Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][kuryr-kubernetes] Propose to support Kubernetes Network Custom Resource Definition De-facto Standard Version 1

2018-06-07 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 3:52 AM, Peng Liu wrote: > Cool. > I'll start to prepare a BP for this, so we can have more detailed > discussion. Great! > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:08 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Irena Ber

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][kuryr-kubernetes] Propose to support Kubernetes Network Custom Resource Definition De-facto Standard Version 1

2018-06-06 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Irena Berezovsky wrote: > Sounds like a great initiative. > > Lets follow up on the proposal by the kuryr-kubernetes blueprint. I fully subscribe what Irena said. Let's get on this quick! > > BR, > Irena > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 6:47 AM, Peng Liu wrote: >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][libnetwork] Release kuryr-libnetwork 1.x for Queens

2018-01-25 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Daniel Mellado wrote: > +1 > > > El 21/1/18 a las 8:13, Irena Berezovsky escribió: > > +1 > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: >> >> Hi Kuryr team, >> >> I think Kuryr-libnetwork is ready to move

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] VTG sessions today postponed

2017-10-04 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi fellow kuryrs, Due to illness of one of the key contributors in todays sessions, we'll postpone the sessions today. As soon as he recovers we'll publish the new time. Regards, Toni __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] vPTG schedule

2017-10-02 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
> corrected the etherpad). > > Sorry for the noise! > > Daniel > > On 10/02/2017 03:30 AM, Hongbin Lu wrote: >> Hi Toni, >> >> The time of a few proposed sessions look inconsistent with the etherpad. >> Could you double check? >> >> On Thu, Sep

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] vPTG schedule

2017-10-02 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
d sessions look inconsistent with the etherpad. > Could you double check? > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi fellow Kuryrs! >> >> It's that time of the cycle again where we hold our

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] vPTG schedule

2017-09-28 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi fellow Kuryrs! It's that time of the cycle again where we hold our virtual project team gathering[0]. The dates this time are: October 2nd, 3rd and 4th The proposed sessions are: October 2nd 13:00utc: Scale discussion In this session we'll talk about the recent scale testing we have

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] No weekly IRC meeting today

2017-08-07 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
HI Kuryrs! Since most of the people are on PTO today, we'll skip the weekly IRC meeting and hold it next week. I don't have PTO, so if there's anything you want to discuss, you are very welcome to come to #openstack-kuryr Regards, Toni

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Queens PTL candidacy

2017-08-03 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi fellow kuryrs! I present my PTL candidacy for the Queens Cycle. We've done well in this past cycle getting close to our first release adding things like: - Kubernetes service support, - Token authentication support, - A lot of devstack improvements like multinode - pod-in-VM neutron trunk and

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Nominate Kirill Zaitsev as kuryr-tempest-core reviewer

2017-07-04 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > +1 +1 > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Mellado > wrote: >> >> Hi Team, >> >> I wanted to nominate Kirill for kuryr-tempest-core reviewer. He's been a >> great help from start both

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] weekly IRC meeting cancelled today

2017-06-05 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs, Today Irena and I are attending the OpenStack Israel day and won't be able to chair the meeting. We can catch up tomorrow on IRC during the day. Toni __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Weekly IRC meeting on May 1st is cancelled

2017-04-29 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs! Most of you have holidays on May 1st, so due to that, we'll adjourn the weekly IRC meeting. The following one is in the summit week. I'll check if I don't have a talk at the same time as the meeting. If I do. I'll have to cancel as well. Regards, Toni

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Videoconf meeting for Actor refactor proposal

2017-04-18 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs, Tomorrow there's going to be a meeting to discuss Ilya's proposal for a refactor of Kuryr controller entities based on the actor model. The meeting will be held at: https://bluejeans.com/826701641 12:00 UTC I'll post the recording probably the day after. See you there, Toni

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Weekly IRC meeting today April 10th is cancelled

2017-04-10 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs, I'm on PTO on the mountains with limited connectivity, hence I won't be able to make it to the weekly IRC meeting. Regards and sorry for the short notice, Toni __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud Provider for Kubernetes

2017-03-24 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:59:18 PM UTC+1, Graham Hayes wrote: > > On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >Folks, > > > >As discussed in the etherpad: > >https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/go-and-containers > > > >Here's a request for a repo in OpenStack: >

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] VTG Action item sorting

2017-03-06 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs! Thanks a lot for the hard work in last week's VTG sessions. We created quite a few Action items and tomorrow will be the time to sort them: https://trello.com/b/1Ij919E8 I'll try to eventually move it to storyboard, but we need to get some stuff created. The session will be held as

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] final day recordings for the Virtual Team Gathering

2017-03-03 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs, Thank you all for participating in the VTG. Here you can find the last two recordings: https://youtu.be/ti4oOK6p_Dw https://youtu.be/iEdOTngEw4I Let's discuss the priority of all the action items next week! Toni

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] 2nd day recording for the Virtual Team Gathering

2017-03-01 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs! Thanks again for joining the Virtual team Gathering sessions. Here you have the links to the recordings: https://youtu.be/o1RKNOAhqho https://youtu.be/ovbK5kk5AZ0 See you today on the last day of this first VTG! Toni

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] 1st day recording for the Virtual Team Gathering

2017-03-01 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs! Thank you all for joining yesterday. For those unable to make it, here are the recordings for the sessions: https://youtu.be/Hdn9LOnCrSc https://youtu.be/6D5iGEkKtGc See you at today's sessions! Toni __

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Weekly IRC meeting today cancelled

2017-02-27 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hello Kuryrs, Due to preparations for this week's VTG, today's meeting is cancelled. Looking forward to see you all tomorrow! Toni __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [kuryr][dragonflow][octavia] layer 7 load balancing discussion

2017-02-21 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi all! An impromptu conversation started between Omer and I about l4 and l7 load balancers for serving Kubernetes workloads (both services and ingress controllers) and we thought it would be nice to have more feedback on the discussion, particularly from Octavia folks. Omer kindly offered to

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] VTG schedule and details

2017-02-20 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs! The VTG sessions[0] will be held in bluejeans: https://bluejeans.com/5508709975 You can also join by phone finding a local number in [1] and entering the meeting id "5508709975" followed by a '#'. The sessions will be ┌──┬─┐

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][kolla][openstack-helm][kuryr] OpenStack on containers leaveraging kuryr

2017-02-10 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 09/02/17 09:57 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> I was talking with Tony and he mentioned that he's recording a new demo >> for >> kuryr and, well, it'd be great to also use the containerized version

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][kolla][openstack-helm][kuryr] OpenStack on containers leaveraging kuryr

2017-02-09 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Dan Sneddon wrote: > Pete, thanks for mentioning network isolation and segmentation. That's > my area of interest, since I'm focused on underlay networking for > TripleO and bare-metal networking in Ironic. > > Network isolation is going to

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Resource management videoconf meeting

2017-02-09 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> In the last weekly IRC meeting it was agreed to hold a v

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Resource management videoconf meeting

2017-02-08 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > In the last weekly IRC meeting it was agreed to hold a videoconf meeting > about resource management. For those unaware, the topic revolves around the > reutilization of Neutron

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Resource management videoconf meeting

2017-02-07 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi all, In the last weekly IRC meeting it was agreed to hold a videoconf meeting about resource management. For those unaware, the topic revolves around the reutilization of Neutron resources like ports and subports as well and virtual devices like veths. This allows for things like batching

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][kuryr] python-k8sclient vs client-python (was Fwd: client-python Beta Release)

2017-01-30 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Team, > > A bit of history, we had a client generated from swagger definition for a > while in Magnum, we plucked it out into python-k8sclient which then got > used by fuel-ccp, kuryr etc. Recently the kuberneted team

[openstack-dev] [kuryr][ptl] PTL candidacy

2017-01-24 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs! I am putting forward my candidacy[1] for a second term as the PTL. It is great to work with all of you every day to make kuryr deliver on its mission. Over this current cycle, we've managed to rebuild the team after we had some core departures and I think we are in a very good place,

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Project Virtual Gathering (PVG)

2017-01-18 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs! Due to traveling restrictions, we opted not to take part in the Atlanta PTG. However, the design work sessions won't disappear :-) Please go through its etherpad[0] and propose, vote, comment about sessions, format and scheduling. Regards, Toni [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Ocata cycle ending and proposing new people as Kuryr cores

2017-01-16 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
2 PM, Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 for both. >> >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Irena Berezovsky <irenab@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Ocata cycle ending and proposing new people as Kuryr cores

2017-01-13 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi fellow kuryrs! We are getting close to the end of the Ocata and it is time to look back and appreciate the good work all the contributors did. I would like to thank you all for the continued dedication and participation in gerrit, the weekly meetings, answering queries on IRC, etc. I also

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Dec 14th kuryr-kubernetes syncup

2016-12-13 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi fellow kuryrs! > > December 14th at 11:00 UTC we'll be having a video meeting [1] to sync > about the current Kubernetes integration. > We're moving the meeting to bluejeans [3

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Dec 14th kuryr-kubernetes syncup

2016-12-12 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi fellow kuryrs! December 14th at 11:00 UTC we'll be having a video meeting [1] to sync about the current Kubernetes integration. There is an etherpad for the topics that we'll be covering [2]. Feel free to add topics and +1 the topics that you want to have discussion on. The objective of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr][Magnum] How stable is kuryr-kubernetes?

2016-12-06 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > Hi folks! > Hi Mikhail! > > We at Samsung are trying to integrate containers in OpenStack and at this > moment we are looking at Kubernetes deployed by Magnum, which works good > enough for now. > > One challenge we

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][magnum] Notes from Summit fishbowl session

2016-11-03 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Vikas Choudhary <choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi magna and kuryrs! >> >> Thank you all for joining last week me

[openstack-dev] [kuryr][magnum] Notes from Summit fishbowl session

2016-11-02 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi magna and kuryrs! Thank you all for joining last week meetings. I am now writing a few emails to have persistent notes of what was talked about and discussed in the Kuryr work sessions. In the Magnum joint session the points were: Kuryr - Magnum joint work session

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Kuryr IPVlan Code PoC

2016-09-24 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Daly, Louise M wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > As promised here is a link to the code PoC for the Kuryr-IPVlan proposal. > > https://github.com/lmdaly/kuryr-libnetwork > > > > Link to specific commit > >

[openstack-dev] [requirements][FFE][kuryr] kuryr-lib

2016-09-19 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi, We recently made the first release (0.1.0) of kuryr-lib on which no project depends except openstack/kuryr-libnetwork. Now, kuryr-lib by itself is not more than a base library and its release is only to serve kuryr-libnetwork and kuryr-kubernetes. Now we are in the process of releasing

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] September 19th meeting agenda

2016-09-19 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs! Yet again I'm late in posting the agenda, sorry. Here goes today's meeting agenda[1]. As always, feel free to add items or bring them up during the open discussion, I'll be checking the agenda for updates just before the meeting starts at 14utc. See you in the meeting, Toni [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ptl] Self non-nomination for Kolla PTL for Ocata cycle

2016-09-14 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > To the OpenStack Community, > > > > Consider this email my self non-nomination for PTL of Kolla for > > the coming Ocata release. I let the team know in our IRC team meeting > > several months ago I was passing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IPVLAN data path proposal

2016-09-13 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Vikas Choudhary > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: >>> >>> Ivan, >>> >>> Thanks for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IPVLAN data path proposal

2016-09-12 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Coughlan, Ivan <ivan.cough...@intel.com> > wrote: >> >> >> Overview >> >> Kuryr proposes to address the issues of double encaps

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] PTL Candidacy

2016-09-12 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
support. - Participate more in upstream container orchestration engine communities. I look forward to work with all of you to make Kuryr into the things all of us want and need from it. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368825/ Antoni Segura Puimedon

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IPVLAN data path proposal

2016-09-12 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Coughlan, Ivan wrote: > > > Overview > > Kuryr proposes to address the issues of double encapsulation and exposure of > containers as neutron entities when containers are running within VMs. > > As an alternative to the vlan-aware-vms and

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Spec and devref placement

2016-09-12 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs! On September 5th's weekly IRC meeting Irena Berezovsky suggested that we should take a decision regarding the location of specs and devrefs. Currently we default to putting all the specs and devrefs for: - Kuryr - Kuryr-libnetwork - Kuryr-kubernetes to openstack/kuryr. Fuxi is still

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] September 12th meeting agenda

2016-09-12 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs! Sorry I didn't get to post it earlier, here goes today's meeting agenda. As always, feel free to add items or bring them up during the open discussion, I'll be checking the agenda for updates just before the meeting starts at 14utc. See you in the meeting, Toni

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr][Dragonflow] - PTL Non Candacy

2016-09-12 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Gal Sagie wrote: > Hello all, > > I would like to announce that i will not be running for projects Kuryr or > Dragonflow > PTL. > > I believe that both projects shows great value and progress compared to the > time they exists > mostly thanks

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Kuryr-Kubernetes devstack proposal for testing

2016-09-06 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs! Yesterday in the meeting we discussed about the need to design a way for the functional testing to happen for the Kuryr-Kubernetes integration. I studied the possibilities today and came up with the following proposal (After the proposal I'll put more detailed explanations).

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Sept. 1st Kuryr-Kubernetes videoconf discussion meeting points

2016-09-05 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs, Last Thursday, we had a very productive Kuryr-Kubernetes integration meeting. I want to thank a lot to all the people that joined the meeting for how well they prepared the meeting and the good points that were raise. We used some slides to guide the meeting points[1]. The key

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Meeting agenda for Sept 5th IRC meeting

2016-09-05 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs, Sorry I didn't get to post this on Fridays due to traveling. Here you can find the weekly IRC meeting agenda for today: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Kuryr#Meeting_September_5th.2C_2016 Remember! Today we meet at the regular 14:00 UTC! Antoni Segura Puimedon

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Python 3 usage and kuryr-kubernetes

2016-08-31 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
he community would have a recommendation for OSt upstream and it's downstreams. > > > Regards, > > Jaume Devesa > Software Engineer @ Midokura > > On Aug 30 2016, at 4:44 pm, Antoni Segura Puimedon <celeb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi fellow kuryrs! >

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Kuryr IRC meetings change

2016-08-31 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
is welcome to add items to it (Though if there are too many some may get pushed a week). Have fun coding and reviewing! Antoni Segura Puimedon PS: There is a nice .ics that you can use to add the meetings to your calendar[3] [1] https://review.openstack.org/362852 [2] https://wiki.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Python 3 usage and kuryr-kubernetes

2016-08-30 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi fellow kuryrs! This email is gonna be a bit long, so I'll put it in parts. Kubernetes integration components == As you know, we are now in the process of upstreaming the Kuryr Kubernetes PoC that the Kuryr team at Midokura did. This PoC upstreaming effort has two main

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] openstack/kuryr-libnetwork dropping 'common' subpackage

2016-08-30 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
separation with the former, but I have to say that at the current stage, after all the friction we got from the repository split, the best option in my mind is to go with the latter option. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/361567/ Antoni Segura Puimedon

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Proposing vikasc for kuryr-libnetwork core

2016-08-16 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
team for the kuryr-kubernetes subproject since he has experience in the day to day work with kubernetes and can help with the review and refactoring of the prototype upstreaming. Regards, Antoni Segura Puimedon __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][kolla] keystone v3 support status and plans?

2016-08-16 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Hey kuryrians, > > Kolla has a kuryr review in our queue and its looking really solid from > Hui Kang. The last key problem blocking the merge (and support of Kuryr in > Kolla) is that Kolla only supports keystone

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Overlay MTU setup in docker remote driver

2016-08-16 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Liping Mao (limao) wrote: > Hi Kuryr team, > > I just notice, this can be fixed in kuryr bind code. > I submit a bug to track this: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/kuryr-libnetwork/+bug/1613528 > > And patch sets are here: >

Re: [openstack-dev] Project mascots update

2016-08-04 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: > *Steve Hardy wrote:* > *"I have one question regarding the review process for the logos when > they are drafted? In the cases where projects have their existing community > generated logos I can imagine there

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Kuryr IRC Meeting time

2016-07-26 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Vikas Choudhary < choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > On 26 Jul 2016 15:45, "Liping Mao (limao)" wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> Currently, kuryr team meeting time is as following: >> >> Every two weeks (on even weeks) on Tuesday at 0300 UTC in

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][Python 3.4-3.5] Async python clients

2016-07-04 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04 2016, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > > > for the neutron clients now we use a thread executor from the asyncio > loop > > any time > > we do neutron client request. > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][Python 3.4-3.5] Async python clients

2016-07-04 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26 2016, Denis Makogon wrote: > > > I know that some work in progress to bring Python 3.4 compatibility to > > backend services and it is kinda hard question to answer, but i'd like to > > know if there are

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] kuryr-libnetwork split

2016-07-04 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2016-07-01 15:05:30 +: > > On 2016-07-01 08:26:13 -0500 (-0500), Monty Taylor wrote: > > [...] > > > Check with Doug Hellman about namespaces. We used to use them in some >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] kuryr-libnetwork split

2016-07-01 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote: > On 07/01/2016 08:10 AM, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > > Hi fellow kuryrs! > > > > In order to proceed with the split of kuryr into a main lib and it's > kuryr > > libnetwork

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] kuryr-libnetwork split

2016-07-01 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon < toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: > Hi fellow kuryrs! > > In order to proceed with the split of kuryr into a main lib and it's kuryr > libnetwork component, we've cloned the contents of openstack/kuryr over to

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] kuryr-libnetwork split

2016-07-01 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi fellow kuryrs! In order to proceed with the split of kuryr into a main lib and it's kuryr libnetwork component, we've cloned the contents of openstack/kuryr over to openstack/kuryr-libnetwork. The idea is that after this, the patches that will go to openstack/kuryr will be to trim out the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Refactoring into common library and kuryr-libnetwork + Nested_VMs

2016-06-28 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Vikas Choudhary < choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon < > toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Vikas Cho

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Refactoring into common library and kuryr-libnetwork + Nested_VMs

2016-06-28 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
t; │ >>> │____ any_other_driver(calling api for nw related services if >>> watcher not supported) >>> >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> >>> -Vikas >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --

Re: [openstack-dev] [Higgins][Zun] Project roadmap

2016-06-13 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Hi team, > > > > During the team meetings these weeks, we collaborated the initial project > roadmap. I summarized it as below. Please review. > > > > * Implement a common container abstraction for different container >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] [Neutron] Controlling security groups through Kuryr's libnetwork plugin [was: Waiting until Neutron PortisActive]

2016-06-13 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Mike Spreitzer <mspre...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Antoni Segura Puimedon <toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote on > 06/11/2016 07:39:41 PM: > > > Well, with a label you can make the Neutron Port have an SG that > > forbids pinging. &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Re-licensing OpenStack charms under Apache 2.0

2016-06-11 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Bilal Baqar wrote: > Hey James > > No problem on my side for this change. > > Regards > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > >> Me too. >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:32 AM Cory Benfield

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] [Neutron] Waiting until Neutron PortisActive

2016-06-11 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > What about pinging? BTW, from where would the pings come? > > In the Docker/Swarm API today there is no way to disable ping. However, > once Kuryr's libnetwork plugin is updated so that `docker network connect >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] [Neutron] Waiting until Neutron Port isActive

2016-06-10 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > Yes, that all makes sense - thanks for explaining. > > Neil > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:50 PM Mohammad Banikazemi wrote: > >> Hi Neil, >> >> Currently, when a docker libnetwork "join" operation in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Kuryr did not detect neutron tag plugin in devstack

2016-06-06 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Liping Mao (limao) wrote: > Hi Kuryr team, > > I notice kuryr did not detect neutron tag plugin in devstack[1]. > This is because when kuryr process start up in devstack, > neutron-server did not finish load tag plugin. > Kuryr use api call to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IPAM issue with multiple docker networks having same cidr subnets

2016-05-27 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Vikas Choudhary wrote: > Hi All, > > Recently, Banix observed and brought into notice this issue [1]. > > To solve this, i could think of two approaches: > 1. Modifying the libnetwork apis to get PoolID also at network creation. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr][magnum]Installing kuryr for mutlinode openstack setup

2016-05-25 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Jaume Devesa wrote: > Hello Akshay, > > responses inline: > > On Wed, 25 May 2016 10:48, Akshay Kumar Sanghai wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a 4 node openstack setup (1 controller, 1 network, 2 compute > nodes). > > I want to install kuryr in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

2016-05-15 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Dieterly, Deklan's message of 2016-05-14 01:18:20 +: > > Python 2.x will not be supported for much longer, and let¹s face it, > > Python is easy, but it just does not scale. Nor does Python have the > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Port binding query

2016-05-12 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > I'm trying Kuryr with networking-calico and think I've hit an unhelpful > inconsistency. A Neutron port has 'id' and 'device_id' fields that are > usually different. When Nova does VIF binding for a Neutron port, it >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Question for Antoni Puimedon about load balancers and overlay networks

2016-05-03 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > I am looking at > https://www.openstack.org/videos/video/project-kuryr-docker-delivered-kubernetes-next, > around 28:00. You have said that overlay networks are involved, and are > now talking about load balancers. Is

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][app-catalog][all] Build unified abstraction for all COEs

2016-04-22 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > +1. > > From: Hongbin Lu [hongbin...@huawei.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 7:50 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Did kuryr need to know about Docker's cluster store?

2016-03-03 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Vikas Choudhary wrote: > Since libnetwork talks to cluster store independent of plugin, I think no > changes are required on Kuryr side. That's right. Docker handles all the KV storage interaction from the data it receives from Kuryr.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] A proposal to separate the design summit

2016-02-26 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > >> On 26 Feb 2016, at 02:38, Sean McGinnis wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 04:13:56PM +0800, Qiming Teng wrote: >>> Hi, All, >>> >>> After reading through all the +1's and -1's, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Now part of OpenStack big-tent

2016-02-24 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Just wanted to update you that Kuryr [1] was officially accepted yesterday > as a > big tent project. We should probably get Kuryr to be selectable as a tag to subscribe to in

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Failed to create network with kuryr driver type

2016-02-02 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Mars Ma wrote: > hi Vikas, > > ubuntu@kuryr1:~$ docker network create --driver=kuryr --ipam-driver=kuryr > --subnet 10.10.0.0/16 --gateway 10.10.0.1 --ip-range 10.10.0.0/24 foo > 68f14fe701710d6f3472d1626c33f0036a145aaa8d81265429e509cf759adfe1 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Starting Kuryr service requires root privilege

2016-01-26 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon > <toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Baohua Yang <yangbao...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi hua >> > Thanks for the suggestion! >> > Yes,

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

2015-12-14 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Jaume Devesa wrote: > +1 > > I think it is good compromise. Thanks Ryu! > > I understand the CLI will belong to the external part. I much prefer to > have > it in a separate project rather than into the plugin. Even if the code is > tiny. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

2015-12-09 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Galo Navarro wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > >> 1) (Downstream) packaging: midonet and python-midonetclient are two > >> distinct packages, and therefore should have distinct upstream > >> tarballs - which are compiled on a per repo basis. > > This is

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

2015-12-09 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon < toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Galo Navarro <g...@midokura.com> wrote: > >> Hi Sandro, >> >> >> 1) (Downstream) packaging: midonet and pyth

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] IRC: ditch #midonet-dev?

2015-12-01 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > +1 for #2 > PS: Beware of the top-posting! It makes vote counting harder ;-) > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Sandro Mathys > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Our IRC channels have been neglected for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Current status of docker python lib supports for libnetwork

2015-11-10 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Baohua Yang wrote: > Hi, kuryr guys > I may not attend tmr's IRC meeting, hence make a quick sync here. > One task is to investigate the docker python lib support to libnetwork. > I checked the code here at

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] mutihost networking with nova vm as docker host

2015-11-06 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Baohua Yang wrote: > It does cause confusing by calling container-inside-vm as nested > container. > > The "nested" term in container area usually means > container-inside-container. > I try to always put it as VM-nested container. But I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][kuryr] network control plane (libkv role)

2015-11-05 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Vikas Choudhary wrote: > ++ [Neutron] tag > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Vikas Choudhary < > choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> By network control plane i specifically mean here sharing network state >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][kuryr] mutihost networking with nova vm as docker host

2015-11-05 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Vikas Choudhary wrote: > ++[Neutron] tag > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Vikas Choudhary < > choudharyvika...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I would appreciate inputs on following queries: >> 1. Are we assuming nova bm

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] competing implementations

2015-11-04 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
ing and we already held the meeting on Friday. Next Monday it will be held as usual and the following week we start alternating (we have yet to get a room for that one). > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon < > toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: > >

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] competing implementations

2015-11-04 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi Kuryrs, Last Friday, as part of the contributors meetup, we discussed also code contribution etiquette. Like other OpenStack project (Magnum comes to mind), the etiquette for what to do when there is disagreement in the way to code a blueprint of fix a bug is as follows: 1.- Try to reach out

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] meetup

2015-10-28 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi fellow Kuryrs, I want to remind you that we'll be meeting up at some corner of [1] to discuss all things kuryr. The agenda will be: - Current challenges with multinode - The path to Mitaka: + Functional testing + COE Integrations + VM nested containers. [1] http://sched.co/4Qan

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Proposing Taku Fukushima as Kuryr core

2015-10-13 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi fellow Kurýrs, I would like to propose Taku Fukushima for the core Kuryr team due to his unparalleled dedication to the project. He has written most of the code and battled through the continuous libnetwork API changes. He will be a great addition to the reviewing tasks. Current core members,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] Kuryr Open Tasks

2015-10-07 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>, > Eran Gampel <eran.gam...@huawei.com<mailto:eran.gam...@huawei.com>>, > Antoni Segura Puimedon <t...@mi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Kuryr - Spec

2015-09-18 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > Hello everyone, > > We have a spec for project Kuryr in Neutron repository [1] , we have been > iterating on it > internally and with the great help and feedback from the Magnum team. > > I am glad to say that we reached a

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] [neutron] libnetwork endpoint to Neutron abstractions

2015-08-21 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi list, I was reviewing the CreateEndpoint patch[1] from Taku that had received positive reviews. I put some comment about an alternative way to map endpoints to nets and subnets and I would appreciate some discussion here on the mailing list about the original proposal and the alternative I

  1   2   >