On 07/03/2015 06:32 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Le 02/07/2015 21:40, Jay Pipes a écrit :
On 07/01/2015 12:23 AM, ChangBo Guo wrote:
thanks Dan and Jay, we don't need add new scheduler for that :-),
what about provide cpu frequency to api /os-hypervisors, that means
we can
report this value
Hi Thierry,
Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed to
ask for.
Rectifying:
On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would
like to ask for a *Spec Freeze Exception* in Liberty for it.
Thanks,
Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz
Thierry Carrez
Hello!
I just found the following commit in the cinder log:
commit a3f4eed52efce50c2eb1176725bc578272949d7b
Merge: 6939b4a e896ae2
Author: Jenkins jenk...@review.openstack.org
Date: Thu Jul 2 23:14:39 2015 +
Merge Revert First version of Cinder driver for Quobyte
Is this part of some
On 2015-07-03 13:09:08 +0100 (+0100), Neil Jerram wrote:
Would you mind checking whether there were still any such errors for my
domain, for the second half of yesterday (2nd July) UK time? My admins here
think they've fixed something, but I think I'm still missing some Gerrit
notification
On 2015-07-03 10:31 AM, Silvan Kaiser wrote:
Hello!
I just found the following commit in the cinder log:
commit a3f4eed52efce50c2eb1176725bc578272949d7b
Merge: 6939b4a e896ae2
Author: Jenkins jenk...@review.openstack.org
mailto:jenk...@review.openstack.org
Date: Thu Jul 2 23:14:39 2015
On 2015-07-03 10:07:05 +0100 (+0100), Chris Dent wrote:
The Ceilometer virtual mid-cycle will be held next week, the 9th and
10th of July.
[...]
Annoying but friendly reminder to please add it at
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints when you get a
moment!
--
Jeremy Stanley
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 03:55:37PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 02:45:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 03:02:54PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
Hi all,
We have an issue with the driver libvirt-xen. When a guest is started by
Nova,
I want to implement this task
3 июля 2015 г. 15:00 пользователь Sergey Kraynev skray...@mirantis.com
написал:
Thank everyone for the good feedback.
If summarize all suggestions:
- I will continue add show as raw output (similar on clients show command
output)
- Also we decided to implement
On 07/02/2015 07:23 PM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org
mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-07-02 16:02:32 +0200 (+0200), Alan Pevec wrote:
After having a closer look, I see that image has requests 2.7
installed
On Fri, 3 Jul 2015, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-07-03 10:07:05 +0100 (+0100), Chris Dent wrote:
The Ceilometer virtual mid-cycle will be held next week, the 9th and
10th of July.
[...]
Annoying but friendly reminder to please add it at
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints when
Hello again!
Ok, now i did find the review [1], sorry i did not earlier.
We will solve the CI issues asap in order to provide the requirements to
recommit the Quobyte driver.
We've been trying to solve the CIs networking issue i wrote about since
then but were unable to nail it down completely as
Kolla Devs as well as the Technical Committee,
I wanted to get the TC’s thoughts on this plan of action as we intend to apply
for big tent once our Ansible code has completed implementation. If the
approach outlined in this email seems like a blocker and we should just start
with #4 instead,
On 2015-07-03 14:54:28 +0100 (+0100), Chris Dent wrote:
Does a virtual mid-cycle count? This one is not quite a sprint. It's a
bunch of meetings, held on google hangouts (falling back to other things
if it is junk), schedule over a two day period with a strict agenda
(forthcoming).
[...]
It was discussed on the mailing list, and at the weekly meeting. Mike had
had no response on the issue from the listed contact email, and the CI was
reporting failure for every patch for two months
On 3 Jul 2015 17:33, Silvan Kaiser sil...@quobyte.com wrote:
Hello!
I just found the following
On 03/07/2015 09:39, Gorka Eguileor gegui...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 07:09:41PM +, Kelsey, Timothy John wrote:
Hello Stackers,
A few intrepid projects have started adopting Bandit, an automatic
security linter built by the security project, into their gate tests.
This is
The recent change to global-requirements is excluding both 2.0 and 2.1
version of Routes. That is forcing us to use Routes 1.13. However,
Routes 1.13 cannot pass py34 tests due to errors like this:
Hi Oslo and Neutron folks,
Why is policy_dirs option deprecated in oslo.policy?
In Neutron we have multiple repositories which consist of Neutron services
and we would like to maintain policy.json separately.
policy_dirs option looks useful for this purpose.
== Detail ==
Neutron project now
Yes. Use environment markers to specify= 2 for portion 2.7 and uncapped
for 3.4.
On 4 Jul 2015 2:19 pm, Qiming Teng teng...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
The recent change to global-requirements is excluding both 2.0 and 2.1
version of Routes. That is forcing us to use Routes 1.13. However,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015, at 04:16 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
Hello,
The Infra team will be taking etherpad.openstack.org offline this Friday
(July 3rd) at 1900UTC to upgrade the database instance that backs this
service. This upgrade will allow us to convert the utf8 character set in
the db to
Please note a correction, the dinner is the night of July 28th at 7pm, not July
27th.
My apologies.
Regards
-steve
From: Steven Dake std...@cisco.commailto:std...@cisco.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
In the Liberty cycle Neutron is mandating the splitting out of third-party
plugins and drivers into separate repositories, see [1]. These external
repositories will be managed by the maintainers of the code, who are
independent from the neutron core maintainers.
The question now arises about what
Please consider forwarding this to the legal list. The gpl is a bit c specific
and can be tricky to apply to other languages, but I would expect the modules
under gplv3 to require all others in process to be gpl compatable, which apache
should be, but will prevent any nonopen to be used. That
On 2015-07-03 22:01:38 +0200 (+0200), Henry Gessau wrote:
[...]
The question now arises about what to do when a security issue is
found in such an external repository that integrates with Neutron.
- How should such security issues be managed?
The OpenStack Vulnerability Management Team
Thanks Mathew for providing the updated information :)
Thanks and Regards,
Asha Seshagiri
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:30:55PM -0500, Douglas Mendiz?bal wrote:
Hi Asha,
The blueprint you linked for Tempest is
From: Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.govmailto:kevin@pnnl.gov
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 at 12:28 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
On 03 Jul 2015, at 12:14, Lingxian Kong anlin.k...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you think if we add a script(may be under tools or cmd package) to
help doing this?
What script do you mean? To launch a separate clean-up component.
I see that, first of all, it’s a subsystem of Mistral
samuel wrote:
[...]
On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would
like to ask for a Feature Freeze Exception in Liberty for it.
Liberty Feature Freeze is on September 3rd, so I doubt you need a
feature freeze exception at this time. I suspect that would be a spec
Hi Glance team,
The question is from a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1462315,
If an image-member is deleted, then create it again with the same
parameters, glance searches db to see if there is already an existing one,
but the result doesn't include the record which was marked as
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 07:09:41PM +, Kelsey, Timothy John wrote:
Hello Stackers,
A few intrepid projects have started adopting Bandit, an automatic security
linter built by the security project, into their gate tests. This is very
rewarding to see for those of us who have worked on the
Hi,
We have weekly Nova API meeting this week. The meeting is being held
tomorrow Friday UTC1200.
In other timezones the meeting is at:
EST 08:00 (Fri)
Japan 21:00 (Fri)
China 20:00 (Fri)
United Kingdom 13:00 (Fri)
The proposed agenda and meeting details are here:
What do you think if we add a script(may be under tools or cmd package) to
help doing this?
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:59 PM, ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe)
moshe.eli...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote:
Thanks, Renat.
I also believe the right place to do it is in Mistral.
I will create a blueprint and we
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Henry Gessau ges...@cisco.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015, Fawad Khaliq fa...@plumgrid.com wrote:
After Neutron core and vendor code decomposition [1], it was decided to
keep db migration scripts in Neutron repo. I was wondering if any of the
networking-*
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
Ceilometer contributors and other interested parties,
To keep people in the loop:
The Ceilometer virtual mid-cycle will be held next week, the 9th and
10th of July. The schedule is being worked out.
The topics that will be covered include:
* Getting
On 3 July 2015 at 21:01, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
I want to give an update on
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-specs/specs/requirements-management.html
- we've just passed a critical milestone there, and this affects how
everyone updates
On 3 July 2015 at 10:17, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 3 July 2015 at 21:01, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
SNIP
- Does that (or should that) also affect stable/kilo and stable/juno ?
(there is no upper-constraints there)
No, and since the disruption of a new
Robert Collins wrote:
I want to give an update on
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-specs/specs/requirements-management.html
- we've just passed a critical milestone there, and this affects how
everyone updates requirements.
As of a few minutes ago devstack-gate landed the
Robert Collins wrote:
On 3 July 2015 at 21:01, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
[...]
- Does that (or should that) also affect stable/kilo and stable/juno ?
(there is no upper-constraints there)
No, and since the disruption of a new pbr and associated minimum
versions throughout
OK, Renat, I see, thanks for clarification. Let's discuss it together
after the blueprint is proposed.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.com
wrote:
On 03 Jul 2015, at 12:14, Lingxian Kong anlin.k...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you think if we add a script(may be
Hi all,
I have updated puppet manifests for all OpenStack components to fix the
logic of configuration of rabbit_ha_queues parameter [1] but Nova puppet
unit tests failed because these tests expect that we will use
rabbit_ha_queues=True for one-controller-node installations [2], [3].
Do we have
All,
As part of the install-from-source blueprint, I'm proposing a basic
script that can fetch tarballs in various ways, the result of which is
installed as part of the image build. This script is for review here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197919/
This requires a couple of variables,
Boris,
thanks for an explanation! I will take a closer look at the cover.sh script.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Boris Pavlovic bpavlo...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Anastasia,
because new patch may not be just a new code, committer may delete
something or fix typos in docsting, etc.
This
On 3 July 2015 at 21:25, Dave Walker em...@daviey.com wrote:
On 3 July 2015 at 10:17, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 3 July 2015 at 21:01, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
SNIP
- Does that (or should that) also affect stable/kilo and stable/juno ?
(there is no
Le 02/07/2015 21:40, Jay Pipes a écrit :
On 07/01/2015 12:23 AM, ChangBo Guo wrote:
thanks Dan and Jay, we don't need add new scheduler for that :-),
what about provide cpu frequency to api /os-hypervisors, that means
we can
report this value automatically, the value can be used in high
First of all, Thanks Flavio for bring this open to the daylight!
I have been really frustrated about the Glance spec process since the beginning
and as glance core tried to work around the limitations the best I can. I'm not
sure if the process is similar way broken on the other projects, but I
Thank everyone for the good feedback.
If summarize all suggestions:
- I will continue add show as raw output (similar on clients show command
output)
- Also we decided to implement additional functional for get_attr
function, when it get only resource name and returns map with all
attributes
Hi Jeremy,
On 30/06/15 17:45, Neil Jerram wrote:
On 30/06/15 16:14, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-06-30 14:08:45 +0100 (+0100), Neil Jerram wrote:
[...]
I keep going back to Gerrit jobs that I've reviewed or commented
on, and finding that there have been other comments since mine,
but that
46 matches
Mail list logo
