Re: [openstack-dev] opnfv proposal on DR capability enhancement on OpenStack Nova

target with a small amount of work. But if anyone is interested to broaden the effort, you are more than welcomed to join. Please feel free to contact me if there is any questions. Thanks :) On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi Keshava, > > What we want to achieve is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Reactive enforcement specs

Hi All, Since the meeting time would be 1:00am in the morning in China, I'm afraid I probably won't make it at IRC. As I have left comments on policy-event-trigger and explicit-reactive-enforcement, my colleague and I are interested in these specs, and would like to provide work on coding accordin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Telco] [NFV] Service function chaining

Hi Yuriy, FYI there is a project proposal on opnfv wiki on this issue: https://wiki.opnfv.org/requirements_projects/openstack_based_vnf_forwarding_graph On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:22 AM, wrote: > Hi all, > > as discussed per last IRC meeting we prepared first thoughts on the > requirements on Se

Re: [openstack-dev] Thoughts on OpenStack Layers and a Big Tent model

by vendors. It is gonna be a difficult task, since this kind of thing is always hard to do, but some form of intra cloud standard has to be introduced and worked on so users could actually have a resource "pool" Best Regards Zhipeng -- Zhipeng Huang Research Assistant Mobile A

Re: [openstack-dev] Thoughts on OpenStack Layers and a Big Tent model

gt;> solution that includes them somehow. >> >> Vish >> >> ___ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Forming the API Working Group

gt; >> >> Regards, Everett >>> >>> [1] >>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014- >>> September/046850.html >>> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-summit-topics >>> >> >> _

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Forming the API Working Group

Hi Thierry, THX for the link ! So we will have the workshop on Nov 3th at Meridien Etoile Hotel? On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Zhipeng Huang wrote: > > HI all, will we have a discussion on this issun at Paris Summit? > > I expect the API WG to propose

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Forming the API Working Group

______ >> > > OpenStack-dev mailing list >> > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > >> >> >> __

Re: [openstack-dev] My notes and experiences about OSv on OpenStack

nd any spelling or grammar mistakes in my email from > Mar 1 2013, notify me * > *and I'll donate $1 or ￥1 to an open organization you specify.* > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://li

Re: [openstack-dev] My notes and experiences about OSv on OpenStack

ect in Intel. But failed... > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Zhipeng Huang > wrote: > >> Hi, I'm also interested in it. You submitted a talk about it to Paris >> Summit right? >> >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Gareth >> wrote: >> &g

Re: [openstack-dev] My notes and experiences about OSv on OpenStack

need do is enabling > some Qemu flags in Nova libvirt driver. > > yep, I will be there :) > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Zhipeng Huang > wrote: > >> Ahhh, that's bad. Do you think there is a need for pushing OSv >> integration in OpenStack in Kilo cy

Re: [openstack-dev] My notes and experiences about OSv on OpenStack

t country happens to be France, and that city happens to be > Paris. I am arriving Nov 4th around 3 pm, and would be happy to meet you > (and other people interested in OSv) either that night, or even better, the > following day or night. > > Cheers > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finalizing cross-project design summit track

ding a >>> SDK session. >>> >>> [0] >>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044766.html >>> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/6cWQG9oNsr >>> >>> >>>> -- >>>> Thierry Carrez (ttx) >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] PCI/SR-IOV meet-up at the summit

___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Zhipeng Huang Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California,

[openstack-dev] [Nova][DR][NFV] opnfv proposal on DR capability enhancement on OpenStack Nova

tact me if anyone got any questions :) -- Zhipeng Huang Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edu Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute affcienado ___ O

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][DR][NFV] opnfv proposal on DR capability enhancement on OpenStack Nova

