Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposed Changes to the Core Team ...

2018-09-21 Thread John Griffith
TG in Denver last week. Based on that > > discussion I have reached out to John Griffith and Winston D (Huang > Zhiteng) > > and asked if they felt they could continue to be a part of the Core > Team. > > Both agreed that it was time to relinquish their titles. > > > > So, I am

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][cinder] about cinder volume qos

2018-09-21 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 2:22 PM Jay S Bryant wrote: > > > On 9/10/2018 7:17 AM, Rambo wrote: > > Hi,all > > At first,I find it is supported that we can define hard performance > limits for each volume in doc.openstack.org[1].But only can define hard > performance limits for each volume

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] about block device driver

2018-08-01 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 8:44 AM Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 7/16/2018 4:20 AM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: > > If I remember correctly the driver was deprecated because it had no > > maintainer or CI. In Cinder we require our drivers to have both, > > otherwise we can't guarantee that they actually

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Update attachments on replication failover

2018-02-27 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Walter Boring wrote: > I think you might be able to get away with just calling os-brick's > connect_volume again without the need to call disconnect_volume first. > calling disconnect_volume wouldn't be good for volumes that are being > used,

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Update attachments on replication failover

2018-02-26 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Matt Riedemann <mriede...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/26/2018 9:28 PM, John Griffith wrote: > >> I'm also wondering how much of the extend actions we can leverage here, >> but I haven't looked through all of that yet.​ >> > > The o

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Update attachments on replication failover

2018-02-26 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Matt Riedemann <mriede...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/26/2018 8:09 PM, John Griffith wrote: > >> I'm interested in looking at creating a mechanism to "refresh" all of the >> existing/current attachments as part of the Cinder F

[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Update attachments on replication failover

2018-02-26 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, Something I've been looking at with Cinder's replication (sort of the next step in the evolution if you will) is the ability to refresh/renew in-use volumes that were part of a migration event. We do something similar with extend-volume on the Nova side through the use of Instance

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to longer development cycles

2017-12-13 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Chris Jones wrote: > > [...] > > For me the first thing that comes to mind with this proposal, is how > > would the milestones/FF/etc be arranged within that year? As I've raised > > previously on this list [0], I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Should we make rebuild + new image on a volume-backed instance fail fast?

2017-10-06 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > This came up in IRC discussion the other day, but we didn't dig into it > much given we were all (2 of us) exhausted talking about rebuild. > > But we have had several bugs over the years where people expect the root >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [election] NON nomination for TC

2017-10-04 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > I'd like to announce that after 4 years serving on the OpenStack > Technical Committee, I will not be running in this fall's > election. Over the last 4 years we've navigated some rough seas > together, including the transition

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

2017-09-07 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/07/2017 04:54 PM, Eric Fried wrote: > >> All- >> >> The plain pdb doc patch [1] is merging. >> >> On clarkb's suggestion, I took a look at remote-pdb [2], and it >> turned >> out to be easy-peasy to use. I

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

2017-09-07 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/07/2017 01:52 PM, Eric Fried wrote: > >> John- >> >> You're not the only one for whom the transition to systemd has >> been >> painful. >> >> However... >> >> It *is* possible (some would argue just

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

2017-09-07 Thread John Griffith
penstack-dev and I can talk you through it. > > [1] https://docs.openstack.org/devstack/latest/systemd.html > > Thanks, > Eric Fried (efried) > > On 09/07/2017 12:34 PM, John Griffith wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

2017-09-07 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:29 AM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Please don't, some of us have no issues with screen and use it extensively > for debugging. Unless there's a viable option using systemd I fail to > understand why this is such a big deal.

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

2017-09-07 Thread John Griffith
Please don't, some of us have no issues with screen and use it extensively for debugging. Unless there's a viable option using systemd I fail to understand why this is such a big deal. I've been using devstack in screen for a long time without issue, and I still use rejoin that supposedly didn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Proposing TommyLikeHu for Cinder core

2017-07-26 Thread John Griffith
+1 On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 8:50 AM, yang, xing wrote: > +1! Tommy is great addition to Cinder core team. > > Thanks, > Xing > > > > > From: Sean McGinnis [sean.mcgin...@gmx.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 4:07 AM > To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Requirements for re-adding Gluster support

2017-07-26 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:30:49PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2017-07-26 12:56:55 +0200 (+0200), Niels de Vos wrote: > > [...] > > > My current guess is that adding a 3rd party CI [3] for Gluster is > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Turning TC/UC workgroups into OpenStack SIGs

2017-06-27 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi everyone, > > One of the areas identified as a priority by the Board + TC + UC > workshop in March was the need to better close the feedback loop and > make unanswered requirements emerge. Part of the solution is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Moving away from "big tent" terminology

2017-06-15 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:15 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Back in 2014, OpenStack was facing a problem. Our project structure, > inherited from days where Nova, Swift and friends were the only game in > town, was not working anymore. The "integrated

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Is there interest in an admin-api to refresh volume connection info?

2017-06-08 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Nova stores the output of the Cinder os-initialize_connection info API in > the Nova block_device_mappings table, and uses that later for making volume > connections. > > This data can get out of whack or need to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Target classes in Cinder

2017-06-02 Thread John Griffith
gainst it. Meh... ok, never mind.​ > > > Jay > > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:14 PM Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 06/02/2017 03:47 PM, John Griffith wrote: >> > Hey Everyone, >> > >> > So quite a while back we int

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Target classes in Cinder

2017-06-02 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Eric Harney <ehar...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/02/2017 03:47 PM, John Griffith wrote: > > Hey Everyone, > > > > So quite a while back we introduced a new model for dealing with target > > management in the drivers (ie initial

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Target classes in Cinder

2017-06-02 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, So quite a while back we introduced a new model for dealing with target management in the drivers (ie initialize_connection, ensure_export etc). Just to summarize a bit: The original model was that all of the target related stuff lived in a base class of the base drivers. Folks

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuxi][kuryr] Where to commit codes for Fuxi-golang

2017-05-30 Thread John Griffith
t; I have committed a patch[1] to add a new repository to Openstack. Please >> take a look at it. Thanks very much! >> >> [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468635 >> >> Best Wishes! >> zengchen >> >> >> >> >> >> 在 2017-0

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuxi][kuryr] Where to commit codes for Fuxi-golang

2017-05-26 Thread John Griffith
fore charing ahead on new repos etc. Doesn't matter much to me though.​ > >Thanks very much! > > Best Wishes! > zengchen > > > > > At 2017-05-25 22:47:29, "John Griffith" <john.griffi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 25, 20

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuxi][kuryr] Where to commit codes for Fuxi-golang

2017-05-25 Thread John Griffith
ed port the code back to OpenStack > > [1]https://github.com/opensds/opensds/blob/master/pkg/dock/ > plugins/connector/connector.go > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:47 PM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, May 25, 2017 a

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuxi][kuryr] Where to commit codes for Fuxi-golang

2017-05-25 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:50 AM, zengchen wrote: > Very sorry to foget attaching the link for bp of rewriting Fuxi with go > language. > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuxi/+spec/convert-to-golang > > > At 2017-05-25 19:46:54, "zengchen" wrote: > > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Supporting volume_type when booting from volume

2017-05-23 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Sean McGinnis > wrote: > > > >> If it's just too much debt and risk of slippery slope type arguments on > >> the Nova side (and that's fair, after lengthy

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Supporting volume_type when booting from volume

2017-05-23 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 5/23/2017 9:56 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > >> Is it entirely unreasonable to turn the question around and ask why, >> given it is such a commonly requested feature, the Nova team are so >> resistant to it? >> > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [go][all] Settling on gophercloud as the go based API library for all OpenStack projects

2017-05-23 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> wrote: > John, > > I had heard this a few time in Boston Summit. So want to put this to bed :) > > -- Dims > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:43 PM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com> > wro

Re: [openstack-dev] [go][all] Settling on gophercloud as the go based API library for all OpenStack projects

2017-05-23 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Folks, > > This has come up several times in various conversations. > > Can we please stop activity on > https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/golang-client/ and just > settle down on

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] OpenStack moving both too fast and too slow at the same time

2017-05-05 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 05/05/2017 10:48 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > Would it be accurate to say, then, that from your perpsective the >> tendency of OpenStack to adopt new projects willy nilly contributes >> to the sense of features

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Is Cinder still maintained?

2017-04-27 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hi, > > I've posted a refactoring patch that simplifies tooz (read: remove > technical debt) usage more than a month ago, and I got 0 review since > then: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447079 > > I'm a bit

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][nova][cinder] Testing of a microversioned world

2017-03-10 Thread John Griffith
e part of "Volume API" of > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tempest-api-versions-in-pike > > Thanks > Ken Ohmichi > > --- > > 2017-03-10 11:37 GMT-08:00 John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com>: > > Hey Everyone, > > > > So along the lines o

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][nova][cinder] Testing of a microversioned world

2017-03-10 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:37 PM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Everyone, > > So along the lines of an earlier thread that went out regarding testing of > deprecated API's and Tempest etc [1]. > > Now that micro-versions are *the API versioning

[openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][nova][cinder] Testing of a microversioned world

2017-03-10 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, So along the lines of an earlier thread that went out regarding testing of deprecated API's and Tempest etc [1]. Now that micro-versions are *the API versioning scheme to rule them all* one question I've not been able to find an answer for is what we're going to promise here for

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][glance][keystone][cinder] Testing of deprecated API versions

2017-03-10 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > > > > As far as I can tell: > > - Cinder v1 if I'm not mistaken has been deprecated in Juno, so it's > > deprecated in all supported releases. > > - Glance v1 has been deprecated in Newton, so it's deprecated in all

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Schedule Instances according to Local disk based Volume?

2017-02-26 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > Matt, > > Thanks for the information, I will check that; But still I think the user > demand here is to use local disk from > compute node as block device, as the data can be remained if the old vm > got deleted,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Should nova just default to use cinder v3 in Pike?

2017-02-11 Thread John Griffith
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Matt Riedemann <mriede...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/11/2017 11:47 AM, John Griffith wrote: > >> >> It seems like just moving Nova to V3 in Pike would alleviate quite a few >> snarls here. The fact that V3.0 is just pointing back to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Should nova just default to use cinder v3 in Pike?

2017-02-11 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > While talking about [1] yesterday and trying to figure out how to > configure nova to use cinder v3 in the CI jobs in Pike, things got a bit > messy from the CI job configuration perspective. > > My initial plan was to

Re: [openstack-dev] Mitaka - Unable to attach volume to VM

2017-02-09 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Sam Huracan wrote: > Hi Sean, > > I've checked 'openstack volume list', the state of all volume is avaiable, > and I can download image to volume. > I also use Ceph as other Cinder volume backend, and issue is similarly. > Same log. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

2016-10-05 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 10/03/2016 12:46 PM, Edward Leafe wrote: > > > We are fortunate in that all of the candidates are exceptionally > well-qualified, and those elected have put in excellent service while on > the TC. But one thing I'm afraid of

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

2016-10-04 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Oct 4, 2016, at 11:54 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > >> In French, "prétendre" has a connotation of "profess" or simply > >> "say", which is very different from the more negative connotation > >> of

Re: [openstack-dev] TC Candidacy

2016-10-03 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Clay Gerrard <clay.gerr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:34 PM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> I think what's more important and critical is the future and where >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

2016-10-03 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:30 AM, gordon chung wrote: > hi, > > as there are many candidates this TC election, i figured i'd ask a > question to better understand the candidates from the usual sales pitch > in self-nominations. hopefully, this will give some insights into the >

[openstack-dev] TC Candidacy

2016-09-29 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, Some of you may know me, I've been around the OpenStack community for a while (longer than some, shorter than others). I'm not an "uber hipster", or a "super cool bro-grammer", or even a "mega hacker" trying to write the most clever code possible to impress everyone. I am however

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][sahara] LVM vs BDD drivers performance tests results

2016-09-21 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Michał Dulko <michal.du...@intel.com> wrote: > On 09/20/2016 05:48 PM, John Griffith wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Duncan Thomas > > <duncan.tho...@gmail.com <mailto:duncan.tho...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][sahara] LVM vs BDD drivers performance tests results

2016-09-20 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > On 20 September 2016 at 16:24, Nikita Konovalov > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> From Sahara (and Hadoop workload in general) use-case the reason we used >> BDD was a complete absence of any

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][sahara] LVM vs BDD drivers performance tests results

2016-09-19 Thread John Griffith
to LIO seems worthwhile - I'd suggest > being cautious with deprecation rather than aggressive though - aiming to > change the default in 'O' then planning the rest based on how that goes. > > On 19 September 2016 at 21:54, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >&

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][sahara] LVM vs BDD drivers performance tests results

2016-09-19 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny <e...@e0ne.info> wrote: > + [sahara] because they are primary consumer of the BDD. > > John, > Thanks for the answer. My comments are inline. > > Regards, > Ivan Kolodyazhny, > http://blog.e0ne.info/ > > O

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] LVM vs BDD drivers performance tests results

2016-09-19 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Hi team, > > We did some performance tests [1] for LVM and BDD drivers. All tests were > executed on real hardware with OpenStack Mitaka release. Unfortunately, we > didn't have enough time to execute all tests and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] FFE request for RBD replication

2016-09-10 Thread John Griffith
Given the the patch is up and well on its way I don't know why this would be a problem. FWIW ya get my +1 On Sep 9, 2016 1:34 PM, "Gorka Eguileor" wrote: > Hi, > > As some of you may know, Jon Bernard (jbernard on IRC) has been working > on the RBD v2.1 replication

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] moving driver to open source

2016-09-09 Thread John Griffith
On Sep 9, 2016 08:26, "Ben Swartzlander" <b...@swartzlander.org> wrote: > > On 09/08/2016 04:41 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: >> >> On 8 September 2016 at 20:17, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com >> <mailto:john.griffi...@gmail.com>> wrot

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards"

2016-09-09 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > John Griffith wrote: > > ​I think Sean Dague made some really good points and I'd tend to lean > > that way. Honestly charters, bylaws, governance etc shift or are > > rewritten fairly

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards"

2016-09-08 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 9/8/2016 6:42 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> On 09/08/2016 05:00 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> >>> Sean Dague wrote: >>> >> >> >>> So... the difference between your proposal and mine is: you force the >>> PTL to

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] moving driver to open source

2016-09-08 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-09-08 09:32:20 +0100 (+0100), Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > That policy is referring to libraries (ie, python modules that we'd > > actually "import" at the python level), while the list above seems to be > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] moving driver to open source

2016-09-08 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:24:09AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Avishay Traeger wrote: > > > There are a number of drivers that require closed-source tools to > > > communicate with the storage. 3 others that

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] moving driver to open source

2016-09-07 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Alon Marx wrote: > I want to share our plans to open the IBM Storage driver source code. > Historically we started our way in cinder way back (in Essex if I'm not > mistaken) ​You're mistaken, Cinder didn't exist at that time... but it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Reconciling flavors and block device mappings

2016-08-26 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Aug 25, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > One other thing to note is that while a flavor constrains how much local > > disk is used it does not constrain volume size at all. So a user can > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Nova] Reconciling flavors and block device mappings

2016-08-26 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, at 03:44 AM, kostiantyn.volenbovs...@swisscom.com > wrote: > > Hi, > > option 1 (=that's what patches suggest) sounds totally fine. > > Option 3 > Allow block device mappings, when present, to

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] [cinder] A current major cause for gate failure - cinder backups

2016-08-24 Thread John Griffith
Patch is up, see LP bug reference in Lisa message. On Aug 24, 2016 10:35, "Jay S. Bryant" wrote: > Lisa, > > Great debug! Thank you! > > Let me know when a patch is up and I will take a look. > > Jay > > On 08/24/2016 02:24 AM, Li, Xiaoyan wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][drivers] Backend and volume health reporting

2016-08-14 Thread John Griffith
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Avishay Traeger wrote: > Hi all, > I would like to propose working on a new feature for Ocata to provide > health information for Cinder backends and volumes. Currently, a volume's > status basically reflects the last management

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][cinder] tag:follows-standard-deprecation should be removed

2016-08-12 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > > I was leaning towards a separate repo until I started thinking about all > the overhead and complications this would cause. It's another repo for > cores to watch. It would cause everyone extra complication

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][cinder] tag:follows-standard-deprecation should be removed

2016-08-12 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 03:40:47PM +0300, Duncan Thomas wrote: > > On 12 Aug 2016 15:28, "Thierry Carrez" wrote: > > > > > > Duncan Thomas wrote: > > > > > I agree that leaving broken drivers

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][cinder] tag:follows-standard-deprecation should be removed

2016-08-11 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Sean McGinnis > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> As follow up on the mailing list discussion [0], gerrit activity > >> >> [1][2] and cinder 3rd party CI policy [3] I'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Matthew Treinish <mtrein...@kortar.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 09:16:02PM -0700, John Griffith wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Matthew Treinish <mtrein...@kortar.org> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 0

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Matthew Treinish <mtrein...@kortar.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:28:52PM -0700, John Griffith wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Sean McGinnis <sean.mcgin...@gmx.com> > wrote: > > > > > . > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [stable] [all] Changing stable policy for drivers

2016-08-09 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > . > > > > Mike, you must have left the midcycle by the time this topic came > > up. On the issue of out-of-tree drivers, I specifically offered this > > proposal (a community managed mechanism for distributing driver >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] persistently single-vendor projects

2016-08-04 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > Ok. I'll play devils advocate here and speak to the other side of this, > because you raised an interesting issue... > > Ceph is outside of the tent. It provides a (mostly) api compatible > implementation of the swift api

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

2016-07-29 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: > Hi folks, > > First of all, let me say that it’s a marketing announcement and as all of > you know such announcements aren’t precise from a technical side. > Personally I’ve seen this paper first time on

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] No middle-man - when does/will Nova directly connect iSCSI volumes?

2016-06-24 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:09:44AM -0700, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > > > > volumes connected to QEMU instances eventually become directly connected? > > > > > Our long term goal is that 100% of all network

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] No middle-man - when does/will Nova directly connect iSCSI volumes?

2016-06-16 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Preston L. Bannister wrote: > QEMU has the ability to directly connect to iSCSI volumes. Running the > iSCSI connections through the nova-compute host *seems* somewhat > inefficient. > ​I know tests I've run in the past virt-io actually

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-24 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > Cinder bugs list was far more manageable once this had been done. > > It is worth sharing the tool for this? I realise it's fairly trivial to > write one, but some standardisation on the comment format etc seems >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-operators][cinder] max_concurrent_builds in Cinder

2016-05-23 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Hi developers and operators, > I would like to get any feedback from you about my idea before I'll start > work on spec. > > In Nova, we've got max_concurrent_builds option [1] to set 'Maximum number > of instance builds

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]The backend-group concept in Cinder

2016-05-18 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:45 PM, chenying wrote: > Hi all: > I want to know whether the backend-group concept have been > discussed or have other recommendations to us? > The backend-group concept means can be regarded as a mechanism to > manage same

Re: [openstack-dev] disabling deprecated APIs by config?

2016-05-18 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > nova-net is now deprecated - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310539/ > > And we're in the process in Nova of doing some spring cleaning and > deprecating the proxies to other services - >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] [glance] Answers to some questions about Glance

2016-05-17 Thread John Griffith
's questions, hope > they are helpful. > > On 5/16/16, 9:06 PM, "John Griffith" <john.griffi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey, > > Maybe not related, but maybe it is. After spending the past couple of > hours trying to help a customer with a Glance issue I'm a bit... well &

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] [glance] On operating a high throughput or otherwise team

2016-05-16 Thread John Griffith
ely? Do we have etiquette that people actually follow > making sure you stay on topic and move forward, or rather diverge and > create even more problems? > > > On 5/16/16 9:06 PM, John Griffith wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Flavio Percoco <

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] [glance] On operating a high throughput or otherwise team

2016-05-16 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 16/05/16 00:23 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: > >> Excerpts from Nikhil Komawar's message of 2016-05-14 17:42:16 -0400: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> Lately I have been involved in discussions that have resulted in giving

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Michał Dulko to Cinder Core

2016-05-03 Thread John Griffith
Definitely a +1 from me On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Patrick East wrote: > +1, Michal has done some awesome work on Cinder! > > -Patrick > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Sean McGinnis > wrote: > >> Hey everyone, >> >> I would like to

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Additional notes on Nova and Cinder volume managment

2016-04-28 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, I've spent a bit more time thinking through some of what we talked about in todays session. I wanted to summarize some things, clarify a couple points and also add some details that I've been thinking about. Etherpad seemed like a more collaborative way to go than super long email

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] openstack client slowness / client-as-a-service

2016-04-19 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 04/19/2016 10:16 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:57:56AM -0500, Dean Troyer wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Adam Young wrote: >>> >>> I wonder how

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [devstack] Adding example "local.conf" files for testing?

2016-04-18 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > Sometimes (especially when I try to reproduce bugs) I have the need > to set up a local environment with devstack. Everytime I have to look > at my notes to check which option in the "local.conf" have to be set > for

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Does the OpenStack community(or Cinder team) allow one driver to call another driver's public method?

2016-03-19 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:05 PM, liuxinguo wrote: > Hi Cinder team, > > > > We are going to implement storage-assisted volume migrate in our driver > between different backend storage array or even different array of > different vendors. > > This is really high-efficiency

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposal: changes to our current testing process

2016-03-07 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Knight, Clinton <clinton.kni...@netapp.com> wrote: > > > On 3/7/16, 10:45 AM, "Eric Harney" <ehar...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >On 03/06/2016 09:35 PM, John Griffith wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 4:27 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposal: changes to our current testing process

2016-03-06 Thread John Griffith
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Jay S. Bryant wrote: > Ivan, > > I agree that our testing needs improvement. Thanks for starting this > thread. > > With regards to adding a hacking check for tests that run too long ... are > you thinking that we would have a

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] PTL for Newton and beyond

2016-03-03 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Ronald Bradford wrote: > Dims, > > As my first project and cycle in OpenStack I have really appreciated your > input and direction as I was starting out and during Mitaka cycle. > It has been great to learn just a bit of what PTL of Oslo

Re: [openstack-dev] Openstack Cinder - Wishlist

2016-03-02 Thread John Griffith
There's actually a Launchpad category for this very thing. Under the importance tag. On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:27 AM, wrote: > Thank you Yatin! > > > > *From:* yatin kumbhare [mailto:yatinkumbh...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 1, 2016 4:43 PM > *To:* OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] volumes stuck detaching attaching and force detach

2016-03-01 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: D'Angelo, Scott > > > > Matt, changing Nova to store the connector info at volume attach time > does > > help. Where the gap will remain is after Nova evacuation or live >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [nova] Work flow for detaching a volume

2016-02-26 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 06:11:15PM +, Srinivas Sakhamuri wrote: > > I want to confirm the correct work flow for detaching a volume, Both nova > > and cinder (unpublished, available through cinder.volumes.detach)

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] How to configure the third party CI to be triggered only when jenkins +1

2016-02-22 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 6:32 PM, liuxinguo wrote: > Hi, > > > > There is no need to trigger third party CI if a patch does not pass > Jenkins Verify. > > I think there is a way to reach this but I’m not sure how. > > > > So is there any reference or suggestion to configure

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][all] Integration python-*client tests on gates

2016-02-15 Thread John Griffith
pens. If we don't currently test that code it > would be a good goal for any new integration testing to do so. > > > > > > > There is a proposal to python-cinderclient tests to implement some > > cross-project testing to make sure, that new python-cinderclient won't >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Multi-attach, determining when to call os-brick's connector.disconnect_volume

2016-02-12 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > There seems to be a few discussions going on here wrt to detaches. One > is what to do on the Nova side with calling os-brick's disconnect_volume, > and also when to or not to call Cinder's

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

2016-02-12 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > Ok... this is going to be one of those threads, but I wanted to try to > get resolution here. > > OpenStack is wildly inconsistent in it's use of tenant vs. project. As > someone that wasn't here at the beginning, I'm not even

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Multi-attach, determining when to call os-brick's connector.disconnect_volume

2016-02-10 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Ildikó Váncsa wrote: > Hi Walt, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Walter A. Boring IV [mailto:walter.bor...@hpe.com] > > Sent: February 09, 2016 23:15 > > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Multi-attach, determining when to call os-brick's connector.disconnect_volume

2016-02-10 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > But the issue is, when told to detach, some of the drivers do bad things. > then, is it the driver's issue to refcount to fix the issue, or is it > nova's to refcount so that it doesn't call the release before all users

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Multi-attach, determining when to call os-brick's connector.disconnect_volume

2016-02-10 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Sean McGinnis <sean.mcgin...@gmx.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 03:30:42PM -0700, John Griffith wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Ildikó Váncsa < > ildiko.van...@ericsson.com> > > wrote: > > > > > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Patrick East to Cinder Core

2016-01-31 Thread John Griffith
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Jay Bryant wrote: > +1. Patrick's contributions to Cinder have been notable since he joined us > and he is a pleasure to work with! Welcome to the core team Patrick! > > Jay > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016, 19:05 Sean McGinnis

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] MTU configuration pain

2016-01-18 Thread John Griffith
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Matt Kassawara wrote: > Prior attempts to solve the MTU problem in neutron simply band-aid it or > become too complex from feature creep or edge cases that mask the primary > goal of a simple implementation that works for most deployments.

Re: [openstack-dev] Should Cinder have a volume_action table to track changes on a Volume?

2016-01-03 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 7:54 AM, SCHVENINGER, DOUGLAS P wrote: > I was looking into a support issue and noticed that Nova has an instance > and instance_action table. I was wondering if this is something that cinder > would consider adding a volume_action table to track changes

  1   2   3   4   5   >