Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Adding Dina Belova to ceilometer-core

2014-09-11 Thread Nadya Privalova
May I be the first :)? Big +1 from me. Thanks Dina! On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hi, > > Dina has been doing a great work and has been very helpful during the > Juno cycle and her help is very valuable. She's been doing a lot of > reviews and has been very active in o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Adding Nejc Saje to ceilometer-core

2014-09-11 Thread Nadya Privalova
I'm in :) +1 On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:58 PM, gordon chung wrote: > > Nejc has been doing a great work and has been very helpful during the > > > Juno cycle and his help is very valuable. > > > I'd like to propose that we add Nejc Saje to the ceilometer-core group. > > can we minus because he ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Complex resource_metadata could fail to store in MongoDB

2014-09-04 Thread Nadya Privalova
IMHO it's ok and even very natural to expect "escaped" query from users. e.g, we store the following structure {metadata: { Zoo: {Foo.Boo: ''value"}}} and query should be "metadata.Zoo.Foo\.Boo" . In this case it's not necessary to know deep of t

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-17 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hello all, As a Ceilometer's core, I'd like to add my 0.02$. During previous discussions it was mentioned several projects which were started or continue to be developed after Ceilometer became integrated. The main question I'm thinking of is why it was impossible to contribute into existing inte

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][Ceilometer][MagnetoDB] HBase database in devstack

2014-04-08 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi, Yep, it would be great to have HBase installed on gating for Ceilometer. Now we use self-written mocked HBase to test functionality. But HBase backend is becoming more complex and it's really hard to add 'new features' in mocked HBase. Hortonworks is the main and the largest contributor in Hado

Re: [openstack-dev] Dependency freeze exception for happybase (I would like version 0.8)

2014-03-29 Thread Nadya Privalova
Sean, The problem with 0.4 is a very new one. We had critical bug that was fixed by ConnectionPool usage. This feature is available since 0.5. So we had two options: 1. Go to rc1 with critical bug (not supported HBase in fact) 2. Fix it but have incorrect dependency on 0.4. And we've chosen option

Re: [openstack-dev] Dependency freeze exception for happybase (I would like version 0.8)

2014-03-28 Thread Nadya Privalova
Sean, please see my comment in bug regarding 0.7. Unfortunately I have nothing to suggest here. If distributive contains only 0.7 we cannot work with HBase through happybase. And I don't see any solutions. But anyway if you change requirements for happybase (I guess we need to get 0.7 back, no?) co

Re: [openstack-dev] Dependency freeze exception for happybase (I would like version 0.8)

2014-03-28 Thread Nadya Privalova
Today I've tested 0.6 and 0.8. They are acceptable for us. But 0.4 is not. So I'd like to support Thomas's suggestion about freeze exception for happybase. Thanks, Nadya On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Nadya Privalova wrote: > Hi folks, > > Running rests against 0

Re: [openstack-dev] Dependency freeze exception for happybase (I would like version 0.8)

2014-03-28 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi folks, Running rests against 0.8. Will update you ASAP Thanks, Nadya On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Thomas Goirand wrote: > > I'd like to ask everyone's opinion here. Is it ok to do a freeze > > exception in this case? If yes (please, everyone, agree! :) ), then >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-20 Thread Nadya Privalova
Tim, yep. If you use one db for Ceilometer and Nova then nova's performance may be affected. I've seen this issue. Will start profiling ASAP. On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Tim Bell wrote: > > +1 for performance analysis to understand what needs to be optimised. > Metering should be light-wei

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-20 Thread Nadya Privalova
Sean, thank for analysis. JFYI, I did some initial profiling, it's described here https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg19030.html. On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 03/20/2014 05:49 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote: > > Hi all, &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-20 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi all, First of all, thanks for your suggestions! To summarize the discussions here: 1. We are not going to install Mongo (because "is's wrong" ?) 2. Idea about spawning several collectors is suspicious (btw there is a patch that run several collectors: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79962/.)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-19 Thread Nadya Privalova
Ok, so we don't want to switch to UCA, let's consider this variant. What options do we have to make possible to run Ceilometer jobs with Mongo backend? I see only https://review.openstack.org/#/c/81001/ or making Ceilometer able to work with old Mongo. But the last variant looks inappropriate at l