Hi Steve, We are hammering out the details right now, and will send it out to the community,like real soon :) Thanks for the comment! On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Zhipeng Huang" > > To: "OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] opnfv proposal on DR capability enhancement on OpenStack Nova

considering and working on a more expanded and detailed version as we speak, and if you are interested you are welcomed to join the effort :) On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:52 AM, A, Keshava wrote: > Zhipeng Huang, > > When multiple Datacenters are interconnected over WAN/Internet if the >

[openstack-dev] [Cinder][DR]replication/CG support in driver

Hi all, We want to add replication/CG related support in huawei driver, would this also be bound to the Dec.19th deadline? There is confusion on whether the deadline is for new drivers or for all the proposals for Kilo. As I remembered in the design summit meetup, it was set for the new drivers co

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][DR]replication/CG support in driver

ls of our > structural code changes - early submission is therefore strongly > advised. > > On 17 November 2014 11:19, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We want to add replication/CG related support in huawei driver, would > this > > also be bound to the Dec.

[openstack-dev] [tricircle][neutron][dragonflow]Joint session at Design Summit Venue

Hi All, Team Tricircle and Dragonflow will hold joint design session at design summit venue, and since both teams are not top level official projects, we will try to gather what we could grab at the site for logistic of the meeting :) The time slot for our session would be 1:30-3:30pm, on Wed and

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] [cinder] Mitaka summit working session: Resource Federation for an Open Cloud

Hi George, Our tricircle team [1] has been working on some issue that shares similar concerns with OCX team, and Orran (from your team I believe) was kept as a regular email receipiant of our discussion. Look forward to further discussion with you guys ! :) [1]https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tric

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle][neutron][dragonflow]Joint session at Design Summit Venue

Hi All, For those of you who are interested, we are having the session at Hinoki room at Building 4#, and agenda is available at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TricircleDFMitakaSession On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi All, > > Team Tricircle and Dragonflow

Re: [openstack-dev] Is there any incubating Data Backup projects?

Hi Yitao, You could also check out a new project called Smaug just announced at the Tokyo summit, the presentation could be found at https://www.openstack.org/summit/tokyo-2015/videos/presentation/disaster-recovery-your-cloud-one-more-choice-than-volume-replication, more info will be available lat

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]Tokyo Summit Summary

Hi Team, We had very great sessions re Tricircle at Tokyo Summit, both main conference [1] and design summit [2]. After the summit the core team dived into new architecture design as discussed in the design summit session [3] , therefore there had been sorta radio silent, but rest assure the work

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova meeting this Thursday

+1 On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:51 PM, John Garbutt wrote: > Hi, > > I just wanted to share my plan for Thursday's meeting. > > As it is thanksgiving in the US, I am assuming no US based people will > attend. > > Given there are lots of non-US people around, and it is our "early" > slot this week,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Tokyo Summit Summary

Hi All, We will hold our regular meeting today starting UTC1300 at #openstack-meeting, and we will chat about the new architecture discussed during the Tokyo Design Summit On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi Team, > > We had very great sessions re Tricircle

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Tricircle]The process for adding networking-tricircle

Hi Neutrinos, We the Tricircle team want to have a neutron-ovn like agent in Neutron for our networking management. I'm aware of the recent stadium model debate going on the mailinglist, so my question is what is the current procedure to propose such out of tree agent? Would it be something like

[openstack-dev] [Tacker][Tricircle]Multi-VIM collaboration

Hi Tacker team, As I commented in the BP[1], our team is interested in a collaboration in this area. I think one of the collaboration point would be to define a mapping between tacker multi-vim api with Tricircle resource routing api table [2]. [1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249085/ [2] http

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tacker][Tricircle]Multi-VIM collaboration

ke heat multi-cloud / multi-region) in > perspective. It will be great to get the Tacker multi-site API bake in > different multi-site deployment patterns underneath. > > - Sridhar > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Zhipeng Huang > wrote: > >> Hi Tacker team, >&

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Coding style guidelines

Hi shinobu, could you provide an example of which part of code need modification to fit the guideline ? On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > Hi Team, > > Please make sure that your coding style follows OpenStack style > guidelines. [1] > > I understand that it's really painfu

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Proposal: Architecture Working Group

Hi Clint and Amrith, Are you guys already working on the proposal ? Is there any public access to see the first draft ? On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > On 10:27 Jun 20, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2016-06-20 10:40:56 -0600: > > > So, it s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FPGA as a resource

Hi Roman, You are actually touching on something we have been working on. There is a team in OPNFV DPACC project has been working acceleration related topics, including folks from CMCC, Intel, ARM, Freescale, Huawei. We found out that in order to have acceleration working under NFV scenrios, other

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FPGA as a resource

could have more deep dive chat when we got chance :) On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Roman Dobosz wrote: > On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:12:16 +0800 > Zhipeng Huang wrote: > > > You are actually touching on something we have been working on. There is > a > > team in OPNFV DPACC

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Hello

Hi Lige, You could also check out shipengfei's blog http://shipengfei92.cn/play_tricircle_with_virtualbox on how to play with devstack to setup a Tricircle env on your laptop : ) On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:54 AM, joehuang wrote: > Hi, Lige, > > > > Welcome to join Tricircle. You can start from

[openstack-dev] [Nomad][DPACC]Call for ideas on Austin Nomad BoF Session

Hi All, We will have a birth of feather session on acceleration management in Austin. https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/7380 I'm now soliciting ideas from the community, for those who is interested in this area please feel free to input any topics you want to dis

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][kuryr] Shared session in design summit

Thanks Hongbin, Actually we have a new project called Fuxi that sorta like Kuryr for storage, would be glad to discuss the ideas On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Hi all, > > > > The Magnum-Kuryr joined session was scheduled to Thursday 11:50 – 12:30: > https://www.openstack.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tosca-parser] [heat-translator] Collaboration with [Tacker] project at the Austin Summit

Hi Sahdev, Could parser team also be part of the joint session ? On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Sahdev P Zala wrote: > Hi Team, > > We will be having a collaborative session with Tacker project at the > summit. The following Tacker working session will be focused on it, > > Tacker Developer T

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes] Introducing the Kubernetes OpenStack Special Interest Group

Hi Ihor, This is a great news ! As a matter of fact at the moment the Tricircle team from OpenStack is working with Ubernetes team lead by Quinton to explore features about how OpenStack federation could help K8s federation works better. This SIG seems like a good fit for our ongoing work. Will y

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes] Introducing the Kubernetes OpenStack Special Interest Group

got it thanks :) On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Zhipeng Huang" > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

+1 On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > OK, there is enough interest, I'll find a place on 6th Street for us > and get a reservation for Thursday around 7 or so. > > Thanks folks! > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Zhou, Han wrote: > > +1 :) > > > > Han Zhou > > Irc: zhouha

[openstack-dev] [Nomad]BoF Session presentation

Hi all, Thanks for attending today's session, please find the presentation slide at http://www.slideshare.net/zhipengh/making-workload-nomadic-when-accelerated -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huaw

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Requirements for becoming approved official project

Thx shinobu, This is a great checklist ! Re PTL election, could we use community tools for that ? On May 2, 2016 1:09 PM, "Shinobu Kinjo" wrote: Hi Team, According to Documentation team, the Tricircle project seems to close to be official (but not really official kind of) since we have standard

[openstack-dev] [Coupler] Austin Summit vBrownBag slide

Hi, For those of you who are interested, you could find our slide at http://www.slideshare.net/zhipengh/storage-is-not-virtualized-enough-part-2-lets-do-service-chaining -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangz

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Proposing Shinobu Kinjo for Tricircle core reviewer

+1, still remember Shinobu getting started from basic concept of tricircle, and now becoming a maester of multisite openstack :) On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:03 PM, joehuang wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose adding Shinobu Kinjo to the Tricircle core > reviewer team. > > Shinobu has been a hi

[openstack-dev] [Cinder][Ceph][Kingbird][Tricircle][Smaug]Build a multisite disaster recovery "stack"

Hi Folks, I was referred to this talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWFYC6W71tY by a colleague, and really think several projects should collaborate on this subject. Two projects that are missed from the talk but would be helpful are Smaug[1] and Tricircle[2]. Smaug provides data protection ser

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Ceph][Kingbird][Tricircle][Smaug]Build a multisite disaster recovery "stack"

with Kingbird in > order to address our first multi-site use case. > Perhaps in the future we will need Smaug and Tricircle but we are not > there yet. > > We will start contributing to Kingbird pretty soon and see how that goes. > Thanks! > > -- > Regards, > Sébastie

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Welcome Shinobu Kinjo to be the core reviewer of Tricircle

Congrats ! Keep up the good work :) On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > Hi Team, > > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:03 AM, joehuang wrote: > > Hello, Team, > > > > After the nomination and one week vote, all current core reviewers has > voted +1, and no -1 vote. So let's welcome

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tacker] Mitaka midcycle meetup - RSVP / etherpad

Hi Sridhar, Do we have means of virtual participant ? On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy wrote: > Tacker team is planning to host a 2-day mid-cycle meetup in San Jose, CA > around end of January. Please RSVP if you are interested to join with your > preferred dates in this googl

Re: [openstack-dev] [senlin] Midcycle meetup (2016-01-11/12)

do we have audio communication for the meetup ? On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Ethan Lynn wrote: > Finally I get a chance to see you all! > > Best Regards, > Ethan Lynn > > > > On Dec 28, 2015, at 17:54, Yanyan Hu wrote: > > Great! Can't wait to see you guys :) > > 2015-12-28 10:03 GMT+08:00 Q

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][stackalytics] some projects not visible in stackalytics now

Hi Thierry, Does this mean big tent projects = TC approved ? My understanding was that for those project migrated from stackforge to OpenStack infra now, is OpenStack big tent projects but not TC-approved OpenStack projects. On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Thierry Carrez

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] weekly meeting of Jan.20

Hi Joe, I was busy working on other business did not get the chance to join the meeting, do we have a minute of the last meeting ? On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:45 PM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, > > After the stateless design was moved to the master branch, we also move > the focus back to the master

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Playing Tricircle with Devstack

cc'ed Joe. Yipei I think you could refer to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1490950 On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Yipei Niu wrote: > There doesn't any problems when installing devstack on node1. However, > when install devstack to node2, I encounter an error and the trace

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV][tacker] Notes from Tacker Midcycle Meetup

Hi tacker team, Sorry for missing the midcycle, I have put down some of my thoughts re tosca-parser and Multisite on the etherpad. : ) On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy wrote: > Thanks for all those who participated in last week's 2-day Tacker Midcycle > meetup. It was a quite a

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]Question regarding pep8 test

Hi Khayam, We try to get every communication on the mailing list for transparency :) So I copied your email here. - Zhiyan pls check to see what happened. S

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] DHCP port problem

CC'ed Li Ma who might have insight on this problem On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Vega Cai wrote: > Hi all, > > When implementing L3 north-south networking functionality, I meet the DHCP > port problem again. > > First let me briefly explain the DHCP port problem. In Tricircle, we have > a Neut

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Weekly Meeting 2015.07.08

Hi Team, We didn't have meeting last week due to work schedule, let's resume the weekly meeting today. The agenda is to discuss the tricircle design google doc listed under the BP https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196564/ -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Proo

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Tricircle Weekly Team Meeting 2015.07.08 Roundup

Hi Team, Thanks a lot for attending today's meeting. The meeting minutes could be found at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tricircle/2015/tricircle.2015-07-08-13.05.html And please find in the attachment for chatlog that had not been logged by meetbot. -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standa

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Tricircle Weekly Team Meeting 2015.07.08 Roundup

use > cases/requirements/design. > > BR, > Irena > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang > wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> Thanks a lot for attending today's meeting. The meeting minutes could be >> found at >> >> >> htt

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Weekly Team Meeting 2015.07.15

Hi Team, We will have our weekly meeting today at UTC1300, we will be discussing Saggi's new patch https://review.openstack.org/201224 -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei In

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Team Weekly Meeting 2015.07.15 Roundup

Hi Team, Sorry I weren't able to make it at the irc meeting due to personal issues, however Joe was kind enough to log all the conversations. So here you go, the automated generated minutes is here (tho not so much info): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tricircle/2015/tricircle.2015-07-15

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Team Weekly Meeting 2015.07.22

Hi Team, As usual we will have meeting at UTC 1300. We will be discussing https://review.openstack.org/201224, zhiyuan might has some input for Saggi :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Weekly Team Meeting 2015.07.22 Roundup

Hi Team, Thanks again for attending the meeting yesterday. We have quite a lot AIs left (3), and hopefully we could got most of them done by the time of next meeting. The meetbot minutes is here: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tricircle/2015/tricircle.2015-07-22-13.05.html, and as usual

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Team Weekly Meeting 2015.07.29

Hi Team， We will as usual have our meeting starting from UTC1300 today. The main topic would be the design BP and DAL patch opened by Zhiyuan. -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Hu

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Weekly Team Meeting 2015.08.05 Agenda

Hi Team, As usual we will have weekly meeting today starting UTC1300. The agenda today is to address the AIs left in the last meeting: 1. update the doc for how to work with KeyStone, joehuang 2. gampel check what mistral supports and which taskflow we want in the reference implementati

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Weekly Team Meeting 2015.08.05 Agenda

Thanks for everyone attending the meeting, minutes could be found here: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tricircle/2015/tricircle.2015-08-05-13.00.html On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi Team, > > As usual we will have weekly meeting today starting UTC

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]Weekly Team Meeting 2015.08.12 Agenda

Hi Team, We will continue to have our regular meeting today. The agenda for today would be: 1. local/bottom cascade service design 2. gampel to have a list of resources that need to be retrieved so we can check if it can be done by tenant context in the design work on resource mapping

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]Tricircle Liberty Midcycle Minisprint on Aug 17th 2015

Hi Team, As discussed in the last meeting, we will hold a design sprint meeting on next Monday starting from UTC 1200 to discuss exclusively design problems and ideas. The meeting will happen at #openstack-tricircle so that we could discuss as long as we are awake without time limits :P The meeti

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Tricircle Liberty Midcycle Minisprint on Aug 17th 2015

Hi All, Joe has suggested to move the meeting earlier to UTC 0800, if there is no problem then we will have the meeting in about 6 hours :) On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi Team, > > As discussed in the last meeting, we will hold a design sprint meeting

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Tricircle Liberty Midcycle Minisprint on Aug 17th 2015

Hi Team, Thanks for attending the meeting and had a lively discussion on L2GW, please find in the attachment for the meeting log. Be noted that we will have the 2nd part of the meeting next Monday at the same time. :) On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi All, >

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] Cancellation of Weekly Team Meeting 2015.08.19

Hi Team, Due to inability of several team members to attend today's meeting, the meeting would be canceled and discussion are welcomed on the mailing list :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] multiple cascade services

ng ) > > > > *From:* e...@gampel.co.il [mailto:e...@gampel.co.il] *On Behalf Of *Eran > Gampel > *Sent:* Thursday, August 27, 2015 7:07 PM > *To:* joehuang; Irena Berezovsky; Eshed Gal-Or; Ayal Baron; OpenStack > Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); caizhiyuan (A);

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Mitaka Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

Do we have enough logistics for projects that are not in the schedule above but also want to have ad hoc sessions at the design summit venue? For example like in Paris we usually just grab a table and slap a card with project name on it. On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > O

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]Weekly Team Meeting 2015.09.09

Hi Team, Let's resume our weekly meeting today. As Eran suggest before, we will mainly discuss the work we have now, and leave the design session in another time slot :) See you at UTC 1300 today. -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technolog

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Weekly Team Meeting 2015.09.09

Hi Please find the meetbot log at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tricircle/2015/tricircle.2015-09-09-13.01.html . And also a noise cancelled minutes in the attachment. On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi Team, > > Let's resume our weekly meeting

[openstack-dev] [all]Big Tent Mode within respective projects

Hi All, As I understand, Neutron by far has the clearest big tent mode via its in-tree/out-of-tree decomposition, thanks to Kyle and other Neutron team members effort. So my question is, is it the same for the other projects? For example, does Nova also have the project-level Big Tent Mode Neutro

Re: [openstack-dev] [all]Big Tent Mode within respective projects

THX Jay :) On Jun 3, 2015 8:41 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote: > On 06/03/2015 08:25 AM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> As I understand, Neutron by far has the clearest big tent mode via its >> in-tree/out-of-tree decomposition, thanks to Kyle and other

Re: [openstack-dev] [all]Big Tent Mode within respective projects

Nice pointer Boris ! :) On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 06/04/2015 07:46 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > >> Jay, >> >> >> At this time, Neutron is the only project that has done any >> splitting out of driver and advanced services repos. Other projects >> have discu

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Polling for weekly team meeting

Hi All, The Tricircle Project has been on stackforge for a while, and without much activities. Now we will completely restructure the code base to make it more community open source friendly, less corporate PoC looking hopefully :P At the mean time I want to call for attention for people who are

Re: [openstack-dev] [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Tricircle] Polling for weekly team meeting

king for > api compatability or will certain features or functions also be needed? > > Many thanks for sharing this project. It is good to understand the > concepts. > > I b e n > 4087824726 > > From: Zhipeng Huang > Sent: Friday, June 5, 07:44 > Subject: [opnfv-t

Re: [openstack-dev] [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Tricircle] Polling for weekly team meeting

Pv6. Can we > make an assessment to understand where each one fits in the workflow of the > platform lifecycle? > > Do the underclouds need to be similar for tricycle to function properly? > What if some openstack are different from others? Are we just looking for > api compa

Re: [openstack-dev] [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Tricircle] Polling for weekly team meeting

Pv6. Can we > make an assessment to understand where each one fits in the workflow of the > platform lifecycle? > > Do the underclouds need to be similar for tricycle to function properly? > What if some openstack are different from others? Are we just looking for > api compa

Re: [openstack-dev] [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Tricircle] Polling for weekly team meeting

ch-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto: > opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of *Zhipeng Huang > *Sent:* Friday, June 05, 2015 8:31 PM > *To:* Rodriguez, Iben > *Cc:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; > opnfv-tech-disc...@lists.opnfv.org > *Subject:* Re: [opnfv

Re: [openstack-dev] [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Tricircle] Polling for weekly team meeting

Good Ideas, we could also try Mesos with k8Ns On Jun 6, 2015 8:44 PM, "Zhipeng Huang" wrote: > Hi Daniel , > > Definitely interested in it :) Tricircle & Ironic & Containers is also > something we've been wanting to try out for a long time :) > > On

Re: [openstack-dev] [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Tricircle] Polling for weekly team meeting

kend and lets carve out a etherpad space for > different development / lab build out ideas and start writing this stuff > down. > > Daniel, > > > > *From:* Zhipeng Huang [mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, June 06, 2015 9:01 AM > *To:* Daniel Smith > *Cc:

Re: [openstack-dev] [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Tricircle] Polling for weekly team meeting

operly? > What if some openstack are different from others? Are we just looking for > api compatability or will certain features or functions also be needed? > > Many thanks for sharing this project. It is good to understand the > concepts. > > I b e n > 4087824726 > &

