Re: [openstack-dev] Ocata - Networking OVN - option "neutron_sync_mode = repair" looks broken

BUG reported: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1689880 On 10 May 2017 at 10:49, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm playing with Networking OVN, and planning to deploy it into > production in a couple weeks. > > After deploying

[openstack-dev] Ocata - Networking OVN - option "neutron_sync_mode = repair" looks broken

Hello, I'm playing with Networking OVN, and planning to deploy it into production in a couple weeks. After deploying everything and starting using OVN, with Floating IPs, multiple compute nodes and everything else, I can say that it looks awesome! Way better than "neutron-*-agents". However,

Re: [openstack-dev] Ocata - Ubuntu 16.04 - OVN does not work with DPDK

On 11 April 2017 at 11:08, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ < > thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 8 April 2017 at 00:37, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] Ocata - Ubuntu 16.04 - OVN does not work with DPDK

On 11 April 2017 at 11:08, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ < > thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 8 April 2017 at 00:37, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] Ocata - Ubuntu 16.04 - OVN does not work with DPDK

On 8 April 2017 at 00:37, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> wrote: > Guys, > > I manage to deploy Ocata on Ubuntu 16.04 with OVN for the first time > ever, today! > > It looks very, very good... OVN L3 Router is working, OVN DHCP working... > bridge mappi

[openstack-dev] Ocata - Ubuntu 16.04 - OVN does not work with DPDK

Guys, I manage to deploy Ocata on Ubuntu 16.04 with OVN for the first time ever, today! It looks very, very good... OVN L3 Router is working, OVN DHCP working... bridge mappings "br-ex" on each compute node... All good! Then, I've said: time for DPDK! I manage to use OVS with DPDK easily

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Newton B3 for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.10

On 8 September 2016 at 14:40, Corey Bryant wrote: > Hi All, > > The Ubuntu OpenStack team is pleased to announce the general availability > of OpenStack Newton B3 milestone in Ubuntu 16.10 and for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS > via the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. > > Ubuntu 16.04 LTS >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] OpenStack Newton B1 for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Ubuntu 16.10

I can't wait to try "VLAN Aware VMs"... But it is not there yet... Maybe on Newton B2... https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/vlan-aware-vms This is *very* important for NFV Instances on OpenStack... Many telcos needs this... Cheers! Thiago On 14 June 2016 at 07:25, Jeffrey Zhang

Re: [openstack-dev] [Monasca] influxDB clustering and HA will be "commercial option".

On 30 May 2016 at 11:59, Jaesuk Ahn wrote: > Hi, Monasca developers and users, > > > https://influxdata.com/blog/update-on-influxdb-clustering-high-availability-and-monetization/ > "For our current and future customers, we’ll be offering clustering and > high availability

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

On 11 May 2016 at 16:05, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > > Folks, > > I am happy to announce that Mitaka release for L2 Gateway is released and > now available at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw. > > You can install it by using "pip install networking-l2gw" > > This

[openstack-dev] Mitaka - OVS Firewall Driver, not working = OVSFWPortNotFound

Guys, I'm trying to enable OVS Firewall Driver in my Cloud Env but, it is not working... I'm trying to replace the following line (openvswitch_agent.ini config across the cloud): --- firewall_driver = neutron.agent.linux.iptables_firewall.OVSHybridIptablesFirewallDriver --- By this: ---

[openstack-dev] Mitaka, Xenial, OVS Firewall Driver, DPDK, VXLAN and Provider Networks

Hey guys! Next Ubuntu and Mitaka are promising something ultra mega cool! Look at this! --- root@mitaka-1:~# apt install neutron-openvswitch-agent Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following additional packages will be installed:

Re: [openstack-dev] Questions regarding image "location" and glanceclient behaviour ...

> > > But this procedure will force me to download all images in advance, > which I > > can not do. > > > > I NEED the previous behavior, where Glance download the images by itself, > > on demand. > > > > How to do this with V2 ? > > You can use glance image-create without passing it any image

Re: [openstack-dev] Questions regarding image "location" and glanceclient behaviour ...

2 doesn't support 'location' anymore, now there are multi > locations for image in V2. You can use 'glance location-add' after create > the the image by 'glance image-create --file xxx' > > > On 18/02/16 15:51, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > > Hey guys, any news about this? > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Questions regarding image "location" and glanceclient behaviour ...

Hey guys, any news about this? I want to use Glance v2 but, without --location that points to a URL and, for me, without it, it is impossible to use it (v2). So, any plans to bring back --location, I want to use v2 like this: -- glance image-create --location

Re: [openstack-dev] Any chances to backport port_security_enabled support into Heat for Kilo 2015.1.3?

On 31 January 2016 at 18:23, Steve Baker <sba...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 29/01/16 09:45, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: >> >> Guys, >> >> This is important and Kilo is missing it: >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179989/ >> >> Is it po

Re: [openstack-dev] Any chances to backport port_security_enabled support into Heat for Kilo 2015.1.3?

Oh, that's okay... Thanks guys!:) On 29 January 2016 at 06:39, Sergey Kraynev wrote: > Sean, thank you for the spotting. > > Martinx, According to the information mentioned by Sean, we unfortunately > can not do it :( > > On 29 January 2016 at 10:45, Sean M. Collins

[openstack-dev] Any chances to backport port_security_enabled support into Heat for Kilo 2015.1.3?

Guys, This is important and Kilo is missing it: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179989/ Is it possible to backport it to Kilo 2015.1.3? Currently, I am manually patching Kilo / Heat by using the following diff:

Re: [openstack-dev] The command "neutron-db-manage" of 8.0.0~b1 fails

On 4 January 2016 at 12:20, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote: > Mike Bayer <mba...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 01/04/2016 06:59 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >>> >>> Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovs-dpdk] availability

On 3 January 2016 at 23:41, Palanisamy, Prabhakaran (Contractor) wrote: > Hi, > > > > Is networking-ovs-dpdk package available non devstack installation ?? > > > > Thanks, > > PP Hi, Don't know if it will help you but, Ubuntu Xenial (development

[openstack-dev] The command "neutron-db-manage" of 8.0.0~b1 fails

Guys, I'm trying to experiment Mitaka on Ubuntu Xenial, which already have beta version on its repositories, however, "neutron-db-manage" fails. Here is the output of it: http://paste.openstack.org/show/482920/ Any clue? I'm using the Kilo instructions as a start point, of course, I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [ANN] OpenStack Kilo on Ubuntu fully automated with Ansible! Ready for NFV L2 Bridges via Heat!

> From: Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 5:15 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ANN] OpenStack Kilo on Ubuntu fully automated > with Ansible! Ready for NFV L2 Bridges via

[openstack-dev] [ANN] OpenStack Kilo on Ubuntu fully automated with Ansible! Ready for NFV L2 Bridges via Heat!

Hello Stackers! I'm proud to announce an Ansible Playbook to deploy OpenStack on Ubuntu! Check it out! * https://github.com/sandvine/os-ansible-deployment-lite Powered by Sandvine! ;-) Basically, this is the automation of what we have documented here: *

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Juno is completely broken in Trusty + Linux 3.19!

Guys, I just upgraded my Trusty servers, that I'm running OpenStack Juno, to Linux 3.19, which is already available at Proposed repository. OpenStack is dead here, no connectivity for the tenants. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1452868 I appreciate any help! It

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Juno is completely broken in Trusty + Linux 3.19!

I meatn, it works okay with Linux 3.16, not 3.19. Sorry... On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:26 PM Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, I just upgraded my Trusty servers, that I'm running OpenStack Juno, to Linux 3.19, which is already available at Proposed repository. OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Juno is completely broken in Trusty + Linux 3.19!

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:26 PM Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, I just upgraded my Trusty servers, that I'm running OpenStack Juno, to Linux 3.19, which is already available at Proposed repository. OpenStack is dead here, no connectivity for the tenants. https

Re: [openstack-dev] Time to Samba! :-)

Just for the record, they are watching us!:-O https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-aws-directory-service/ Best! Thiago On 16 August 2014 16:03, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Stackers, I'm wondering here... Samba4 is pretty solid (up coming 4.2 rocks), I'm using

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Juno RC2 available

Congrats :-D On 9 October 2014 09:52, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Hello everyone, One week to final release! Due to a number of issues discovered in the published Heat 2014.2 RC1, we generated a new Juno release candidate. You can find the list of bugfixes in this RC

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing to disallow updates of IPv6 attributes on subnets

with a slaac subnet. And attach your VMs to this new network. Once it’s done, you can remove the previous network. Hope that it helps Robert On 10/8/14, 10:25 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! Currently, I have IceHouse up and running (Ubuntu 14.04.1

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Test PPA's] Glance Test PPA's for Juno missing?

