Great news! Even being non-voting, it already helped me 2-3 times to
spot a subtle error in a patch.
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 18:56 -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> Just a quick heads up to everyone -- the tempest-dsvm-virtual-ironic
> job is now fully voting in both check and gate queues for I
Hi Kenichi and Isaku,
Thanks for bringing this to discussion.
IMHO, NFV ETSI drafts are still evolving and it is good that we should keep
track of these drafts so that NFV and Service VM teams will align to these
drafts for NFV deployments.
Also, NFV ETSI drafts has robust architecture, which
Hi Isaku,
Thank you for your reply.
2014-05-26 13:47 GMT+09:00 Isaku Yamahata :
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:13:57PM +0900,
> "Ogaki, Kenichi" wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
>
> Hi.
>
> > I’m newbie to Openstack, so I want to clarify how OpenStack can implement
> > ETSI NFV Architecture.
> >
> > The conc
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-05-25 23:12:26 +:
> On 23 May 2014 04:57, Gregory Haynes wrote:
> >>
> >> Eventually we may need to scale traffic beyond one HAProxy, at which
> >> point we'll need to bring something altogether more sophisticated in -
> >> lets design that when w
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:40:02AM +0300,
Dmitry wrote:
> Hi Isaku,
> Thank you for the updated link. I'n not sure where from I get the previous
> one, probably from the direct Google search.
> If we're talking about NFV Mano, it's very important to keep NFVO and VNFM
> as a separate services, w
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:13:57PM +0900,
"Ogaki, Kenichi" wrote:
> Hi All,
Hi.
> I’m newbie to Openstack, so I want to clarify how OpenStack can implement
> ETSI NFV Architecture.
>
> The concept of Advanced service looks like Network Service in ETSI NFV
> Architecture as shown in Figure 3 be
I just filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1323152 - TripleO
changes are failing on check-tempest-dsvm-virtual-ironic which has
just been made voting (and I support that) - but we need to get this
fixed asap or make it nonvoting again. I haven't dug deep enough to
know if its rooted in Iro
Great, thanks for working on it. I'll test it out asap.
Cheers,
Kieran
On 23 May 2014 23:18, Brant Knudson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Kieran Spear wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I notice that the templated catalog doesn't support the V3 API*. This
>> is a blocker for us, particula
On 23 May 2014 04:57, Gregory Haynes wrote:
>>
>> Eventually we may need to scale traffic beyond one HAProxy, at which
>> point we'll need to bring something altogether more sophisticated in -
>> lets design that when we need it.
>> Sooner than that we're likely going to need to scale load beyond
On 05/24/2014 01:36 PM, Armando M. wrote:
I appreciate that there is a cost involved in relying on distributed
communication, but this must be negligible considered what needs to
happen end-to-end. If the overhead being referred here is the price to
pay for having a more dependable system (e.g. b
On 05/23/2014 03:31 PM, Robert Kukura wrote:
The core refactoring effort may eventually provide a nice solution, but
we can't wait for this. It seems we'll need to either use
python-neutronclient or get access to the Controller classes in the
meantime.
Using python-neutronclient will be the cle
Hi,
I created a small userscript that allows you to hide CI comments in Gerrit.
That way you can read only comments written by humans and hide everything else.
I’ve been struggling for a long time to follow discussions on changes with many
patch sets because of the CI noise. So I came up with t
- Original Message -
> Hi folks
>
> I believed we should link bug or bp for any commit except automated
> commit by infra.
I think that stuff like refactors should be exempt, if for the simple
truth that often there's no bug involved.
> However, I found also there is no written policy
Hello Mitsuhiro,
I'm sorry, but I remain unconvinced. Is there a customer demand for this
feature?
If you'd like, feel free to add this topic to a Cinder weekly meeting
agenda, and join the meeting so that we can have an interactive discussion.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderMeetings
Thank
14 matches
Mail list logo