Re: [openstack-dev] Enabling an Open Cloud with OpenStack

Hi Orran, We also have a project called Tricircle that aim to solve similar problem, but with a different approach with Mercador. You and your team are more than welcome to join the discussion we will hold in Tricircle Meeting. See the details at https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.o

Re: [openstack-dev] [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Tricircle] Polling for weekly team meeting

Last reminder, if you are interested, take the poll :) On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi Iben , if u are interestEd dont forget to participate the time pool :) > On Jun 5, 2015 11:03 PM, "Rodriguez, Iben" > wrote: > >> Hello Joe, &g

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Weekly Team Meeting starting on Wednesday !

Hi Team, Thanks for expressing your interests in Tricircle. The meeting logistics has been approved by the infra team, therefore starting from Wednesday this week, we will have *weekly* irc meetings on #openstack-meeting, from UTC 1300 to UTC 1400, to discuss the whats, whys and hows in Tricircle

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Weekly Team Meeting starting on Wednesday !

Just a reminder of today's meeting On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi Team, > > Thanks for expressing your interests in Tricircle. The meeting logistics > has been approved by the infra team, therefore starting from Wednesday this > week, we wi

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Weekly Team Meeting roundup

Hi Team, Thanks for the great discussions. Meeting minutes could be found at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tricircle_weekly_meeting_2015_06_24/2015/tricircle_weekly_meeting_2015_06_24.2015-06-24-13.04.html. Let's start hacking and reconvene next week :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Stand

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Starting with BP registration

Hi Team, Just a reminder that as what was discussed in yesterday's meeting, let's start the API reuse design with new BP registration at https://launchpad.net/tricircle and online doc edit/discuzz -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technolog

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle]New branch added

Hi Team, Zhiyuan just added a new branch "experiment" for the purpose of hacking new ideas, check it out at https://github.com/stackforge/tricircle/tree/experiment. -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Ubernetes and Tricirle

Hi Team, We should definitely look into this https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/kubernetes/blob/8813c955182e3c9daae68a8257365e02cd871c65/release-0.19.0/docs/proposals/federation.md, it would be fantastic if Tricircle could provide support for this feature -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle]Weekly Meeting 2015.07.01

Hi Team, We will have weekly meeting on Wednesday from UTC1300 to UTC1400 as usual. The main topic would be to discuss https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196564/, and any other business that people are interested :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

Thanks Khayam for the info Shinobu do you have any initial thoughts on what you would like to present ? :) On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > If you want anyone to joint this linuxcon to present the Tricle, let me > know. > IMHO I could -; > > Cheers, > S > > On Tue, Mar 8,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

#openstack-tricircle ? On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > Irc? > On Mar 9, 2016 5:50 PM, "joehuang" wrote: > >> >> Interesting, maybe we can co-present on Tricircle in Linux con. For the m-l >> is mainly for development topics. Let's move it to non-maillist discussion. >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

any possible that we use gRPC for Tricircle ? On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > Hi Chaoyi, > > Thank you for the pointer. > I'm also researching privately how we can improve RPC protocol > reasonably like HTTP2. > It's quite easy to foreseen that it would be bottleneck, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

t; Shinobu > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Zhipeng Huang > wrote: > > any possible that we use gRPC for Tricircle ? > > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Shinobu Kinjo > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Chaoyi, > >> > >> Thank you f

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

e and would cause a big > change on some layer. But since the OpenStack wouldn't stop growing > because of demands by end-users (I guess), it's worth thinking of that > features for our future. > > Cheers, > Shinobu > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Z

[openstack-dev] [congress][Policy][Copper]Collaboration between OpenStack Congress and OPNFV Copper

Hi Congress Team, As you might already knew, we had a project in OPNFV covering deployment policy called Copper , in which we identify Congress as one of the upstream projects that we need to put our requirement to. Our team has been working on setting up a simple op

  1   2   3   4   >