Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Magnum] Container + OpenStack Integration

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote: Since docker 1.7 is suposed to support advanced networking, could that just be plugged into neutron? Yes, we'd be looking at doing a docker libnetwork driver that uses the remote driver interface. The remote driver

[openstack-dev] [neutron][kuryr][magnum] Design Specification for Kuryr

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: That's clear, thanks Gal. The feature benchmark should be parity with how the majority of other (complete) remote drivers for libnetwork behave. From a Magnum perspective we value consistency from an end user

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] [neutron] libnetwork endpoint to Neutron abstractions

Hi list, I was reviewing the CreateEndpoint patch[1] from Taku that had received positive reviews. I put some comment about an alternative way to map endpoints to nets and subnets and I would appreciate some discussion here on the mailing list about the original proposal and the alternative I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Kuryr - virtual sprint

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:50 PM, Salvatore Orlando salv.orla...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Gal, even if I've been a lurker so far, I'm interested in attending for learning and contributing to it with my massive bug-injecting skills! You said virtual sprint and somewhere in september - I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] binding information for networks

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Gal Sagie gal.sa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, Recently i have came across two use cases that having binding information, or metadata for networks can be useful. (similar to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr][kolla] - Bringing Dockers networking to Neutron

From: Antoni Segura Puimedon toni+openstac...@midokura.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 11:16 AM To: Mohammad Banikazemi m...@us.ibm.com, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com Cc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] - Bringing Dockers networking to Neutron

@lists.openstack.org, Eran Gampel eran.gam...@toganetworks.com, Antoni Segura Puimedon t...@midokura.com, Irena Berezovsky ir...@midokura.com Date: 07/22/2015 12:31 PM Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] - Bringing Dockers networking to Neutron -- Hello Everyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr][kolla] - Bringing Dockers networking to Neutron

...@toganetworks.com, Antoni Segura Puimedon t...@midokura.com, Irena Berezovsky ir...@midokura.com, gal.sa...@gmail.com gal.sa...@gmail.com Date: 07/23/2015 11:34 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr][kolla] - Bringing Dockers networking to Neutron -- Gal

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] New Neutron subproject for a Neutron backed Docker remote networking driver

On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Gurucharan Shetty shet...@nicira.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Gurucharan Shetty shet...@nicira.com wrote: From a 2 min look, this seems to wrap docker commands instead of using the new plugin The plugin is here:

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] meetup

Hi fellow Kuryrs, I want to remind you that we'll be meeting up at some corner of [1] to discuss all things kuryr. The agenda will be: - Current challenges with multinode - The path to Mitaka: + Functional testing + COE Integrations + VM nested containers. [1] http://sched.co/4Qan

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Current status of docker python lib supports for libnetwork

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Baohua Yang wrote: > Hi, kuryr guys > I may not attend tmr's IRC meeting, hence make a quick sync here. > One task is to investigate the docker python lib support to libnetwork. > I checked the code here at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][kuryr] network control plane (libkv role)

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Vikas Choudhary wrote: > ++ [Neutron] tag > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Vikas Choudhary < > choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> By network control plane i specifically mean here sharing network state >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][kuryr] mutihost networking with nova vm as docker host

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Vikas Choudhary wrote: > ++[Neutron] tag > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Vikas Choudhary < > choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I would appreciate inputs on following queries: >> 1. Are we assuming nova bm

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] competing implementations

ing and we already held the meeting on Friday. Next Monday it will be held as usual and the following week we start alternating (we have yet to get a room for that one). > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon < > toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: > >

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] competing implementations

Hi Kuryrs, Last Friday, as part of the contributors meetup, we discussed also code contribution etiquette. Like other OpenStack project (Magnum comes to mind), the etiquette for what to do when there is disagreement in the way to code a blueprint of fix a bug is as follows: 1.- Try to reach out

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] mutihost networking with nova vm as docker host

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Baohua Yang wrote: > It does cause confusing by calling container-inside-vm as nested > container. > > The "nested" term in container area usually means > container-inside-container. > I try to always put it as VM-nested container. But I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] Kuryr Open Tasks

To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>, > Eran Gampel <eran.gam...@huawei.com<mailto:eran.gam...@huawei.com>>, > Antoni Segura Puimedon <t...@mi

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Proposing Taku Fukushima as Kuryr core

Hi fellow Kurýrs, I would like to propose Taku Fukushima for the core Kuryr team due to his unparalleled dedication to the project. He has written most of the code and battled through the continuous libnetwork API changes. He will be a great addition to the reviewing tasks. Current core members,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] New Neutron subproject for a Neutron backed Docker remote networking driver

to the container (or external) neutron server). Regards, Toni On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/09/2015 04:55 AM, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: Hi list, As the subject says, we are starting a new Neutron subproject that aims to service the Docker

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] New Neutron subproject for a Neutron backed Docker remote networking driver

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/09/2015 10:55 AM, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: Names: Kuryr - Czech name for Courier since it is delivering networking to containers. v: apuimedo+1 :) If you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Kuryr - Spec

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > Hello everyone, > > We have a spec for project Kuryr in Neutron repository [1] , we have been > iterating on it > internally and with the great help and feedback from the Magnum team. > > I am glad to say that we reached a

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Galo Navarro wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > >> 1) (Downstream) packaging: midonet and python-midonetclient are two > >> distinct packages, and therefore should have distinct upstream > >> tarballs - which are compiled on a per repo basis. > > This is

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon < toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Galo Navarro <g...@midokura.com> wrote: > >> Hi Sandro, >> >> >> 1) (Downstream) packaging: midonet and pyth

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Jaume Devesa wrote: > +1 > > I think it is good compromise. Thanks Ryu! > > I understand the CLI will belong to the external part. I much prefer to > have > it in a separate project rather than into the plugin. Even if the code is > tiny. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] IRC: ditch #midonet-dev?

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > +1 for #2 > PS: Beware of the top-posting! It makes vote counting harder ;-) > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Sandro Mathys > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Our IRC channels have been neglected for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Kuryr did not detect neutron tag plugin in devstack

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Liping Mao (limao) wrote: > Hi Kuryr team, > > I notice kuryr did not detect neutron tag plugin in devstack[1]. > This is because when kuryr process start up in devstack, > neutron-server did not finish load tag plugin. > Kuryr use api call to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] [Neutron] Waiting until Neutron Port isActive

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > Yes, that all makes sense - thanks for explaining. > > Neil > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:50 PM Mohammad Banikazemi wrote: > >> Hi Neil, >> >> Currently, when a docker libnetwork "join" operation in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] [Neutron] Waiting until Neutron PortisActive

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > What about pinging? BTW, from where would the pings come? > > In the Docker/Swarm API today there is no way to disable ping. However, > once Kuryr's libnetwork plugin is updated so that `docker network connect >

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Bilal Baqar wrote: > Hey James > > No problem on my side for this change. > > Regards > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > >> Me too. >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:32 AM Cory Benfield

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] [Neutron] Controlling security groups through Kuryr's libnetwork plugin [was: Waiting until Neutron PortisActive]

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Mike Spreitzer <mspre...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Antoni Segura Puimedon <toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote on > 06/11/2016 07:39:41 PM: > > > Well, with a label you can make the Neutron Port have an SG that > > forbids pinging. &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Higgins][Zun] Project roadmap

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Hi team, > > > > During the team meetings these weeks, we collaborated the initial project > roadmap. I summarized it as below. Please review. > > > > * Implement a common container abstraction for different container >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IPAM issue with multiple docker networks having same cidr subnets

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Vikas Choudhary wrote: > Hi All, > > Recently, Banix observed and brought into notice this issue [1]. > > To solve this, i could think of two approaches: > 1. Modifying the libnetwork apis to get PoolID also at network creation. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Refactoring into common library and kuryr-libnetwork + Nested_VMs

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Vikas Choudhary < choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon < > toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Vikas Cho

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Refactoring into common library and kuryr-libnetwork + Nested_VMs

t; │ >>> │____ any_other_driver(calling api for nw related services if >>> watcher not supported) >>> >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> >>> -Vikas >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Starting Kuryr service requires root privilege

> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon > <toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Baohua Yang <yangbao...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi hua >> > Thanks for the suggestion! >> > Yes,

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Failed to create network with kuryr driver type

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Mars Ma wrote: > hi Vikas, > > ubuntu@kuryr1:~$ docker network create --driver=kuryr --ipam-driver=kuryr > --subnet 10.10.0.0/16 --gateway 10.10.0.1 --ip-range 10.10.0.0/24 foo > 68f14fe701710d6f3472d1626c33f0036a145aaa8d81265429e509cf759adfe1 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Now part of OpenStack big-tent

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Just wanted to update you that Kuryr [1] was officially accepted yesterday > as a > big tent project. We should probably get Kuryr to be selectable as a tag to subscribe to in

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] A proposal to separate the design summit

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > >> On 26 Feb 2016, at 02:38, Sean McGinnis wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 04:13:56PM +0800, Qiming Teng wrote: >>> Hi, All, >>> >>> After reading through all the +1's and -1's, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Did kuryr need to know about Docker's cluster store?

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Vikas Choudhary wrote: > Since libnetwork talks to cluster store independent of plugin, I think no > changes are required on Kuryr side. That's right. Docker handles all the KV storage interaction from the data it receives from Kuryr.

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][app-catalog][all] Build unified abstraction for all COEs

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > +1. > > From: Hongbin Lu [hongbin...@huawei.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 7:50 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Port binding query

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > I'm trying Kuryr with networking-calico and think I've hit an unhelpful > inconsistency. A Neutron port has 'id' and 'device_id' fields that are > usually different. When Nova does VIF binding for a Neutron port, it >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Dieterly, Deklan's message of 2016-05-14 01:18:20 +: > > Python 2.x will not be supported for much longer, and let¹s face it, > > Python is easy, but it just does not scale. Nor does Python have the > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Question for Antoni Puimedon about load balancers and overlay networks

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > I am looking at > https://www.openstack.org/videos/video/project-kuryr-docker-delivered-kubernetes-next, > around 28:00. You have said that overlay networks are involved, and are > now talking about load balancers. Is

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][magnum]Installing kuryr for mutlinode openstack setup

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Jaume Devesa wrote: > Hello Akshay, > > responses inline: > > On Wed, 25 May 2016 10:48, Akshay Kumar Sanghai wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a 4 node openstack setup (1 controller, 1 network, 2 compute > nodes). > > I want to install kuryr in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Kuryr IRC Meeting time

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Vikas Choudhary < choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > On 26 Jul 2016 15:45, "Liping Mao (limao)" wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> Currently, kuryr team meeting time is as following: >> >> Every two weeks (on even weeks) on Tuesday at 0300 UTC in

Re: [openstack-dev] Project mascots update

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: > *Steve Hardy wrote:* > *"I have one question regarding the review process for the logos when > they are drafted? In the cases where projects have their existing community > generated logos I can imagine there

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] kuryr-libnetwork split

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote: > On 07/01/2016 08:10 AM, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > > Hi fellow kuryrs! > > > > In order to proceed with the split of kuryr into a main lib and it's > kuryr > > libnetwork

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] kuryr-libnetwork split

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon < toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: > Hi fellow kuryrs! > > In order to proceed with the split of kuryr into a main lib and it's kuryr > libnetwork component, we've cloned the contents of openstack/kuryr over to

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] kuryr-libnetwork split

Hi fellow kuryrs! In order to proceed with the split of kuryr into a main lib and it's kuryr libnetwork component, we've cloned the contents of openstack/kuryr over to openstack/kuryr-libnetwork. The idea is that after this, the patches that will go to openstack/kuryr will be to trim out the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][Python 3.4-3.5] Async python clients

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26 2016, Denis Makogon wrote: > > > I know that some work in progress to bring Python 3.4 compatibility to > > backend services and it is kinda hard question to answer, but i'd like to > > know if there are

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][Python 3.4-3.5] Async python clients

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04 2016, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > > > for the neutron clients now we use a thread executor from the asyncio > loop > > any time > > we do neutron client request. > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] kuryr-libnetwork split

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2016-07-01 15:05:30 +: > > On 2016-07-01 08:26:13 -0500 (-0500), Monty Taylor wrote: > > [...] > > > Check with Doug Hellman about namespaces. We used to use them in some >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][kolla] keystone v3 support status and plans?