About this https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cloud-archive/+archive/ubuntu/juno-staging ? On 27 September 2014 13:12, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Everyone, I've been trying some upgrade testing from Icehouse to Juno on running systems using the test PPA's but I'm running

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Test PPA's] Glance Test PPA's for Juno missing?

Also here: http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/install-guide/install/apt/content/ch_basic_environment.html - there is add-apt-repository cloud-archive:juno but I'm not sure if it is ready for tests... Cheers! On 27 September 2014 15:34, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: About

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSSN 0020] Disassociating floating IPs does not terminate NAT connections with Neutron L3 agent

] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103475 [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121689/ On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Hey stackers, Let me ask something about this... Why not use Linux Conntrack Table at each Tenant Namespace (L3 Router

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSSN 0020] Disassociating floating IPs does not terminate NAT connections with Neutron L3 agent

Hey stackers, Let me ask something about this... Why not use Linux Conntrack Table at each Tenant Namespace (L3 Router) to detect which connections were made/established over a Floating IP ? Like this, on the Neutron L3 Router: -- apt-get install conntrack ip netns exec

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][IPv6] Neighbor Discovery for HA

Sounds impressive! :-D On 1 September 2014 23:52, Xu Han Peng pengxu...@gmail.com wrote: Anthony, Thanks for your reply. If HA method like VRRP are used for IPv6 router, according to the VRRP RFC with IPv6 included, the servers should be auto-configured with the active router's LLA as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Docker] How to Dockerize your applications with OpenStack Heat in simple steps

Hey Stackers! Wait! =) Let me ask something... Why are you guys using Docker within a VM?!?! What is the point of doing such thing?! I thought Docker was here to entirely replace the virtualization layer, bringing a bare metal-cloud, am I right?! Tks! Thiago On 26 August 2014 05:45,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]Performance of security group

+1 NFTablesDriver! Also, NFTables, AFAIK, improves IDS systems, like Suricata, for example: https://home.regit.org/2014/02/suricata-and-nftables/ Then, I'm wondering here... What benefits might come for OpenStack Nova / Neutron, if it comes with a NFTables driver, instead of the current

[openstack-dev] Time to Samba! :-)

Hey Stackers, I'm wondering here... Samba4 is pretty solid (up coming 4.2 rocks), I'm using it on a daily basis as an AD DC controller, for both Windows and Linux Instances! With replication, file system ACLs - cifs, built-in LDAP, dynamic DNS with Bind9 as a backend (no netbios) and etc...

Re: [openstack-dev] Time to Samba! :-)

, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Martinx - ジェームズ's message of 2014-08-16 12:03:20 -0700: Hey Stackers, I'm wondering here... Samba4 is pretty solid (up coming 4.2 rocks), I'm using it on a daily basis as an AD DC controller, for both Windows and Linux Instances

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

Guys, Just for the record, I'm using IceHouse in a Dual-Stacked environment (with security groups working) but, Instance's IPv6 address are static (no upstream SLAAC, arrived in Juno-2, I think) and the topology is `VLAN Provider Networks`, no Neutron L3 Router. Where each VLAN have v4/v6 addrs,

Re: [openstack-dev] Time to Samba! :-)

I know! :-P On 16 August 2014 21:17, Adam Lawson alaw...@aqorn.com wrote: Also, don't forget that AD != LDAP. ;) On Aug 16, 2014 5:16 PM, Adam Lawson alaw...@aqorn.com wrote: Doesn't Murano address this already? On Aug 16, 2014 2:35 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Spec freeze exception] Support Stateful and Stateless DHCPv6 by dnsmasq

Just a note... This is huge!! Great news!! Nevertheless, if Juno comes only with SLAAC, I'll be very, very happy!;-) Nice job guys! On 23 July 2014 01:06, Xu Han Peng pengxu...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to request one Juno Spec freeze exception for Support Stateful and Stateless

[openstack-dev] How to patch Horizon to change Shut Off Instance function?

Hello Stackers! I need to change the behavior of Shut Off Instance at Horizon, it needs to gracefully halt the instance via ACPI, instead of just destroying it. How can I do that?! Thanks! Thiago ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] cloud-init IPv6 support

A bit more... I have OpenStack IceHouse with Trusty up and running, *almost* in an IPv6-Only environment, *there is only one place* that I'm still using IPv4, which is: 1- For Metadata Network. This means that, soon as OpenStack enables Metadata over IPv6, I'll kiss goodbye IPv4. For real, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Neutron IPv6 in Icehouse and further

Hi! I'm waiting for that too... Currently, I'm running IceHouse with static IPv6 address, with the topology VLAN Provider Networks and, to make it easier, I'm counting on the following blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ipv6-provider-nets-slaac ...but, I'm not sure if it

[openstack-dev] Missing button to send Ctrl+Alt+Del for SPICE Console

Hello Stackers! I'm using SPICE Consoles now but, there is no button to send Ctrl + Alt + Del to a Windows Instance, so, it becomes very hard to log in into those guests... Can you guys enable it at Horizon?! Tks! Thiago ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

[openstack-dev] Need help to patch IceHouse to enable emulated sound board.

Guys, Sorry to ask this here but, how can I enable an emulated sound board for KVM Instances on IceHouse with Ubuntu 14.04? I already have configured the SPICE Consoles for my Cloud for Desktops and, the only missing piece of configuration in now the sound device for Instances (specially Windows

Re: [openstack-dev] [IceHouse][Neutron][Ubuntu 14.04] Error: Failed to delete network

asdf Deleted network: asdf Thanks, Aaron On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, I'm trying to delete a network in Neutron but it is failing, from Horizon it triggers the error message above (subject), and from CLI, it shows

Re: [openstack-dev] [IceHouse][Neutron][Ubuntu 14.04] Error: Failed to delete network

an admin External Network... Seems to be serious (I think). Regards, Thiago On 23 May 2014 14:52, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, I'm trying to delete a network in Neutron but it is failing, from Horizon it triggers the error message above (subject), and from CLI

[openstack-dev] [IceHouse][Neutron][Ubuntu 14.04] Error: Failed to delete network

Guys, I'm trying to delete a network in Neutron but it is failing, from Horizon it triggers the error message above (subject), and from CLI, it shows this: --- root@psuaa-1:~# neutron net-delete a1654832-8aac-42d5-8837-6d27b7421892 Request Failed: internal server error while processing your

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Small feedback about Management Network API Endpoints

, it can reach the old Internet infrastructure normally... Best! Thiago On 13 May 2014 03:17, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, I'm running OpenStack IceHouse configured with IPv6 in almost every part of it, I can say that both `Management Network` and `API Endpoints` works

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Privacy extension

in the DHCPv6 transaction. This would require multiple addresses to be allowed on a single MAC. -Anthony From: Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Thursday, May 15, 2014 at 14:18

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Privacy extension

Hello! I agree that there is no need for Privacy Extensions in a Cloud environment, since MAC address are fake... No big deal... Nevertheless, I think that should be nice to allow 1 Instance to have more than 1 IPv6 addr, since IPv6 is (almost) virtually unlimited... This way, a VM with, for

Re: [openstack-dev] B203 table 6 for Neutron//Re: SDN NBI Core APIs consumed by OpenStack: Wednesday May 14th at 10:30-11am in the developer lounge at 3rd floor

Hello! This is very an interesting topic! I would like to talk about one idea I had, which is related to: 1.9. API for VPN. I think it would be awesome, for example, when dealing with IPv6-Only Projects (Tenants) Networks, the VPNs should use `Opportunistic Encryption`, this way, the VPNs will

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Small feedback about Management Network API Endpoints

Guys, I'm running OpenStack IceHouse configured with IPv6 in almost every part of it, I can say that both `Management Network` and `API Endpoints` works with IPv6, but, there are still only three places that I am unable to use it with IPv6, which is: 1- Metadata (no IPv6 here, the equivalent of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Nova][Designate][L3][IPv6] Discussion about Cross-Project Integration of DNS at Summit

Carl, Let me ask you something... If my cloud is IPv6-Only based (that's my intention), which blueprint will fit on it (internal-dns-resolution or external-dns-resolution) ? Since IPv6 is all public, don't you think that we (might) need a new blueprint for IPv6-Only, like just dns-resolution?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Nova][Designate][L3][IPv6] Discussion about Cross-Project Integration of DNS at Summit

I'll be an alpha / beta tester, for sure!! :-D I'm very interested on DNS for IPv6 in Neutron (and in Horizon too)... Hope to see it in Juno!! IPv6 (with a perfect DNS setup) is very important... Best! Thiago On 29 April 2014 17:09, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: The design summit

[openstack-dev] [NEUTRON] [IPv6] [VPNaaS] - IPSec by default on each Tenant router, the beginning of the Opportunistic Encryption era (rfc4322 ?)...

Guys, I here thinking about IPSec when with IPv6 and, one of the first ideas/wishes of IPv6 scientists, was to always deploy it with IPSec enabled, always (I've heard). But, this isn't well diffused by now. Who is actually using IPv6 Opportunistic Encryption?! For example: With O.E., we'll be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

BTW, the VNC Consoles are now working in a Dual-Stacked fashion (both vncserver 5900 and novncproxy 6080 traffics goes via IPv6). ;-) Guide updated... Cheers! Thiago On 15 April 2014 19:57, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Stackers! I just finished the OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Devstack] [IPv6]

Awesome!! I'll check this today! Tks! On 16 April 2014 12:03, Robert Li (baoli) ba...@cisco.com wrote: Hi folks, If you want to use IPv6 with devstack, Check this out https://review.openstack.org/87987. The commit message has all the details on how to use it. thanks, Robert

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

almost there! What do you guys think? BTW, sorry about tons of e-mails I sent before, I'll not do that again. Cheers! Thiago On 12 April 2014 04:09, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: BTW, I think that the following patches are also important / relevant to begin with: --- 4. Two

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Cool! Instance shows an IPv6 address and it clearly isn't generated by EUI-64 (SLAAC) but, at least, I can use static IPv6! YAY! --- root@controller:~# nova list

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

Hey Thomas! That's an amazing list! :-D Okay, I'll drop by on IRC anytime soon to chat with you guys, tk for the invite! About DHCPv6 support, yes, I agree with you, it can be postponed (in fact, I don't think I'll ever use it). Radvd should be enough for me. I think that we need to start

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

Hey guys! My OpenStack Instance have IPv6 connectivity! Using ML2 / Simple Flat Network... For the first time ever! Look: --- administrative@controller:~$ nova boot --image 70f335e3-798b-4031-9773-a640970a8bdf --key-name Key trusty-1 administrative@controller:~$ ssh -i ~/test.pem

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

: I think I'll put my OVS bridge br-eth0 (bridge_mappings = physnet1:br-eth0) on top of a VLAN but, I'll not tell OpenStack to use vlan, I'll keep using flat but, on top of a hidden vlan... eheh :-P I'll keep testing to see how far I can go...:-) Cheers! On 12 April 2014 00:42, Martinx

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

:11, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: In fact, neutron accepted the following command: --- root@controller:~# neutron subnet-create --ip-version 6 --disable-dhcp --tenant-id 5e0106fa81104c5cbe21e1ccc9eb1a36 sharednet1 2001:1291:2bf:fffb::/64 Created a new subnet

[openstack-dev] Error while creating an Instance - IceHouse / Ubuntu 14.04

Guys, I'm trying to create an Instance here at my lab but, I'm seeing the following error: command: nova boot --image dda95a36-71e0-4474-b3e2-4f5ceef79c14 --flavor 2 my_first_vm nova-api.log: --- 2014-04-10 03:37:02.250 1743 ERROR nova.api.openstack.wsgi [-] Exception handling resource:

Re: [openstack-dev] Error while creating an Instance - IceHouse / Ubuntu 14.04

Mmm... Okay, sorry!:-) On 10 April 2014 12:37, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: This sounds like a question for the users list, since you're using distro packages: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Thanks. -Ben On 04/10/2014 01:45 AM, Martinx

Re: [openstack-dev] Error while creating an Instance - IceHouse / Ubuntu 14.04

Sounds like I'm facing BUG 1298640! Thank you! I'll double check the new configuration scheme... Cheers! Thiago On 10 April 2014 16:44, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 4/10/2014 10:41 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: Mmm... Okay, sorry!:-) On 10 April 2014 12:37, Ben

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

Amazing!! :-D I'll do my best to try to make this a reality, as fast as I can! We really need to start evaluating Neutron IPv6, even on its simplest topology (like Flat - provider network with external RA)... Cheers! Thiago On 3 April 2014 16:43, Simon Leinen simon.lei...@switch.ch wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

:33 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: Guys! I would like to do this: 1- Create and maintain a Ubuntu PPA Archive to host Neutron with IPv6 patches (from Nephos6 / Shixiong?). Why? Well, I'm feeling that Neutron with native and complete IPv6 support will be only available

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Supporting upstream RAs

Awesome! I have a perfect lab to evaluate it...:-) Just a curiosity, it will work with ML2 and Flat Network (dual-stacked with IPv4)? I would like to try to fit this into a running lab environment, if possible... I mean, currently, I have a lab with Flat Network topology (Havana without

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Supporting upstream RAs

Okay Collins! Got it... I remember that e-mail from Feb... I understand it, no rush... ^_^ Chat tomorrow, tks! On 7 April 2014 17:35, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.comwrote: Hi Martin, I previously posted to the mailing list with some information about our IPv6 lab environment

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Location of 'enable_security_group' key in ml2_conf.ini

Hi! I faced this problem this weekend, look: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303517 Currently, my ml2_conf.ini contains: --- [security_group] enable_security_group = True [securitygroup] firewall_driver = neutron.agent.linux.iptables_firewall.OVSHybridIptablesFirewallDriver --- Best! Thiago

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

Well, at first, I'm planning to maintain this Neutron IPv6 PPA repository only for Ubuntu 14.04 anyway... But, of course, if new dnsmasq arrives into Ubuntu 12.04 on Cloud Archive, I see no problem in working on it too... On 3 April 2014 13:19, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.comwrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

Awesome guys! I'll do it! I have the neutron-ipv6.patch that came from the output of git format-patch -1 --stdout FETCH_HEAD but, it did not got applied successfully against neutron-2014.1.rc1, look: --- builder@neutron-dev-1:~/neutron/neutron-2014.1.rc1$ patch -p1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

edge Neutron IPv6 code?! I'm watching https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70649/ :) Tks Sean! Thiago On 2 April 2014 12:24, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.comwrote: On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 11:13:32AM EDT, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: Awesome guys! I'll do it! OK - so keep an eye

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

Okay, cool! I'll... Tks! On 2 April 2014 12:49, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.comwrote: On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 11:40:39AM EDT, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: But, can this current neutron-ipv6.patch at least, be used to enable Neutron IPv6 with RA (--ipv6_ra_mode slaac

[openstack-dev] Neutron and IPv6 for IceHouse?

Hello Stackers! Please, forgive me to ask this here but, I'm about to lose my budget to deploy OpenStack in my ISP, because it does not support IPv6. There is no more IPv4 around here and I can not grow without IPv6. Please, I'm begging for you guys, pleeease, release IceHouse with IPv6!

Re: [openstack-dev] Neutron and IPv6 for IceHouse?

-Subteam Sean M. Collins -- *From:* Martinx - ジェームズ [thiagocmarti...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Saturday, March 08, 2014 3:11 PM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List *Subject:* [openstack-dev] Neutron and IPv6 for IceHouse? Hello Stackers! Please, forgive me

Re: [openstack-dev] Neutron and IPv6 for IceHouse?

-February/026589.html Sean M. Collins -- *From:* Martinx - ジェームズ [thiagocmarti...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Saturday, March 08, 2014 3:11 PM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List *Subject:* [openstack-dev] Neutron and IPv6 for IceHouse? Hello Stackers! Please

Re: [openstack-dev] Neutron and IPv6 for IceHouse?

there is still work being done on them. There is also some patches that are under review to start bringing up Neutron routers and do RAs, but it is still under development. See the IPv6 section of the wiki for a full list. Sean M. Collins -- *From:* Martinx - ジェームズ

Re: [openstack-dev] Feature freeze + Icehouse-3 milestone candidates available

AWESOME!! If may I ask, does IPv6 bits got included into this milestone?! I'm very anxious to start testing it with Ubuntu 14.04 plus the official devel packages from Canonical. Thanks a lot!! Best, Thiago On 5 March 2014 17:46, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Hi everyone, We

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][IPv6] Testing functionality of IPv6 modes using Horizon

I'll wait for IceHouse-3 to arrives on Ubuntu 14.04 to start testing the whole IPv6 features... Lab is ready, two /48 to play with... =) On 28 February 2014 12:55, Abishek Subramanian (absubram) absub...@cisco.com wrote: Hi, I just wanted to find out if anyone had been able to test using

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Idea: Floating IPv6 - Without any kind of NAT

Hello Stackers! It is very nice to watch the OpenStack evolution in IPv6! Great job guys!! I have another idea: Floating IP for IPv6, or just Floating IPv6 With IPv4, as we know, OpenStack have a feature called Floating IP, which is basically a 1-to-1 NAT rule (within tenant's Namespace

[openstack-dev] keystone-manage db_sync doesn't work if [database] connection points to IPv6 address

Guys, I'm trying to install IceHouse-2 in a dual-stacked environment (Ubuntu 14.04) but, keystone-manage db_sync doesn't work if db connection points to a IPv6 address, like this: My /etc/network/interfaces looks like: --- # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback iface lo

Re: [openstack-dev] keystone-manage db_sync doesn't work if [database] connection points to IPv6 address

Sure! I'll...=) On 2 February 2014 13:32, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote: Can you open a bug for this at https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone ? Thanks! On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, I'm trying to install IceHouse

Re: [openstack-dev] keystone-manage db_sync doesn't work if [database] connection points to IPv6 address

Done. https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1275615 I'll try it again tomorrow... Just to make sure it isn't me doing something wrong... Best! Thiago On 2 February 2014 15:58, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Sure! I'll...=) On 2 February 2014 13:32, Dolph Mathews

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Neutron] auto configration of local_ip

Guys, Let me ask something about this... Apparently, VXLAN can be easier to implement/maintain when using it with IPv6 (read about it here: www.nephos6.com/pdf/OpenStack-on-IPv6.pdf), so, I'm wondering if local_ip can be an IPv6 address (for IceHouse-3 / Ubuntu 14.04) and, of course, if it is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Implement NAPT in neutron (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-napt-api)

Hi! From a operator point of view, I think that it would be nice to give to the FWaaS (IPv4 flavor), the ability to manage the tenant's NAT table, not only the filter table, as it is today. If fact, I don't know if it is out of the scope of FWaaS or not, it is just an idea I had. Because right

[openstack-dev] An idea: For an IPv6-only Tenant subnet: a Floating IP with NAT46 sounds needed...

Hello Stackers! I have an idea: In a IPv6-Only Tenant subnet, we can offer a solution to make its IPv6 network, reachable from the old Internet infrastructure (IPv4), how? 1- Floating IP (v4) based on NAT46. That way, the attached Floating IP (when with NAT46), it will be a real IPv4 address

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Blueprint Bind dnsmasq in qrouter- namespace

Hello Stackers! I agree with one namespace approach, if it is better for IPv6 (or even for IPv4 and for operators). And also, I think that, when with IPv6, we must do what is better for IPv6 networks... If things needs to be changed, lets do it! BTW, one namespace with all the required services

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Icehouse milestone 1 packages for Ubuntu

AWESOME! Do you know if we can start testing IPv6 tenants networks? Tks! On 12 December 2013 07:38, James Page james.p...@ubuntu.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi All As OpenStack Icehouse milestone 1 is now out, I thought it worth updating everyone on Ubuntu

Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing myself - looking for a IPv6 topology

Cool! Thank you Kyle! I'll try to join the today's IPv6 meeting... Cheers! Thiago On 20 November 2013 01:08, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.comwrote: On Nov 19, 2013, at 7:23 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: One more thing... I'm thinking about the use

[openstack-dev] Introducing myself - looking for a IPv6 topology

Hello Stackers! I'm Thiago and I'm here on dev list mostly to watch you guys... Nevertheless, I want to say that I would love to test in deep, the IPv6 support in OpenStack IceHouse. At at glance, what I'm looking for is more or less specified here, as follows: --- I have 1 native IPv6 /48

Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing myself - looking for a IPv6 topology

-Only tenant) and the L3 Namespace Router will do the NAT46. This way, the old Internet will be able to seamless reach a IPv6-Only network. What do you guys have in mind / roadmap?! Cheers! Thiago On 19 November 2013 22:57, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.comwrote: Hello Stackers

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Neutron] Security groups issue when running latest libvirt?

That is true... Back to LibvirtHybridOVSBridgeDriver, Security Groups is working again... On 6 November 2013 15:03, Simon Pasquier simon.pasqu...@bull.net wrote: Answering myself as I investigated a little further and cross-posting to openstack-dev because I'd like to get feedback from