On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 1:18 AM Tobias Urdin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We've been talking for a while about the deprecation and removal of the
> stable/newton branches.
> I think it's time now that we get rid of them, we have no open patches
> and Newton is considered EOL.
>
> Could cores get back wit
+1
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 8:51 AM Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'd like to propose Quique (@quiquell) as a core reviewer for TripleO. Quique
> is actively involved in improvements and development of TripleO and TripleO
> CI. He also helps in other projects including but not limited to
> Inf
Just a heads up but we recently updated to puppet5 in the master
dependencies. It appears that this has completely hosed the master
scenarios and containers-multinode jobs. Please do recheck/approve
anything until we get this resolved.
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1803024
I have a
d to figure out the correct way forward
with these packages.
Thanks,
-Alex
[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/550848/
> On 10/31/18 6:35 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> >
> > So this is a single layer that is updated once and shared by all the
> > containers that inherit fro
;re
sure the gate is much better.
Thanks,
-Alex
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 9:39 AM Alex Schultz wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> So we have identified an issue that has been causing a bunch of
> failures and proposed a revert of our podman testing[0]. We have
> cleared the gate and are aski
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:16 AM Harald Jensås wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 15:00 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:25 PM Clark Boylan
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, at 10:42 AM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> > >
Hey everyone,
Based on previous emails around this[0][1], I have proposed a possible
reducing in our usage by switching the scenario001--011 jobs to
non-voting and removing them from the gate[2]. This will reduce the
likelihood of causing gate resets and hopefully allow us to land
corrective patch
Hey folks,
So we have identified an issue that has been causing a bunch of
failures and proposed a revert of our podman testing[0]. We have
cleared the gate and are asking that you not approve or recheck any
patches at this time. We will let you know when it is safe to start
approving things.
T
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:25 PM Clark Boylan wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, at 10:42 AM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:36 AM Ben Nemec wrote:
> > >
> > > Tagging with tripleo since my suggestion below is specific to that
> > > pr
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:36 AM Ben Nemec wrote:
>
> Tagging with tripleo since my suggestion below is specific to that project.
>
> On 10/30/18 11:03 AM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > A little while back I sent email explaining how the gate queues work and
> > how fixing bugs
With the proposed retirement of instack-undercloud[0], we will no
longer be supporting future development of the instack project as
well. As with instack-undercloud, we will continue to support the
stable branches of instack for their life but will not being doing any
future development. Please le
Just a heads up. I've been battling with some unit test issues with
the latest version of puppet 5.5. I've proposed some fixes[0][1], but
it appears that there is a larger issue with legacy functions which
affects the stable branches. I've reported the issues[2][3] upstream
to Puppetlabs, but it'
We have officially moved off of the instack-undercloud deployment
process in Rocky and have officially removed it's support from
python-tripleoclient in Stein. In order to prevent confusion I have
proposed a patch to start the retirement of instack-undercloud[0]. We
will continue to support the s
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:16 AM Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
>
>
> On 10/19/18 8:04 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:53 AM James Slagle
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:14 AM Alex Schultz
> >> wrote:
> >
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:53 AM James Slagle wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:14 AM Alex Schultz wrote:
> > Additionally I took a stab at combining the puppet/docker service
> > definitions for the aodh services in a similar structure to start
> > reducing the
+1
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 6:29 AM Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 8:24 AM Juan Antonio Osorio Robles
> wrote:
>>
>> I would like to propose Bob Fournier (bfournie) as a core reviewer in
>> TripleO. His patches and reviews have spanned quite a wide range in our
>> project, his
Time to resurrect this thread.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12:14 PM James Slagle wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
> > Last week I was tinkering with my docker configuration a bit and was a
> > bit surprised that puppet/services/docker.yaml no longer used puppet to
> > conf
And master is blocked again. We need https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607952/
Thanks,
-Alex
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:02 AM Alex Schultz wrote:
>
> Hey Folks,
>
> Currently the tripleo gate is at 21 hours and we're continue to have
> timeouts and now scenario001/004 (in qu
Hey Folks,
Currently the tripleo gate is at 21 hours and we're continue to have
timeouts and now scenario001/004 (in queens/pike) appear to be broken.
Additionally we've got some patches in puppet-openstack that we need
to land in order to resolve broken puppet unit tests which is
affecting both p
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> The release page says Ocata is planned to go into extended maintenance mode
> on Aug 27 [1]. There really isn't much to this except it means we don't do
> releases for Ocata anymore [2]. There is a caveat that project teams that do
> not wis
0, Juan Antonio Osorio Robles wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/14/2018 09:01 AM, Alex Schultz wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Chandan kumar
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> As Ocata release is alr
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 6:37 AM, Chandan kumar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As Ocata release is already EOL on 27-08-2018 [1].
> In TripleO, we are running Ocata jobs in TripleO CI and in promotion
> pipelines.
> Can we drop it all the jobs related to Ocata or do we need to keep some jobs
> to support upg
roles.
- Shared roles are open for reuse/replacement if something better is
available (upstream/elsewhere).
If anyone has any others, feel free to comment.
Thanks,
-Alex
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> I just realized I booked the room and put it in the etherpad but
>
I just realized I booked the room and put it in the etherpad but
forgot to email out the time.
Time: Tuesday 09:00-10:45
Room: Big Thompson
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ansible-collaboration-denver-ptg
Thanks,
-Alex
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2
e got the tempest role collaboration and some basic ideas
for best practice items that we can discuss. Feel free to add your
own and I'll update the etherpad with a time slot when I get one
nailed down.
Thanks,
-Alex
[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ansible-collaboration-denver-ptg
> I&
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:52 PM Alex Schultz wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:31 AM, Samuel Monderer
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Due to many different HW in our environment we have multiple roles.
>> > I would like to place each role d
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:31 AM, Samuel Monderer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to many different HW in our environment we have multiple roles.
> I would like to place each role definition if a different file.
> Is it possible to refer to all the roles from roles_data.yaml to all the
> different files instea
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> We just released Rocky RC1 and branched stable/rocky for most of tripleo
> repos, please let us know if we missed something.
> Please don't forget to backport the patches that land in master and that you
> want in Rocky.
>
> We're currently
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> This is the final countdown email for the Rocky development cycle. Thanks to
> everyone involved in the Rocky release!
>
> Development Focus
> -
>
> Teams attending the PTG should be preparing for those discussions and
> cap
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> Ahoy folks,
>
> In order to get to a spot where can start evaluate the current status
> of TripleO under python3 I've thrown together a set of ansible
> playbooks[0] to launch a fedora28 node and build the required
> py
Ahoy folks,
In order to get to a spot where can start evaluate the current status
of TripleO under python3 I've thrown together a set of ansible
playbooks[0] to launch a fedora28 node and build the required
python-tripleoclient (and dependencies) These playbooks will spawn a
VM on an OpenStack cl
Please do not approve or recheck anything until further notice. We've
got a few issues that have basically broken all the jobs.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1786764
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1787226
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1787244
https://bugs.launchpad.net
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Jill Rouleau wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Like Alex mentioned[0] earlier, we've created a bunch of ansible roles
> for tripleo specific bits. The idea is to start putting some basic
> cookiecutter type things in them to get things started, then move some
> low-hanging
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
.. snip ..
> ansible-role-container-registry
> ansible-role-redhat-subscription
> ansible-role-tripleo-modify-image
> instack-undercloud
> os-apply-config
> os-collect-config
> os-net-config
> os-refresh-config
> paunch
> python-tricirclecli
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Alex Schultz's message of 2018-08-09 14:31:34 -0600:
>> Ahoy folks,
>>
>> I think it's time we come up with some basic rules/patterns on where
>> code lands when it comes to OpenStack related Ansible roles and as we
>> convert/ex
Ahoy folks,
I think it's time we come up with some basic rules/patterns on where
code lands when it comes to OpenStack related Ansible roles and as we
convert/export things. There was a recent proposal to create an
ansible-role-tempest[0] that would take what we use in
tripleo-quickstart-extras[1]
+1
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 7:19 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
> +1
>
> On 8/1/18 1:31 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose Lukas Bezdicka core on TripleO.
>>
>> Lukas did a lot work in our tripleoclient, tripleo-common and
>> tripleo-heat-templates repos to make FFU possi
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:32 PM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
>
>
> On 08/02/2018 11:41 PM, Steve Baker wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/08/18 13:03, Alex Schultz wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:28 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 7/6/18 7:02 P
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:28 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
> On 7/6/18 7:02 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07/05/2018 01:23 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 14:13 -0400, James Slagle wrote:
I would almost rather see us organize the directories by service
nam
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
> Hi Alex:
>
> Can you consider this our FFE for the QDR patches. Its mainly blocked on CI
> issues. Half the patches for QDR integration are already merged. The other 3
> referenced need to get merged once CI passes. Please consider this ou
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:48 AM, Samuel Monderer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to deploy a small environment with one controller and one compute
> but i get a timeout with no specific information in the logs
>
> 2018-07-30 13:19:41Z [overcloud.Controller.0.ControllerConfig]:
> CREATE_IN_PROGRESS st
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:32 AM, Martin Magr wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>> Your fellow reporter took a break from writing, but is now back on his
>> pen.
>>
>> Welcome to the twenty-fifth edition of a weekly update in TripleO world!
>> The goal is to pr
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 5:48 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 3:58 AM Jiří Stránský wrote:
>>
>> I'd call this a semi-FFE, as a few of the patches have characteristics of
>> feature work,
>> but at the same time i don't believe we can afford having Ceph
>> unupgradable in R
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 2:31 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to request a FFE for [1]. Current status of TripleO UI patches
> is here [2] there are last 2 patches pending review which currently depend
> on [3] which is close to land.
>
> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripl
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Steve Baker wrote:
> I'd like to request a FFE for this blueprint[1].
>
> The remaining changes will be tracked as Depends-On on this oooq change[2].
>
> Initially the aim of this blueprint was to do all container prepare
> operations in a mistral action before the
Hey folks,
So it's been great fun and we've accomplished much over the last two
cycles but I believe it is time for me to step back and let someone
else do the PTLing. I'm not going anywhere so I'll still be around to
focus on the simplification and improvements that TripleO needs going
forward.
+1
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:07 AM, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez
wrote:
> Hi!!!
>
> I'll like to propose Jose Luis Franco [1][2] for core reviewer in all the
> TripleO upgrades bits. He shows a constant and active involvement in
> improving and fixing our updates/upgrades workflows, he helps also tryi
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 1:54 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
> [Added tripleo]
>
> It would be nice to have this situation verified/improved for containerized
> libvirt for compute nodes deployed with TripleO as well.
>
> On 7/12/18 11:02 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>
>> Greetings! We've been deploying wit
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> I've had a few operators complain about the permissive rule tripleo
> creates for ssh. The current alternatives seems to be to either disable
> tripleo firewall management completely, or move from the default-deny
> model to a set of
Hello everyone,
As milestone 3 is quickly approaching, it's time to review the open
blueprints[0] and their status. It appears that we have made good
progress on implementing significant functionality this cycle but we
still have some open items. Below is the list of blueprints that are
still op
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Paul Bourke wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At the weekly meeting a week or two ago, we mentioned removing some old /
> unused images from Kolla in the interest of keeping the gate run times down,
> as well as general code hygiene.
>
> The images I've determined that are eith
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote:
> Check and gate jobs look clear.
> More details on a bit.
>
So for a recap of the last 24 hours or so...
Mistral auth problems - https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1777541
- caused by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/574878/
- fixed
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote:
> On 19.6.2018 16:29, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 02:18:38PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
>>>
>>> Is this the same issue Carlos is trying to fix via
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/494517/ ?
>>
>>
>> That solves
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Alan Bishop has been highly involved in the Storage backends integration in
> TripleO and Puppet modules, always here to update with new features, fix
> (nasty and untestable third-party backends) bugs and manage all the
> backports for stab
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Tobias Urdin wrote:
> Hello CloudKitty team,
>
>
> I'm having an issue with this review not going through and being stuck after
> staring at it for a while now [1].
>
> Is there any configuration[2] issue that are causing the error[3]? Or is the
> package broken?
>
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I'm trying to patch puppet-keystone to support multi-valued
> configuration options (like trusted_dashboard). I have a patch that
> works, mostly, but I've run into a frustrating problem (frustrating
> because it would
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> TL;DR: we made nice progress and you can checkout this demo:
> https://asciinema.org/a/185533
>
> We started the discussion back in Dublin during the last PTG. The idea of
> Standalone (aka All-In-One, but can be mistaken with all-in-one over
with waiting until early Stein to
continue. Let's focus on the Rocky work and push this to early Stein
instead. I'll talk about this in the next IRC meeting if anyone wishes
to discuss further.
Thanks,
-Alex
> Thanks,
> Michele
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at
+1
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Alan Bishop has been highly involved in the Storage backends integration in
> TripleO and Puppet modules, always here to update with new features, fix
> (nasty and untestable third-party backends) bugs and manage all the
> backports for
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have talked to several people about this and I would love to get this
> finalized once and for all. I have checked the OpenStack puppet modules
> which are mostly developed by the Red Hat team, as of right now, TripleO is
> usin
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from zuul's message of 2018-05-29 14:28:57 +:
>> Build failed.
>>
>> - release-openstack-python
>> http://logs.openstack.org/26/26956a27b95550e2162243da79d62bb1b19d50d7/release/release-openstack-python/2bd7f7d/
>> : POST_FAILUR
org/cgit/openstack/ansible-role-container-registry/
[1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ansible-role-redhat-subscription/
[2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ansible-role-tripleo-keystone/
[3] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/puppet-openstacklib/
[4] https://review.openst
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
> Hi, Sergii
>
> thanks for the question. It's not first time that this topic is raised and
> from first view it could seem that branching would help to that sort of
> issues.
>
> Although it's not the case. Tripleo-quickstart(-extras) is part
Since the summit is coming up, there will likely be very low
attendance. We'll carry any open items until the following week.
Thanks,
-Alex
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstac
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Wesley Hayutin's message of 2018-05-16 12:51:25 -0600:
>> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:41 PM Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>
>> > Excerpts from Petr Kovar's message of 2018-05-16 17:39:14 +0200:
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > In the past fe
some time to review this and raise any
concerns/issues now.
Thanks,
-Alex
[0] https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#development-workflow
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> Hello tripleo folks,
>
> So we've been experimenting with migrating
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
> An update for your review please folks
>
>> Bogdan Dobrelya writes:
>>
>>> Hello.
>>> As Zuul documentation [0] explains, the names "check", "gate", and
>>> "post" may be altered for more advanced pipelines. Is it doable to
>>> introduce
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:25 PM Alex Schultz wrote:
>>
>> Hello tripleo folks,
>>
>> So we've been experimenting with migrating some squads over to
>> storyboard[0] but this seems to be ca
Hello tripleo folks,
So we've been experimenting with migrating some squads over to
storyboard[0] but this seems to be causing more issues than perhaps
it's worth. Since the upstream community would like to standardize on
Storyboard at some point, I would propose that we do a cut over of all
the
Welcome to the twentieth edition of a weekly update in TripleO world!
The goal is to provide a short reading (less than 5 minutes) to learn
what's new this week.
Any contributions and feedback are welcome.
Link to the previous version:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-May/130
We haven't used tripleo-incubator in some time and it is no longer
maintained. We are planning on officially retiring it ASAP[0]. We
had previously said we would do it for the pike py35 goals[1] but we
never got around to removing it. Efforts have begun to officially
retire it. Please let us kn
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:29 AM, John Fulton wrote:
> We hit a bug [1] in CI job container-to-container-upgrades because a
> workflow that was needed only for Pike and Queens was removed [2] as
> clean up for the migration to external_deploy_tasks.
>
> As we need to support an n undercloud deployin
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 6:08 AM, Waleed Musa wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
> I'm wondering, what is the plan of having these environments/*.yaml and
> enviroments/services-baremetal/*.yaml.
>
> It seems that it's deprecated files, Please advice here.
>
The services-baremetal were to allow for an end use
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Ade Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I starting looking at how we implement password changes in an
> existing deployment, and found that there were issues. This made me
> wonder whether we needed a test job to confirm that password changes
> (and other config changes
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Shyam Biradar
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on TrilioVault deployment integration with TripleO.
> This integration will contain changes to TripleO heat templates repo and
> tripleO puppet module as shown in attached document.
>
> We are targeting this integration f
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> Resending from an address that is subscribed to the list. Apologies to
> those of you who get this twice.
>
> On 04/30/2018 10:06 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>
>> It would be useful to have more input from PTLs on this issue, so I'm
>> CCing all o
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Jimmy McArthur wrote:
> Project Updates are in their own track:
> https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/summit-schedule#track=223
>
TripleO is still missing?
Thanks,
-Alex
> As are SIG, BoF and Working Groups:
> https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouv
+1
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> +1, thanks Tobias for your contributions!
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 8:21 AM, Iury Gregory wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018, 12:15 Mohammed Naser wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm proposing that we add Tobias Urdin to
+1
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 5:55 AM, James Slagle wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> As you probably know mcornea on IRC, Marius Cornea has been contributing on
>> TripleO for a while, specially on the upgrade bits.
>> Part of the quality team, he'
Hey everyone,
We released Rocky Milestone 1 this week[0]. I have gone through and
updated the blueprints that were still targeted to rocky-1 to move
them to rocky-2. Please take some time to review the outstanding
blueprints to make sure that we still still be able to deliver them
during the Roc
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote:
> FYI...
>
> This is news to me so thanks to Emilien for pointing it out [1].
> There are official tags for tripleo launchpad bugs. Personally, I like what
> I've seen recently with some extra tags as they could be helpful in finding
> the hi
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 11:32 AM, David Moreau Simard
wrote:
> Nice!
>
> I don't have a strong opinion
> about this but what I might recommend would be to chat with the
> openshift-ansible [1] and the kolla-ansible [2] folks.
>
> I'm happy to do the introductions if necessary !
>
> Their models, r
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> So we currently have 63 blueprints for currently targeted for
> Rocky[0]. Please make sure that any blueprints you are interested in
> delivering have an assignee set and have been approved. I would like
>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from zuul's message of 2018-03-26 18:11:49 +:
>> Build failed.
>>
>> - publish-openstack-releasenotes
>> http://logs.openstack.org/94/94bb28ae46bd263314c9d846069ca913d225e625/tag/publish-openstack-releasenotes/9440894/
>> : POS
Hey everyone,
In today's IRC meeting, I brought up[0] that we've been having an
increase in the number of open bugs of the last few weeks. We're
currently at about 635 open bugs. It would be beneficial for everyone
to take a look at the bugs that they are currently assigned to and
ensure they are
Hey everyone,
So we currently have 63 blueprints for currently targeted for
Rocky[0]. Please make sure that any blueprints you are interested in
delivering have an assignee set and have been approved. I would like
to have the ones we plan on delivering for Rocky to be updated by
April 3, 2018.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> As the title states, cycle trailing projects will need to change their
> requirements update behavior until they create stable/queens branches.
>
> When requirements unfreezes we will be doing rocky work, meaning that
> requirements updates to
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote:
>> On 5.10.2017 22:40, Alex Schultz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey folks,
>>>
>>> So I wandered across the policy spec[0] for how we should be handling
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:55 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
> Zane Bitter writes:
>
>> Yeah, it's definitely nice to have that flexibility. e.g. here is a
>> patch that wouldn't merge for 3 months because the thing it was
>> dependent on also got proposed as a backport:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.
v3 actions and
focus on developers ability to reproduce CI outside of the upstream.
Thanks,
Alex Schultz
irc: mwhahaha
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-re
Due to a loss in my family, I will not be around for the next few
weeks. If you have any TripleO issues, please reach out to Emilien
Macchi (emil...@redhat.com) or Steven Hardy (sha...@redhat.com).
Thanks,
-Alex
__
OpenStack
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Julie Pichon wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 27 December 2017 at 16:48, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> - Keystone removed _member_ role management, so we stopped using it
>> (only Member is enough): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/529849/
>
> There's been so many issues with the de
> Just a note, the queens repo is not currently synced in the infra so
> the queens repo patch is failing on Ubuntu jobs. I've proposed adding
> queens to the infra configuration to resolve this:
> https://review.openstack.org/529670
>
As a follow up, the mirrors have landed and two of the four sc
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> Currently they are all globally failing in master (we are using pike
> still[0] which is probably the problem) in the tempest run[1] due to:
> AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'requires_ext'
Currently they are all globally failing in master (we are using pike
still[0] which is probably the problem) in the tempest run[1] due to:
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'requires_ext'
I've submit a patch[2] to switch UCA to queens. If history is any
indication, it will probably
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> The reboot is done (mostly...see below).
>
> On 12/18/2017 05:11 PM, Joe Talerico wrote:
>>
>> Ben - Can you provide some links to the ovs port exhaustion issue for
>> some background?
>
>
> I don't know if we ever had a bug opened, but there's s
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 3:31 PM, David Moreau Simard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the migration of review.rdoproject.org to Zuul v3 draws closer, I'd like
> to open up the discussion around how we want to approach an eventual
> migration to Zuul v3 outside the gate.
> I'd like to take this opportunity to a
Hey everyone,
Due to likely low attendance, we'll be canceling the next two weekly
meetings on Dec 26th and Jan 2nd. We'll resume weekly meetings back on
Jan 9th. Happy holidays and stuff.
Thanks,
-Alex
__
OpenStack Develop
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:01:41PM -0700, Alex Schultz wrote:
>> I assume since some of this work was sort of done earlier outside of
>> tripleo and does not affect the default installation path that most
>> folks will con
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Mark Hamzy wrote:
> Alex Schultz wrote on 12/14/2017 09:24:54 AM:
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Mark Hamzy wrote:
>> ... As I said previously, please post the
>> patches ASAP so we can get eyes on these changes. Since this does
>
1 - 100 of 370 matches
Mail list logo