[openstack-dev] Query regarding vRouters Openstack

Hi All, Can someone please help in clarifying below doubts regarding vRouter (say vyyata/quagga for example). How we can use openstack framework for communicating to vRouters? To be more precise: * How we can make the communication between neutron and vRouter possible? * How

[openstack-dev] Query regarding BluePrint submission for Review

Dear All, We want to submit a new blueprint for review. Can you please provide the steps for doing it. Thanks Vikram ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] Our idea for SFC using OpenFlow. RE: [NFV][Telco] Service VM v/s its basic framework

Hi Murali, We have proposed service function chaining idea using open flow. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/service-function-chaining-using-openflow Will submit the same for review soon. Thanks Vikram From: yuriy.babe...@telekom.de [mailto:yuriy.babe...@telekom.de] Sent: 18

Re: [openstack-dev] Our idea for SFC using OpenFlow. RE: [NFV][Telco] Service VM v/s its basic framework

Sorry for the incontinence. We will sort the issue at the earliest. Please find the BP attached with the mail!!! From: Murali B [mailto:mbi...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 December 2014 12:20 To: Vikram Choudhary Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; yuriy.babe...@telekom.de; keshav...@hp.com

Re: [openstack-dev] Our idea for SFC using OpenFlow. RE: [NFV][Telco] Service VM v/s its basic framework

Hi Keshava, Please find my answer inline… From: A, Keshava [mailto:keshav...@hp.com] Sent: 22 December 2014 20:10 To: Vikram Choudhary; Murali B Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; yuriy.babe...@telekom.de; stephen.kf.w...@gmail.com; Dhruv Dhody; Dongfeng (C); Kalyankumar Asangi; A, Keshava

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: Re: [neutron][AdvancedServices] Confusion about the solution of the service chaining!

Hi Alan, We have also proposed an idea about SFC. For more details you can refer to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146315/ Thanks Vikram -Original Message- From: Sumit Naiksatam [mailto:sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 January 2015 01:39 To: lv.erc...@zte.com.cn Cc: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: Re: [neutron][AdvancedServices] Confusion about the solution of the service chaining!

Hi Alan, We are now in the process of doing It :) Thanks Vikram From: lv.erc...@zte.com.cn [mailto:lv.erc...@zte.com.cn] Sent: 12 January 2015 12:57 To: Vikram Choudhary Cc: Dongfeng (C); Dhruv Dhody; Kalyankumar Asangi; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); sumitnaiksa

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] FWaaS - question about drivers

Hi, You can write your own driver. You can refer to below links for getting some idea about the architecture. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/ServiceTypeFramework https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/Agent Thanks Vikram -Original Message- From: Sławek Kapłoński

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Design Summit Session etherpad

Hi Kyle, The link [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-neutron-summit-topics shows the next meeting is scheduled on (4/7/2015) but it’s Tuesday not Monday. Date on Monday is (4/6/2015) so I got confused:☹ Agenda for Next Neutron Team Meeting Monday (4/7/2015) at 1400 UTC on

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Design Summit Session etherpad

is Tuesday 1400UTC, that is Apr 7. Neutron meeting time is rotated between Monday 2100UTC and Tuesday 1400UTC. Akihiro 2015-04-01 14:12 GMT+09:00 Vikram Choudhary vikram.choudh...@huawei.com: Hi Kyle, The link [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-neutron-summit-topics shows

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposal to add Ihar Hrachyshka as a Neutron Core Reviewer

+1 From: Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] Sent: 05 March 2015 03:12 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposal to add Ihar Hrachyshka as a Neutron Core Reviewer +1! On 4 March 2015 at 22:29, Kevin Benton

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How should edge services APIs integrate into Neutron?

Hi Paul, Thanks for starting this mail thread. We are also eyeing for supporting MPBGP in neutron and will like to actively participate in this discussion. Please let me know about the IRC channels which we will be following for this discussion. Currently, I am following below BP’s for this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] - Neutron social Monday night

Great for getting this done Kevin! On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote: Thanks for organizing! On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:26 PM Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everybody! I got us a place for Monday night at 8pm. Here is the link:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] - Neutron social Monday night

Nice initiative Kevin.. It will be fun:) Vikram On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/12/2015 04:16 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: http://lockwaittimeoutexceeded.rsvpify.com/ Hah, that is awesome :) -jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Liberty mid-cycle coding sprint

Hi Kyle, This will be great as I was also interested in attending these session ☺ Thanks Vikram From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com] Sent: 17 April 2015 01:09 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Liberty mid-cycle

Re: [openstack-dev] :Blueprint for FwaaS

Hi Slawek, Please find my respose inline. Thanks Vikram -Original Message- From: Sławek Kapłoński [mailto:sla...@kaplonski.pl] Sent: 06 April 2015 14:54 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] :Blueprint for FwaaS Hello, I made blueprint for fwaas:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

Hi Miguel, Voting for timeslot: b. Thanks Vikram From: Sandhya Dasu (sadasu) [mailto:sad...@cisco.com] Sent: 07 April 2015 21:49 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting Hi Miguel, Both time slots work

[openstack-dev] Getting GERRIT error while submitting spec for liberty.

Hi All, Can anyone please help me in resolving the below errors. viksdeep@ubuntu:~/work/neutron-specs$ git review -s Creating a git remote called gerrit that maps to: ssh:// vikram.choudh...@review.openstack.org:29418/openstack/neutron-specs.git traceback object at 0x7fe3acbf0908 We don't

Re: [openstack-dev] Getting GERRIT error while submitting spec for liberty.

Hi All, There was some issue with SSH key. After regenerating and re-adding to my account it worked. Thanks for the help. Thanks Vikram On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Claudio Pupparo claudio.pupp...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, I've read your answer to Vikram and I'm in the first case, where

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Service Chain project IRC meeting minutes - 06/04/2015

Hi Cathy, Thanks for heading up this meeting. No worries about the timing, time zones are really difficult to handle ;) I do agree with Armando that finalization of the API is important and must be done at the earliest. As discussed over the last meeting I will start working on this and hope by

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Regarding Flow classifiers existing proposals

Thanks Miguel! From: Miguel Angel Ajo [mailto:mangel...@redhat.com] Sent: 05 June 2015 14:12 To: Vikram Choudhary Cc: azama-y...@mxe.nes.nec.co.jp; Henry Fourie; Cathy Zhang; arma...@gmail.com; Dongfeng (C); Kyle Mestery; openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; Dhruv Dhody; Kalyankumar Asangi

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Service Chain project IRC meeting minutes - 06/04/2015

Chain project IRC meeting minutes - 06/04/2015 On 4 June 2015 at 19:32, Vikram Choudhary viks...@gmail.commailto:viks...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Cathy, Thanks for heading up this meeting. No worries about the timing, time zones are really difficult to handle ;) I do agree with Armando

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Regarding Flow Classifier proposals for Liberty!

Dear All, There are multiple proposal floating around flow classifier rules for Liberty [1], [2] and [3]. I feel we all should work together and try to address all our use case having a unified framework rather than working separately achieving the same goal. Moreover, I can find the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Assaf Muller for the Neutron Core Reviewer Team

Congrats Assaf ;) On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Somanchi Trinath trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote: Congratulations Assaf J *From:* Jaume Devesa [mailto:devv...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:25 PM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Regarding Flow classifiers existing proposals

/p/flow-classifier [2] SFC IRC Meeting http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Neutron_Service_Chaining_meeting Thanks Vikram From: Vikram Choudhary Sent: 05 June 2015 14:42 To: 'Miguel Angel Ajo' Cc: azama-y...@mxe.nes.nec.co.jp; Henry Fourie; Cathy Zhang; arma...@gmail.com; Dongfeng (C); Kyle Mestery

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [fwaas] - Collecting use cases for API improvements

Hi German, Thanks for the initiative. I am currently working for few of the FWaaS BP's proposed for Liberty and definitely would like to be a part of this effort. BTW did you mean FWaaS IRC meeting to take up this discussion further? Thanks Vikram On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Kyle Mestery

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][bgpvpn] IRC meetings on BGP VPN interconnection API

Hi Thomos/Mathieu, Thanks for starting this mail thread. Let's discuss over the IRC as suggested by Paul. Thanks Vikram On 5/29/15, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote: You can use the VPNaaS IRC channel/time... we don't have much on the agenda right now, other than discussion VPN flavors for

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] QoS code sprint

Thanks for arranging this Miguel. Looking forward to contribute in the best way we can  On 26-Jun-2015 3:33 pm, Miguel Angel Ajo mangel...@redhat.com wrote: Hi everybody, Next week, from Tue (Jul 29th) to Thu (Jun 2nd), a few of us will be physically [1] attending the neutron QoS coding

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How should edge services APIs integrate into Neutron?

.* This is my thoughts . keshava *From:* Vikram Choudhary [mailto:vikram.choudh...@huawei.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:45 AM *To:* p...@michali.net; openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org *Cc:* Kalyankumar Asangi *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How should edge services APIs

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] FW: [Ryu-devel] [IMPORTANT]: Query regarding BGP Speaker and BGP Peer States.

Thanks for the information. On 17-Aug-2015 7:53 pm, Gal Sagie gal.sa...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe its best to also send this to the Ryu mailing list On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Vikram Choudhary vikram.choudh...@huawei.com wrote: Widening audience! *From:* Vikram Choudhary

[openstack-dev] [neutron] FW: [Ryu-devel] [IMPORTANT]: Query regarding BGP Speaker and BGP Peer States.

Widening audience! From: Vikram Choudhary [mailto:vikram.choudh...@huawei.com] Sent: 17 August 2015 18:05 To: ryu-de...@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Tidwell, Ryan; Vikram Choudhary; Jaume Devesa; Numan Siddique; Kalyankumar Asangi; Baldwin, Carl (OpenStack Neutron) Subject: [Ryu-devel] [IMPORTANT

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Cedric Brandily to Neutron Core Reviewer Team

Congrats Credic! On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote: Congratulations Cedric!! Edgar On 7/22/15, 8:37 AM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: It has been a week since this nomination. I'm pleased to confirm Cedric as a core reviewer for

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Service Chain project IRC meeting minutes - 07/16/2015

Hi Wei, It happens every week unless cancelled by the chair. Thanks Vikram On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Damon Wang damon.dev...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Does service chaining project meeting will be held this week? I'd like to join :-D Wei Wang 2015-07-17 2:09 GMT+08:00 Cathy Zhang

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Social Meetup in Tokyo

Great getting this arranged Akhiro! On Oct 24, 2015 5:06 PM, "Neil Jerram" wrote: > Lovely, thanks for organizing! Looking forward to it! > > Neil > > > Original Message > From: Akihiro Motoki > Sent: Friday, 23 October 2015 17:27 > To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] HenryG addition to the Neutron Drivers team

Congratulations Henry! On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka > wrote: > >> >> > On 21 Oct 2015, at 05:14, Armando M. wrote: >> > >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > Henry has

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

Hi Cathy, Could you please check on this. My mother passed away yesterday and I will be on leave for couple of weeks. Thanks Vikram On 09-Nov-2015 6:15 pm, "Ihar Hrachyshka" wrote: > Thanks Thomas, much appreciated. > > I need to admit that we haven’t heard from SFC folks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Reminder: Team meeting on Monday at 2100 UTC

Hi Team, I won't be able to work for couple of weeks as my mother passed away yesterday. Hope the team will understand and support in this difficult time. Thanks Vikram On 10-Nov-2015 2:00 am, "Ihar Hrachyshka" wrote: > GMT time zone is available by following the official

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qos][fwaas] service groups vs. traffic classifiers

Thanks for all your efforts Sean. I was actually thinking a separate IRC for this effort would be great and will help all the interested people to come together and develop. Any thoughts on this? Thanks Vikram On Nov 3, 2015 11:54 PM, "Sean M. Collins" wrote: > I made a

[openstack-dev] [networking-onos]: Proposing new cores for networking-onos

Hi All, I would like to propose Mr. Ramanjaneya Reddy Palleti and Mr. Dongfeng as new cores for networking-onos project. Their contribution was significant in the last Liberty cycle w.r.t to this project. *Facts:* http://stackalytics.com/?metric=loc=networking-onos=all Request existing cores to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qos][fwaas] service groups vs. traffic classifiers

03, 2015 at 02:08:26PM EST, Vikram Choudhary wrote: > Thanks for all your efforts Sean. > > I was actually thinking a separate IRC for this effort would be great > and will help all the interested people to come together and develop. > > Any thoughts on this? Unless it becom

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][db]Neutron db revision fails

Hi Zhi, We already have a defect logged for this issue. https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1503342 Thanks Vikram On Oct 12, 2015 8:10 AM, "Zhi Chang" wrote: > Hi, everyone. > I install a devstack from the latest code. But there is an error when > I create a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] New cycle started. What are you up to, folks?

It groups Subnets; > floating IPs will hang off of these instead of Networks; and they can > be owned by Networks or RoutedNetworkGroups. One day, they will also > stand alone to represent a pure L3-only network (e.g. Calico). > > This new model will allow Neutron router

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][db] reviewers: please mind the branch a script belongs to

Thanks for sharing this Ihar! Thanks Vikram On Sep 3, 2015 2:13 AM, "Carl Baldwin" wrote: > Thanks, I learned a thing or two from the document that you linked. > Thanks for reminding us of that. > > Carl > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][nova] QoS Neutron-Nova integration

Hi Ajo, I am In. Thanks for the information. Thanks Vikram On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo wrote: > >Hi, > > Looking forward to the M cycle, > > I was wondering if we could loop you in our next week Neutron/QoS > meeting > on

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL Non-Candidacy

I was little upset hearing this. You are a true leader Kyle. Nice working with you. On Sep 12, 2015 5:33 AM, "Assaf Muller" wrote: > Kyle, you've really done a fantastic job during your time. The community > is now much more welcoming, and I think that working on Neutron is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all]gerri performance

+1 for me as well :( On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > Yes, a 'git review' just took around 20s for me. > > On 24/09/15 13:21, Miguel Angel Ajo wrote: > >I am experiencing it, yes :/ > >>Gary Kotton wrote: > >>Hi, > >>Anyone else experiencing bad

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] -1 due to line length violation in commit messages

+1 for <=80 chars. It will be uniform with the existing coding style. On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 09/25/2015 04:44 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> releases are approaching, so it’s the right time to start some bike >> shedding

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL Election Conclusion and Results

Congrats Armando! On Sep 26, 2015 5:57 AM, "Edgar Magana" wrote: > Congratulations to our PTLs! > > Let's make Mitaka a great release. > > As Neutron core I want to congratulate to Rosella, Ryan and Armando for > volunteering. It is a huge responsibility and we all

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Scaling our testing needs

It would be better if we can document the scenarios / cases where individual tests make sense. As a developer this confuses me the most. On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > hi, > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Armando M.

Re: [openstack-dev] FW: [vitrage] Gerrit Upgrade 12/16

+1 for getting the old view! On Dec 17, 2015 2:13 PM, "Eugene Nikanorov" wrote: > I'm sorry to say that, but the new front page design is horrible and > totally confusing. > > I hope it'll change soon in the new release. > > E. > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:53 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] Gerrit Upgrade 12/16

Hi All, Old interface was better. Is it possible to restore the same! Thanks Vikram On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Spencer Krum wrote: > This is a gentle reminder that the downtime will be this Wednesday > starting at 17:00 UTC. > > Thank you for your patience, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Query about re-directing incoming traffic.

traffic to a specific destination by installing an additional route in the routing table. What we want is the traffic should also follow it's normal forwarding path after it gets processed by the NF (network function). > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Vikram Choudhary <viks...@gmail.com&

[openstack-dev] Query about re-directing incoming traffic

Hi All, We want to redirect all / some specific traffic incoming traffic to a particular port where a network function is deployed. [Network function could be DPI, IDS, Firewall, Classifier, etc]. In this regard, we have few queries: 1. How this can be achieved? 2. Do we have well-defined NBI's

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Query about re-directing incoming traffic.

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/28/2015 11:13 AM, Vikram Choudhary wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> We want to redirect all / some specific incoming traffic to a particular >> neutron port, where a network function is

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Query about re-directing incoming traffic.

Hi All, We want to redirect all / some specific incoming traffic to a particular neutron port, where a network function is deployed. [Network function could be DPI, IDS, Firewall, Classifier, etc]. In this regard, we have few queries: 1. How we can achieve this? 2. Do we have well-defined NBI's

Re: [openstack-dev] Gerrit performance

Same here! On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Michał Dulko wrote: > On 12/29/2015 10:44 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > > Hi, > > I know it is holidays but gerrit response is so slow. If anyone from > > Infra is online please can you help. > > Thanks > > Gary > > > > Actually

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Query about re-directing incoming traffic.

