On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 6:13 AM Blake Covarrubias wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
> Omni has not been abandoned by Platform9. We're still developing Omni
> internally, and are working to open source additional code as well as improve
> docs so that others may more easily test & contribute.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 3:54 PM Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
> I'd like to propose Quique (@quiquell) as a core reviewer for TripleO. Quique
> is actively involved in improvements and development of TripleO and TripleO
> CI. He also helps in other projects including but not limited to
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 1:24 PM Juan Antonio Osorio Robles
> I would like to propose Bob Fournier (bfournie) as a core reviewer in
> TripleO. His patches and reviews have spanned quite a wide range in our
> project, his reviews show great insight and quality and I think he
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 2:06 PM Jiří Stránský wrote:
> Hi Steve,
Thanks for the reply - summary of our follow-up discussion on IRC below:
> On 25/09/2018 10:51, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > After some discussions with bandini at the PTG, I've been ta
After some discussions with bandini at the PTG, I've been taking a
look at this bug and how to solve it:
(Also more information in downstream bz1626140)
The problem is that we always run container bootstrap tasks (as well
as a bunch of
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote:
> On 4.9.2018 08:13, Janki Chhatbar wrote:
>> I am looking to automate role file generation in TripleO. The idea is
>> basically for an operator to create a simple yaml file (operator.yaml,
>> listing services that are
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Honza Pokorny wrote:
> Over the last few months, it seems that tripleo-quickstart has evolved
> into a CI tool. It's primarily used by computers, and not humans.
> tripleo-quickstart is a helpful set of ansible playbooks, and a
> collection of feature
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:48 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 08/15/2018 04:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:31 PM Emilien Macchi > > wrote:
>> More seriously here: there is an ongoing effort to converge the
>> tools around
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Samuel Monderer
> Hi Remo,
> Attached are templates I used for the deployment. They are based on a
> deployment we did with OSP11.
> I made the changes for it to work with OSP13.
> I do think it's the roles_data.yaml file that is causing the error
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Alan Bishop has been highly involved in the Storage backends integration in
> TripleO and Puppet modules, always here to update with new features, fix
> (nasty and untestable third-party backends) bugs and manage all the
> backports for
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 06/13/2018 03:17 PM, James Slagle wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:49 AM, Dmitry Tantsur
>>> Slightly hijacking the thread to provide a status update on one of the
>> Thanks for jumping in.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Mark Hamzy wrote:
> I am trying to delete the Storage, StorageMgmt, Tenant, and Management
> networks and trying to deploy using TripleO.
> The following patch
> on top of
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 3:06 AM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> I've been working on a series of patches to enable support for
> keystone federation in tripleo. I've been making good use of the
> DeployArtifacts support for testing puppet modules...until today.
> I have some patches that teach
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Moshe Levi wrote:
> We are trying to add container support ovs hw offload.
> We were able to do the deployment a few weeks ago, but now we getting an
> errors .
> Jan 14 07:14:32 localhost os-collect-config: "2018-01-14
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Cédric Jeanneret
> While trying to add some unit tests for some resources in the
> puppet-tripleo repository, I stumbled on a not-so-nice case: the
> tripleo::firewall::service_rules definition.
> In there, a
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Wes has been consistently and heavily involved in TripleO CI work.
> He has a very well understanding on how tripleo-quickstart and
> tripleo-quickstart-extras work, his number and quality of reviews are
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Attila Darazs wrote:
> On 11/29/2017 08:34 PM, John Trowbridge wrote:
>> I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has
>> been a solid contributor to tripleo-quickstart and extras almost since the
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 4:56 PM, James Slagle wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>> Integration with TripleO Heat Templates
>> This work is on-going and you should eventually see
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote:
>> I would like to propose John Fulton core on TripleO.
>> I think John did an awesome work during the Pike cycle around the
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:55 PM, James Slagle <james.sla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:16 AM, James Slagle <james.sla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Honza Pokorny wrote:
> Hello people,
> I would like to nominate Ana Krivokapić (akrivoka) for the core team for
> tripleo-validations. She has really stepped up her game on that project
> in terms of helpful reviews, and great patches.
Today I had a productive hallway discussion with jtomasek and
stevebaker re $subject, so I wanted to elaborate here for the benefit
of those folks not present. Hopefully we can get feedback on the
ideas and see if it makes sense to continue and work on some patches:
The problem under
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Abhishek Kane
> In THT I have an environment file and corresponding puppet service for
> Veritas HyperScale.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> I generally thought the stable policy seemed reasonable enough for lifecycle
> management tools. I’m not sure what specific problems you had in TripleO
> although I did read your review. Kolla was
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Lee Yarwood wrote:
> Hello all,
> I'm currently working to get the tripleo-spec for fast-forward upgrades
> out of WIP and merged ahead of the Queens M-1 milestone next week. One
> of the documented pre-requisite steps for fast-forward
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Marios Andreou wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:50 AM, mathieu bultel wrote:
>> On 09/28/2017 05:05 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> > I was reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487496/ and
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Ricardo Noriega De Soto
> Hello guys,
> After integrating BGPVPN and L2GW Neutron drivers in TripleO, I've realized
> I always have to jump to the overcloud controller (and copy-pasting the
> overcloudrc file) in order to use the CLI
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Justin Kilpatrick wrote:
> Maybe I'm getting a little off topic with this question, but why was
> Tempest removed last time?
> I'm not well versed in the history of this discussion, but from what I
> understand Tempest in the gate has
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote:
> What i'd like to dig more is how Ansible and Heat can live together. And
> what features do Heat offer that are not covered by Ansible as well? Is
> there still the need to have Heat as the main engine, or could that
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 6:50 PM, James Slagle wrote:
> I proposed a session for the PTG
> (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ptg-queens) about forming a
> common plan and vision around Ansible in TripleO.
> I think it's important however that we kick this
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Alex has demonstrated high technical and community skills in TripleO -
> where he's already core on THT, instack-undercloud, and puppet-tripleo
> - but also very involved in other repos.
> I propose that we extend his
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Dnyaneshwar Pawar
> while testing my patches i am getting errors with command 'openstack deploy
> --templates' any idea what is wrong here?
This shows rabbit is failing to
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Kaz Shinohara wrote:
>> No, I think we still need this, because it is disabled by default -
>> this option allows you to enable defeating token expiry via trusts,
> My understanding for the current implementation is..
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Dnyaneshwar Pawar
> I am getting following error. Do I need to specify anything else in the
> This command was working fine before commit
> 3e6147dee4497bbb607e6377bd588e32f62be2b7 .
There is a
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> A few weeks later than I had planned, but here's the other half of the field
> feedback I mentioned in my previous email:
> * They very emphatically want in-place upgrades to work when moving from
> non-containerized to
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Dan Trainor wrote:
> Hi -
> I'm looking for the glue that populates the overcloud role list.
> I can get a list of roles via 'openstack overcloud role list', however I'm
> looking to create new roles to incorporate in to this
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Kaz Shinohara wrote:
> Hi Rabi,
> I still takes `deferred _auth_method=password` behalf of trusts because we
> don't enable trusts in the Keystone side due to some internal reason.
> The issues what you pointed are correct(e.g.
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 06/09/2017 03:10 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>> History lesson: a long, long time ago we made a very big mistake. We
>> treated stack outputs as things that would be resolved dynamically when
>> you requested them,
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 03:15:13PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> Tagging with tripleo and heat teams for the os-*-config projects. I'm not
> sure which owns them now, but it sounds like we need a new release.
I think they're still owned by the TripleO team, but we missed them in the
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:22:07AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> This is a thread for anyone that participated in the onboarding rooms,
> on either the presenter or audience side. Because we all went into this
> creating things from whole cloth, I'm sure there are lots of lessons
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 04:33:33AM +, Dnyaneshwar Pawar wrote:
> Hi TripleO team,
> I am trying to apply custom configuration to an existing overcloud. (using
> openstack overcloud deploy command)
> Though there is no error, the configuration is in not applied to overcloud.
