
>
> I
Hi Mike,
Comments inline:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Mike Kolesnik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came across the implementation of
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/nova-event-callback
> and have a question about the way it was implemented.
>
> I notice that now Neutron has a depende
Hi Zzelle, Carl and others,
We’ve been doing work on a more modular agent whose responsibilities are
basically to:
1: apply configurations in devices when Neutron service resources (like Neutron
Routers) are created or updated.
2: monitor the health of devices hosting such service resources
Our
On 2014-04-29 08:52:38 +0400 (+0400), Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> +1 to lock May 7
I've updated the wiki article to note that I'll lock it for further
edits at the end of the (UTC) day on the 7th and generate the
checksummed list from it, then link it there for everyone to
download as quickly as I ca
I mis quoted it should be in RFC 5246 not 5264.
On Apr 25, 2014, at 2:50 AM, Carlos Garza
mailto:carlos.ga...@rackspace.com>> wrote:
Trevor is referring to our plans on using the SSL session ID of the
ClientHello to provide session persistence.
See RFC 5264 section 7.4.1.2 which sends an
On 2014-04-29 09:16:53 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
[...]
> I think Wednesday would be the ideal day, as it has the most overlap
> with the conference and is at least adjacent to if not within most
> design tracks.
[...]
Seconded.
> I suggest we ensure that everyone understands the process a
Hi Everyone,
Since this is the scheduled off week, I'm going to cancel this week's QA
meeting.
The next meeting will be on May 8th and will be at 22:00 UTC instead of having
two consecutive meetings at the same time. I will send out the usual reminder
email next week.
Thanks,
Matt Treinish
_
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
> Hi Kyle
>
> 2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery :
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>> Hi Zang
>>>
>>> Thank you for your contribution on this!
>>> The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit.
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a patch in flight at the moment [0] to install check_mk server and
> > compliment the already merged installation of check_mk agent [1] so my
> > thoughts are now turning to how we would recommend adding new service
> > checks.
> >
> > The concept behind check_mk makes
Hi Kyle
2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery :
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi Zang
>>
>> Thank you for your contribution on this!
>> The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit.
>>
> Has the idea of using Barbican been discussed before? There
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
> Hi Zang
>
> Thank you for your contribution on this!
> The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit.
>
Has the idea of using Barbican been discussed before? There are many
reasons why using Barbican for this may be better
Hi Zang
Thank you for your contribution on this!
The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit.
[1] We are depending DB security, anyway
When we get stolen the private key in the DB, it means we are also
stolen ID/PW for DB.
If we stolen the key, even if we keep the private k
Using OVS with nova-nework will bring you more issues that what you are
expected.
Security groups will not work and other L3 capabilities.
Edgar
From: laserjetyang mailto:laserjety...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists
This was added long ago to support testing environments without a lot of disk
space.
Vish
On Apr 29, 2014, at 12:12 AM, Zhangleiqiang (Trump)
wrote:
> Hi, all:
>
> I find in some of the cinder backend volume drivers, there are codes in
> create_volume as follows:
>
>
Since this is the scheduled off week, I thought we would skip the team
meeting on Friday 2 May.
Doug
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Break time is extremely busy in the developers lounge. We can have
others in the room, but we need enough of a space for everyone to stand
in two lines and rotate and be uninterrupted.
Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas's message of 2014-04-29 09:07:12 -0700:
> How about 10:30 AM Break on Wednesday at
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2014-04-29 07:32:59 -0700:
> On 04/29/2014 06:42 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
> >> Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are
> >> interested in participating in the key signing
How about 10:30 AM Break on Wednesday at the Developers Lounge (Do we
have one this time?)
-- dims
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 04/29/2014 06:42 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> Just a friendly reminder to a
In Keystone, users are assigned to a domain when they are created. This is a
unique combination.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 11:25 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re:
Please don't send review requests to the list. The preferred methods
are discussed here:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html
Thanks.
-Ben
On 04/29/2014 04:45 AM, sxmatch wrote:
Hi,guys:
There is a nova-specs "add force detach volume to nova"
（https
On 04/29/2014 03:16 AM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote:
Hi all,
I have a patch in flight at the moment [0] to install check_mk server and
compliment the already merged installation of check_mk agent [1] so my thoughts
are now turning to how we would recommend adding new service checks.
The
This is a development list, and your question sounds usage-related. I
suggest asking again on the users list:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Thanks.
-Ben
On 04/29/2014 12:53 AM, abhishek jain wrote:
Hi all
I'm getting follwoing error when trying to run nova-c
Just a couple quick notes, since I've been pinged off-list. The summit
proposal for the QoS API was rejected due to time constraints, but I'm
hoping that we can still meet in Atlanta and discuss the next steps.
In the meantime, I have created a draft spec in neutron-specs, but it's
mostly just a c
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:58:50AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> On 04/25/2014 03:15 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> >There are myriad problems with the above user experience and
> >implementation. Let me explain them.
> >
> >1. The user isn't creating a "server group" when they issue a nova
> >server-gr
Hi, everybody.
I’ve started to work on implementation of Event in ceilometer on HBase
backend in the edges of blueprint
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/hbase-events-feature
By now Events has been implemented only in SQL.
You know, using SQL we can build any query we need.
Wit
Hi Illia,
WEAK/QUORUM instead of true/false it is ok for me.
But we have also STRONG.
What does STRONG mean? In current concept we a using QUORUM and say that it
is strong. I guess it is confusing (at least for me) and can have different
behavior for different backends.
I believe that from user
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hey
>
> In this patch:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/83681
>
> by Ghanshyam Mann, we encountered an unusual situation where a timestamp
> in the returned XML looked like this:
>
> 2014-04-08 09:00:14.399708+00:00
>
> What appeared to
On 04/29/2014 06:42 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
>> Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are
>> interested in participating in the key signing in Atlanta:
>>
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenPGP_Web_of_Trust/Juno_
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 14:48 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> My conclusions from all that:
>
> 1) This sucks
>
> 2) At the very least, we should be clear in our API samples tests
> which of the three formats we expect - we should only change the
> format used in a given part of th
Anita, thanks, I'll take a look on it.
I just find the very nice pros - new screen detects changes and shows
small notification, it's very useful for folks like me how opening 500
tabs for review and than iterating through them.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 04/29/2014
On 2014-04-29 07:09:42 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
> Use the old change view.
Specifically, if you browse to
https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/preferences by default
everyone normally starts at Change View: Server Default (Old Screen)
so if you make sure it's set to that (or really just
On 04/29/2014 08:26 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> Yup, it sounds like for now the old screen is the only option. I'm now
> trying to work using the new screen and collect some most annoying
> issues.
Khai had linked to an etherpad that wikimedia has been working on to
collect their thoughts on the n
Hey
In this patch:
https://review.openstack.org/83681
by Ghanshyam Mann, we encountered an unusual situation where a timestamp
in the returned XML looked like this:
2014-04-08 09:00:14.399708+00:00
What appeared to be unusual was that the timestamp had both sub-second
time resolution and t
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Pendergrass, Eric
wrote:
> Hi, I pulled devstack yesterday and have been trying to get any test to run
> successfully.
>
>
>
> My process is this:
>
> Install tox >=1.6,<1.7
>
> Install libmysqlclient-dev
>
> Install mongodb-server
>
> Source .tox/py27/bin/activate
Hi, guys:
For two weeks in the row, I have customer meeting at 10am EDT, which conflicts
with our weekly Neutron IPv6 call. I hope this meeting schedule won’t be
permanent…Will try my best to avoid it.
Sorry for the absence. :(
Shixiong
Shixiong Shang
!--- Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish ---!
_
Yup, it sounds like for now the old screen is the only option. I'm now
trying to work using the new screen and collect some most annoying
issues.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> While the infra team I've seen a lot of questions floating on IRC where
> people are finding that
IIRC Thierry said that pods will be available starting from Monday.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>
> ... the $subject says it all.
>
> Wondering about dedicated spaces for a cores meet-up prior
> to the design summit proper kicking off on the Tuesday.
>
> Thanks!
> Eoghan
While the infra team I've seen a lot of questions floating on IRC where
people are finding that things are missing, not usable. They are mostly
related to the "New" change view.
It's worth noting that among the infra team the New change screen is
considered unusable (there is a solid jeblair rant
On 04/29/2014 06:30 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks to all those involved. Any chance of restoring the "Diff side by
> side" button. The new interface may take a while to get used to. In the
> past there was a link to the current branch patches. That too is missing.
> Thanks
> Gary
Use the o
... the $subject says it all.
Wondering about dedicated spaces for a cores meet-up prior
to the design summit proper kicking off on the Tuesday.
Thanks!
Eoghan
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org
Hi,
I think it is a good idea to have the use cases in a different document that
API proposals (Stephen's, included)
Once we declare the uses cases done for Juno, I will move it to the BP
repository.
I would also like to see operator's use cases flushed out in the document.
Stephen, could you p
Hi,
Thanks to all those involved. Any chance of restoring the "Diff side by side"
button. The new interface may take a while to get used to. In the past there
was a link to the current branch patches. That too is missing.
Thanks
Gary
___
OpenStack-dev m
Hi all,
Dima, I think I understand your reasoning but I have some issues with that.
I agree that binary logic is much more straightforward and easy to
understand and use. But following that logic, having the only one hardcoded
consistency level is even easier and more understandable.
As I can see,
@Daniel:
Thanks for your explanation, it helps me a lot.
--
zhangleiqiang (Trump)
Best Regards
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 5:33 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
On 28/04/14 17:41 +, Janczuk, Tomasz wrote:
Hello,
Have any performance numbers been published for Marconi? I have asked this
question before
(http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/031004.html) but
there were none at that time.
Hi Tomasz,
Some folks in the tea
Hi,guys:
There is a nova-specs "add force detach volume to nova"
（https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84048/）that need more review.
It has core review +1 by John. I wish it could be merged before May Day.
Thanks your help a lot!
___
OpenStack-dev mailing
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:17:05AM +, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote:
> Hi, all:
>
> I find Nova has supported volume encryption for LVM volume ([1]).
> Currently , qcow2 also support encryption now, and there is libvirt's
> support too ([2]). After reading up the implementation, qcow2's su
Hi, all:
I find Nova has supported volume encryption for LVM volume ([1]).
Currently , qcow2 also support encryption now, and there is libvirt's support
too ([2]). After reading up the implementation, qcow2's support can be added to
current framework.
Do you think it is meaningf
Hi all,
I have a patch in flight at the moment [0] to install check_mk server and
compliment the already merged installation of check_mk agent [1] so my thoughts
are now turning to how we would recommend adding new service checks.
The concept behind check_mk makes this really simple to do. You
Hi, all:
I find in some of the cinder backend volume drivers, there are codes in
create_volume as follows:
#cinder.volume.drivers.lvm
def _sizestr(self, size_in_g):
if int(size_in_g) == 0:
return '100m'
Similar code
80 matches
Mail list logo