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Neil Jerram <neil.jer...@metaswitch.com> wrote: > On 28/12/15 16:16, Vikram Choudhary wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > We want to redirect all / some specific incoming traffic to a > > particular neutron port, where a network function i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday 1400UTC

21:00 UTC is too difficult for me to attend. It's early morning (2:30 AM) ;( On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo wrote: > I agree with Gary here, > >The 21:00 UTC time here is a difficult time for me, because it's > exactly the time of getting kids to

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] how to install networking-sfc on compute node

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Na Zhu wrote: > Hi, > > From this link > https://github.com/openstack/networking-sfc/tree/master/devstack, it is > about installing networking-sfc together with neutron-server, > I want to install networking-sfc on compute node, can anyone tell

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Proposing Mohan Kumar for networking-sfc core

+1... Welcome Mohan! On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Antony Silvester wrote: > +1 > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:01 PM, P. Ramanjaneya Reddy < > ramanji...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Henry Fourie >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Spec detailing both approaches

Hi Igor/Cathy/Louis, Thanks for driving this effort. Will certainly help with the review! Thanks Vikram On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Duarte Cardoso, Igor < igor.duarte.card...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Cathy, Louis, > > > > I'll reupload the Neutron spec today to openstack/neutron-specs along

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Failure on installing openstack with latest devstack.

Remove cloud.yaml file and try! *os-client-config* will look for a file called *clouds.yaml*in the following locations: Current Directory ~/.config/openstack /etc/openstack Thanks Vikram On Jan 17, 2016 8:19 AM, "Vikram Choudhary" <viks...@gmail.com> wrote: > Remove

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Failure on installing openstack with latest devstack.

Remove cloud.yaml file try! *os-client-config* will look for a file called *clouds.yaml*in the following locations: Current Directory~/.config/openstack/etc/openstack Thanks Vikram Hi, I'm continuously seeing failure installing openstack with latest devstack. It exits with the following

[openstack-dev] [devstack] Failure on installing openstack with latest devstack.

Hi There, Can someone please me to resolve below devstack error? 2016-01-22 07:00:29.802 | 6134 INFO keystone.cmd.cli [-] Domain default already exists, skipping creation. 2016-01-22 07:00:29.952 | 6134 INFO keystone.cmd.cli [-] Created project admin 2016-01-22 07:00:29.959 | 6134 DEBUG

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Failure on installing openstack with latest devstack.

Thanks Markus. Will try! On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Markus Zoeller <mzoel...@de.ibm.com> wrote: > Vikram Choudhary <viks...@gmail.com> wrote on 01/22/2016 08:11:52 AM: > > > From: Vikram Choudhary <viks...@gmail.com> > > To: "OpenStack Developm

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] BGP Dynamic Routing Development Going Forward

I agree with Armando and feel option 2 would be viable if we really want to deliver this feature in Mitaka time frame. Adding a new stadium project invites more work and can be done in N release. Thanks Vikram On Jan 22, 2016 11:47 PM, "Armando M." wrote: > > > On 22 January

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday 1400UTC

+1 for Kyle's suggestion Thanks Vikram On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Martin Hickey wrote: > Hi, > > +1 for me on Kyle's suggestion. > > Regards, > Martin > > [image: Inactive hide details for Kyle Mestery ---19/01/2016 16:39:05---On > Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:14 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

Thanks for resuming this up Armando! On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 29 March 2016 at 20:43, Vikram Choudhary <viks...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Armando, >> >> We want to add the support for a new ML2 driver

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][python-neutronclient] Adding new options to the existing Neutron CLIs

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:36 AM, reedip banerjee wrote: > Dear All Neutron Developers and Reviewers, > > I have a query/concern related to the parsing of options in > python-neutronclient. > I would like to bring this up, as it "may" also impact the transition of > the CLIs

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] BGP Dynamic Routing Development Going Forward

; have the most hands-on experience with the Neutron codebase. By all means, > we do make mistakes, but we're the ones who have been dealing with the > hurdles caused by those mistakes. If we advised you for a strategy, then > this strategy is most likely the direct consequence of a past/ongoing &g

[openstack-dev] [fuel][plugins][ovs] NSH Query

Hi Folks, We were trying https://github.com/openstack/fuel-plugin-ovs.git, and has below query: *Our Setup:* SF |

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP support

Hi Gary, Could you please provide the spec details.. Thanks Vikram On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Thanks for the pointers. Any reason why this is not part of the L2 gateway > effort? I think that could be a natural place for this. The project name >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