> Am I missing
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 02:45:08PM +0300, Marios Andreou wrote:
>Hi folks, after some discussion locally with colleagues about improving
>the upgrades experience, one of the items that came up was pre-upgrade and
>update validations. I took an AI to look at the current status of
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:46:28PM +0200, Lance Haig wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> I am happy to assist in any way to be honest.
> The backwards compatibility is not always correct as I have seen when
> developing our library of templates on Liberty and then trying to deploy it
> on Mitaka for
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:21:30AM -0400, Lance Haig wrote:
>Good to know that there is interest.
Thanks for starting this effort - I agree it would be great to see the
example templates we provide improved and over time become better
references for heat features (as well as being more well
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:57:38PM +, Kendall Nelson wrote:
>If you are running a project onboarding session and have etherpads/slides/
>etc you are using to educate new contributorsÂ please send them to me! I
>am collecting all the resources you are sharing into a
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:56:56PM -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:51:13AM +, Andrea Frittoli wrote:
> > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:33 PM Matthew Treinish
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:49:14AM +0530, Rabi Mishra wrote:
> > > >
e first time there was some
>opposition from ironic community (although I personally find it reasonable
>to have those) but AFAIU this is no longer the case.
>I would gladly revive old Steven Hardy patches  (have them starred on
>Gerrit since then :) ) and make it happen if
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 02:51:28PM -0700, Dan Sneddon wrote:
> On 04/13/2017 12:01 AM, Rabi Mishra wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Dan Sneddon > > wrote:
> > On 04/12/2017 01:22 PM, Thomas Herve wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:48:32PM -0400, Justin Kilpatrick wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> > Tempest isn't really either of those things. According to another message
> > in this thread it takes around 15 minutes to run just the smoke tests.
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:22:50PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Exceptionally, I'll self-promote a blog post that I wrote about my
> personal experience of being PTL in OpenStack.
Thanks for writing this up Emilien - it aligns pretty well
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:53:04AM +0200, Martin André wrote:
> I'd like to propose we extend Florian Fuchs +2 powers to the
> tripleo-validations project. Florian is already core on tripleo-ui
> (well, tripleo technically so this means there is no changes to make
> to gerrit
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 04:01:48PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> After our weekly meeting of today, I found useful to share and discuss
> our roadmap for Container CI jobs in TripleO.
> They are ordered by priority from the highest to lowest:
> 1. Swap ovb-nonha job with ovb-containers, enable
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 04:45:38PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
> We are feeling the pinch on stable-branch reviewers in Heat, so now that I
> understand the process a bit better, let's try this again.
> I'd like to nominate Huang Tianhua to join the heat-stable-maint team.
> Tianhua is a
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:07:24PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:56:59AM +1300, Steve Baker wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:09:43PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Bringing an old topic on the table.
> We might have noticed:
> 1. Some tripleo-specs take huge amount of time before getting merged
> (or even reviewed). We have been asking folks to review them every
> week but unfortunately
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 04:34:09PM +0530, Sanjay Upadhyay wrote:
>I recently started work with a requirement to integrate a security tool
>with monitoring framework for alerting and logging. I fail to Â find
>relevant docs in this direction. After looking around for more
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 01:43:39PM -0700, Dan Sneddon wrote:
> I've been trying to figure out a workflow for previewing the results of
> importing custom templates in an overcloud deployment (without actually
> deploying). For instance, I am overriding some parameters using custom
> templates, and
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:30:48AM -0500, Gregory Haynes wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, at 05:18 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:22:37PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> > > While looking through the dib v2 changes after the feature branch was
> > >
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:22:37PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> While looking through the dib v2 changes after the feature branch was merged
> to master, I noticed this commit, which bring dib-run-parts back into dib
> itself. Unfortunately I missed the original proposal to do this, but I have
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:21:54PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> > Following up on the previous thread:
> > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109748.html
> > Here is the latest data,
I wanted to raise visibility of a problem we're experiencing in TripleO CI,
which I think will potentially affect other projects that consume trunk
builds from the RDO repositories (and potentially other distros too I
The problem is that we tag our final ocata releases after
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:34:50PM -0500, James Slagle wrote:
> I've been working on this spec for TripleO:
> which allows users to selectively disable Heat deployment resources
> for a given server (or server in the case of a *DeloymentGroup
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:06:34AM +, Brandon B. Jozsa wrote:
>+1 for the monthly meetings and a long standing, cross-team, collaborative
Yes the etherpad is a good idea, thanks!
