Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Stepping down from Release Management team

> On Oct 8, 2018, at 2:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Anne Bertucio writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have had a fantastic time getting to work on the Release Management >> team and getting to know you all through the release marketing work, >> however, it is time for me to step down from my

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [election] NON nomination for TC

> On Oct 3, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Sean Dague wrote: >> I'd like to announce that after 4 years serving on the OpenStack >> Technical Committee, I will not be running in this fall's >> election. Over the last 4 years we've navigated some rough seas

[openstack-dev] Sydney Forum Topic Submission

Hi, We have made it to the next stage of the topic selection process for the Forum in Sydney! At the Forum the entire OpenStack community (users and developers) gathers to brainstorm the requirements for the next release, gather feedback on the past version and have strategic discussions that go

[openstack-dev] Forum Topic Submission

Hi Forum Brainstormers, Wow! Some great topics in the etherpads so far. This event is going to be amazing. We're less than a week away now from opening the "formal submission" part of the process. If you haven't already, please start prioritizing the top sessions from your list of ideas.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Turning TC/UC workgroups into OpenStack SIGs

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > Shamail Tahir wrote: > > In the past, governance has helped (on the UC WG side) to reduce > > overlaps/duplication in WGs chartered for similar objectives. I would > > like to un

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Turning TC/UC workgroups into OpenStack SIGs

/file/d/0B_yCSDGnhIbzS3V1b1lpZGpIaHBmc29S aUdiYzJtX21BWkl3/ Thanks, Shamail On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > Matt Riedemann wrote: > > How does the re-branding or re-categorization of these groups solve the > > ac

[openstack-dev] [Forum] Moderators needed!

ton-2017/summit-schedule/events/18802/high-availability-in-openstack> Cloud-Native Design/Refactoring across OpenStack <https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18767/cloud-native-designrefactoring-across-openstack> Thanks, Doug, Emilien, Melvin, Mike,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

> On Feb 27, 2017, at 12:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2017-02-27 09:32:09 -0600: >>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: >>> This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

Thanks Clint! On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Shamail Tahir's message of 2017-02-27 00:44:44 -0500: > > Hi Clint, > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com> wrote: > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

n > established project team's business, and a complete waste of time to > even have to filter by thread. We've gotten _really_ wide over the > years. So if you have a better strategy to help newbies deal with that > and not get funneled into a silo _immediately_, do share. But for now, &

Re: [openstack-dev] [ux] Future of the OpenStack UX team

Hi, > On Feb 15, 2017, at 3:39 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > > Shamail Tahir wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org >> <mailto:thie...@openstack.org>> wrote: >> >>Hi everyone, &

Re: [openstack-dev] [ux] Future of the OpenStack UX team

> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Thanks, Shamail Tahir t: @ShamailXD tz: Eastern Time __

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] IRC Mishaps

... because I'm lazy and haven't brought my bouncer back online: j #openstack-meeting-alt Yes, I like to remind 'j' often that there is a channel called openstack-meeting-alt instead of actually joining it myself. > On Feb 9, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: >

[openstack-dev] [ux] Poll for next team meeting

we determine a time. I will be closing the poll on Feb. 9th, 2017 @ 23:59 UTC. Poll: http://doodle.com/poll/76bnere6ztdg7hgd -- Thanks, Shamail Tahir t: @ShamailXD tz: Eastern Time [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109622.html

Re: [openstack-dev] [ux] Future of the OpenStack UX team

> On Feb 6, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > >> On 2017-02-03 17:07:51 -0500 (-0500), Shamail wrote: >> [...] >> I'll send a doodle poll next week to determine a new meeting time >> and who's interested in participating. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ux] Future of the OpenStack UX team

> On Feb 3, 2017, at 2:16 PM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > > Shamail wrote: >> Hi Thierry, >> >>> On Jan 31, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: >>> >>> Shamail wrote: &

Re: [openstack-dev] [ux] Future of the OpenStack UX team

Hi Thierry, > On Jan 31, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > > Shamail wrote: >>> Sorry for not noticing this thread and replying earlier. >>> >>> I've now reviewed the minutes from the meeting, and I support thingee's &

Re: [openstack-dev] [ux] Future of the OpenStack UX team

Personas in our user stories and I also participated in the Personas workshop with the UX team. Thanks, Shamail > > Thanks, > Lana > >> On 05/01/17 00:43, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> Piet recently reached out to me to explain that he won't b

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Creating a new IRC meeting room ?

> On Dec 4, 2016, at 11:18 PM, Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 10:07:21PM -0500, Shamail wrote: >> >> Do we know how many of the project level rooms currently have bots? I know I >> ran into an issue that one of th

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Creating a new IRC meeting room ?

> On Dec 4, 2016, at 9:47 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:35:05AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> There has been a bit of tension lately around creating IRC meetings. >> I've been busy[1] cleaning up unused slots and

Re: [openstack-dev] PTG from the Ops Perspective - a few short notes

> On Oct 12, 2016, at 4:09 AM, Qiming Teng wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:39:11PM -0500, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: >> Hello Tom, >> >> I must say I think this is bad news - especially for projects like >> Kolla - ops centric. >> One of reasons we created

Re: [openstack-dev] [Product] Project Navigator - Maturity Metrics

> On Sep 19, 2016, at 12:22 PM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > > Gordon, > > Thanks for brining this to our attention. We pull data from many different > sources for the Navigator. Most of the attributions for that data can be > found under "Tag Details" or various "?" modal

Re: [openstack-dev] [Product] Project Navigator - Maturity Metrics

/tags/ [2] https://github.com/openstack/ops-tags-team/tree/master/descriptions Thanks, Shamail > On Sep 16, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Kenny Johnston <ke...@kencjohnston.com> wrote: > > OpenStackers, > > What is the best way to understand the past discussion, and perhaps start a >

Re: [openstack-dev] venting -- OpenStack wiki reCAPTCHA

Hi Tom, I'll help with that. :) Thanks, Shamail > On Sep 9, 2016, at 2:49 PM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> wrote: > >> On 廿十六年九月九日 朝 11:45, Hayes, Graham wrote: >>> On 09/09/2016 08:44, Tom Fifield wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 廿十六年九月八日

Re: [openstack-dev] venting -- OpenStack wiki reCAPTCHA

> On Sep 9, 2016, at 12:38 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > >> On 2016-09-09 11:06:21 -0500 (-0500), Tom Fifield wrote: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368114/ > [...] > > Thanks! I had already written almost the exact same change, applied > it in production and tested it

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] establishing project-wide goals

Thanks Doug, > On Aug 1, 2016, at 10:44 AM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: > > Excerpts from Shamail Tahir's message of 2016-08-01 09:49:35 -0500: >>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: >>> >>&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] establishing project-wide goals

on feedback) in the Product WG repo. We are currently working with the infra team to get a visualization tool deployed that shows the status for each artifact and provides links so that people can get more details as necessary. Could something similar be (re)used here? I also have a general question a

Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote: > On 05/02/2016 01:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases >> simultaneously (Newton and Oc

[openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

the location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2. -- Thanks, Shamail Tahir t

Re: [openstack-dev] Summit Core Party after Austin

rg?subject:unsubscribe > >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] Telco Working Group meeting for Wednesday April 6th CANCELLED

> On Apr 12, 2016, at 1:12 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Calum Loudon" >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> , >>

[openstack-dev] [election][tc] TC Candidacy for Shamail Tahir

Hi everyone, I would like to announce my candidacy for OpenStack Technical Committee member for the upcoming term. I am currently an offering manager for OpenStack initiatives at IBM and I have been involved in the OpenStack community since 2013. I spend most of my time[1] in our working groups

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] OpenStack Contributor Awards

> On Mar 1, 2016, at 10:40 AM, Matt Jarvis > wrote: > > +1 for custom T-shirts or hoodies. Actual medals/trophies would also be a > nice idea ;) +1 > >> On 1 March 2016 at 15:30, Tom Fifield wrote: >> Excellent, excellent. >> >> What's

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] A proposal to separate the design summit

> On Feb 22, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > > >> On 22/02/16 18:35, "Thierry Carrez" wrote: >> >> Clayton O'Neill wrote: >>> Is the expectation that the ops mid-cycle would continue separately, >>> or be held with the meeting formerly known as

Re: [openstack-dev] Encouraging first-time contributors through bug tags/reviews

share the results at a future cross-project meeting and decide where to go from there. Regards, Shamail __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subjec

Re: [openstack-dev] Encouraging first-time contributors through bug tags/reviews

t; Thanks and everyone (in the U.S.) have a Happy Thanksgiving, > > anthony. > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Maish Saidel-Keesing <mais...@maishsk.com> >> wrote: >> This is an awesome idea!!! >> >>> On 11/25/15 16:15, Shamail Tahir wrot

Re: [openstack-dev] Encouraging first-time contributors through bug tags/reviews

eedback from the people who have worked on the upstream training before each summit... Did you experience any issues finding available items for the people to work on? How do you guide the new contributors to help them discover low-hang

Re: [openstack-dev] Encouraging first-time contributors through bug tags/reviews

Hi, > On Nov 25, 2015, at 11:05 PM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: > > Excerpts from Shamail Tahir's message of 2015-11-25 09:15:54 -0500: >> Hi everyone, >> >> Andrew Mitry recently shared a medium post[1] by Kent C. Dobbs which >>

[openstack-dev] Encouraging first-time contributors through bug tags/reviews

4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Bug_Tags [5] http://docs.openstack.org/upstream-training/ -- Thanks, Shamail Tahir t: @ShamailXD tz: Eastern Time __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Product] [nfv][telco][product] Future of telco working group and weekly meeting reminder

Hi Steve, > On Nov 18, 2015, at 6:39 AM, Steve Gordon wrote: > > Hi all, > > Back in Vancouver [1] we began discussing the growing overlap between OPNFV > requirements projects and the current mission of the telco working group. > During this period the product working

Re: [openstack-dev] Looking to contribute

environment and IDs. Once you have done a few of these... you can find projects of interest and start attending their IRC meetings to identify future contributions that align with your interests. All the best! Thanks, Shamail [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack/+bugs?field.tag=low

Re: [openstack-dev] Troubleshooting cross-project comms

Hi Anne, > On Oct 29, 2015, at 8:15 AM, Anne Gentle > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I wanted to write up some of the discussion points from a cross-project > session here at the Tokyo Summit about cross-project communications. The > etherpad is here: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Life cycle management use cases

your insights on lifecycle management tremendously. Please help by posting comments to our existing user story[2]. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ProductTeam [2] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-user-stories/user-stories/draft/lifecycle_management.html Thanks, Shamail

[openstack-dev] [tc] projects.yaml (project since data)

ble to add an "official-since" into projects.yaml? The value could tie to when the TC approves a project (since not all projects have to adhere with the 6-month release itself). [1] https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projects.yaml -- Thanks, Shamail Ta

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] projects.yaml (project since data)

Sure. Thanks. > On Oct 13, 2015, at 8:55 PM, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote: > > Makes sense to me. Care to propose such a change to the repo? > >> On 14 October 2015 at 11:53, Shamail Tahir <itzsham...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> &

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] service catalog: TNG

Clint, consul does provide DNS-SD (but not DNS-TXT) interface so using it as a backend allows us to focus on REST but set ground work for DNS too. > > -Sean > > -- > Sean Dague > http://dague.net > > > ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] service catalog: TNG

> On Oct 9, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote: > >> On 10/09/2015 11:21 AM, Shamail wrote: >> >> >>> On Oct 9, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: >>> >>> It looks like some great co

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Recording little everyday OpenStack successes

> On Oct 9, 2015, at 10:49 AM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > ​Great idea Thierry, great to promote some positive things! Thanks for > putting this together.​ +1 Great indeed... thanks Thierry.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] service catalog: TNG

> On Oct 9, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > > It looks like some great conversation got going on the service catalog > standardization spec / discussion at the last cross project meeting. > Sorry I wasn't there to participate. > Apologize if this is a question that has

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [ptl] Troubleshooting cross-project communications

> On Sep 17, 2015, at 7:50 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > >> On 16:16 Sep 16, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Anne Gentle wrote: >>> [...] >>> What are some of the problems with each layer? >>> >>> 1. weekly meeting: time zones, global reach, size of cross-project >>> concerns due to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [ptl] Troubleshooting cross-project communications

> >> __ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

iverse-affiliation matters, amongst other things, is because it shows that the project can potentially survive a single contributor changing their involvement then wouldn't that achieve the same purpose of showing stability/mindshare/collaboration for projects with diverse-a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Blazar] Anyone interested?

://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-user-stories/user-stories/draft/capacity_management.html Thanks, Shamail > On Sep 1, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Sylvain Bauza <sba...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Le 01/09/2015 15:46, Nikolay Starodubtsev a écrit : >> Also, if we decided