Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Spec and devref placement

e: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (no

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Python 3 usage and kuryr-kubernetes

of the project when we'll move to python3. Is there a policy that prevents to run some services on python2 and some on python3 in distros? What's the reason behind? Regards, Jaume Devesa Software Engineer @ Midokura ![](https://link.nylas.com/open/cxy7986hfe7y675s4rqwe1j9/local

[openstack-dev] [kuryr][magnum]Installing kuryr for mutlinode openstack setup

ed than me in Kuryr. I hope I haven't said anything stupid. Best regards, [1]: http://github.com/openstack/kuryr -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura PGP key: 35C2D6B2 @ keyserver.ubuntu.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature __

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] enabling third party CI

s result. > > Any feedback is welcome here. > -- > Emilien Macchi > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IRC Meeting - Tuesday (1/26) 0300 UTC (#openstack-meeting-4)

ect:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: ope

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How to make deb and rpm packages for a networking-* project?

___ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura _

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Pin some puppet dependencies on git clone

puppet-openstack-integration) and produce the DIB_REPOREF variables > (perhaps ignoring all :ref => 'master' ones), so that we don't have to > track and update them by hand. > > I'm not sure if we absolutely need a Puppetfile for TripleO. The value > added is more in the pin

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Pin some puppet dependencies on git clone

me know if you're interested to support that in TripleO Puppet > elements, I can help with that. > > On 12/14/2015 02:25 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 21:50 +0100, Jaume Devesa wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Today TripleO CI jobs failed because

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

No. I'm saying that I prefer python-os-midonetclient to be a project by its own instead of being merged inside the neutron plugin repo. On 14 December 2015 at 18:43, Antoni Segura Puimedon < toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Jau

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

Sandro > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstac

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Pin some puppet dependencies on git clone

://github.com/openstack/diskimage-builder/tree/master/elements/source-repositories [4]: https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-puppet-elements/blob/master/elements/puppet-modules/source-repository-puppet-modules -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura

Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient

> > Date: Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:48 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [midonet] Split up python-midonetclient > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Cc: Jaume Devesa <ja...@midokura.co

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Steps to follow to provide MidoNet as Neutron backend in TripleO's overcloud

Thursday on the IRC meeting? On 18 August 2015 at 18:14, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 05:59:44PM +0200, Jaume Devesa wrote: Hi Steven/Emilien, Thanks for the quick responses. On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:10, Steven Hardy wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 04:19:08PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Steps to follow to provide MidoNet as Neutron backend in TripleO's overcloud

Sorry, I meant Tuesday. On 19 August 2015 at 10:51, Jaume Devesa devv...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Steven. I've registered the blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/midonet-deployment-support We'll start preparing the pseudo-thirdparty job, develop the feature

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Steps to follow to provide MidoNet as Neutron backend in TripleO's overcloud

as well? Am I right? Cheers, -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Steps to follow to provide MidoNet as Neutron backend in TripleO's overcloud

Hi Steven/Emilien, Thanks for the quick responses. On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:10, Steven Hardy wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 04:19:08PM +0200, Jaume Devesa wrote: I think the pattern for the templates will be similar to the Cisco ML2 plugins which are currently being integrated: https

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposing Assaf Muller for the Neutron Core Reviewer Team

__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer

Re: [openstack-dev] install custom middleware via devstack

__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party][infra] Third-Party CI Operators: Let's use a common CI Solution!

?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] - Joining the team - interested in a Debian Developer and experienced Python and Network programmer?

. Artem Dmytrenko and Jaume Devesa have done great work [1] with me over the last year figuring out how to integrate routing protocols with Neutron. We have had to exhibit some patience as this work has not yet bubbled to the top of the team's overall priority list. However, I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [third-party] how to use a devstack external plugin in gate testing

-neutron-plugin-midonet El 11/02/15 a las 17:43, Jaume Devesa escribió: Hello, I'm working in the same job as Kyle for the midonet plugin, but first I need to do some changes in devstack. (Sean's review on my patch[1] has lead me to this conversation). After talking with Lucas, (Midokura's

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [third-party] how to use a devstack external plugin in gate testing

Monday's third party meeting? Regards, [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152876 El 06/02/15 a las 22:54, Kyle Mestery escribió: , OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) - -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [third-party] how to use a devstack external plugin in gate testing

