Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][dvr]What does table 9 used for inbr-tun?

Thanks for your help. I still have a question about flows in br-int. In Muller's blog, he says "the source MAC is replaced from the remote machine’s host MAC to that VM’s gateway MAC." But in my local environment, the flows is " table=1, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=10144, priority=4,d

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-stable-maint][stable/liberty][trove] stable/liberty changes in Trove that are ready for merge

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:15:23PM +, Amrith Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for the blast mail, this is targeted at the stable-maint team. The > following five changes are now ready to merge. Two of them are changes > proposed by the bot and three of them are clearly identified as cherry-picks >

Re: [openstack-dev] Sahara Job Binaries Storage

Hi Jerico, Internal db storage for job binaries was added at the start of EDP as an alternative for sites that do not have swift running. Since then, we've also added integration with manila so that job binaries can be stored in manila shares. You are correct, storing lots of binaries in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Nailgun] Random failures in unit tests

Igor, We have UI and CLI integration tests which use fake mode of Nailgun, and we can't avoid using fake threads for them. So I think we need to think how to fix fake threads instead. There is a critical bug which is the main reason of randomly failin

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Let's do presentations/sessions on Mitaka's new complex features in Design Summit

I can do a presentation on microversions. Scott D'Angelo (scottda) -- Original Message -- >From : Gorka Eguileor Subject : [openstack-dev] [cinder] Let's do presentations/sessions on Mitaka's new complex features in Design Summit Hi, As you all probably know, during this cycle we ha

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] How do we move forward with xstatic releases?

On 13 March 2016 at 07:11, Matthias Runge wrote: > On 10/03/16 11:48, Beth Elwell wrote: > > If we will anyway have potential breakage I don’t understand why the > > better solution here would not be to just use the bower and npm tools > > which are standardised for JavaScript and would move Hori

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] COE drivers spec

Hi Kai, Does Magnum already have drivers for networks and volumes, or are you suggesting this is what needs to be handled by a new COE driver structure? I think having a directory per COE is a good idea, if the driver handles multiple responsibilities. So far we haven't really identified what

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

I do think negative tests should live on, most likely in their own tempest-plugin based repository. However, I'm not sure that I agree with the reason being because they are functional tests rather than integration. If you look at the current tests, one could argue that many non-Nova tests are

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Newton Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

On 2016-03-16 10:37:36 -0400 (-0400), Emilien Macchi wrote: [...] > If PuppetOpenStack and Infra could avoid overlaps, that would be > awesome. Some people are working on both groups and to continue the > best of our collaboration I would like to set this constraint. We'll do our best! We (Infra)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][ptls] tagging reviews, making tags searchable

John, thanks, this is great info. (more comments inline below). -amrith > -Original Message- > From: John Dickinson [mailto:m...@not.mn] > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 11:16 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][ptls] tagging reviews, mak

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Mitaka RC1 available

Hello everyone, Glance is the first milestone-based project to produce a release candidate for the end of the Mitaka cycle! You can find the RC1 source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/glance/glance-12.0.0.0rc1.tar.gz Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a rel

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Newton Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

On 03/16/2016 03:37 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > If PuppetOpenStack and Infra could avoid overlaps, that would be > awesome. Some people are working on both groups and to continue the > best of our collaboration I would like to set this constraint. > > Thanks a lot, Same for packaging + infra. Las

Re: [openstack-dev] [cross-project] [all] Quotas -- service vs. library

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 07:10:35AM -0400, Attila Fazekas wrote: > > NO : For any kind of extra quota service. > > In other places I saw other reasons for a quota service or similar, > the actual cost of this approach is higher than most people would think so > NO. > I have to agree, there is

[openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] PTL candidacy

Hi everyone, I'm announcing my candidacy for PTL of the CloudKitty team during the Newton cycle. Some of the features and improvements of the project I envisioned are not yet ready and contributed and there is more to come. But due to lack of contributor's time we'll need more time to make t

[openstack-dev] [release][documentation] openstackdocstheme 1.3.0 release

We are jubilant to announce the release of: openstackdocstheme 1.3.0: OpenStack Docs Theme With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstackdocstheme Please report issues through launchpad: http://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals For more details, please

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Newton Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:37:36AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > If PuppetOpenStack and Infra could avoid overlaps, that would be > awesome. Some people are working on both groups and to continue the > best of our collaboration I would like to set this constraint. Please count Fuel in for this re

