On 21/10/2015 01:48, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:50:04PM +0100, Beth Elwell wrote:
Hi Jim,
I have replied inline to your comments below:
On 19/10/2015 19:38, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:05:04PM +0100, Beth Elwell wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently
Hi Jim,
I will be on holiday the week of the 9th November and so will be unable to make
that meeting. Work on the ironic UI will be posted in the sub team report
section and if anyone has any questions regarding it please shoot me an email
or ping me.
Thanks!
Beth
> On 22 Oct 2015, at 01:58,
on that.
I would appreciate feedback with regard to whether the ironic community
are happy for me to continue on with developing a horizon panel or would
like me to work on an angular panel.
Many thanks,
Beth Elwell
Hi Jim,
I have replied inline to your comments below:
On 19/10/2015 19:38, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:05:04PM +0100, Beth Elwell wrote:
Hi all,
I am currently in the process of writing an Ironic panel in Horizon
upstream. It was originally intended for this panel to be
I’m not a core but I wanted to add my complete agreement with making Diana a
core in horizon. She has done some incredible work in horizon through her work
on the code, reviews and also community attitude and assistance getting people
(myself included) familiar with horizon.
Beth
> On 8 Mar 20
> On 10 Mar 2016, at 07:46, Richard Jones wrote:
>
> It has been mentioned, xstatic packages can block the gate. We currently
> control xstatic package releases, thus we can roll back, if something
> goes wrong.
>
> If we're pulling directly with npm/bower, someone from the outside can
> break
Has there been any consideration of growing the core team to help with review
bandwidth? I ask only because that resulting responsibility to the community
can drive additional review activity. Just worried that only 1x +2 could cause
issues with code being merged on a project this large that cou
but I don't think
> the bar is being met just yet.
>
> Rob
>
> On 1 March 2017 at 10:36, Beth Elwell <mailto:beth.openst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Has there been any consideration of growing the core team to help with review
> bandwidth? I ask only because that re
Hi all,
Thanks very much in advance for any help you are able to offer.
I have been working on developing the QoS Policies panel for horizon and have
the panel working, however I am struggling with the qos.service.spec.js file.
In advance of going into my findings and issues so far, the related
Apr 2017, at 17:45, Beth Elwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks very much in advance for any help you are able to offer.
>
> I have been working on developing the QoS Policies panel for horizon and have
> the panel working, however I am struggling with the qos.service.spec.
Hi all,
Just wondering who is going to the PTG from the horizon team and whether we
want to organise a google hangout group and/or plans for a happy hour or
evening for the team to get to know each other better maybe?
Looking forward to seeing you there,
Beth Elwell (betherly
Hi Goutham,
I apologise I have not come across Kingbird before but will be interested to
find out more about it!
To me the UX looks good but I don’t have enough exposure to what Kingbird is to
know if it represents what you will need from a UI. Horizon has lots of
templates and examples of how
++ I think Anup would be a great addition to the core team :) Thank you for all
your contributions!
Beth
> On 20 Sep 2017, at 01:16, Julia Kreger wrote:
>
> Greetings fellow stackers!
>
> I would like to propose adding Anup Navare to ironic-ui-core. Anup has
> been involved with ironic-ui thi
13 matches
Mail list logo