i've just created 4.0.0 and rocky branch.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 6:55 PM Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> it seems we forgot to create rocky branch.
> i'll make a release and the branch sooner or later, unless s
hi,
what kind of jobs should it be? eg. unit tests, tempest, etc...
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 9:43 AM Miguel Lavalle wrote:
>
> Dear networking Stackers,
>
> During the recent PTG in Denver, we discussed measures to prevent patches
> merged in the Neutron repo breaking Stadium and related network
hi,
it seems we forgot to create rocky branch.
i'll make a release and the branch sooner or later, unless someone
beat me to do so.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-re
hi,
after a recent change [1] ,
neutron-fwaas' unit tests need an unreleased version of neutron.
(the one including the corresponding change [2])
while it's handled by tox-siblings on the gate,
it requires extra steps if you want to run the tests locally.
is there any preferred solution for this?
hi,
please see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/578328/ and comment on it
if you have any opinions. thank you.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstac
hi,
Here's a report of my week.
I will not attend the neutron meeting due to an overlapping schedule. (sorry!)
Issues I failed to triage. Needs a help from someone familiar with DVR.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1783470 get_subnet_for_dvr
returns SNAT mac instead of gateway in subnet_
i went through existing bugs and prioritized them.
i'd recommend the others to do the same. there are not too many of them.
i also updated series and milestones.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> hi,
>
> I created a LP team "tap-as-a-service-driver
hi,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 03:53:22PM +0900, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> queens branch of networking-midonet has had no changes merged since
>> its creation.
>> the following commit would tell you
hi,
queens branch of networking-midonet has had no changes merged since
its creation.
the following commit would tell you how many gate blockers have been
accumulated.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/572242/
it seems the stable team doesn't have a bandwidth to review subprojects
in a timely mann
hi,
- networking-midonet uses autodoc in their doc.
build-openstack-sphinx-docs runs it.
- build-openstack-sphinx-docs doesn't use tox-siblings. thus the job
uses released versions of dependencies. eg. neutron, neutron-XXXaas,
os-vif, etc
- released versions of dependencies and networking-midonet
hi,
I created a LP team "tap-as-a-service-drivers",
whose initial members are same as the existing tap-as-a-service-core
group on gerrit.
I made the team the Maintainer and Driver of the tap-as-a-service project.
This way, someone in the team can take it over even if I disappeared
suddenly. :-)
_
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:13 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Lance Bragstad's message of 2018-06-25 22:51:37 -0500:
>> Thanks a bunch for digging into this, Tony. I'll follow up with the
>> oauthlib maintainers and see if they'd be interested in these changes
>> upstream. If so, I can ch
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 08:54:56PM +0900, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>
>> do you have a plan to submit these changes on gerrit?
>
> I didn't but I have now:
>
> * https://review.openstack.org/577028
> * htt
hi,
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 4:32 AM, Miguel Lavalle wrote:
> Dear OpenStack Networking community of projects,
>
> As part of the implementation of multiple port bindings in the Neutron
> reference implementation
> (https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/backlog/pike/portbinding_
hi,
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 04:14:36PM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> On 18-05-16 17:07:09, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> > Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2018-05-16 15:59:47 -0500:
>> > > Sphinx has breaking changes (yet again) and we ne
i just made the change as i haven't got any concerns.
welcome, kaz!
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> hi,
>
> i plan to add Kazuhiro Suzuki to tap-as-a-service-core group. [1]
> he is one of active members of the project.
> he is also the origina
hi,
i plan to add Kazuhiro Suzuki to tap-as-a-service-core group. [1]
he is one of active members of the project.
he is also the original author of tap-as-a-service-dashboard.
i'll make the change after a week unless i hear any objections/concerns.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/
thank you. done. https://pypi.org/project/tap-as-a-service/
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, at 7:59 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> i'm thinking about publishing the latest release of tap-as-a-service on
oops, i forgot to add the critical one.
Critical
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1765008 Tempest API tests
failing for stable/queens branch
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:11 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> hi,
>
> here's a summary of this week.
>
> RFEs for d
hi,
here's a summary of this week.
RFEs for drivers team:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1766380 [RFE] Create
host-routes for routed networks (segments)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1764738 routed provider
networks limit to one host
Medium:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/
hi,
i'm thinking about publishing the latest release of tap-as-a-service on pypi.
background: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555788/
iirc, the naming (tap-as-a-service vs neutron-taas) was one of concerns
when we talked about this topic last time. (long time ago. my memory is dim.)
do you have a
hi,
1. i'm going to create a release and stable branch for tap-as-a-service/queens.
2. to clean up the queue before a release, i approved a bunch of
patches today without waiting for two +2s.
given the current review bandwidth, i guess we should relax the policy.
how do you think?
3. what to do
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:59 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Occasionally we will make changes to the Zuul configuration language.
> Usually these changes will be backwards compatible, but whether they are
> or not, we still want to move things forward.
>
> Because Zuul's configuration is now s
a floating-ip is associated to a router only if it's associated to a fixed-ip.
consider the case where there are two routers sharing a public network.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Bhatia, Manjeet S
wrote:
> Hi Neutrinos,
>
>
>
> I am working on L3 flavors driver implementation for ODL backen
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 4:01 AM, Armando M. wrote:
> Hi neutrinos,
>
> To some of you this email may not come as a surprise.
it was a surprise to me.
>
> During the past few months my upstream community engagements have been more
> and more sporadic. While I tried hard to stay committed and fulf
hi,
thank you.
do you have anything to hand off to the next bug deputy (me) ?
On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Luo, Lujin wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I was on bug deputy between 2017.12.18 and 2017.12.25. I am sending a short
> summary of the bugs reported during this period.
>
> https://bugs.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Just sending this email to try to understand the model for stable branch
>>> maintenance in networking-ovn (potentially other neutron drivers too).
>>>
>>> Right now, only members of the ``neutron-stable-maint
hi,
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
> I wanted to rise this topic, I have been wanting to do it from long
> ago,
> but preferred to wait until the zuulv3 stuff was a little bit more stable,
> may
> be now it's a good time.
>
> We were thinkin
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Bhatia, Manjeet S
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Takashi Yamamoto [mailto:yamam...@midokura.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 10:13 PM
>> To: Bhatia, Manjeet S
>> Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstac
hi,
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Bhatia, Manjeet S
wrote:
> Hello Neutrinos,
>
>
>
> I’ve been trying service profile flavors for L3 in neutron to register the
> driver,
>
> the method I’ve been using is below
>
>
>
> I have this added to neutron.conf
>
> [service_providers]
>
> service_provid
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Takashi Yamamoto
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unless anyone objects, I'll remove the following people from the list
> of networking-midonet core reviewers.
>
> - Joe Mills
> - Michael Micucci
>
> They made great contributions in th
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Takashi Yamamoto
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unless anyone objects, i'll add the following people to neutron-vpnaas
> core reviewers. [1]
>
> - Cao Xuan Hoang
> - Akihiro Motoki
> - Miguel Lavalle
>
> Hoang is the most active con
Hi,
Unless anyone objects, I'll remove the following people from the list
of networking-midonet core reviewers.
- Joe Mills
- Michael Micucci
They made great contributions in the past (thank you!) but have not
reviewed any patches in the last 6 months. [2]
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/adm
Hi,
Unless anyone objects, i'll add the following people to neutron-vpnaas
core reviewers. [1]
- Cao Xuan Hoang
- Akihiro Motoki
- Miguel Lavalle
Hoang is the most active contributor for the project these days.
I don't bother to introduce Akihiro and Miguel as i guess everyone here
knows the
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Pierre Riteau wrote:
> On 29 Sep 2017, at 15:58, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
> tl;dr - If you're having issues with your jobs, check the FAQ, this email
> and followups on this thread for mentions of them. If it's an issue with
> your job and you can spot it (bad config)
+1
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:56 AM, IWAMOTO Toshihiro
wrote:
> +1
> thanks for organizing!
>
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:18:45 +0900,
> Brian Haley wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On 09/12/2017 10:44 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>> > +1
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
>> >> +1
>>
R_xxx.
> Dragon flow folks seems to have their own spec.
>
> thanks,
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:10:07PM +0900,
> Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
>> > If I understand the main issue with us
done
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/tag/?h=11.0.0.0rc1
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron-vpnaas+branch:stable/pike+topic:create-pike
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> hi,
>
> can anyone with an ap
done.
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tap-as-a-service/tag/?h=2.0.0
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tap-as-a-service+branch:stable/pike+topic:create-pike
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 a
essary for hosted projects
because they are not managed by openstack/releases.
unlike neutron-vpnaas, networking-hyperv is an official project. [2]
[2]
https://github.com/openstack/governance/commit/c84d0a702f536a43324212f803e0a43a640c9b56
>
>
>>
>>
>> Akihiro
>>
>
hi,
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Takashi Yamamoto's message of 2017-08-08 10:49:09 +0900:
>> hi
>>
>> i'll create stable/pike (and probably a release) for tap-as-a-service
>> in this week.
>>
>
> We have a bunch of tools that expect stable branches to only
hi
i'll create stable/pike (and probably a release) for tap-as-a-service
in this week.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
hi,
who is planning to make stable/pike for networking-l2gw?
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.or
hi,
can anyone with an appropriate permission create a stable/pike
and pike rc1 for neutron-vpnaas?
stable/pike
11.0.0.0rc1
openstack/neutron-vpnaas
8278615c1f35f98447a3f9692a78ab45e90ee8c6
thank you.
__
OpenStack Developme
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'm not sure if changes like this requires an FFE, but just in case.
> I'd like to request an FFE for midonet v2 plugin removal.
>
> - patches are ready for review: https://review.opensta
hi,
I'm not sure if changes like this requires an FFE, but just in case.
I'd like to request an FFE for midonet v2 plugin removal.
- patches are ready for review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/486790/
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-midonet/
- this is a removal of an already-deprecated
ht?
AFTER_DELETE might be tricky as we probably need to provide flavor
info to subscribers.
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Takashi Yamamoto
> wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> today i managed to play with l3 flavors.
>> i wrote a crude patch to implement midonet flavor
hi,
some of drivers in neutron-vpnaas don't have maintainers. [1]
unless someone steps up, we might end up with removing those drivers.
especially, VyattaIPsecDriver will likely be removed in near future,
as it requires a special agent [2] which is difficult to maintain for
those who are not fami
hi,
today i managed to play with l3 flavors.
i wrote a crude patch to implement midonet flavor. [1]
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483174/
a good news is it's somehow working.
a bad news is it has a lot of issues, as you can see in TODO comments
in the patch.
given these issues, now i ten
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed last month [1], we agree that each neutron-related
> dashboard has its own repository.
> I would like to move this forward on FWaaS and VPNaaS
> as the horizon team plans to split them out as horizon plugins.
>
> A
as i haven't heard any objections, i went ahead and added them to the list. [1]
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/607,members
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Ryu Ishimoto wrote:
>
> +1 !
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:41 AM Takashi Yamamoto
> wrote:
>>
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Sławek Kapłoński wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some time ago my patch [1] was merged. It changes list of supported
> qos_rule_types to dict with rule types as keys and list of supported
> parameters and values for each rule type.
> Additionally now almost merged (I hope) i
unless anyone objects, i'll add the following people to
networking-midonet project's core reviewers.
- Antonio Ojea
- Brandon Berg
- Xavi León
http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/networking-midonet/30
http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/networking-midonet/90
_
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> One of the many reasons for getting all our API services running wsgi
> under a real webserver is to get out of the custom ports for all
> services game. However, because of some of the limits of apache
> mod_wsgi, we really haven't been able to
hi,
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The problem that we have is that any foreign key usage under transactions is
> now broken. An example of an exception that is raised is:
>
>
>
> DBReferenceError: (sqlite3.IntegrityError) FOREIGN KEY constraint failed
> [SQL: u'
thank you for heads up.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Many projects are using data_utils library which is provided by
> Tempest for creating test resources with random resource names.
> Now the library is provided as stable interface (tempest.lib) and old
> un
hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Andrea Frittoli
wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> TL;DR: if today you import manager,py from tempest.scenario please maintain
> a copy of [0] in tree until further notice.
>
> Full message:
> --
>
> One of the priorities for the QA team in the Pike cyc
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Manik Bindlish
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I am facing an issue in visualizing port-mirroring information.
>
>
>
> 1.)Created 2 VMs:
>
> VM1: ubuntu3(10.0.0.3, floating IP: 192.168.200.252) – Tap service created
>
> VM2: ubuntu2(10.0.0.12, floating ip: 192.168
hi,
i want to document who cares which drivers.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/436081/
please comment on the review if you know an appropriate contact person
for each drivers.
btw, is the following a driver for neutron-vpnaas? i couldn't find
documentation.
vmware_nsx/plugins/nsx_v/vshield/edg
+1
2017/02/18 4:21 "Kevin Benton" :
Hi all,
I'm organizing a Neutron social event for Thursday evening in Atlanta
somewhere near the venue for dinner/drinks. If you're interested, please
reply to this email with a "+1" so I can get a general count for a
reservation.
Cheers,
Kevin Benton
__
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> i plan to cut a release for networking-midonet once relevant projects get
> ready.
> ie. neutron-vpnaas, tap-as-a-service
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/429437/
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Armando M. wrote
0:32:10 +0900:
>> >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Takashi Yamamoto
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Doug Hellmann
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> Excerpts
hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Takashi Yamamoto's message of 2017-02-06 10:32:10 +0900:
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Takashi Yamamoto
>> wrote:
>> > hi,
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:46 AM,
done.
vinay or anil, can you update launchpad? i don't have permission.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Soichi Shigeta
wrote:
>
> Hi Yamamoto,
>
>We discussed this on today's IRC and agreed to make an ocata release.
>
>Best regards,
>Soichi
>
>
>
>> tap-as-a-service folks,
>>
>> un
i plan to cut a release for networking-midonet once relevant projects get ready.
ie. neutron-vpnaas, tap-as-a-service
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
> On 2 February 2017 at 16:09, Armando M. wrote:
>>
>> Hi neutrinos,
>>
>> I have put a number of patches in the merge queue
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> hi,
>
>>> That's great to hear Yamamoto. Since you are already a neutron-core I assume
>>> you are already intimate with the work required to strengthen the VPNaaS
>>> project. I have added you to [4]
thank you.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> Yes, I will go and do this.
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> On 2/6/17, 4:05 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> is anyone going to cut
hi,
is anyone going to cut ocata release/branch for networking-l2gw?
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.open
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> Excerpts from Takashi Yamamoto's message of 2017-01-26 11:42:48 +0900:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 2:17 AM,
tap-as-a-service folks,
unless anyone objects, i'll make a ocata release and thus stable
branch this week.
(otherwise the CI of consuming subprojects will break)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
hi,
>> That's great to hear Yamamoto. Since you are already a neutron-core I assume
>> you are already intimate with the work required to strengthen the VPNaaS
>> project. I have added you to [4] and you can lean on me for any changes that
>> needs reviewing.
i wrote a scenario test.
https://revi
3 09:11:01 -0600:
>> >> 2017-01-12 21:43 GMT-06:00 Takashi Yamamoto :
>> >> > hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>> >> >> Hi
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As o
hi,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Dariusz Śmigiel's message of 2017-01-13 09:11:01 -0600:
>> 2017-01-12 21:43 GMT-06:00 Takashi Yamamoto :
>> > hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>
hi,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote:
> Hi
>
> As of today, the project neutron-vpnaas is no longer part of the neutron
> governance. This was a decision reached after the project saw a dramatic
> drop in active development over a prolonged period of time.
>
> What does this mea
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
> On 27 November 2016 at 20:50, Takashi Yamamoto
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > As of today, the project neutron-vpnaas is no lon
> Cheers,
> Lingxian Kong (Larry)
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Takashi Yamamoto
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > As of today, the project neutron-vpnaas is no longer part of the n
the project has more demands.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Lingxian Kong (Larry)
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Takashi Yamamoto
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > As of today, the project neut
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Takashi Yamamoto
wrote:
> release team,
>
> can we (networking-midonet) branch stable/newton from a past commit
> with a RC tag, backport some changes [1], and then cut the first release
> on the branch?
to answer myself, RC or beta-looking tag
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> Anil,
>
> do you have any opinion?
>
> i'm thinking to branch stable/newton at around
> 675af77205d4e404bc7c185c13ab6d86f300d185
after taas meeting, i went ahead and create the branch.
>
> On Thu, Nov
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
> On 27 November 2016 at 20:50, Takashi Yamamoto
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > As of today, the project neutron-vpnaas is no lon
, ...)
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
>> On 25 Nov 2016, at 15:23, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25 Nov 2016, at 11:02, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>>>>
Anil,
do you have any opinion?
i'm thinking to branch stable/newton at around
675af77205d4e404bc7c185c13ab6d86f300d185
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
>> Please see -
>> http://lo
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote:
> Hi
>
> As of today, the project neutron-vpnaas is no longer part of the neutron
> governance. This was a decision reached after the project saw a dramatic
> drop in active development over a prolonged period of time.
>
> What does this mean in
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
>> On 25 Nov 2016, at 11:02, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25 Nov 2016, at 09:25, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>>>>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
>> On 25 Nov 2016, at 09:25, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 25 Nov 2016, at 05:26, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>>>>
>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
>> On 25 Nov 2016, at 05:26, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> networking-midonet doesn't have stable/newton branch yet.
>> newton jobs failures are false alarms.
>>
>> branch
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> On 11/25/2016 05:26 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>>> networking-midonet doesn't have stable/newton branch yet.
>>> newton jobs failures are false
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 11/25/2016 05:26 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>> networking-midonet doesn't have stable/newton branch yet.
>> newton jobs failures are false alarms.
>
> Then let's remove these jobs,
sure. i'll submit
hi,
networking-midonet doesn't have stable/newton branch yet.
newton jobs failures are false alarms.
branching has been delayed because development of some futures
planned for newton has not been completed yet.
the plan is to revert ocata-specific changes after branching newton.
On Fri, Nov 25,
atever.
how do you think?
>
> On 11/24/16, 10:00 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote:
>
> can you give me an example of breakage?
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The change https://review.openstack.
can you give me an example of breakage?
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386845/ that landed yesterday
> has caused a breakage in stable/newton. This is due to the fact that the
> following projects do not have stable/newton
hi,
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Hi YAMAMOTO (and other midokura folks),
>
> I spotted unit tests in the branch are failing due to upper constraints not
> applied. So I backported the fix as:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/392698/ Sadly, it does not pass because
>
+1
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Miguel Lavalle wrote:
> Dear Neutrinos,
>
> I am organizing a social event for the team on Thursday 27th at 19:30. After
> doing some Google research, I am proposing Raco de la Vila, which is located
> in Poblenou: http://www.racodelavila.com/en/index.htm. The
hi,
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
> On 22 September 2016 at 22:36, Takashi Yamamoto
> wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 22 September 2016 at 00
hi,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
> On 22 September 2016 at 00:46, reedip banerjee wrote:
>>
>> Dear Neutron Core members,
>>
>> I have a query regarding the procedure for inclusion in the Neutron
>> Stadium.
>> I wanted to know if a project can apply for Big Tent and Ne
hi,
On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Anil Rao wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is an update on the issue of not being able to capture packets flowing
> between two VMs on the same host.
it it about bug 1529595 ?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tap-as-a-service/+bug/1529595
>
> Isolating the problem:
>
> It h
hi,
we tap-as-a-service project had a plan to make a release compatible with mitaka.
however,
- it's a bit late for mitaka already
- the reference implementation needs to be adapted to l2 agent
extension but no much progress yet
so, a question is, if we still want to make a release for mitaka,
or
;s try to find a timeslot that works.
>>>
>>> using #openstack-neutron with the meetbot works, but it's going to
>>> generate a lot of noise.
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Takashi Yamamoto
wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>> +1 for earlier time. But also, have we booked any channel for the meeting?
>> Hijacking #openstack-neutron may not work fine during such a busy (US
st meeting will still be UTC 1700 ~ UTC 1800 May 17 on Neutron
>> channel.
>> In the meeting, we can see if we can reach consensus on a new meeting time.
>>
>> Cathy
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Takashi Yamamoto [mailto:yamam...@midokura.co
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