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] High Availability

Thanks Adrian, I think the Keystone approach will work. For others, please speak up if it doesn’t work for you. Best regards, Hongbin From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: March-17-16 9:28 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [ope

[openstack-dev] [Packaging-Rpm] PTL Candidacy

I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL in Packaging-Rpm I’m working on creating, building, polishing and maintaining Linux packages for OpenStack projects with various dependencies for few years since IceHouse launch. It allowed me to accumulate deep knowledge base about core OpenStack fun

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][FFE] FF exception request for Numa and CPU pinning

FFE extension granted until March 18 for: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285282/ On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:48:31PM +0300, Dmitry Klenov wrote: > Folks, > > Majority of the commits for Numa and CPU pinning feature are merged in time > [0]. > > One commit for validation is still to be merged [1

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] working on bug reports; what blocks you?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 03:28:48PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 3/17/2016 11:41 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > >What are the various reasons which block you to work on bug reports? > >This question goes especially to the new contributors but also to the > >rest of us. For me, personally, it's tha

Re: [openstack-dev] lvm2 and docker issue

Hi Steven, As per your suggestion I changed kolla_docker to include -ipc=host and it has fixed lvm issue for kola build containers. Thank you Serguei [http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/assets/email-signature-tool/logo_07.png?ct=1423747865775] Serguei Bezverkhi, TECHNICAL LEADER.SERVICES Global SP Se

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

On 03/17/2016 06:04 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote: Here is the non comprehensive list of usages based on what trees I happen to have checked out (which is quite a few, but not all of OpenStack for sure). I think before deciding to take over ownership of an upstream lib (which is a large commitment over

Re: [openstack-dev] [packstack] Update packstack core list

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: > 2016-03-16 11:23 GMT+01:00 Lukas Bezdicka : >>> ... >>> - Martin Mágr >>> - Iván Chavero >>> - Javier Peña >>> - Alan Pevec >>> >>> I have a doubt about Lukas, he's contributed an awful lot to >>> Packstack, just not over the last 90 days. Lukas

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Paul Belanger wrote: So, I cannot comment on the how useful the bot is but if projects are in fact using it I would like to see it added to openstack-infra so we can properly manage it. I was waiting to see if there's sufficient interest. The channels that it is already in

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] High Availability

Hongbin, On Mar 17, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Hongbin Lu mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: Adrian, I think we need a boarder set of inputs in this matter, so I moved the discussion from whiteboard back to here. Please check my replies inline. I would like to get a clear problem statement written

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [puppet] move puppet-pacemaker

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk wrote: > Guys, > > Fuel has own implementation of pacemaker [1]. It's functionality may be > useful in other projects. > > [1] https://github.com/fuel-infra/puppet-pacemaker I'm afraid to see 3 duplicated efforts to deploy Pacemaker: * puppetlab

[openstack-dev] [Solum] PTL candidacy

Hi, I would like to submit my candidacy to continue as PTL of Solum for the Newton cycle. In Mitaka we accomplished several things including, - completion of app and workflow API model - ability to scale application instances - ability to deploy pre-built application containers - made Solum's de

[openstack-dev] [glance] PTL candidacy

Hi everyone, I'd like to be considered for Glance PTL. First: thanks (again) to Flavio for his leadership over the last cycle. Glance is in pretty good shape right now: we have a coherent team which is focussed on a well defined set of priorities. It's a relatively small team, but we're fortuna

[openstack-dev] [nova] centralize-config-options-newton bp is open

For those working on the centralize-config-options blueprint in mitaka, there is a new blueprint for newton to track your work: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/centralize-config-options-newton Please use that for new changes and when rebasing existing changes. -- Thanks, Matt Rie

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Newton Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi PTLs, > > Here is the proposed slot allocation for project teams at the Newton Design > Summit in Austin. This is based on the requests the mitaka PTLs have made, > space availability and project activity & collaboration needs. > > | fb:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Let's do presentations/sessions on Mitaka's new complex features in Design Summit

On 16/03, D'Angelo, Scott wrote: > I can do a presentation on microversions. > "I love it when a plan comes together". This one had your name written all over it. ;-) > > > Scott D'Angelo (scottda) > > -- Original Message -- > From : Gorka Eguileor > Subject : [openstack-dev] [cinder

[openstack-dev] [zaqar-ui][zaqar] Nominating Thai Tran for zaqar-ui core

Hi team, I would like to propose adding Thai Tran(tqtran) for the Zaqar UI core team. Thai has done amazing work since the beginning of Zaqar UI project. He is currently the most active contributor on Zaqar UI projects for the last 90 days[1]. If no one objects, I'll proceed and add him in a week

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] High Availability

Douglas, I am not opposed to adopt Barbican in Magnum (In fact, we already adopted Barbican). What I am opposed to is a Barbican lock-in, which already has a negative impact on Magnum adoption based on our feedback. I also want to see an increase of Barbican adoption in the future, and all our

Re: [openstack-dev] How do I calculate the semantic version prior to a release?

2016-02-29 9:32 GMT+01:00 Thomas Bechtold : >> >> python setup.py rpm_version >> > >> > The output for i.e. for Manila is here "1...b3.dev138" And in Tempest rpm_version outputs 4.0.0.dev22 while setup.py --version says 10.0.1.dev79 ?! >> > Which is not really correct. The version is "2

[openstack-dev] [release][release] reno 1.6.1 release

We are pleased to announce the release of: reno 1.6.1: RElease NOtes manager With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/reno Please report issues through launchpad: http://bugs.launchpad.net/reno For more details, please see below. Changes in reno 1.6.0..1.6.1

[openstack-dev] [Tempest] [Devstack] Where to keep tempest configuration?

Hello Community, We started using tempest/devstack plugins. They allows to do not bother other teams when Project specific changes need to be done. Tempest configuration is still performed at devstack [0]. So I would like to rise the following questions: - Where we should keep Projects specif

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] purplerbot irc bot for logs and transclusion

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:50:38PM +, Chris Dent wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Paul Belanger wrote: > > >So, I cannot comment on the how useful the bot is but if projects are in fact > >using it I would like to see it added to openstack-infra so we can properly > >manage it. > > I was waiting

Re: [openstack-dev] [HA][RabbitMQ][messaging][Pacemaker][operators] Improved OCF resource agent for dynamic active-active mirrored clustering

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > Hello! > A quick status update inline: > [snip] > So, what's next? > > - I'm open for merging both [5], [6] of the existing OCF RA solutions, > as it was proposed by Andrew Beekhof. Let's make it happen. > Great :-) Oyvind (CC'd) is th

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

Main reason to split negative tests out, that I see, is attempt to remove "corner, not integrational" tests out of Tempest tree. If so, then "negative" tests is not proper choice, I think. Tempest has lots of positive "corner" test cases. So, if move something, then we need to move exactly "corner"

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Let's do presentations/sessions on Mitaka's new complex features in Design Summit

If people are interested I could do some small presentation on genconfig. All the Best, Kendall J. Nelson Software Engineer & OpenStack Contributor

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] PTL non-candidacy

Absolutely +1, elmiko. It's going to seem weird having a new PTL :) On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 3:27 PM, michael mccune wrote: > i know you are not leaving the project Sergey, but i just wanted to say > that it's been a true pleasure working with you as the PTL. > > regards, > mike > > > On 03/15/2

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][ptls] tagging reviews, making tags searchable

On 18 Mar 2016, at 7:15, Amrith Kumar wrote: > As we were working through reviews for the Mitaka release, the Trove team was > trying to track groups of reviews that were needed for a specific milestone, > like m-1, or m-3 or in the recent days for rc1. > > The only way we could find was to ha

[openstack-dev] [Trove] Mitaka RC1 available

And.. we now have Trove ready and producing a release candidate for the end of the Mitaka cycle! You can find the RC1 source code tarball at: https://tarballs.openstack.org/trove/trove-5.0.0.0rc1.tar.gz Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this RC1

[openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

Hi I have one proposal[1] related to negative tests in Tempest, and hoping opinions before doing that. Now Tempest contains negative tests and sometimes patches are being posted for adding more negative tests, but I'd like to propose removing them from Tempest instead. Negative tests verify surf

[openstack-dev] [neutron][dvr]What does table 9 used for in br-tun?

hi guys. In DVR mode, I have some questions about flows of table 9 in br-tun. I see these flows in br-tun: cookie=0x9a5f42115762fc76, duration=392186.503s, table=9, n_packets=1, n_bytes=90, idle_age=247, hard_age=65534, priority=1,dl_src=fa:16:3f:64:82:2f actions=output:1 cookie=0x9a5f42

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] revert new gerrit

On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 20:58 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Yes, we had a session on it several summits ago, a group of > contributors said they were going to work on developing it, pushed > up a skeleton repo, and then we never heard back from them after > that. Unfortunate. Yeah, unfortunately, w

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder to move implemented nova specs from mitaka

Matt Riedemann wrote on 03/18/2016 03:20:23 PM: > From: Matt Riedemann > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Date: 03/18/2016 03:22 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder to move implemented nova > specs from mitaka > > > > On 3/18/2016 5:46 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > > Matt

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] revert new gerrit

Hi everybody, What about if we just create new project for alternative Gerrit WebUI and use it? I don't think that with current set of web frameworks it would be too hard. Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016, at 10:31 A

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/trove failed

I just ran stable/liberty through these tests on a sandbox and they passed. I'm not sure what caused this failure but if it persists, I'll take another look. Some changes are coming soon on master and I'll backport them to mitaka and liberty. They'll make debugging these tests a whole lot easier

Re: [openstack-dev] [zaqar-ui][zaqar] Nominating Thai Tran for zaqar-ui core

On 18/03/16 08:49 -0400, Ryan Brown wrote: On 03/18/2016 06:24 AM, Fei Long Wang wrote: Hi team, I would like to propose adding Thai Tran(tqtran) for the Zaqar UI core team. Thai has done amazing work since the beginning of Zaqar UI project. He is currently the most active contributor on Zaqar

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Newton Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

It would be great if at least one Fuel slot did not overlap with Ironic sessions. Vladimir Kozhukalov On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-03-18 08:53:11 +0530 (+0530), Armando M. wrote: > > It's be nice if Neutron didn't overlap as much with Nova, Ironic, QA and > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [puppet] move puppet-pacemaker

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Dmitry Ilyin wrote: > Hello. > > I'm the author of fuel-infra/puppet-pacemaker and I guess I would be able to > merge the code from "fuel-infra/puppet-pacemaker" to > "openstack/puppet-pacemaker" > We will be having a single set of pcmk_* types and two providers f

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] High Availability

OK. If using Keystone is not acceptable, I am going to propose a new approach: · Store data in Magnum DB · Encrypt data before writing it to DB · Decrypt data after loading it from DB · Have the encryption/decryption key stored in config file · Use encry

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] PTL non-candidacy

i know you are not leaving the project Sergey, but i just wanted to say that it's been a true pleasure working with you as the PTL. regards, mike On 03/15/2016 07:33 PM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: Hi folks, the PTL self-nomination period is opened and I want to note that I won’t be running again

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] High Availability

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 11:41 AM, Ricardo Rocha wrote: > > Hi. > > We're on the way, the API is using haproxy load balancing in the same > way all openstack services do here - this part seems to work fine I expected the API to work. Thanks for the confirmation. > > For the conductor we're sto

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: [Heat] Nomination Oleksii Chuprykov to Heat core reviewer

Thank you all! I would do my best as Heat core. On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Sergey Kraynev wrote: > Looks like it was unanimously decision :) > Oleksii, my congratulations ! > Good work. I will add you to necessary groups ;) > > On 17 March 2016 at 04:34, Huangtianhua wrote: > > +1 ：） > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [jacket] Introduction to jacket, a new project

Hi Kevin, I am interesting in Jacket too, so I would like to contribute once the work starts. Thanks, Phuong. From: Janki Chhatbar [mailto:jankihchhat...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 8:21 PM To: zs Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [jacket] Introduction to jacket, a new project Hi Kev

[openstack-dev] [kolla][security][tc] Next steps for Kolla vulnerability:managed tag

The Technical Committee, Please see this review which offers threat analysis as an option for the vulnerability:managed tag: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/294212/ Kolla coresec team: In this IRC meeting on Security, I requested an audit, and the security team came back with a threat analysi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Mitaka RC1 available

On 16 March 2016 at 18:17, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Nova is next to produce a release candidate for the end of the Mitaka cycle! > Congratulations to all the Nova devs. You can find the RC1 source code > tarball at: > > https://tarballs.openstack.org/nova/nova-13.0.0.0rc1.tar.gz

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder to move implemented nova specs from mitaka

On 3/18/2016 5:46 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: Matt Riedemann wrote on 03/16/2016 09:49:06 PM: From: Matt Riedemann To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: 03/16/2016 09:50 PM Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder to move implemented nova specs from mitaka

Re: [openstack-dev] [HA][RabbitMQ][messaging][Pacemaker][operators] Improved OCF resource agent for dynamic active-active mirrored clustering

On 03/17/2016 12:17 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya > wrote: > > Hello! > A quick status update inline: > > > [snip] > > > So, what's next? > > - I'm open for merging both [5], [6] of the exist

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Upgrading from Kilo to Liberty, missing database entries

On Mar 17, 2016, at 12:17 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > Yeah. To trigger the bug, you don’t need to upgrade. Just create a > network/port without the extension enabled; then enable the extension; then > try to start an instance using the network/port. Thanks I appreciate the clarification. T

Re: [openstack-dev] Sahara Job Binaries Storage

Hi Trevor, Thanks for the explanation, looking forward to that on/off option and/or internal db deprecation. Regards, Jerico > On 18 Mar 2016, at 12:55 AM, Trevor McKay wrote: > > Hi Jerico, > > Internal db storage for job binaries was added at > the start of EDP as an alternative for si

Re: [openstack-dev] [cross-project] [all] Quotas -- service vs. library

On 03/16/2016 05:42 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 03/16/2016 08:27 AM, Amrith Kumar wrote: Nikhil, thank you for the very timely posting. This is a topic that has been discussed quite a bit recently within the Trove team. I've read the document you reference as [1] and I have not been part of earlier

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] revert new gerrit

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016, Andrew Laski wrote: I spent a little bit of time investigating the possibility of a chrome extension to turn off the keyboard shortcuts and search mechanism a little while ago. I eventually gave up but what I learned is that those changes are apparently related to the inline

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][ptls] tagging reviews, making tags searchable

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:16:00AM -0700, John Dickinson wrote: > 3) A dashboard generated from gerrit and git data. > http://not.mn/swift/swift_community_dashboard.html The "Community Starred > Patches" is a list of the top 20 commonly starred patches by the Swift > community. Basically, for

[openstack-dev] [neutron] report from Brno code sprint, Mar 14-16

Hi all, Just giving my fellows an update from the event where we gathered our upgrades subteam to plan for Newton and do some coding. == We had folks from multiple companies participating in the event (Red Hat, SuSE, Intel, IBM). We also had some folks joining us online. Thanks everyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel-web/docs to fuel-docs migration

Hi, everyone, we've merged migration changes. Please send all new documentation patches to openstack/fuel-docs repository. Development documentation is available there in devdocs/ subfolder. On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Hi, everyone, > > this week we plan to mig

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] revert new gerrit

On 03/18/2016 06:03 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: > On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 20:58 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> Yes, we had a session on it several summits ago, a group of >> contributors said they were going to work on developing it, pushed >> up a skeleton repo, and then we never heard back from t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Neutron] Mitaka RC1 available

On 03/17/2016 09:13 PM, Armando M. wrote: On 18 March 2016 at 00:16, Jeremy Stanley mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org>> wrote: On 2016-03-17 09:44:59 +0530 (+0530), Armando M. wrote: > Unfortunately, Neutron is also going to need an RC2 due to > upstream CI issues triggered by infra change

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/trove failed

Hi Amrith, Thanks for keeping an eye on the periodic jobs :) On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:01:10PM +, Amrith Kumar wrote: > I just ran stable/liberty through these tests on a sandbox and they passed. > I'm not sure what caused this failure but if it persists, I'll take another > look. Good

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][ptls] tagging reviews, making tags searchable

Jim, Maybe we could collaborate and build something that'd work for multiple projects? Happy to help with this. It is clearly a problem that some projects seem to be facing and there aren't any good solutions there. Thanks, -amrith > -Original Message- > From: Jim Rollenhagen [mailto:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] revert new gerrit

On 18 March 2016 at 16:21, Andrey Kurilin wrote: > > If you haven't tried gertty yet, I highly recommend it. > > I have an opened tab with it and I should try it, but I wonder why we need > gerrit if it a bad thing for a lot of contributors? Is there an alternative > for it? > Btw, I'm ready to h