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Hey kuryrians, > > Kolla has a kuryr review in our queue and its looking really solid from > Hui Kang. The last key problem blocking the merge (and support of Kuryr in > Kolla) is that Kolla only supports keystone

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Proposing vikasc for kuryr-libnetwork core

team for the kuryr-kubernetes subproject since he has experience in the day to day work with kubernetes and can help with the review and refactoring of the prototype upstreaming. Regards, Antoni Segura Puimedon __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Overlay MTU setup in docker remote driver

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Liping Mao (limao) wrote: > Hi Kuryr team, > > I just notice, this can be fixed in kuryr bind code. > I submit a bug to track this: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/kuryr-libnetwork/+bug/1613528 > > And patch sets are here: >

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Resource management videoconf meeting

Hi all, In the last weekly IRC meeting it was agreed to hold a videoconf meeting about resource management. For those unaware, the topic revolves around the reutilization of Neutron resources like ports and subports as well and virtual devices like veths. This allows for things like batching

[openstack-dev] [kuryr][ptl] PTL candidacy

Hi Kuryrs! I am putting forward my candidacy[1] for a second term as the PTL. It is great to work with all of you every day to make kuryr deliver on its mission. Over this current cycle, we've managed to rebuild the team after we had some core departures and I think we are in a very good place,

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][kuryr] python-k8sclient vs client-python (was Fwd: client-python Beta Release)

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Team, > > A bit of history, we had a client generated from swagger definition for a > while in Magnum, we plucked it out into python-k8sclient which then got > used by fuel-ccp, kuryr etc. Recently the kuberneted team

[openstack-dev] [kuryr][dragonflow][octavia] layer 7 load balancing discussion

Hi all! An impromptu conversation started between Omer and I about l4 and l7 load balancers for serving Kubernetes workloads (both services and ingress controllers) and we thought it would be nice to have more feedback on the discussion, particularly from Octavia folks. Omer kindly offered to

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] VTG schedule and details

Hi Kuryrs! The VTG sessions[0] will be held in bluejeans: https://bluejeans.com/5508709975 You can also join by phone finding a local number in [1] and entering the meeting id "5508709975" followed by a '#'. The sessions will be ┌──┬─┐

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Resource management videoconf meeting

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > In the last weekly IRC meeting it was agreed to hold a videoconf meeting > about resource management. For those unaware, the topic revolves around the > reutilization of Neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][kolla][openstack-helm][kuryr] OpenStack on containers leaveraging kuryr

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Dan Sneddon wrote: > Pete, thanks for mentioning network isolation and segmentation. That's > my area of interest, since I'm focused on underlay networking for > TripleO and bare-metal networking in Ironic. > > Network isolation is going to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][kolla][openstack-helm][kuryr] OpenStack on containers leaveraging kuryr

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 09/02/17 09:57 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> I was talking with Tony and he mentioned that he's recording a new demo >> for >> kuryr and, well, it'd be great to also use the containerized version

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Resource management videoconf meeting

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> In the last weekly IRC meeting it was agreed to hold a v

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Project Virtual Gathering (PVG)

Hi Kuryrs! Due to traveling restrictions, we opted not to take part in the Atlanta PTG. However, the design work sessions won't disappear :-) Please go through its etherpad[0] and propose, vote, comment about sessions, format and scheduling. Regards, Toni [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Ocata cycle ending and proposing new people as Kuryr cores

2 PM, Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 for both. >> >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Irena Berezovsky <irenab@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] 2nd day recording for the Virtual Team Gathering

Hi Kuryrs! Thanks again for joining the Virtual team Gathering sessions. Here you have the links to the recordings: https://youtu.be/o1RKNOAhqho https://youtu.be/ovbK5kk5AZ0 See you today on the last day of this first VTG! Toni

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Weekly IRC meeting today cancelled

Hello Kuryrs, Due to preparations for this week's VTG, today's meeting is cancelled. Looking forward to see you all tomorrow! Toni __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Sept. 1st Kuryr-Kubernetes videoconf discussion meeting points

Hi Kuryrs, Last Thursday, we had a very productive Kuryr-Kubernetes integration meeting. I want to thank a lot to all the people that joined the meeting for how well they prepared the meeting and the good points that were raise. We used some slides to guide the meeting points[1]. The key

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Meeting agenda for Sept 5th IRC meeting

Hi Kuryrs, Sorry I didn't get to post this on Fridays due to traveling. Here you can find the weekly IRC meeting agenda for today: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Kuryr#Meeting_September_5th.2C_2016 Remember! Today we meet at the regular 14:00 UTC! Antoni Segura Puimedon

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Kuryr-Kubernetes devstack proposal for testing

Hi Kuryrs! Yesterday in the meeting we discussed about the need to design a way for the functional testing to happen for the Kuryr-Kubernetes integration. I studied the possibilities today and came up with the following proposal (After the proposal I'll put more detailed explanations).

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Python 3 usage and kuryr-kubernetes

Hi fellow kuryrs! This email is gonna be a bit long, so I'll put it in parts. Kubernetes integration components == As you know, we are now in the process of upstreaming the Kuryr Kubernetes PoC that the Kuryr team at Midokura did. This PoC upstreaming effort has two main

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Python 3 usage and kuryr-kubernetes

he community would have a recommendation for OSt upstream and it's downstreams. > > > Regards, > > Jaume Devesa > Software Engineer @ Midokura > > On Aug 30 2016, at 4:44 pm, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi fellow kuryrs! >

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Kuryr IRC meetings change

is welcome to add items to it (Though if there are too many some may get pushed a week). Have fun coding and reviewing! Antoni Segura Puimedon PS: There is a nice .ics that you can use to add the meetings to your calendar[3] [1] https://review.openstack.org/362852 [2] https://wiki.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] openstack/kuryr-libnetwork dropping 'common' subpackage

separation with the former, but I have to say that at the current stage, after all the friction we got from the repository split, the best option in my mind is to go with the latter option. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/361567/ Antoni Segura Puimedon

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr][Dragonflow] - PTL Non Candacy

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Gal Sagie wrote: > Hello all, > > I would like to announce that i will not be running for projects Kuryr or > Dragonflow > PTL. > > I believe that both projects shows great value and progress compared to the > time they exists > mostly thanks

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] September 12th meeting agenda

Hi Kuryrs! Sorry I didn't get to post it earlier, here goes today's meeting agenda. As always, feel free to add items or bring them up during the open discussion, I'll be checking the agenda for updates just before the meeting starts at 14utc. See you in the meeting, Toni

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IPVLAN data path proposal

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Coughlan, Ivan wrote: > > > Overview > > Kuryr proposes to address the issues of double encapsulation and exposure of > containers as neutron entities when containers are running within VMs. > > As an alternative to the vlan-aware-vms and

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Spec and devref placement

Hi Kuryrs! On September 5th's weekly IRC meeting Irena Berezovsky suggested that we should take a decision regarding the location of specs and devrefs. Currently we default to putting all the specs and devrefs for: - Kuryr - Kuryr-libnetwork - Kuryr-kubernetes to openstack/kuryr. Fuxi is still

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] PTL Candidacy

support. - Participate more in upstream container orchestration engine communities. I look forward to work with all of you to make Kuryr into the things all of us want and need from it. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368825/ Antoni Segura Puimedon

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ptl] Self non-nomination for Kolla PTL for Ocata cycle

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > To the OpenStack Community, > > > > Consider this email my self non-nomination for PTL of Kolla for > > the coming Ocata release. I let the team know in our IRC team meeting > > several months ago I was passing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IPVLAN data path proposal

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Vikas Choudhary > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: >>> >>> Ivan, >>> >>> Thanks for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IPVLAN data path proposal

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Coughlan, Ivan <ivan.cough...@intel.com> > wrote: >> >> >> Overview >> >> Kuryr proposes to address the issues of double encaps

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Kuryr IPVlan Code PoC

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Daly, Louise M wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > As promised here is a link to the code PoC for the Kuryr-IPVlan proposal. > > https://github.com/lmdaly/kuryr-libnetwork > > > > Link to specific commit > >

[openstack-dev] [requirements][FFE][kuryr] kuryr-lib

Hi, We recently made the first release (0.1.0) of kuryr-lib on which no project depends except openstack/kuryr-libnetwork. Now, kuryr-lib by itself is not more than a base library and its release is only to serve kuryr-libnetwork and kuryr-kubernetes. Now we are in the process of releasing

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] September 19th meeting agenda

Hi Kuryrs! Yet again I'm late in posting the agenda, sorry. Here goes today's meeting agenda[1]. As always, feel free to add items or bring them up during the open discussion, I'll be checking the agenda for updates just before the meeting starts at 14utc. See you in the meeting, Toni [1]

[openstack-dev] [kuryr][magnum] Notes from Summit fishbowl session

Hi magna and kuryrs! Thank you all for joining last week meetings. I am now writing a few emails to have persistent notes of what was talked about and discussed in the Kuryr work sessions. In the Magnum joint session the points were: Kuryr - Magnum joint work session

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][magnum] Notes from Summit fishbowl session

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Vikas Choudhary <choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi magna and kuryrs! >> >> Thank you all for joining last week me

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Dec 14th kuryr-kubernetes syncup

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi fellow kuryrs! > > December 14th at 11:00 UTC we'll be having a video meeting [1] to sync > about the current Kubernetes integration. > We're moving the meeting to bluejeans [3

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr][Magnum] How stable is kuryr-kubernetes?

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > Hi folks! > Hi Mikhail! > > We at Samsung are trying to integrate containers in OpenStack and at this > moment we are looking at Kubernetes deployed by Magnum, which works good > enough for now. > > One challenge we

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Dec 14th kuryr-kubernetes syncup

Hi fellow kuryrs! December 14th at 11:00 UTC we'll be having a video meeting [1] to sync about the current Kubernetes integration. There is an etherpad for the topics that we'll be covering [2]. Feel free to add topics and +1 the topics that you want to have discussion on. The objective of the

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Ocata cycle ending and proposing new people as Kuryr cores

Hi fellow kuryrs! We are getting close to the end of the Ocata and it is time to look back and appreciate the good work all the contributors did. I would like to thank you all for the continued dedication and participation in gerrit, the weekly meetings, answering queries on IRC, etc. I also

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:59:18 PM UTC+1, Graham Hayes wrote: > > On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >Folks, > > > >As discussed in the etherpad: > >https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/go-and-containers > > > >Here's a request for a repo in OpenStack: >

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Weekly IRC meeting today April 10th is cancelled

Hi Kuryrs, I'm on PTO on the mountains with limited connectivity, hence I won't be able to make it to the weekly IRC meeting. Regards and sorry for the short notice, Toni __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] VTG Action item sorting

Hi Kuryrs! Thanks a lot for the hard work in last week's VTG sessions. We created quite a few Action items and tomorrow will be the time to sort them: https://trello.com/b/1Ij919E8 I'll try to eventually move it to storyboard, but we need to get some stuff created. The session will be held as

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] final day recordings for the Virtual Team Gathering

Hi Kuryrs, Thank you all for participating in the VTG. Here you can find the last two recordings: https://youtu.be/ti4oOK6p_Dw https://youtu.be/iEdOTngEw4I Let's discuss the priority of all the action items next week! Toni

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] 1st day recording for the Virtual Team Gathering

Hi Kuryrs! Thank you all for joining yesterday. For those unable to make it, here are the recordings for the sessions: https://youtu.be/Hdn9LOnCrSc https://youtu.be/6D5iGEkKtGc See you at today's sessions! Toni __

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Videoconf meeting for Actor refactor proposal

Hi Kuryrs, Tomorrow there's going to be a meeting to discuss Ilya's proposal for a refactor of Kuryr controller entities based on the actor model. The meeting will be held at: https://bluejeans.com/826701641 12:00 UTC I'll post the recording probably the day after. See you there, Toni

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Queens PTL candidacy

Hi fellow kuryrs! I present my PTL candidacy for the Queens Cycle. We've done well in this past cycle getting close to our first release adding things like: - Kubernetes service support, - Token authentication support, - A lot of devstack improvements like multinode - pod-in-VM neutron trunk and

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Nominate Kirill Zaitsev as kuryr-tempest-core reviewer

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > +1 +1 > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Mellado > wrote: >> >> Hi Team, >> >> I wanted to nominate Kirill for kuryr-tempest-core reviewer. He's been a >> great help from start both

  1   2   >