Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Supporting volume_type when booting from volume

It’s definitely a nice feature to have for end user, actually we implemented it our own because we need this but nova doesn’t support. Yingjun > On May 24, 2017, at 6:58 AM, Jay Bryant wrote: > > > On 5/23/2017 9:56 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: >> >> >> On 23 May 2017

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaasv2]How to configure lbaasv2 in devstack

Currently horizon doesn’t support LBaaS v2, there is a blueprint related but it doesn’t implement yet: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/lbaas-v2-panel 2015-07-21 9:49 GMT+08:00 jiangshan0...@139.com jiangshan0...@139.com: Hi all, I have configured these lines in my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Rally] Improve review process

Nice! On May 5, 2015, at 8:11 PM, Roman Vasilets rvasil...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, Rally Team. I have created Rally Gerrit dashboard that organized patches in groups: Critical for next release, Waiting for final approve, Bug fixes, Proposed specs, Important patches, Ready for review, Has

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-operators][rally] What's new in Rally v0.0.2

Nice! On Mar 13, 2015, at 1:03 AM, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote: Hi stackers, For those who doesn't know Rally team started making releases. There are 3 major reasons why we started doing releases: * A lot of people started using Rally in their CI/CD. Usually

[openstack-dev] [nova] Support starting index when auto naming multiple instances

Currently when booting multiple instances, the instance display-names will be something like 'test-1,test-2' if we set multi_instance_display_name_template = %(name)s-%(count)s. Here is the problem, if we need more instances and want the instance names start with 'test-3', there is no such way

Re: [openstack-dev] Which program for Rally

From a user’s aspect i do think Rally is more suitable for a product-ready cloud, and seems like it is where it focused on. It’s very easy to evaluate that if the performance of the cloud is better after we adjust some configs or some other tuning. It also provides SLA which maybe not so

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][rally] Application for a new OpenStack Program: Performance and Scalability

Cool, Rally is really helpful for performance benchmarking and optimizing for our openstack cloud. On Jul 22, 2014, at 5:53, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote: Hi Stackers and TC, The Rally contributor team would like to propose a new OpenStack program with a mission to provide

Re: [openstack-dev] [Rally] PTL Candidacy

+1 On Jul 22, 2014, at 2:38, Boris Pavlovic bpavlo...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, I would like to propose my candidacy for Rally PTL. I started this project to make benchmarking of OpenStack simple as possible. This means not only load generation, but as well OpenStack specific benchmark

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal: Move CPU and memory allocation ratio out of scheduler

+1, if doing so, a related bug related bug may be solved as well: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1323538 On Jun 3, 2014, at 21:29, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stackers, tl;dr = Move CPU and RAM allocation ratio definition out of the Nova scheduler and into the

Re: [openstack-dev] Quota Management

Glad to see this, i will be glad to contribute on it if the project could move on.. On Apr 4, 2014, at 10:01, Cazzolato, Sergio J sergio.j.cazzol...@intel.com wrote: Glad to see that, for sure I'll participate of this session. Thanks -Original Message- From: Jay Pipes

Re: [openstack-dev] Nova V2 Quota API

On Jan 29, 2014, at 22:48, Vinod Kumar Boppanna vinod.kumar.boppa...@cern.ch wrote: Hi, In the Documentation, it was mentioned that there are two API's to see the quotas of a tenant. 1. v2/{tenant_id}/os-quota-sets - Shows quotas for a tenant 2.

Re: [openstack-dev] Nova V2 Quota API

I reported a bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1274153 On Jan 29, 2014, at 23:33, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote: Hi can you point out where you're seeing documentation for the first without tenant_id? At

[openstack-dev] [nova] Needs approval again after rebase

Hi, The patch https://review.openstack.org/43583 was approved but failed to get merged. Could any core reviewer take a look at this after rebase ? Thanks Yingjun ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] Review request for 40171

Hi, all， Could any one from the nova core team take a look at the patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40171/ Clean destroy for project quota * Destroy user quotas under the project when deleting project quota. * Fixes bug 1206479 https://code.launchpad.net/bugs/1206479 Change-Id:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Proposal to revert per-user-quotas

Thanks for address the issues. About the bad state for fixed_ips, floating_ips, i think we could make the user_id column=NULL when creating the quota usage and reservation, so the usages for fixed_ips and floating_ips will be synced within the project. Does this make sense? 2013/8/20 Andrew

[openstack-dev] Multiple workers for neurton API server

Hi, all. Currently, there is only one pid running for neutron-server. It's not enough to handle the requests when undering lots of API access. So multiple workers for neutron-server are urgrent necessary. Please refer to https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/multi-workers-for-api-server