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate

2014-03-18 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi folks, I'd like to discuss Ceilometer's tempest situation with you. Now we have several patch sets on review that test core functionality of Ceilometer: notificaton and pollstering (topic https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tempest+branch:master+topic:bp/add-basic-cei

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]Collector's performance

2014-03-11 Thread Nadya Privalova
of both? > > > > Best Regards, > > Ildiko > > > > *From:* Nadya Privalova [mailto:nprival...@mirantis.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 11, 2014 6:05 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List > *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]Collector's performan

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]Collector's performance

2014-03-11 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi team! Last week we were working on notification problem in ceilometer during tempest tests creation. Tests for notification passed successfully on Postgres but failed on MySQL. This made us start investigations and this email contains some results. As it turned out, tempest as it is is somethi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel-dev] [OSTF][Ceilometer] ceilometer meters and samples delete

2014-01-17 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi guys, I would ask in another way. Ceilometer has a mechanism to add a sample through POST. So it looks not consistent not to allow user to delete a sample. IMHO, insertion and deletion through REST looks a little bit hacky: user always has an ability to fake data collected from OpenStack servic

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Aggregation discussion

2014-01-13 Thread Nadya Privalova
ink about it. Thanks, Nadya On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 17:10 +0400, Nadya Privalova wrote: > > Idea: > > The goal is to improve performance when user gets statistics for > > meter. Now we have fixed list of statistics (min, max

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Aggregation discussion

2014-01-10 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi team, I've decided to move discussion about aggregation in mailing list. Here is a description about my idea and I really need your comments. *Idea:* The goal is to improve performance when user gets statistics for meter. Now we have fixed list of statistics (min, max and so on). During reques

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Tempest]Tracking of blueprints and changes

2013-12-30 Thread Nadya Privalova
lien. Thanks, Nadya On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:53 PM, David Kranz wrote: > On 12/27/2013 05:27 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote: > > Hello guys! > > I hope all of you are enjoying the holidays! But I'd like to raise a > Tempest question. Again. I hope this email will not be

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Tempest]Tracking of blueprints and changes

2013-12-27 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hello guys! I hope all of you are enjoying the holidays! But I'd like to raise a Tempest question. Again. I hope this email will not be lost after vacations :) After the summit we decided to track all tests that are being created for Ceilometer in Tempest here: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tem

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Tempest][Ceilometer] Pollster's testing strategy

2013-12-20 Thread Nadya Privalova
Thanks, Julien! Will create blueprint on Monday and will start implementation. On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20 2013, Nadya Privalova wrote: > > Hi Nadya, > > > For QA and Tempest guys brief description of Ceilometer's pollster

[openstack-dev] [QA][Tempest][Ceilometer] Pollster's testing strategy

2013-12-20 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi guys! For QA and Tempest guys brief description of Ceilometer's pollstering. Ceilometer has several agents that once in 'interval' asks Nova, Glance and other services about their metrics. We need to test this functionality, 'Interval' is defined in pipeline.yaml file and is 10 minutes by defau

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Oslo] Consuming Notifications in Batches

2013-12-20 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi John, As for me your ideas look very interesting. As I understood notification messages will be kept in MQ for some time (during batch-basket is being filled), right? I'm concerned about the additional load that will be on MQ (Rabbit). Thanks, Nadya On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Herndon,

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][ceilometer] Who can be a asked to help review tempest tests?

2013-12-17 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi David, I'm working on tempest tests for Ceilometer too. I think this thread is a good place to make a reminder about our strategy how to avoid duplications in change requests. 1. We have something like a test plan https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer-test-plan 2. Ceilometer team's decid

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] [Rally] Does Ceilometer affect instance creation?

2013-12-12 Thread Nadya Privalova
ec 10, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Nadya Privalova > wrote: > >> Julien, >> >> Yes, I use the same SQL for Nova and Ceilometer. Thanks for pointing this >> out. My bad, I didn't take it into account. So if we want to use Ceilometer >> + MySQL in production (in theory :) )

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Glance][Oslo]Notification issue with Glance

2013-12-11 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hello, guys! We faced with Glance notifications issue during Tempest tests for Ceilometer. We tried to send notification by ourselves (during investigation we've found that Glance uses almost the same code): from oslo.config import cfg from oslo import messaging CONF.rabbit_host = 'localhost' C

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] [Rally] Does Ceilometer affect instance creation?

2013-12-10 Thread Nadya Privalova
to get it reviewed/merged. > > > Thanks. > > > Best regards, > Boris Pavlovic > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 10 2013, Nadya Privalova wrote: >> >> Hi Nadya, >> >> >

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] [Rally] Does Ceilometer affect instance creation?

2013-12-10 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi guys, I decided to forward this message to dev list too. On the previous week I was investigating Ceilometer performance. And this letter is a brief description of my results. Lab description: 3 controllers 187 computes HA: Galera for MySQL memcached is on, RabbitMQ in HA mode Ceilometer proc

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Tokens in memcache become unauthorized

2013-12-02 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi guys, I've faced with nova+memcache issue on the cluster in HA-mode. Issue is related to nova in case of using REST (that includes Horizon): it's impossible to use auth-token several times because it became unauthorized in cache. Logs: Nov 13 06:58:49 controller-1461 nova keystoneclient.midd

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] storage driver testing

2013-11-29 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hello Sandy, I'm very interested in performance results for Ceilometer. Now we have successfully installed Ceilometer in the HA-lab with 200 computes and 3 controllers. Now it works pretty good with MySQL. Our next steps are: 1. Configure alarms 2. Try to use Rally for OpenStack performance with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel-dev] [OSTF][Ceilometer] ceilometerclient proxy issue

2013-11-15 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi guys, I've created the bp https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-ceilometerclient/+spec/proxy-support. Will start working on this asap. Thanks, Nadya On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Mike Scherbakov wrote: > Hi Ceilometer team, > do you have any plans for http proxy support (see concerns b

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][qa]Tempest tests for Ceilometer

2013-11-13 Thread Nadya Privalova
or looking into crs. As I see 39237 made a good progress today Thanks, Nadya On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12 2013, Nadya Privalova wrote: > > Hi Nadya, > > > Here is a list of ceilometer-regarding cr in tempest (just a reminder): > >

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][qa]Tempest tests for Ceilometer

2013-11-12 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hello, guys! I hope everybody has eventually got home after the summit and feeling ok :) So it's time to proceed thinking about integration, unit and performance testing in Ceilometer. First of all I'd like to appreciate your help in composing etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-sum

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [qa] Ceilometer ERRORS in normal runs

2013-10-22 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi guys, I can share my experience with devstack+ceilometer. There is certainly a problem with MongoDB, because Ceilometer requires more fresh Mongo than devstack provides. But I didn't experienced problems with SQL. And just a quick question about testing: are there any plans to test Ceilometer w

[openstack-dev] [Savanna][EDP] Issues from internal UI demo

2013-09-23 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hello folks, Today I've showed a demo with EDP UI. Here a feedback from our Mirantis-team. Items without NOTEs should be done, I believe. For some of them bugs are already filed: 1. We need URL hints for DataSouce (as it done for JobBinary) 2. DataSource UI should depend on DataSource type ( http

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] swift integration - optional?

2013-09-12 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi Jon, The main reason why this button is on UI is to let user know that Savanna supports swift. If a cluster doesn't have swift at all user may disable swift explicitly, but it's the truth that if he or she doesn't disable swift nothing will be broken. Regards, Nadya On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna-dashboard] version 0.3 - updated UI mockups for EDP workflow

2013-09-10 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hi all, I've created a temporary page for UIs mockups. Please take a look: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Savanna/UIMockups/JobCreationProposal Chad, it's just pictures demonstrate how we see dependencies in UI. It's not a final decision. Guys, feel free to comment this. I think it's time to sta