Hi Armando, We want to add the support for a new ML2 driver. Can you please guide what is the step moving forward? Thanks Vikram On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Armando M. wrote: > Hi folks, > > Status update on this matter: > > Russell, Kyle and I had a number of patches

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS Agent extension for Newton cycle

Hi Cathy, A project called "neutron-classifier [1]" is also there addressing the same use case. Let's sync up and avoid work duplicity. [1] https://github.com/openstack/neutron-classifier Thanks Vikram On Apr 14, 2016 6:40 AM, "Cathy Zhang" wrote: Hi everyone, Per

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc] Network-sfc project f2f2 meet-up place and time

I have added the point about the common flow classifier to the etherpad. Hope we will discuss about that as well. On Apr 27, 2016 3:03 AM, "Cathy Zhang" wrote: > Hi Anil, > > > > Sorry just checked the email. We ended it around 1:45pm. > > It is mostly a get-to-know

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] OSC transition

+1 for keeping neutron-dynamic-routing CLI's in neutronclient repo like other *aaS services. Thanks Vikram On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Richard Theis wrote: > Hi, > > The latest devref [1] would place it in python-neutronclient as Henry > noted. But stay tuned for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][TC] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Yes, the effort is on-going for ODL [1] and ONOS [2] [3] has successfully integrated the same.. [1] networking-odl spec https://github.com/openstack/networking-odl/blob/master/doc/source/sfc-driver.rst [2] ONOS Implementation

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS Agent extension for Newton cycle

+1 for the bi-weekly proposal @17:00 UTC Tuesday. IMO, let's start with this and then we can check on the feasibility of having the meeting on a weekly basis. On May 23, 2016 1:10 PM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Hirofumi Ichihara to Neutron Core Reviewer Team

Congrats Hirofumi! On Apr 15, 2016 11:12 AM, "reedip banerjee" wrote: > Congratulations Hirofumi :) > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Takashi Yamamoto > wrote: > >> welcome, hirofumi! >> >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Akihiro Motoki

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc] A standards-compliant SFC API

Just a quick glance over the proposal seems like the networking-sfc also does the same. In addition, networking-sfc is successfully integrated with ONOS[1] and planned for ODL[2], OVN [3] & Tacker[4] (without any issues with the existing API's so far). In addition, If we feel the existing

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc] A standards-compliant SFC API

; [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/308453/ > > > > Best regards, > > Igor. > > > > *From:* Vikram Choudhary [mailto:viks...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, April 21, 2016 3:39 AM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS Agent extension for Newton cycle

AFAIK, there is proposal about adding a 'priority' option in the existing flow classifier rule. This can ensure the rule ordering. On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:58 PM, IWAMOTO Toshihiro wrote: > At Wed, 20 Apr 2016 14:12:07 +0200, > Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > > > > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Adding ihrachys to theneutron-drivers team

Congrats Ihar! From: reedip banerjee [mailto:reedi...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 September 2016 14:08 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Adding ihrachys to theneutron-drivers team Congratulations Ihar :) On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:00

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] bug deputy report

3. https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1628044 - bgp listener not > listening on mitaka. Someone should validate the bug in latest code. >>> Ryu team got to check this issue... Neutron is not responsible for creating BGP peer... On Oct 3, 2016 8:26 PM, "Assaf Muller" wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] #networking-sfc IRC channel

+1 for networking-sfc! From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com] Sent: 23 November 2016 16:56 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] #networking-sfc IRC channel Hi networking-sfc's leaders, devs and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stepping down as testing lieutenant and from the core & drivers teams

Hi Assaf, Wish you all the best for your future endeavor! Thanks Vikram -Original Message- From: Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville) [mailto:swaminathan.vasude...@hpe.com] Sent: 29 November 2016 00:35 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Stepping down from core

It was really a good experience working with you Carl. Best of luck for your future endeavour! Thanks Vikram On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Trinath Somanchi wrote: > Carl - > > > > You are an asset to Neutron community. Missing you as core is a hard > thing. > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] proposing Ryan Tidwell and Nate Johnston as service LTs

+1 for Ryan! On Dec 16, 2016 7:23 AM, "Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw)" wrote: > +1. From the neutron-fwaas perspective, Nate has been instrumental in > driving our integration with neutron on the agent extension framework, > neutron-lib as well as on CI. > > Thanks > > Sridar