?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev - -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer, Midokura -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU24bCAAoJEPvO/ogkgqHBpKMP/0aQoCNgQs/8w8gDjmUxlzI4 BE3e3

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Provider Router topology

this spec. I'll update it in a few days. Salvatore [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/131535/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/128272 On 31 October 2014 10:01, Jaume Devesa devv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, in Midokura we are working on a blueprint to define a new kind of topology

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Let's fix all neutron bugs! (NOT)

@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP - VPN BoF session in Kilo design summit

this in the meeting on Thursday. Carl On Oct 29, 2014 5:27 AM, Jaume Devesa devv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, it seems like the BGP dynamic routing it is in a good shape to be included in Neutron during Kilo[1]. There is quite interest in offer BGP-VPN too. Mathieu Rohon's spec[2] goes

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Provider Router topology

/1fUPhpBWpiUvBe_c55lkokDIls--4dKVSFmGVtjxjg0w/edit# [3]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-l3-refactoring [4]: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-provider-router -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP - VPN BoF session in Kilo design summit

L3 subteam meeting. [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125401/ [ ​2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125401/ [3]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/bgp-vpn-dynamic-routing ​Cheers,​ ​ -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura ___ OpenStack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][third-party] Midokura Third-Party CI Status

server. Cheers, -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] static IP DHCP

___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura ___ OpenStack-dev mailing

[openstack-dev] Raising priority for Dynamic Routing

be happy to collaborate in anything to include it there as first experimental extension. Cheers, -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Raising priority for Dynamic Routing

Sorry, I forgot to tag the subject. On 28 August 2014 16:24, Jaume Devesa devv...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to ask you consider to raise priority from low to medium (I completely understand this is not a high priority feature) the BGP Dynamic Routing feature (https

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP dynamic routing testing.

documentation in the next days and I like to have it hierarchically sorted... Just let me know if something is not clear enough. Regards, jaume [1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/DynamicRouting/TestingDynamicRouting -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura

Re: [openstack-dev] Problems with new Neutron service plugin

, but also they are not accessible through api. I will be grateful for your help Regards! Maciek ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Jaume Devesa

Re: [openstack-dev] Problems with new Neutron service plugin

will still be able to access the code in question. -- /kashyap ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Neutron IPv6 in Icehouse and further

/openstack-dev -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Change in openstack/neutron-specs[master]: BGP dynamic routing

- From: Jaume Devesa (Code Review) [mailto:rev...@openstack.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 3:06 PM To: Artem Dmytrenko Cc: Baldwin, Carl (OpenStack Neutron); mark mcclain; Sean M. Collins; Anthony Veiga; Pedro Marques; Nachi Ueno; YAMAMOTO Takashi; Itsuro Oda; fumihiko kakuma; A, Keshava

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Third-Party][Infra] Optimize third party resources

be more reactive in the 'good' patches. ​[1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99679/2​ -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] BGP Dynamic Routing Proposal

___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Introducing task oriented workflows

/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Jaume Devesa Software Engineer at Midokura

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Updates to the template for Neutron BPs

Another question about this, Kyle: once merged, will there be a place where to read these approved specs, or should we run it locally? I tried to find the approved *nova-specs *in docs.openstack.org, but I couldn't find them. Regards, jaume On 21 April 2014 09:02, Mandeep Dhami

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Updates to the template for Neutron BPs

Great! Thanks Anne! On 22 April 2014 16:44, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Jaume Devesa devv...@gmail.com wrote: Another question about this, Kyle: once merged, will there be a place where to read these approved specs, or should we run it locally

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Branchless Tempest QA Spec - final draft

Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/16/2014 11:48 AM, Jaume Devesa wrote: Hi Sean, for what I understood, we will need a new feature flag for each new feature, and a feature flag (default to false) for each deprecated one. My concern is: since the goal is make tempest a confident tool

Re: [openstack-dev] New Nova hypervisor: Docker

Hi Sam, that's a great work and it will be for sure my default driver for my development environment. I have a question: once the review will be approved and the code merged into master, do you plan to create a driver nova subteam as Xen, HyperV and others do? I would be glad to cooperate on it.