Hey everyone!
I recently got freed up to work on Ceilometer, so I thought I'd send out a
quick note to introduce myself.
I'm a developer at RAX and I'll be working with Andrew Melton and Sandy Walsh
on Ceilometer going forward. I started at RAX 3 months ago to work on StackTach
and other
Hey all,
I've been poking around to get an understanding of what some of these default
meters mean in the course of researching this Glance bug
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1201701). I was wondering if anyone
could explain to me what the instance meter is. The unit 'instance'
Hey Julien,
On 8/5/13 3:14 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I've been poking around to get an understanding of what some of these
default meters mean in the course of researching this Glance bug
(https://bugs.launchpad.net
Reported bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1208547
On 8/5/13 8:45 AM, Thomas Maddox thomas.mad...@rackspace.com wrote:
Yep, I'll do that this morning. Thanks!
On 8/5/13 8:40 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
Thinking about
On 8/6/13 7:52 AM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 08/06/2013 08:31 AM, Nejc Saje wrote:
Hey everyone,
I'm a developer at XLAB d.o.o. in Ljubljana. My colleagues are part of
the EU research project Contrail, dealing with cloud federation, and I
got hired to work on
On 8/5/13 4:02 PM, Monsyne Dragon mdra...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 8/5/13 8:40 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
Thinking about it, the latter option seems to describe a very real
concern
going forward that didn't occur to me when I
Hmmm, that's interesting.
That would effect an all-in-one deployment? It's referencing localhost right
now; not distributed. My Thrift server is hbase://127.0.0.1:9090/. Or would
that still effect it, because it's a software facilitated localhost reference
and I'm doing dev inside of a VM (in
not sure if
DHCP issues can affect localhost connections.
Thanks,
Stas
On 12 August 2013 15:29, Thomas Maddox
thomas.mad...@rackspace.commailto:thomas.mad...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hmmm, that's interesting.
That would effect an all-in-one deployment? It's referencing localhost right
now
Hey team,
I was curious about why we went for a JOIN here rather than just using the
meter table initially?
https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/storage/impl_sqlalchemy.py#L336-L391.
Doug had mentioned that some performance testing had gone on with some of
these
Hello!
I was having some chats yesterday with both Julien and Doug regarding some
thoughts that occurred to me while digging through CM and Doug suggested that I
bring them up on the dev list for everyones benefit and discussion.
My bringing this up is intended to help myself and others get a
On 8/14/13 3:26 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
I was curious about why we went for a JOIN here rather than just using
the
meter table initially?
https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/storage/im
pl_sqlalchemy.py
On 8/14/13 10:29 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
Am I misunderstanding the code? This looks like it's returning the first
sample's details:
https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/storage/im
pl
_mongodb.py#L578
On 8/19/13 8:21 AM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 08/18/2013 04:04 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/17/2013 03:10 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16 2013, Jay Pipes wrote:
Actually, that's the opposite of what I'm suggesting :) I'm suggesting
getting rid of the
On 8/20/13 1:48 PM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 08/20/2013 10:42 AM, Thomas Maddox wrote:
On 8/19/13 8:21 AM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 08/18/2013 04:04 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/17/2013 03:10 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16 2013, Jay
On 8/20/13 6:47 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/19/2013 08:27 AM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
On 08/19/2013 05:08 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18 2013, Jay Pipes wrote:
I'm proposing that in these cases, a *new* resource would be added to
the
resource table (and its ID
Hey Stas,
Were you ever able to get any answers on this? :)
Thanks!
-Thomas
On 8/12/13 9:42 AM, Thomas Maddox
thomas.mad...@rackspace.commailto:thomas.mad...@rackspace.com wrote:
Happens all of the time. I haven't been able to get a single meter stored. :(
From: Stas Maksimov maksi
.
Will update you as soon as I have some results.
Thanks,
Stas
On 3 September 2013 23:00, Thomas Maddox
thomas.mad...@rackspace.commailto:thomas.mad...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hey Stas,
Were you ever able to get any answers on this? :)
Thanks!
-Thomas
On 8/12/13 9:42 AM, Thomas Maddox
I think Dragon's BP for notification triggers would solve this problem.
Instead of looking at it as applying a single alarm to several resources,
you could instead leverage the similarities of the resources:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/notifications-triggers.
Compound that
Hey Steven!
Sorry for missing my chance to chat on IRC today. We have our next weekly
meeting on October 3rd (next Thursday) at 15:00 UTC (10:00 CST). That's
probably the best chance at getting us all in a room, since we're pretty well
distributed around the planet. I definitely agree with
Hey All!
I'm working to make the sample pipeline optional and I'm stuck at a
decision point about whether I ought to use a collector config option
(like 'enable_sample_pipelines'), or let it be driven by setup.cfg (i.e.
the existence of sample plugin references). My favorite right now is the
On 10/3/13 8:15 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.commailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Julien Danjou
jul...@danjou.infomailto:jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
I'm working to make the sample pipeline optional
On 10/3/13 8:53 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
Interesting point, Doug and Julien. I'm thinking out loud, but if we
wanted
to use pipeline.yaml, we could have an 'enabled' attribute for each
pipeline?
That would be an option, for sure
On 10/3/13 4:09 PM, Thomas Maddox thomas.mad...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 10/3/13 8:53 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
Interesting point, Doug and Julien. I'm thinking out loud, but if we
wanted
to use pipeline.yaml, we could have
On 10/7/13 1:55 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.commailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Thomas Maddox
thomas.mad...@rackspace.commailto:thomas.mad...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 10/3/13 4:09 PM, Thomas Maddox
thomas.mad
Hey all,
It seems I missed the Kilo proposal deadline for Neutron, unfortunately, but I
still wanted to propose this spec for Neutron and get feedback/approval, sooner
rather than later, so I can begin working on an implementation, even if it
can't land in Kilo. I opted to put this in an
Sounds great. I went ahead and set up a Gerrit review here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/142566/.
Thanks for the feedback and your time!
-Thomas
On 12/17/14, 10:41 AM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Thomas Maddox
thomas.mad...@rackspace.com wrote
26 matches
Mail list logo
