[openstack-dev] Proposal: The OpenStack Client Library Guide

2018-04-05 Thread Adrian Turjak
Hello fellow OpenStackers, As some of you have probably heard me rant, I've been thinking about how to better solve the problem with various tools that support OpenStack or are meant to be OpenStack clients/tools which don't always work as expected by those of us directly in the community.

[openstack-dev] [cyborg] Promote Li Liu as new core reviewer

2018-04-05 Thread Zhipeng Huang
Hi Team, This is an email for my nomination of adding Li Liu to the core reviewer team. Li Liu has been instrumental in the resource provider data model implementation for Cyborg during Queens release, as well as metadata standardization and programming design for Rocky. His overall stats [0]

[openstack-dev] [api] Adding a SDK to developer.openstack.org pages

2018-04-05 Thread Gilles Dubreuil
Hi, I'd like to update the developer.openstack.org to add details about a new SDK. What would be the corresponding repo? My searches landed me into https://docs.openstack.org/doc-contrib-guide/ which is about updating the docs.openstack.org but not developer.openstack.org. Is the developer

Re: [openstack-dev] [bifrost][helm][OSA][barbican] Switching from fedora-26 to fedora-27

2018-04-05 Thread Paul Belanger
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 11:27:34AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:54:26AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:45:13PM -0500, Paul Belanger wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > A quick search of git shows your projects are using fedora-26 nodes for

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][requirements] Pip 10 is on the way

2018-04-05 Thread Paul Belanger
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:27:13PM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, at 9:13 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, at 8:06 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > > > On 18-03-31 15:00:27, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > > According to a notice[1] posted to the pypa-announce and > > > >

[openstack-dev] zun-api error

2018-04-05 Thread Murali B
Hi Hongbin, Thank you for your help As per the our discussion here is the output for my current api on pike. I am not sure which version of zun client client I should use for pike root@cluster3-2:~/python-zunclient# zun service-list ERROR: Not Acceptable (HTTP 406) (Request-ID:

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Stein" release

2018-04-05 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/5/2018 3:32 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: If you don't absolutely need new features from libvirt 3.2.0 and 3.0.0 is fine, please choose 3.0.0 as minimum. If you don't absolutely need new features from qemu 2.9.0 and 2.8.0 is fine, please choose 2.8.0 as minimum. If you don't absolutely need

[openstack-dev] [nova] heads up, tox -e[pep|fast]8 defaulting to python3

2018-04-05 Thread melanie witt
Howdy everyone, We recently updated the tox pep8 and fast8 environments to default to using python3 [0] because it has stricter checks and we wanted to make sure we don't let pep8 errors get through the CI gate [1]. Because of this, you'll need the python3 and python3-dev packages in your

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][requirements] Pip 10 is on the way

2018-04-05 Thread Clark Boylan
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > The other major issue we've run into is that nova file injection (which > is tested by tempest) seems to require either libguestfs or nbd. > libguestfs bindings for python aren't available on pypi and instead we > get them from system

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][requirements] Pip 10 is on the way

2018-04-05 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Thursday, 5 April 2018 22:44:32 CEST Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-04-05 13:27:13 -0700 (-0700), Clark Boylan wrote: > [...] > > > I'm not sure what the best option is here but if we can show that > > system site packages with virtualenvs is viable with pip10 and > > people want to move

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][requirements] Pip 10 is on the way

2018-04-05 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2018-04-05 13:27:13 -0700 (-0700), Clark Boylan wrote: [...] > I'm not sure what the best option is here but if we can show that > system site packages with virtualenvs is viable with pip10 and > people want to move forward with devstack using a global > virtualenv we can work to clean up this

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [tripleo] On moving start scripts out of Kolla images

2018-04-05 Thread Michał Jastrzębski
So I'll re-iterate comment which I made in BCN. In previous thread we praised how Kolla provided stable API for images, and I agree that it was great design choice (to provide stable API, not necessarily how API looks), and this change would break it. So *if* we decide to do it, we need to follow

Re: [openstack-dev] Following the new PTI for document build, broken local builds

2018-04-05 Thread Zane Bitter
On 21/03/18 06:49, Stephen Finucane wrote: As noted by Monty in a prior openstack-dev post [2], some projects rely on a pbr extension to the 'build_sphinx' setuptools command which can automatically run the 'sphinx-apidoc' tool before building docs. This is enabled by configuring some settings