I guess we'll want one per-release, so I created one for Pike here:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:25:46AM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona,
Adding openstack-ansible to the subject tags (apologies, sdake pointed out
I got that wrong in the initial mail, here's the top of this thread):
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 04:02:54PM +, Steven Hardy wrote:
Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona,
we've had some productive cross-project discussions amongst the various
It's clear that we share many common problems, such as patterns for major
version upgrades (even if the workflow isn't
>That's slowing down getting backports merged, amongst other things.
>I'd like to request that we update the membership to be the same as
> Rico Lin
There's been some discussion on IRC about this, but I wanted to formally
request a FFE for the remaining composable upgrades work and provide a
We've made pretty good progress on this, and the
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 02:59:42PM +0200, Marios Andreou wrote:
> Hi, as part of the composable upgrades workflow shaping up for Newton to
> Ocata, we need to install the new hiera hook that was first added with
>  and disable the old hook and data as part of the upgrade
> initialization .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 08:52:51AM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> I have been discussed with TripleO UI core reviewers and it's pretty
> clear Honza's work has been valuable so we can propose him part of
> Tripleo UI core team.
> His quality of code and reviews make him a good candidate and it
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 07:03:56PM +0200, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote:
> Sagi (sshnaidm on IRC) has done significant work in TripleO CI (both
> on the current CI solution and in getting tripleo-quickstart jobs for
> it); So I would like to propose him as part of the TripleO CI core team.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:03:28PM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Greeting folks,
> I would like to propose some changes in our core members:
> - Remove Jay Dobies who has not been active in TripleO for a while
> (thanks Jay for your hard work!).
> - Add Flavio Percoco core on tripleo-common
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:34 AM, mathieu bultel wrote:
> > Hi Adriano
> > On 01/17/2017 03:05 PM, Adriano Petrich wrote:
> > So I want to make a backwards compatibility job upstream so from last scrum
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:48:27PM +, Adriano Petrich wrote:
>Â Â That sounds exactly what we need. Do we run tempest or something on
>those to validate it?
It doesn't currently run tempest, only some basic sanity tests (crud
operations where we create some resources
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 02:56:15PM +, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote:
> I have concern to rely on undercloud for overcloud swift.
> Undercloud is not HA (yet) so it may not be operational when disk failed or
> swift overcloud node is added/deleted.
I think the proposal is only for a
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 03:20:37PM -0500, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 02:21:00PM +0000, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > I commented on the bug, I'm not sure about this as it seems to overlap with
> > our service_config_settings interface, which IIRC landed slightly
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 04:04:51PM -0500, Harry Rybacki wrote:
> Greetings All,
> Folks have been diligently working on the blueprint to prepare
> TripleO-Quickstart (OOOQ) and TripleO-Quickstart-Extras for
> their transition into TripleO-CI. Presently, our aim is to begin
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:02:12PM -0500, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> I've been working along with a few others on some "opstools"
> composable services for TripleO: that is, services that provide
> things like centralized logging, performance monitoring, or
> availability/health monitoring.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:46:05PM -0600, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 12/08/2016 08:05 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I've been investigating how to implement TripleO network configuration
> > in TripleO UI. Based on my findings I'd like to propose a solution.
