Sean, The problem with 0.4 is a very new one. We had critical bug that was fixed by ConnectionPool usage. This feature is available since 0.5. So we had two options: 1. Go to rc1 with critical bug (not supported HBase in fact) 2. Fix it but have incorrect dependency on 0.4. And we've chosen option 2.
I don't ask to fix dependency on 0.4 if the final decision is "not to change requirements". I absolutely agree with you that it's too late. I think it doesn't worth it. 0.4 is too old and unlikely to be used (anyway I agree that it's still a problem). But if requirements is changed my plea is to remove 0.4. Jim, Yes, it would help. But now I cannot imagine how we can put HBase on gating. It is not in official repos. Anyway, I'm thinking about it and hope that solution will be find soon. Thanks, Nadya On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:31 AM, James E. Blair <jebl...@openstack.org>wrote: > Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> writes: > > > So how did Ceilometer get into this situation? Because the ceilometer > > requirements are happybase>=0.4,<=0.6 > > Is this a case where testing minimums might have helped? > > -Jim > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev