/openstack-dev
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
All truly great thoughts are conceived by walking.
- F.N.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
All truly great thoughts are conceived by walking.
- F.N
questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
All truly great thoughts are conceived by walking.
- F.N
/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
(not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
The stable/kilo is currently having issues with tests (both stable and
functional) this CR https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205059/ is meant to
fix that, and currently it does fix the unit and doc tests. But I haven't
been able to fix the functional tests. I'm about to start travelling so I
won't
explicitly using tox utility.
Thanks and Regards,
Asha Seshagiri
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio jaosor...@gmail.com
wrote:
The stable/kilo is currently having issues with tests (both stable and
functional) this CR https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205059/ is meant
I'd like to nominate Dave Mccowan for the Barbican core review team.
He has been an active contributor both in doing relevant code pieces and
making useful and thorough reviews; And so I think he would make a great
addition to the team.
Please bring the +1's :D
Cheers!
--
Juan Antonio Osorio
0/
>
> >
> > 3. Any templates exposing vendor specific interfaces (e.g at least
> anything
> > related to the OS::TripleO::*ExtraConfig* interfaces) must not expose any
> > parameters via the top level template.
> >
> > How does this sound?
> >
> > This does mean we
UI or other tool requiring user input much easier, I think?
>
> Steve
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>
> Steve
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http
+1 on my side.
On 9 Jun 2016 18:10, "Emilien Macchi" wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been in discussion with Martin André and Tomas Sedovic, who are
> > involved with the creation of the new
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Adam Young <ayo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/21/2016 02:42 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote:
>
> Adam, this is pretty much the proposal for TLS for the internal services
> (which you were added already as a reviewer for the spec)
> https://rev
where they need some confirmation from the deployment
> process that the data in the CSR is valid and should be signed.
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsub
em like it should live under that. Other than that I don't
> have enough knowledge of the organization of the puppet modules to comment.
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ..
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
__
gt;
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
&
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
>> we can collect use cases for things that are currently using hooks that
>> we may want to support in other ways in Newton.
>>
>> -Sean
>>
>>
> I think you should probably also post this to the operators mailing list
> before we actually deprecate hooks.
I agree with Matt, I think this should ge
6PM +0300, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 05:28:57PM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
> > > I finally have enough understanding of what is going on wit
around. :/
>
> We need to really discuss this problem at the summit and get a viable path
> forward. Its just getting worse. :/
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
> ----------
> *From:* Juan Antonio Osorio [jaosor...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 05, 2016 5
oker. Since Rabbit seems to be the tool
> > of
> > choice, we would use X509 authentication and TLS for
> > encryption. ACLs,
> > for now, would stay in the flat file format. In the future, we
> > might
> > chose to use the LDAP backed ACLs for Rabbit, as they
___
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
+1
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
___
+1
On 20 Mar 2016 20:27, "Dan Prince" wrote:
> I'd like to propose that we add Emilien Macchi to the TripleO core
> review team. Emilien has been getting more involved with TripleO during
> this last release. In addition to help with various Puppet things he
> also has
>
So then, would it be acceptable to come up with a blueprint trying to
formalize
the interfaces for the hooks, and make those standard (and better tested and
documented)? We could base the deprecation on the outcome of that blueprint.
I think everybody agrees that the current solution is not ide
mechanism for
this means, but it was deprecated recently. So bummer :/
>
> Nova instance user spec again?
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
> ------
> *From:* Juan Antonio Osorio
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 05, 2016 4:07:06 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing Lis
e might chose to use
> the LDAP backed ACLs for Rabbit, as they seem far more flexible. Rabbit
> does not currently support Kerberos for either authentication or
> encryption, but we can engage the upstream team to implement it if desired
> in the future, or we can shift to a Proton based depl
> > When we did the Rippowam demo, we used the Proton driver and Kerberos for
> > securing the message broker. Since Rabbit seems to be the tool of
> choice,
> > we would use X509 authentication and TLS for encryption. ACLs, for now,
> > would stay in the flat file format.
ubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
__
OpenSt
Adam, that should be fixed by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/341354/
which merged not too many days ago. Before that commit we had another
configuration which was already deprecated in keystone upstream.
On 6 Aug 2016 05:04, "Adam Young" wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 06:40 PM,
it
makes it easier to populate the required field's in the CA (which in our
case is FreeIPA). I'm currently working on a patch to add it to the
fakeha-caserver OVB job; which, after this is done, I hope to move from the
experimental queue, to the periodic one.
BR
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor
> primarily in the puppet manifest so it's not a huge stretch to add him.
> >
>
> +1 as well.
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:uns
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio <jaosor...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to request an FFE to properly support the novajoin
> vendordata
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 02/02/2017 06:27 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to request an FFE to properly support the novajoin
>> vendordata plugin in TripleO. Most of
uestions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
_
quicker.
Best Regards,
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
jaosorior
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
, but did not get
enough time to figure out some parts of it. So that work will not be
included here.
BR
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
t
> productive cycle, and I'm looking forward to reaching our final newton
> release! :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> __________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: ope
?
>
> Thanks
> -dant
>
> --
>
> P.S. and full disclosure: I'm biased towards the third option.
>
>
> ______
> OpenStack Development Mailing Lis
+1
On 7 Nov 2016 17:18, "Dave McCowan (dmccowan)" wrote:
>
> Arun has been a long-time terrific reviewer and contributor to Barbican.
>
> 100% +1
>
>
> --Dave
>
> On 11/7/16, 9:37 AM, "Ade Lee" wrote:
>
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >I'd like to nominate Arun Kant
+1 :D
On 4 Nov 2016 20:16, "Jiří Stránský" wrote:
> +1, Michele does great reviews, and his contributions around HA and
> upgrades have been crucial.
>
> On 4.11.2016 18:40, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
>> MIchele Baldessari (bandini on IRC) has consistently demonstrated high
>>
g/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi
I don't have a strong opinion about any option, as long as we have
something in place I'm happy.
But regarding option 1.A: what would be done for newton once these
templates are moved to t-h-t. Would they be backported? What about mitaka?
On 24 Nov 2016 17:55, "Carlos Camacho Gonzalez"
(not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib
>> e
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
Why not drive the post-config with something like shade over ansible?
Similar to what the kolla-ansible community is doing.
On 30 Mar 2017 16:42, "Jiří Stránský" wrote:
> On 30.3.2017 14:58, Dan Prince wrote:
>
>> There is one case that I was thinking about reusing this piece
b
>
> thoughts?
>
> --
> Best regards
> Sagi Shnaidman
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mail
by responding with +1.
>
> --Dave
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
+1
He's a great reviewer
On 7 Jul 2017 8:40 pm, "Emilien Macchi" wrote:
> Alex has demonstrated high technical and community skills in TripleO -
> where he's already core on THT, instack-undercloud, and puppet-tripleo
> - but also very involved in other repos.
> I propose
I actually like the idea of moving to kolla-kubernetes. I guess there would
be a bunch of work towards giving folks an upgrade path and reaching
feature parity; but this would happen anyway eurgh the switch to
kubernetes. And this would have the added value of merging two
communities, thus more
+1!!!
On 21 Jul 2017 22:32, "Alex Schultz" wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Brent Eagles wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Emilien Macchi
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
_
+1
On 5 Jul 2017 19:57, "Emilien Macchi" wrote:
> After reading http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-
> June/118899.html
> - we might want to collect TripleO's community feedback on doing
> weekly meetings on #tripleo instead of #openstack-meeting-alt.
>
>
-mistralclient/commit/83b3d0d39cb8072682fac74f6a40877030e91c18
And this is the commit that's attempting to migrate to keystone v3 in
tripleo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446752/
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
Nice!! Congrats Gibi!!
On 23 Aug 2017 11:19, "Stephen Finucane" wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 20:18 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> > I'm proposing that we add gibi to the nova core team. He's been around
> > for awhile now and has shown persistence and leadership in the
>
rds,
> Rabi Mishra
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opens
to inject
extra ansible roles into the overcloud nodes? If not, maybe a dedicated
hook to do this kind of thing would be something useful for others as well.
Any thoughts?
[1] https://github.com/JAORMX/tripleo-ipsec
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
master/
> nodepool/builder.py
>
> Thanks
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev
-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (no
k Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
_
but will be to be documented).
> - Create a composable service that will deploy FreeIPA service(s),
> part of TripleO Heat Templates. The way it works *now* will require
> you to have a puppet-freeipa module to deploy the bits but we're
> work
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/21/2017 01:45 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote:
>
>> The second option seems like the most viable. Not sure how the TripleO
>> integration would go though. Care to elaborate on what y
...@lists.openstack.org
>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstac
>>> k-operators
>>> >
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>> openstack-operat..
try to run FreeIPA on a container [1] (which wasn't available when I
started working on this).
[1] https://hub.docker.com/r/freeipa/freeipa-server/
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio
ubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing L
On 21 Nov 2017 01:19, "Alex Schultz" <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio
<jaosor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> A few months ago Dan Sneddon and me worked in an ansible role that would
> enable IPSEC for
TripleO composable
service.
Any input and contributions are welcome!
[1] https://github.com/JAORMX/tripleo-ipsec
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
file. The aforementioned option is something that we're using for
containerized openstack services.
I'll look into adding the ability to turn that handler on/off from oslo.log.
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio <jaosor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 6,
he usage of this advanced
configuration. Taking it into use doesn't look that bad; If you look at the
file where the options are being set (_options.py), you will see that there
are several options that get ignored once we start usi
want to use use it in to call python-heatclient API in order
>> to create stacks (Openstack address is based on https).
>> I am wondering, where to copy this pem file and how to refer it ?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>> Best regards.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2017-11
> Thanks in advance.
> Best regards.
>
> 2017-11-09 9:05 GMT+01:00 Juan Antonio Osorio <jaosor...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Alright,
>>
>> So, first question. What do you actually want to do? Do you need to
>> authenticate with the heat endpoint with TLS (using cli
ubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack De
ubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack De
ubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack De
;
>>
>> ¹
>> https://github.com/openstack/oslo.log/blob/master/oslo_log/f
>> ormatters.py#L166-L235
>> ²
>> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-oslo/%
>> 23openstack-oslo.2017-11-01.log.html#t2017-11-01T13:23:14
>> ³ https://github.com/openstack/puppet-nova/blob
On 3 Nov 2017 19:59, "Doug Hellmann" wrote:
Excerpts from Cédric Jeanneret's message of 2017-11-01 14:54:34 +0100:
> Dear Stackers,
>
> While working on my locally deployed Openstack (Pike using TripleO), I
> was a bit struggling with the logging part. Currently, all logs
Proposed a patch to be able to enable the JSON formatter via an oslo.log
configuration parameter:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/517882/
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Cédric Jeanneret <
cedric.jeanne...@camptocamp.com> wrote:
> On 11/06/2017 08:36 AM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote:
&
+1
On 6 Dec 2017 18:25, "Harry Rybacki" wrote:
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:19 AM, mathieu bultel wrote:
> On 12/06/2017 04:45 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> Team,
>>
>> Wes has been consistently and heavily involved in TripleO CI work.
>> He has a very well
By using the ssl_overcloud flag in your configuration and setting it to
true.
On 6 Dec 2017 17:33, "Moshe Levi" <mosh...@mellanox.com> wrote:
> How do I tell quickstart to generate certs and enable tls?
>
>
>
> *From:* Juan Antonio Osorio [mailto:jaosor...
>From the node you're running the nova command, do you have access to the
10.0.0.0 network (external)?
In virtual environments, quickstart will leave an overcloud-prep-network.sh
script that will create a vlan interface that gives the undercloud access
to that network. So, if it's a virtual
recommend using that. Rather generate your own certs or tell
quickstart to do it for you by using the appropriate flag.
So maybe the is an issue with tripleo or just these config files
*From:* Juan Antonio Osorio [mailto:jaosor...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:36 PM
*To:* OpenS
you folks
think?
