r.conf. The display_name field will be None for
> the new volume.
>
> Xing
>
> ____
> From: Victor Denisov [vdeni...@mirantis.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 7:23 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
How are the names chosen for those new cloned images?
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:04 AM, yang, xing wrote:
> Hi Victor,
>
> Yes, you are right.
>
> Thanks,
> Xing
>
> ________
> From: Victor Denisov [vdeni...@mirantis.com]
> Sent: Mo
I just realized that probably we create images from individual
snapshots of that consistency group and add those images to the new
consistency group.
Am I correct?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Victor Denisov wrote:
> Or probably when we clone a consistency group from a snapshot we
>
Or probably when we clone a consistency group from a snapshot we
should clone all the images in this consistency group?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Victor Denisov wrote:
> Hi Xing,
>
> One more question. You mentioned that there is an operation: create
> consistency group from
will delete the individual snapshot. After that you can remove the
> volume from the group and delete the volume.
>
> More comments inline below.
>
> Thanks,
> Xing
>
>
> ____________
> From: Victor Denisov [vdeni...@mirantis.com]
> Sent: Tu
ack.org/admin-guide/blockstorage-groups.html
>
> Thanks,
> Xing
>
>
>
> From: Victor Denisov [vdeni...@mirantis.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 11:29 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Cc: Jason Dillaman
> Subject: [
Hi,
I'm working on consistency groups feature in ceph.
My question is about what kind of behavior does cinder expect from
storage backends.
I'm particularly interested in what happens to consistency groups
snapshots when I remove an image from the group:
Let's imagine I have a consistency group c
