Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Newton Midcycle Planning

2016-04-12 Thread ClaytonLuce, Timothy
And I'll add Raleigh NC NetApp is available too. Nothing better than summer in the South :) -Original Message- From: D'Angelo, Scott [mailto:scott.dang...@hpe.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 10:39 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI)

2015-03-23 Thread ClaytonLuce, Timothy
Mike, Did not see a response to this request. Please respond, we can discuss in the Cinder Core meeting this week. -Original Message- From: ClaytonLuce, Timothy [mailto:timothy.claytonl...@netapp.com] Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 5:27 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI)

2015-03-23 Thread ClaytonLuce, Timothy
) On 13:15 Mon 23 Mar , ClaytonLuce, Timothy wrote: Mike, Did not see a response to this request. Please respond, we can discuss in the Cinder Core meeting this week. Which request? I already responded to your message: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI)

2015-03-20 Thread ClaytonLuce, Timothy
I'd like to point out that for NetApp FC drivers NetApp has been in discussions and updating progress on these drivers since their submission. I will point out a discussion in the Nov Core meeting where I brought up the challenge around FC environments and the response I received: 16:10:44

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI)

2015-03-20 Thread ClaytonLuce, Timothy
) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI) On 12:33 Fri 20 Mar , ClaytonLuce, Timothy wrote: I'd like to point out that for NetApp FC drivers NetApp has been in discussions and updating progress on these drivers since