Vikas,
Thanks for starting this. Where would you classify the Segmentation (VLANID
etc) allocation engine. Currently, the libnetwork plugin is tied to the api
and talks to Neutron, how would libnetwork and api part interact?
Fawad Khaliq
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Vikas Choudhary wrote
capable to doing
the options you mentioned above.
Hope that clarifies it.
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Vikas Choudhary
wrote:
> Hi Fawad,
>
> While I was going through nested-containers-spec
> <https://github.com/openstack/kuryr/blob/master/doc/sour
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Gal Sagie wrote:
> Hi Hongbin,
>
> Thank you for starting this thread.
> The person that is going to work on this integration is Fawad (CC'ed) and
> hopefully others will help
> him (We have another person from Huawei that showed intrest in working on
> this).
>
+
Armando has submitted the proposal on Gerrit [1]. Let's take the discussion
there.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312199/7
Fawad Khaliq
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Doug Wiegley
wrote:
> Were we looking at the same etherpad? I think the ‘inclusion criteria’
> and ‘bene
ations and/or API extensions to non-open solutions."
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
>
>> Second, would it be acceptable to make this operator configurable? This
>> would mean users could receive different default filtering as they moved
>> between clouds.
>>
>
> If you must
+1 to both. Great to see the core team growing.
Fawad Khaliq
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Anil Rao wrote:
> Both Takashi and Soichi have been involved with the project for a while
> now and have made significant contributions in terms of code and reviews.
>
>
>
Thanks for brining this up.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this has come up in the past, but some folks in the infra channel
> brought up the topic of changing the default security groups to allow all
> traffic.
>
> They had a few reasons for this that I wil
Folks,
A friendly reminder to review the updated spec [1]
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269039/
Thank you,
Fawad Khaliq
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Thanks for the reviews. The spec [1] has been updated after the latest
> feedback.
&
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Gal Sagie wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Just wanted to update you that Kuryr [1] was officially accepted yesterday
> as a
> big tent project.
>
Great news and congrats everyone!
> We are currently facing some interesting challenges and times and if you
> are run
Folks,
Thanks for the reviews. The spec [1] has been updated after the latest
feedback.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269039/
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The spec [1] for Mangum-Kuryr integration is out and ha
Hi folks,
The spec [1] for Mangum-Kuryr integration is out and has already gone
through good discussion and updates. Please take out some time to review,
we would like to converge on the design soon.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269039/5
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam <
vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
> L2GW seems like a good option for bridging/linking /integrating physical
> appliances which does not support overlay technology (say VXLAN) natively.
>
>
>
> In my case the physical appliance suppor
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Xie, Xianshan wrote:
> Hi, all,
> I have registered a new BP about the live migration with a direct pci
> passthru device.
> Could you please help me to review it? Thanks in advance.
>
Can you please share the link?
> The following is the details:
>
> --
works.
[1] https://github.com/openstack/networking-l2gw
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHQRAKvOr-U
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74Wfr4myf5k
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Hi Steve,
Thanks a lot for the detailed response.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:26:13AM +0500, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
> >Hi Triple-O folks,
> >I am trying to understand how the notion of overcloud and undercloud
> woul
b.com/openstack/networking-l2gw/tree/master/networking_l2gw/l2gatewayclient
[4]
https://github.com/openstack/networking-bgpvpn/tree/master/networking_bgpvpn/neutronclient
Thanks a lot,
Fawad Khaliq
__
OpenStack Development Mailin
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Gal Sagie wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> We are going to have an IRC Meeting tomorrow (2/1) at 1500 UTC
> in #openstack-meeting-4
>
> The meeting agenda can be seen here [1].
> We are going to focus most of the meeting on the Kubernetes-Kuryr
> integration.
> You can
Great. Looking forward to it.
For everyone's benefit, here's the link [1] to CNI spec.
[1] https://github.com/appc/cni/blob/master/SPEC.md
Fawad Khaliq
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote:
> We are going to discuss CNI, the Container Network Interface
Gary,
Thanks for sending the email about the breakage. +1 to the deprecation
warning.
Fawad Khaliq
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> The commit
> https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/5d53dfb8d64186b5b1d2f356fbff8f222e15d1b2
> may
> break
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> Are there no comment after I added more detail?
> No inputs from both horizon and neutron side.
>
> Although Horizon team is tackling to address some problems around
> horizon plugin mechanism
> such as translations, I think option (c)
There is one example [1] in review and may be incomplete but might help. It
only adds the scripts to build. Publishing part is different.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248239/
Fawad Khaliq
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:15 AM, P. Ramanjaneya Reddy wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Can
Very useful information. Thanks, Assaf.
Fawad Khaliq
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Assaf Muller wrote:
> Today we merged [1] which adds content to the Neutron testing guidelines:
>
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/devref/development.environment.html#testing-neutro
Excellent. I will take a look. Thanks for taking care of this!
Fawad Khaliq
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Takashi Yamamoto
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
> > Thanks Yamamoto. Yes, agree it makes sense to keep it in the TaaS tree.
> > Would be
Very cool! Thanks.
Fawad Khaliq
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Matthew Treinish
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As some people may have seen already we've been working on creating a test
> results dashboard up and running to visualize the state of the tests
> running in
> t
://review.openstack.org/#/c/96149/
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Takashi Yamamoto
wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Any plan to revive this [1] so we can discuss and finalize the use cases
> a
Hi Reedip,
I believe TaaS API will go through a round of reviews when the spec is
introduced. It will be good to discuss these points there.
Fawad Khaliq
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:45 PM, reedip banerjee
wrote:
> Dear Members of Neutron-TaaS community,
> I have a few queries related
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> python-neutronclient still has XML support of Neutron API.
> I would like to discuss when we drop XML support in neutronclient.
>
> Neutron API XML suppoort was marked as deprecated in Icehouse and Juno
> and was dropped in Kilo. Jun
Folks,
Any plan to revive this [1] so we can discuss and finalize the use cases
and APIs.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96149/
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
> On 24 November 2015 at 21:46, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Neutron has now various subprojects and some of them would like to
>> implement Horizon supports. Most of them are additional features.
>> I would like to start the discus
Hi Akihiro,
Great initiative.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Neutron has now various subprojects and some of them would like to
> implement Horizon supports. Most of them are additional features.
> I would like to start the discussion where we should have hori
00
[2] https://www.rdoproject.org/networking/networking-in-too-much-detail/
Fawad Khaliq
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Tapio Tallgren
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the stupid question, but how will I use the connection tracking
> in security groups? Is there an extension to the Neut
ght into the plans for this support.
Thanks for the note and link to the bug. I think we are all set to take the
discussions further.
Fawad
> Kuba
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1461000
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Fawad Khaliq > <mailto:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Li Ma wrote:
> It is suggested that you can issue a RFE request for it. [1] We can
> discuss with it and track the progress in the launchpad.
>
> By the way, I'm very interested in it. I discussed a another problem
> with Huawei neutron engineers about abstract VT
/port-mirroring
Can we please restore this [1] and have the reviews complete. I believe
there is a lot of interest in this and we will need to consider multiple
use case scenarios. This [1] will be the best place to capture and discuss.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96149/
Thanks,
Fawad Kh
Hi kakuma,
No worries and thanks a lot for the help. Seems like the process is similar
to the one we followed for the setting up the CI with Neutron. Wanted
confirmation and you helped.
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 6:22 PM, fumihiko kakuma
wrote:
> Hi Fawad,
>
> I
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Takashi Yamamoto
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
> > Thanks a lot, Yamamoto.
> >
> > kakuma, I am assuming if you were able to set it up for a ofagent repo,
> then
> > it should have been the standar
ill sure update shortly.
>
Great. Thanks!
>
> Gal.
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Is there a plan to add conntrack support to the security groups for the
>> OVS driver in Mitaka cycle?
>>
>> My unde
Folks,
Is there a plan to add conntrack support to the security groups for the OVS
driver in Mitaka cycle?
My understanding is that it is being actively worked on for networking-ovn
but no concrete plan for support in the OVS Neutron driver yet.
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
Thanks a lot, Yamamoto.
kakuma, I am assuming if you were able to set it up for a ofagent repo,
then it should have been the standard procedure documented here [1]. I
reach out to infra for any help.
[1] http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html
Fawad Khaliq
On Wed, Nov
mirroring and that
serves use cases where services like IPS are deployed and incorporated.
Do you happen to have a blueprint proposed with the original API
demonstrated that we can iterate over and add the use cases and adjust the
API accordingly to take further for review?
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
On
Folks,
What would be the mechanism to enable a third party CI on a Neutron
sub-project? I am not sure if anyone has already tried it.
I am interesting in adding PLUMgrid CI on networking-plumgrid [1]
cc: Mike
[1] https://github.com/openstack/networking-plumgrid
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that
> maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe
> that in lots of cases it would b
ht. Sounds good. Thanks!
>
>
> [1]
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kuryr/+spec/external-network-connectivity
>
>
> Thanks
> Vikas
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
>
>> Hi Vikas,
>>
>> I suggest take a stab at creating a bluepri
Hi Vikas,
I suggest take a stab at creating a blueprint for this with details through
Gerrit on top of this [1].
@Toni/Gal, would be great to have specs as part of Kuryr. I have added the
directory with a template here [1]
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241935/
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
On
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Edgar Magana
wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> I have been part of this community from the very beginning when in Santa
> Clara, CA back in 2011 a bunch of we crazy people decided to work on this
> networking project.
> Neutron has become is a very unique piece of code
Kyle,
You have done an exceptional job over the three cycles.
Neutron has matured to a new level under your leadership.
You will be missed. Enjoy your new free time!
Fawad Khaliq
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> I'm writing to let everyone know that I do not pla
Thanks Mohankumar. Option #1 is exactly what I was looking for and that
should work.
Thanks a lot!
Fawad Khaliq
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Mohankumar N
wrote:
> Hi Fawad,
>
>
>
> If I understood your question correctly , here some ways to do
>
>
>
> [1] you
former as its much
cleaner and aligns better with phase II. If former is the case, can we
please enhance the devref to capture how the process will work for
python-neutronclient.
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Amir Sadoughi
wrote:
> I started down the path of makin
to keep the
client side in the respective projects as well.
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/python-neutronclient/tree/master/neutronclient/neutron/v2_0
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148318/16
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> After some consultation with Doug and Thierry, we've boiled the change I'm
> recommending below down to two options:
>
> 1. independent, ad-hoc backport branches, tag yourself
>
This makes sense. Standard instructions on tagging/release manag
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
> > After Neutron core and vendor code decomposition [1], it was decided to
> > keep db migration scripts in Neutron repo. I was wondering if any of the
> > networking-* project
/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/kilo/core-vendor-decomposition.html
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
Great!
A correction here: RBAC proposal does address some of the use cases on
interconnecting tenants.
Fawad Khaliq
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Anik wrote:
> That's exactly what I was asking for. Thanks Fawad.
>
> Regards,
> An
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Assaf Muller wrote:
> Check out:
>
> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/liberty/rbac-networks.html
If I understand correctly, what Anik is probably asking for is way to
connect two OpenStack projects together from a network point of view, whe
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I got us a place for Monday night at 8pm.
>
> Here is the link:
> http://www.yelp.com/biz/yaggers-downtown-restaurant-and-sports-bar-vancouver
>
> Don't forget to show up, they are opening the restaurant just for us!
>
grea
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Good points, Dan and John.
>
> At this point it may be useful to see who is actually using
> nova-docker. Can folks who are using any version of nova-docker,
> please speak up with a short description of their use case?
>
I am using Kilo
/
If it looks fine, Infra folks, can please back plumgrid-ci back to voting.
I will be happy to answer to any further questions.
[1] http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html
[2]
http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#permissions-on-your-third-party-system
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-compute-v2.html#compute_server-actions
Fawad Khaliq
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Abhishek Talwar/HYD/TCS <
abhishek.tal...@tcs.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am looking if we can change the resources of a running VM instance (i.e.
> cpu,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Gabriel Bezerra
wrote:
> Em 10.03.2015 14:34, Gabriel Bezerra escreveu:
>
> Em 10.03.2015 14:24, Carl Baldwin escreveu:
>> Neutron currently does not enforce the uniqueness, or non-overlap, of
>> subnet cidrs within the address scope for a single tenant. For
>>
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Sukhdev Kapur
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> A great discussion. I am not expert at OVN, hence, want to ask a question.
> The answer may make a case that it should probably be a ML2 driver as
> oppose to monolithic plugin.
>
> Say a customer want to deploy an OVN based solu
These are not the counts. These seem to be vote weights.
Fawad Khaliq
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:53 AM, vishal yadav
wrote:
> Can anyone tell why the voting counts for all the entries are same!
> (attached screenshot). Even though I voted for some entries, voting counts
> did n
I just happened to have a new setup with all services. Works for me.
Fawad Khaliq
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> With the current master in devstack I am unable to create a neutron
> network. It looks like there is an issue with keystone. Anyone else h
Folks,
PLUMgrid CI is down because of unforeseen hardware breakdown issues. We are
working on getting it sorted out asap. I will respond to this thread when
it's back up.
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
__
OpenStack Development Ma
Lot's of interesting talks. Thank you Kyle. Voted and looking forward.
Fawad Khaliq
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo <
mangel...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Thank you very much, voted.
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:22
Hi Chengyong,
I remember there is a blueprint[1] by Edgar Magana which talks about
similar use cases but that still marked for discussion whether this belongs
to Neutron or Heat.
[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/network-topologies-api
Fawad Khaliq
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 2:26
Hi Boahua,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. The issues seen are not related to
"access", they are all related to API layer, so having ALLOW all etc does
not fix/workaround the problems I mentioned.
Please do share if you have something more to add.
Fawad Khaliq
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014
olved them
already. Please do share how do tackle these issues?
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
like it! +1
Fawad Khaliq
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:58 AM, mar...@redhat.com
wrote:
> On 13/08/14 17:05, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> > Per this week's Neutron meeting [1], it was decided that offering a
> > rotating meeting slot for the weekly Neutron meeting would be a good
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Kyle Mestery
wrote:
>
>
>1. PLUMgrid
> 1. Not saving enough logs
>
> All Jenkins slaves were just updated to upload all required logs. PLUMgrid
CI should be good now.
>
>
>
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
__
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> >This allows the viewer to see categories of reviews based upon their
> >divergence from OpenStack's Jenkins results. I think evaluating
> >divergence from Jenkins might be a metric worth consideration.
>
> I think the only thing this really
ven't done the investigation yet but this may help you move past this
issue for now.
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Trevor Vardeman <
trevor.varde...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> I'm running Ubuntu 14.04, and rather suddenly I'm unable to run
> "
Hi Narasimhan,
You can find information about third party CIs and their owners in
DriverLog [1]. They should be the point of contact.
[1] http://stackalytics.com/report/driverlog
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:54
Hi Mandeep,
You can find discussion/details in the etherpad link[1].
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refactoring-the-neutron-core
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
(m) +1 408.966.2214
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Mandeep Dhami wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I am not at the conference this week, but
+1 at lunch tomorrow
On May 15, 2014 12:31 PM, "Hoban, Adrian" wrote:
> +1 for lunch tomorrow
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wright [mailto:chr...@sous-sol.org]
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 11:06 AM
> To: Steve Gordon; CARVER, PAUL; Stephen Wong; Alan Kavanagh
> Cc: OpenStack Deve
instance of
a subnet of tenant for whom the tenant_id is specified).
Thanks,
Fawad Khaliq
(m) +1 408.966.2214
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:54 AM, André Aranha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was checking networks in Neutron and in the API
> (http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-networking-v2.html) it is s
+1 excellent idea!
Fawad Khaliq
(m) +1 408.966.2214
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I'm +1 for "Review Hour" on IRC because it shorten communication round
> trip time.
> As Akihiro said, it won't solve everything, but
+1 to Sean
Fawad Khaliq
(m) +1 408.966.2214
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Collins, Sean <
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> I just want to quickly caution about having these meetings in person
> since not everyone will be able to attend - the summits are probably
>
78 matches
Mail list logo
