Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [tap-as-a-service] stable/newton 'broken'

2016-12-01 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > Anil, > > do you have any opinion? > > i'm thinking to branch stable/newton at around > 675af77205d4e404bc7c185c13ab6d86f300d185 after taas meeting, i went ahead and create the branch. > > On Thu, Nov

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Re: [neutron][networking-midonet] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-12-02 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > release team, > > can we (networking-midonet) branch stable/newton from a past commit > with a RC tag, backport some changes [1], and then cut the first release > on the branch? to answer myself, RC or beta-looking tag

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2016-12-03 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
the project has more demands. > > > Cheers, > Lingxian Kong (Larry) > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Takashi Yamamoto > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > As of today, the project neut

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2016-12-13 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
> Cheers, > Lingxian Kong (Larry) > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Takashi Yamamoto > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > As of today, the project neutron-vpnaas is no longer part of the n

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-01-12 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 27 November 2016 at 20:50, Takashi Yamamoto > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > As of today, the project neutron-vpnaas is no lon

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-01-12 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote: > Hi > > As of today, the project neutron-vpnaas is no longer part of the neutron > governance. This was a decision reached after the project saw a dramatic > drop in active development over a prolonged period of time. > > What does this mea

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-01-25 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 2:17 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Dariusz Śmigiel's message of 2017-01-13 09:11:01 -0600: >> 2017-01-12 21:43 GMT-06:00 Takashi Yamamoto : >> > hi, >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-01-31 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
3 09:11:01 -0600: >> >> 2017-01-12 21:43 GMT-06:00 Takashi Yamamoto : >> >> > hi, >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Armando M. wrote: >> >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> >> >> As o

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-01-31 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, >> That's great to hear Yamamoto. Since you are already a neutron-core I assume >> you are already intimate with the work required to strengthen the VPNaaS >> project. I have added you to [4] and you can lean on me for any changes that >> needs reviewing. i wrote a scenario test. https://revi

[openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] ocata

2017-02-05 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
tap-as-a-service folks, unless anyone objects, i'll make a ocata release and thus stable branch this week. (otherwise the CI of consuming subprojects will break) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-02-05 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > hi, > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Takashi Yamamoto's message of 2017-01-26 11:42:48 +0900: >>> hi, >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 2:17 AM,

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] ocata release?

2017-02-05 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, is anyone going to cut ocata release/branch for networking-l2gw? __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.open

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] ocata release?

2017-02-05 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
thank you. On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Yes, I will go and do this. > Thanks > Gary > > On 2/6/17, 4:05 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote: > > hi, > > is anyone going to cut

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-02-06 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > hi, > >>> That's great to hear Yamamoto. Since you are already a neutron-core I assume >>> you are already intimate with the work required to strengthen the VPNaaS >>> project. I have added you to [4]

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [stadium] subprojects on independent release cycle

2017-02-08 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
i plan to cut a release for networking-midonet once relevant projects get ready. ie. neutron-vpnaas, tap-as-a-service On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 2 February 2017 at 16:09, Armando M. wrote: >> >> Hi neutrinos, >> >> I have put a number of patches in the merge queue

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] ocata

2017-02-09 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
done. vinay or anil, can you update launchpad? i don't have permission. On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Soichi Shigeta wrote: > > Hi Yamamoto, > >We discussed this on today's IRC and agreed to make an ocata release. > >Best regards, >Soichi > > > >> tap-as-a-service folks, >> >> un

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-02-13 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Takashi Yamamoto's message of 2017-02-06 10:32:10 +0900: >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Takashi Yamamoto >> wrote: >> > hi, >> > >> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:46 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] vpnaas no longer part of the neutron governance

2017-02-13 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
0:32:10 +0900: >> >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Takashi Yamamoto >> >> wrote: >> >> > hi, >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Doug Hellmann >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> Excerpts

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [stadium] subprojects on independent release cycle

2017-02-13 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > i plan to cut a release for networking-midonet once relevant projects get > ready. > ie. neutron-vpnaas, tap-as-a-service https://review.openstack.org/#/c/429437/ > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Armando M. wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Neutron team social in Atlanta on Thursday

2017-02-18 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
+1 2017/02/18 4:21 "Kevin Benton" : Hi all, I'm organizing a Neutron social event for Thursday evening in Atlanta somewhere near the venue for dinner/drinks. If you're interested, please reply to this email with a "+1" so I can get a general count for a reservation. Cheers, Kevin Benton __

[openstack-dev] [neutron] vpnaas driver maintainers

2017-02-20 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, i want to document who cares which drivers. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/436081/ please comment on the review if you know an appropriate contact person for each drivers. btw, is the following a driver for neutron-vpnaas? i couldn't find documentation. vmware_nsx/plugins/nsx_v/vshield/edg

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements][docs] sphinx update to 1.7.4 from 1.6.5

2018-06-20 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 04:14:36PM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote: >> On 18-05-16 17:07:09, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> > Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2018-05-16 15:59:47 -0500: >> > > Sphinx has breaking changes (yet again) and we ne

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Ports port_binding attribute is changing to an iterable

2018-06-20 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 4:32 AM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: > Dear OpenStack Networking community of projects, > > As part of the implementation of multiple port bindings in the Neutron > reference implementation > (https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/backlog/pike/portbinding_

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements][docs] sphinx update to 1.7.4 from 1.6.5

2018-06-20 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 08:54:56PM +0900, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > >> do you have a plan to submit these changes on gerrit? > > I didn't but I have now: > > * https://review.openstack.org/577028 > * htt

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements][docs] sphinx update to 1.7.4 from 1.6.5

2018-06-26 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:13 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Lance Bragstad's message of 2018-06-25 22:51:37 -0500: >> Thanks a bunch for digging into this, Tony. I'll follow up with the >> oauthlib maintainers and see if they'd be interested in these changes >> upstream. If so, I can ch

[openstack-dev] [taas] LP project changes

2018-07-02 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, I created a LP team "tap-as-a-service-drivers", whose initial members are same as the existing tap-as-a-service-core group on gerrit. I made the team the Maintainer and Driver of the tap-as-a-service project. This way, someone in the team can take it over even if I disappeared suddenly. :-) _

[openstack-dev] [neutron] autodoc and tox-siblings

2018-07-02 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, - networking-midonet uses autodoc in their doc. build-openstack-sphinx-docs runs it. - build-openstack-sphinx-docs doesn't use tox-siblings. thus the job uses released versions of dependencies. eg. neutron, neutron-XXXaas, os-vif, etc - released versions of dependencies and networking-midonet

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Stable review

2018-07-11 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, queens branch of networking-midonet has had no changes merged since its creation. the following commit would tell you how many gate blockers have been accumulated. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/572242/ it seems the stable team doesn't have a bandwidth to review subprojects in a timely mann

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stable review

2018-07-12 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 03:53:22PM +0900, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: >> hi, >> >> queens branch of networking-midonet has had no changes merged since >> its creation. >> the following commit would tell you

Re: [openstack-dev] [taas] LP project changes

2018-07-12 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
i went through existing bugs and prioritized them. i'd recommend the others to do the same. there are not too many of them. i also updated series and milestones. On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > hi, > > I created a LP team "tap-as-a-service-driver

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy report

2018-07-30 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, Here's a report of my week. I will not attend the neutron meeting due to an overlapping schedule. (sorry!) Issues I failed to triage. Needs a help from someone familiar with DVR. https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1783470 get_subnet_for_dvr returns SNAT mac instead of gateway in subnet_

[openstack-dev] [taas] cancel the weekly meeting officially

2018-07-31 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, please see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/578328/ and comment on it if you have any opinions. thank you. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstac

[openstack-dev] [neutron] tox-siblings alternative for local testing

2018-08-28 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, after a recent change [1] , neutron-fwaas' unit tests need an unreleased version of neutron. (the one including the corresponding change [2]) while it's handled by tox-siblings on the gate, it requires extra steps if you want to run the tests locally. is there any preferred solution for this?

[openstack-dev] [taas] rocky

2018-09-26 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, it seems we forgot to create rocky branch. i'll make a release and the branch sooner or later, unless someone beat me to do so. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-re

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stadium][networking] Seeking proposals for non-voting Stadium projects in Neutron check queue

2018-09-30 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, what kind of jobs should it be? eg. unit tests, tempest, etc... On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 9:43 AM Miguel Lavalle wrote: > > Dear networking Stackers, > > During the recent PTG in Denver, we discussed measures to prevent patches > merged in the Neutron repo breaking Stadium and related network

Re: [openstack-dev] [taas] rocky

2018-10-11 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
i've just created 4.0.0 and rocky branch. On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 6:55 PM Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > > hi, > > it seems we forgot to create rocky branch. > i'll make a release and the branch sooner or later, unless s

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stadium] Query regarding procedure for inclusion in Neutron Stadium

2016-09-22 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 22 September 2016 at 00:46, reedip banerjee wrote: >> >> Dear Neutron Core members, >> >> I have a query regarding the procedure for inclusion in the Neutron >> Stadium. >> I wanted to know if a project can apply for Big Tent and Ne

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stadium] Query regarding procedure for inclusion in Neutron Stadium

2016-09-24 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 22 September 2016 at 22:36, Takashi Yamamoto > wrote: >> >> hi, >> >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Armando M. wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 22 September 2016 at 00

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in Barcelona

2016-10-17 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
+1 On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: > Dear Neutrinos, > > I am organizing a social event for the team on Thursday 27th at 19:30. After > doing some Google research, I am proposing Raco de la Vila, which is located > in Poblenou: http://www.racodelavila.com/en/index.htm. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][neutron][midonet] midonet liberty gate failure

2016-11-02 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi YAMAMOTO (and other midokura folks), > > I spotted unit tests in the branch are failing due to upper constraints not > applied. So I backported the fix as: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/392698/ Sadly, it does not pass because >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] stable/newton 'broken'

2016-11-24 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
can you give me an example of breakage? On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > > The change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386845/ that landed yesterday > has caused a breakage in stable/newton. This is due to the fact that the > following projects do not have stable/newton

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [tap-as-a-service] stable/newton 'broken'

2016-11-24 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
atever. how do you think? > > On 11/24/16, 10:00 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote: > > can you give me an example of breakage? > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The change https://review.openstack.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] Fwd: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-11-24 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, networking-midonet doesn't have stable/newton branch yet. newton jobs failures are false alarms. branching has been delayed because development of some futures planned for newton has not been completed yet. the plan is to revert ocata-specific changes after branching newton. On Fri, Nov 25,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] Fwd: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-11-24 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 11/25/2016 05:26 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: >> networking-midonet doesn't have stable/newton branch yet. >> newton jobs failures are false alarms. > > Then let's remove these jobs, sure. i'll submit

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] Fwd: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-11-24 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> On 11/25/2016 05:26 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: >>> networking-midonet doesn't have stable/newton branch yet. >>> newton jobs failures are false

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-11-25 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > >> On 25 Nov 2016, at 05:26, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: >> >> hi, >> >> networking-midonet doesn't have stable/newton branch yet. >> newton jobs failures are false alarms. >> >> branch

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-11-25 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > >> On 25 Nov 2016, at 09:25, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >>> >>>> On 25 Nov 2016, at 05:26, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: >>>> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/networking-midonet failed

2016-11-25 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > >> On 25 Nov 2016, at 11:02, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >>> >>>> On 25 Nov 2016, at 09:25, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: >>>>

<    1   2