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Stein" release

2018-04-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 04/04/2018 10:45 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > Answering my own questions about Debian -- > > From looking at the Debian Archive[1][2], these are the versions for > 'Stretch' (the current stable release) and in the upcoming 'Buster' > release: > > libvirt | 3.0.0-4+deb9u2 |

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][requirements] Pip 10 is on the way

2018-04-05 Thread Clark Boylan
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, at 9:13 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, at 8:06 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > > On 18-03-31 15:00:27, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > According to a notice[1] posted to the pypa-announce and > > > distutils-sig mailing lists, pip 10.0.0.b1 is on PyPI now and 10.0.0 > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [tripleo] On moving start scripts out of Kolla images

2018-04-05 Thread Martin André
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Paul Bourke wrote: > Hi all, > > This mail is to serve as a follow on to the discussion during yesterday's > team meeting[4], which was regarding the desire to move start scripts out of > the kolla images [0]. There's a few factors at play,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements] uncapping eventlet

2018-04-05 Thread Matthew Thode
On 18-04-05 20:11:04, Graham Hayes wrote: > On 05/04/18 16:47, Matthew Thode wrote: > > eventlet-0.22.1 has been out for a while now, we should try and use it. > > Going to be fun times. > > > > I have a review projects can depend upon if they wish to test. > > https://review.openstack.org/533021

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements] uncapping eventlet

2018-04-05 Thread Graham Hayes
On 05/04/18 16:47, Matthew Thode wrote: > eventlet-0.22.1 has been out for a while now, we should try and use it. > Going to be fun times. > > I have a review projects can depend upon if they wish to test. > https://review.openstack.org/533021 It looks like we may have an issue with oslo.service

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] use of tags in launchpad bugs

2018-04-05 Thread Alex Schultz
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > FYI... > > This is news to me so thanks to Emilien for pointing it out [1]. > There are official tags for tripleo launchpad bugs. Personally, I like what > I've seen recently with some extra tags as they could be

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] use of tags in launchpad bugs

2018-04-05 Thread Wesley Hayutin
FYI... This is news to me so thanks to Emilien for pointing it out [1]. There are official tags for tripleo launchpad bugs. Personally, I like what I've seen recently with some extra tags as they could be helpful in finding the history of particular issues. So hypothetically would it be "wrong"

[openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-sig/news

2018-04-05 Thread Michael McCune
Greetings OpenStack community, Today's meeting was quite lively with a good discussion about versions and microversions across OpenStack and their usage within the API schema world. We began with a review of outstanding work: elmiko is continuing to work on an update to the microversion history

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Bug Day April 12th poll (was originally April 6th)

2018-04-05 Thread Michael Turek
Hey everyone, At this week's ironic IRC meeting we decided to push the bug day to April 12th. I updated the poll name to indicate this and it unfortunately wiped the results of the poll. If you can recast your vote here it would be appreciated https://doodle.com/poll/xa999rx653pb58t6 It's

Re: [openstack-dev] [k8s] OpenStack and Containers White Paper

2018-04-05 Thread Mikhail Fedosin
Hello! I'm working on Keystone authentication and authorization and other related parts of openstack cloud provider. I will be happy to help you! Best, Mike On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Jaesuk Ahn wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I can probably help on proof-reading and making

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

2018-04-05 Thread Dan Prince
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 4:37 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > >> Much of the work on this is already there. We've been using this stuff >> for over a year to dev/test the containerization efforts for a long >>

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

2018-04-05 Thread Wesley Hayutin
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 at 12:25 Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 4:37 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > > Much of the work on this is already there. We've been using this stuff >> for over a year to dev/test the containerization efforts for a long >> time

[openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-20, April 9-13

2018-04-05 Thread Sean McGinnis
Welcome to our regular release countdown email. Development Focus - Team focus should be on spec approval and implementation for priority features. Please be aware of the project specific deadlines that vary slightly from the overall release schedule [1]. Teams should now be

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

2018-04-05 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 4:37 AM, Dan Prince wrote: Much of the work on this is already there. We've been using this stuff > for over a year to dev/test the containerization efforts for a long > time now (and thanks for your help with this effort). The problem I > think is how

[openstack-dev] [all][requirements] uncapping eventlet

2018-04-05 Thread Matthew Thode
eventlet-0.22.1 has been out for a while now, we should try and use it. Going to be fun times. I have a review projects can depend upon if they wish to test. https://review.openstack.org/533021 -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc][openstack-helm][tripleo]propose retire kolla-kubernetes project