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/567200/
BR
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
Hello,
A lot of folks are in the OpenStack summit, so we'll cancel the Security
Squad meeting today.
BR
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
+1 I dig
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, 17:41 Dave McCowan (dmccowan),
wrote:
> +1
> This is a great time.
>
> On 6/14/18, 4:30 PM, "Ade Lee" wrote:
>
> >The new time slot has been pretty difficult for folks to attend.
> >I'd like to propose a new time slot, which will hopefully be more
> >amenable to
Thanks for the postmortem; it's always a good read tp learn stuff :)
On 28 Oct 2017 00:11, "Ben Nemec" wrote:
Hi all,
As you may or may not have noticed all ovb jobs on rh1 started failing
sometime last night. After some investigation today I found a few issues.
On 4 Jan 2018 23:35, "Alan Bishop" wrote:
Has there been any previous discussion on providing a mechanism for
transferring ownership of a secret from one user to another?
For castellan there isn't a discussion AFAIK. But it sounds like something
you can enable with
tment, we have plenty of room
> for it.
>
> Thanks!
> --
> Emilien Macchi
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.
Yeah! +1 Moisés has been doing a great job there
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, 16:27 Doug Hellmann, wrote:
> Moisés Guimarães (moguimar) did quite a bit of work on oslo.config
> during the Rocky cycle to add driver support. Based on that work,
> and a discussion we have had since then about general
___
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail:
Hello folks!
With the PTG being quite soon, I just wanted to remind folks to add your
topics on the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ptg-stein
Also, please vote for the topics you're the most interested in, so we
can add them to the agenda. I'll submit a potential agenda by
ward and get developers easier ways to bring up testing
environments for them to work on and to be able to reproduce CI jobs.
Thanks!
Juan Antonio Osorio Robles
IRC: jaosorior
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail
This is not the case. Barbican requires users and systems that use it to
use keystone for authentication. So keystone can't use Barbican for
this. Chicken and egg problem.
On 08/29/2018 08:08 PM, Waines, Greg wrote:
>
> My understanding is that Keystone can be configured to use Barbican to
>
Hey folks!
It's time to come up with topics to discuss on the forum in Berlin[1]!
There is an etherpad for us to bring up ideas:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-forum-stein
We need to submit by September 12.
Here's is also the link to the wiki:
Hello!
The Denver schedule is now available, still at the same link:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ptg-stein
And I also made a Google Calendar that folks can follow:
https://calendar.google.com/calendar?cid=MjdqZmUwNmN1dWhldDdjYm5vb3RvaGRyZTRAZ3JvdXAuY2FsZW5kYXIuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbQ
In
Due to folks being at the Denver PTG (including myself) there won't be
the weekly meeting next week.
BR
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
Thanks, merged the topics.
On 08/30/2018 07:10 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> On 8/28/18 2:50 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio Robles wrote:
>> Hello folks!
>>
>>
>> With the PTG being quite soon, I just wanted to remind folks to add your
>> topics on the etherpad: https:/
FWIW, instead of barbican, castellan could be used as a key manager.
On 08/30/2018 12:23 PM, Adrian Turjak wrote:
>
>
> On 30/08/18 6:29 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>>
>> Is that what is being described here ?
>>
>>
Logging is a topic that I think should get more love on the TripleO side.
On 08/24/2018 12:17 PM, Juan Badia Payno wrote:
> Recently, I did a little test regarding fluentd logging on the gates
> master[1], queens[2], pike [3]. I don't like the status of it, I'm
> still working on them, but
Logging is a topic that I think should get more love on the TripleO side.
On 08/24/2018 12:17 PM, Juan Badia Payno wrote:
> Recently, I did a little test regarding fluentd logging on the gates
> master[1], queens[2], pike [3]. I don't like the status of it, I'm
> still working on them, but
Sounds good to me. Even if pacemaker is heavier, less options and
consistency is better.
Greetings from Mexico :D
On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, 13:33 Emilien Macchi, wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> We have been supporting both Keepalived and Pacemaker to handle VIP
> management.
> Keepalived is actually the
/undercloud.conf.j2#L117
--
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosor...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo