Thanks for starting this. Where would you classify the Segmentation (VLANID
etc) allocation engine. Currently, the libnetwork plugin is tied to the api
and talks to Neutron, how would libnetwork and api part interact?
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Vikas Choudhary
will be capable to doing
the options you mentioned above.
Hope that clarifies it.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Vikas Choudhary <choudharyvika...@gmail.com>
> Hi Fawad,
> While I was going through nested-containers-spec
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Gal Sagie wrote:
> Hi Hongbin,
> Thank you for starting this thread.
> The person that is going to work on this integration is Fawad (CC'ed) and
> hopefully others will help
> him (We have another person from Huawei that showed intrest in
Armando has submitted the proposal on Gerrit . Let's take the discussion
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Doug Wiegley <doug...@parksidesoftware.com>
> Were we looking at the same etherpad? I think the ‘
/or API extensions to non-open solutions."
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
>> Second, would it be acceptable to make this operator configurable? This
>> would mean users could receive different default filtering as they moved
+1 to both. Great to see the core team growing.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Anil Rao <email@example.com> wrote:
> Both Takashi and Soichi have been involved with the project for a while
> now and have made significant contributions in terms of code and reviews
Thanks for brining this up.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> I know this has come up in the past, but some folks in the infra channel
> brought up the topic of changing the default security groups to allow all
> They had a few reasons
A friendly reminder to review the updated spec 
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Fawad Khaliq <fa...@plumgrid.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the reviews. The spec  has been updated after the la
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Gal Sagie wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> Just wanted to update you that Kuryr  was officially accepted yesterday
> as a
> big tent project.
Great news and congrats everyone!
> We are currently facing some interesting challenges and
Thanks for the reviews. The spec  has been updated after the latest
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Fawad Khaliq <fa...@plumgrid.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> The spec  for Mangum-Ku
The spec  for Mangum-Kuryr integration is out and has already gone
through good discussion and updates. Please take out some time to review,
we would like to converge on the design soon.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam <
> L2GW seems like a good option for bridging/linking /integrating physical
> appliances which does not support overlay technology (say VXLAN) natively.
> In my case the physical appliance
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Thanks a lot for the detailed response.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:26:13AM +0500, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
> >Hi Triple-O folks,
> >I am trying to understand how the notion of ove
Thanks a lot,
OpenStack Development Ma
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Gal Sagie wrote:
> Hello All,
> We are going to have an IRC Meeting tomorrow (2/1) at 1500 UTC
> in #openstack-meeting-4
> The meeting agenda can be seen here .
> We are going to focus most of the meeting on the Kubernetes-Kuryr
Great. Looking forward to it.
For everyone's benefit, here's the link  to CNI spec.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Mohammad Banikazemi <m...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> We are going to discuss CNI, the Containe
Thanks for sending the email about the breakage. +1 to the deprecation
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com> wrote:
> The commit
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> Are there no comment after I added more detail?
> No inputs from both horizon and neutron side.
> Although Horizon team is tackling to address some problems around
> horizon plugin mechanism
> such as translations,
There is one example  in review and may be incomplete but might help. It
only adds the scripts to build. Publishing part is different.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:15 AM, P. Ramanjaneya Reddy <ramanji...@gmail.com
Very useful information. Thanks, Assaf.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Assaf Muller <amul...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Today we merged  which adds content to the Neutron testing guidelines:
Excellent. I will take a look. Thanks for taking care of this!
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Fawad Khaliq <fa...@plumgrid.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Yamamoto. Yes, agree i
Very cool! Thanks.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Matthew Treinish <mtrein...@kortar.org>
> Hi Everyone,
> As some people may have seen already we've been working on creating a test
> results dashboard up and running to visualize the state of t
I believe TaaS API will go through a round of reviews when the spec is
introduced. It will be good to discuss these points there.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:45 PM, reedip banerjee <reedi...@gmail.com>
> Dear Members of Neutron-TaaS community,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> python-neutronclient still has XML support of Neutron API.
> I would like to discuss when we drop XML support in neutronclient.
> Neutron API XML suppoort was marked as deprecated in Icehouse and Juno
> and was
Any plan to revive this  so we can discuss and finalize the use cases
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> Neutron has now various subprojects and some of them would like to
> implement Horizon supports. Most of them are additional features.
> I would like to start the discussion where
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Armando M. wrote:
> On 24 November 2015 at 21:46, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
>> Neutron has now various subprojects and some of them would like to
>> implement Horizon supports. Most of them are additional
r team) wanted insight into the plans for this support.
Thanks for the note and link to the bug. I think we are all set to take the
>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1461000
> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 7:0
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Tapio Tallgren <tapiotallg...@gmail.com>
> Sorry for the stupid question, but how will I use the connection tracking
> in security groups? Is
Can we please restore this  and have the reviews complete. I believe
there is a lot of interest in this and we will need to consider multiple
use case scenarios. This  will be the best place to capture and discuss.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Li Ma wrote:
> It is suggested that you can issue a RFE request for it.  We can
> discuss with it and track the progress in the launchpad.
> By the way, I'm very interested in it. I discussed a another problem
> with Huawei neutron
the person name, Miguel will sure update shortly.
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Fawad Khaliq <fa...@plumgrid.com> wrote:
>> Is there a plan to add conntrack support to the security groups for the
>> OVS dri
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Fawad Khaliq <fa...@plumgrid.com> wrote:
> > Thanks a lot, Yamamoto.
> > kakuma, I am assuming if you were able to set it up for a ofagent rep
No worries and thanks a lot for the help. Seems like the process is similar
to the one we followed for the setting up the CI with Neutron. Wanted
confirmation and you helped.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 6:22 PM, fumihiko kakuma <kak...@valinux.co.jp>
Is there a plan to add conntrack support to the security groups for the OVS
driver in Mitaka cycle?
My understanding is that it is being actively worked on for networking-ovn
but no concrete plan for support in the OVS Neutron driver yet.
mirroring and that
serves use cases where services like IPS are deployed and incorporated.
Do you happen to have a blueprint proposed with the original API
demonstrated that we can iterate over and add the use cases and adjust the
API accordingly to take further for review?
Thanks a lot, Yamamoto.
kakuma, I am assuming if you were able to set it up for a ofagent repo,
then it should have been the standard procedure documented here . I
reach out to infra for any help.
On Wed, Nov
What would be the mechanism to enable a third party CI on a Neutron
sub-project? I am not sure if anyone has already tried it.
I am interesting in adding PLUMgrid CI on networking-plumgrid 
That's right. Sounds good. Thanks!
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Fawad Khaliq <fa...@plumgrid.com> wrote:
>> Hi Vikas,
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Hi all,
> currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that
> maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe
> that in
I suggest take a stab at creating a blueprint for this with details through
Gerrit on top of this .
@Toni/Gal, would be great to have specs as part of Kuryr. I have added the
directory with a template here 
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Edgar Magana
> Dear Colleagues,
> I have been part of this community from the very beginning when in Santa
> Clara, CA back in 2011 a bunch of we crazy people decided to work on this
> networking project.
> Neutron has become is
You have done an exceptional job over the three cycles.
Neutron has matured to a new level under your leadership.
You will be missed. Enjoy your new free time!
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote:
> I'm writing to let ever
former as its much
cleaner and aligns better with phase II. If former is the case, can we
please enhance the devref to capture how the process will work for
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Amir Sadoughi amir.sadou...@rackspace.com
I started down
Thanks Mohankumar. Option #1 is exactly what I was looking for and that
Thanks a lot!
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Mohankumar N mohankuma...@huawei.com
If I understood your question correctly , here some ways to do
 you want to extend
to keep the
client side in the respective projects as well.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Henry Gessau ges...@cisco.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015, Fawad Khaliq fa...@plumgrid.com wrote:
After Neutron core and vendor code decomposition , it was decided to
keep db migration scripts in Neutron repo. I was wondering if any of the
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote:
If I understand correctly, what Anik is probably asking for is way to
connect two OpenStack projects together from a network
A correction here: RBAC proposal does address some of the use cases on
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Anik anik...@yahoo.com wrote:
That's exactly what I was asking for. Thanks Fawad.
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
I got us a place for Monday night at 8pm.
Here is the link:
Don't forget to show up, they are opening the restaurant just for
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
Good points, Dan and John.
At this point it may be useful to see who is actually using
nova-docker. Can folks who are using any version of nova-docker,
please speak up with a short description of their use case?
If it looks fine, Infra folks, can please back plumgrid-ci back to voting.
I will be happy to answer to any further questions.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Abhishek Talwar/HYD/TCS
I am looking if we can change the resources of a running VM instance (i.e.
cpu, ram, changing
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Gabriel Bezerra gabri...@lsd.ufcg.edu.br
Em 10.03.2015 14:34, Gabriel Bezerra escreveu:
Em 10.03.2015 14:24, Carl Baldwin escreveu:
Neutron currently does not enforce the uniqueness, or non-overlap, of
subnet cidrs within the address scope for a
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com
A great discussion. I am not expert at OVN, hence, want to ask a question.
The answer may make a case that it should probably be a ML2 driver as
oppose to monolithic plugin.
Say a customer want to deploy
These are not the counts. These seem to be vote weights.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:53 AM, vishal yadav vishalcda...@gmail.com
Can anyone tell why the voting counts for all the entries are same!
(attached screenshot). Even though I voted for some entries, voting counts
I just happened to have a new setup with all services. Works for me.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
With the current master in devstack I am unable to create a neutron
network. It looks like there is an issue with keystone. Anyone
PLUMgrid CI is down because of unforeseen hardware breakdown issues. We are
working on getting it sorted out asap. I will respond to this thread when
it's back up.
OpenStack Development Mailing
Lot's of interesting talks. Thank you Kyle. Voted and looking forward.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
Thank you very much, voted.
- Original Message -
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Kyle Mestery mest
I remember there is a blueprint by Edgar Magana which talks about
similar use cases but that still marked for discussion whether this belongs
to Neutron or Heat.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 2:26
already. Please do share how do tackle these issues?
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. The issues seen are not related to
access, they are all related to API layer, so having ALLOW all etc does
not fix/workaround the problems I mentioned.
Please do share if you have something more to add.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 7:28 PM
like it! +1
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:58 AM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com
On 13/08/14 17:05, Kyle Mestery wrote:
Per this week's Neutron meeting , it was decided that offering a
rotating meeting slot for the weekly Neutron meeting would be a good
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com
1. Not saving enough logs
All Jenkins slaves were just updated to upload all required logs. PLUMgrid
CI should be good now.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
This allows the viewer to see categories of reviews based upon their
divergence from OpenStack's Jenkins results. I think evaluating
divergence from Jenkins might be a metric worth consideration.
I think the only thing
the investigation yet but this may help you move past this
issue for now.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Trevor Vardeman
I'm running Ubuntu 14.04, and rather suddenly I'm unable to run
./stack.sh successfully. Brandon, who is also
You can find information about third party CIs and their owners in
DriverLog . They should be the point of contact.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.comwrote:
On Wed, May 21
+1 at lunch tomorrow
On May 15, 2014 12:31 PM, Hoban, Adrian adrian.ho...@intel.com wrote:
+1 for lunch tomorrow
From: Chris Wright [mailto:chr...@sous-sol.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 11:06 AM
To: Steve Gordon; CARVER, PAUL; Stephen Wong; Alan Kavanagh
You can find discussion/details in the etherpad link.
(m) +1 408.966.2214
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Mandeep Dhami dh...@noironetworks.comwrote:
I am not at the conference
to the instance of
a subnet of tenant for whom the tenant_id is specified).
(m) +1 408.966.2214
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:54 AM, André Aranha andre.f.ara...@gmail.comwrote:
I was checking networks in Neutron and in the API
+1 excellent idea!
(m) +1 408.966.2214
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
I'm +1 for Review Hour on IRC because it shorten communication round
As Akihiro said, it won't solve everything, but we can improve it
+1 to Sean
(m) +1 408.966.2214
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Collins, Sean
I just want to quickly caution about having these meetings in person
since not everyone will be able to attend - the summits are probably
where we will have
Mail list logo