> > tl;dr
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:02:51PM +0100, Thomas Herve wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:03:10PM +0100, Thomas Herve wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Giulio Fidente <gfide
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:03:10PM +0100, Thomas Herve wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> > hi,
> > we're trying to address in TripleO a couple of use cases for which we'd like
> > to trigger a Mistral workflow from a Heat template.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Tim Rozet wrote:
> I wanted to get thoughts about re-thinking how users configure and create new
> networks with OOO. The current way to configure network settings for a
> deployment requires creating nic + network environment templates, and
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 01:54:34PM -0700, Alex Schultz wrote:
> Hey folks,
> So I'm in the process of evaluating options for implementing the
> capture-environment-status-and-logs blueprint. At the moment my
> current plan is to implement a mistral workflow to execute the
> sosreport to
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:18:59PM +0800, Rico Lin wrote:
>Think about bare metalÂ (ironic) deployment, we can do directly ironic
>call, or use nova to deploy.
>Right now I have a spec about implemented Ironic resources  in Heat.
>IncludingÂ Chassis, Port and some state setting
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:27:50PM -0500, Zane Bitter wrote:
> Any parameter in a Heat template that has a default other than None is
> considered optional, so the user is not required to pass a value. Otherwise,
> however, the parameter is required and creating the stack will fail pretty
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 05:26:31PM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Alex Schultz (mwhahaha on IRC) has been active on TripleO since a few
> months now. While he's very active in different areas of TripleO, his
> reviews and contributions on puppet-tripleo have been very useful.
> Alex is
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 05:01:49PM +, Dougal Matthews wrote:
>I would like to propose we add Julie (jpich) to the TripleO core team for
>python-tripleoclient and tripleo-common. This nomination is based
>partially on review stats and also my experience with her
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 01:40:43PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> MIchele Baldessari (bandini on IRC) has consistently demonstrated high
> levels of contributions in TripleO projects, specifically in High
> Availability area where's he's for us a guru (I still don't understand
> how pacemaker
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 05:46:48PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 01/11/16 15:13, James Slagle wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > TripleO (like some other projects in OpenStack) have not always done
> > > good job in merging
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:09:54PM +0200, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez wrote:
> Here you have my 2 cents,
> I think the proposed draft does not fit with what we currently have/want.
> I'm 100% sure that can be improved but here it goes.
Thanks to everyone for the feedback (both on and off list),
I recently received a draft version of our project logo, using the mascot
we selected together. A final version (and some cool swag) will be ready
for us before the Project Team Gathering in February. Before they make our
logo final, they want to be sure we're happy with our mascot.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:28:00AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > I would like to request for some space dedicated to TripleO project
> > for the first OpenStack PTG.
> > https://www.openstack.org/ptg/
> > The event will happen in February 2017 during the next
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:23:08PM +0200, Marius Cornea wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> In Newton we've deprecated the *-scale and *-flavor deploy command
> arguments in favor of using Heat environment files. In the context of
> testing the composable roles where the custom roles' node count and
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:20:07AM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
> Hi all,
> As we work to finish the last remaining tasks for Newton, it's a good time
> to look back over the cycle, and recognize the excellent work done by
> several new contributors.
> We've seen a
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 04:36:30PM +0200, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
> As reported on this bug
> HA gate and periodic jobs for master and sometimes newton started to
> fail for errors related to memory shortage. Memory on undercloud
Firstly, thanks for this detailed feedback - it's very helpful to have
someone with a fresh perspective look at the day-1 experience for TripleO,
and while some of what follows are "know issues", it's great to get some
perspective on them, as well as ideas re how we might improve things.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 06:32:07PM +0200, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> On 09/14/2016 05:59 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> > On 09/14/2016 02:31 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > > Related to this is the future of all of the per-role customization
> > > interfaces. I'm thinking th
As we work to finish the last remaining tasks for Newton, it's a good time
to look back over the cycle, and recognize the excellent work done by
several new contributors.
We've seen a different contributor pattern develop recently, where many
folks are subsystem experts and mostly focus
I wanted to draw attention to this patch:
As part of the custom-roles work, I had to break backwards compatibility
for the OS::TripleO::AllNodesExtraConfig resource.
I'm not happy about that, but I couldn't find any way to avoid it if we
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:21:43PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi folks!
> I'm looking into support for multiple overclouds with shared control plane.
> I'm porting a downstream guide: https://review.openstack.org/368840.
> However, this no longer works, probably because "internal_api"
1 - 100 of 516 matches
Mail list logo