2018-04-05 Thread Brandon Jozsa
On April 4, 2018 at 4:21:58 PM, Michał Jastrzębski (inc...@gmail.com) wrote: On 4 April 2018 at 14:45, Brandon Jozsa wrote: > I’ve been a part of the OpenStack-Helm project from the very beginning, and > there was a lot of early brainstorming on

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][ci][ceph] switching to config-download by default

2018-04-05 Thread James Slagle
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:38 AM, James Slagle wrote: > I've pushed up for review a set of patches to switch us over to using > config-download by default: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/config-download-default > > I believe I've come up with the proper

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][ci][ceph] switching to config-download by default

2018-04-05 Thread James Slagle
I've pushed up for review a set of patches to switch us over to using config-download by default: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/config-download-default I believe I've come up with the proper series of steps to switch things over. Let me know if you have any feedback or foresee any

Re: [openstack-dev] Asking for ask.openstack.org

2018-04-05 Thread Zane Bitter
On 05/04/18 00:12, Ian Wienand wrote: On 04/05/2018 10:23 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 04/04/18 17:26, Jimmy McArthur wrote: Here's the thing: email alerts. They're broken. This is the type of thing we can fix if we know about it ... I will contact you off-list because the last email to what I

Re: [openstack-dev] Asking for ask.openstack.org

2018-04-05 Thread Jimmy McArthur
Ian, thanks for digging in and helping sort out some of these issues! Ian Wienand April 4, 2018 at 11:04 PM We've long had problems with this host and I've looked at it before [1]. It often drops out. It seems there's enough interest we should dive a bit deeper.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] about re-image the volume

2018-04-05 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/5/2018 3:15 AM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: But just to be clear, Nova will have to initialize the connection with the re-imagined volume and attach it again to the node, as in all cases (except when defaulting to downloading the image and dd-ing it to the volume) the result will be a new volume

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Tripleo] ipmitool issues HP machines

2018-04-05 Thread Dan Prince
Sigh. And the answer is: user error. Adminstrator != Administrator. Well this was fun. Sorry for the bother. All is well. :) Dan On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Jim Rollenhagen > wrote: >> On

[openstack-dev] [kolla] [tripleo] On moving start scripts out of Kolla images

2018-04-05 Thread Paul Bourke
Hi all, This mail is to serve as a follow on to the discussion during yesterday's team meeting[4], which was regarding the desire to move start scripts out of the kolla images [0]. There's a few factors at play, and it may well be best left to discuss in person at the summit in May, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Tripleo] ipmitool issues HP machines

2018-04-05 Thread Dan Prince
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Jim Rollenhagen > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Dan Prince wrote: >>> >>> Kind of a support question but figured I'd ask

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Tripleo] ipmitool issues HP machines

2018-04-05 Thread Dan Prince
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Dan Prince wrote: >> >> Kind of a support question but figured I'd ask here in case there are >> suggestions for workarounds for specific machines. >> >> Setting

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Do we want new meeting time?

2018-04-05 Thread Ivan Kolodyazhny
Hi team, It's a friendly reminder that we've got voting open [1] until next meeting. If you would like to attend Horizon meetings, please, select comfortable options for you. [1] https://doodle.com/poll/ei5gstt73d8v3a35 Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, http://blog.e0ne.info/ On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [OVN] Tempest API / Scenario tests and OVN metadata

2018-04-05 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
Hi, The tests below are failing in the tempest API / Scenario job that runs in the networking-ovn gate (non-voting): neutron_tempest_plugin.api.admin.test_quotas_negative.QuotasAdminNegativeTestJSON.test_create_port_when_quotas_is_full

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

2018-04-05 Thread Javier Pena
- Original Message - > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Javier Pena wrote: > > > >> Greeting folks, > >> > >> During the last PTG we spent time discussing some ideas around an > >> All-In-One > >> installer, using 100% of the TripleO bits to deploy a single node > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] about re-image the volume

2018-04-05 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On 04/04, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/2/2018 6:59 AM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: > > I can only see one benefit from implementing this feature in Cinder > > versus doing it in Nova, and that is that we can preserve the volume's > > UUID, but I don't think this is even relevant for this use case, so

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

2018-04-05 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
On 4/3/18 9:57 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 at 13:53 Dan Prince > wrote: On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Javier Pena > wrote: > >> Greeting folks, >> >>

[openstack-dev] [qa] QA Office Hours 9:00 UTC is cancelled

2018-04-05 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Today QA Office Hours @9:00 UTC is canceled due to unavailability of members. -gmann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: