Re: [openstack-dev] [Cyborg]Queens PTL candidacy

2017-08-08 Thread Harm Sluiman
__ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- 宋慢

Re: [openstack-dev] [cyborg]Nominate Rushil Chugh and Justin Kilpatrick as new core reviewers

2017-05-25 Thread Harm Sluiman
+1 I haven't had time to actively participate these past months but have monitored and agree :) Thanks for your time Harm Sluiman harm.slui...@gmail.com > On May 25, 2017, at 10:24 AM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > > Hi Team, > > This is an email for nomination of rushil an

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration] No team meeting today, resume next Wed

2017-03-08 Thread Harm Sluiman
Thanks for the update. Unfortunately I could not attend and can't seem to find a summary or anything about what took place. A pointer would be appreciated please ;-) Thanks for your time Harm Sluiman harm.slui...@gmail.com > On Mar 8, 2017, at 7:22 AM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Bi-weekly Meeting 2017.01.18 Agenda

2017-01-18 Thread Harm Sluiman
ei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen > > (Previous) > Research Assistant > Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 > University of California, Irvine > Email: zhipe...@uci.edu > Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Bi-weekly Meeting 2017.1.4 Agenda

2017-01-06 Thread Harm Sluiman
to Nasca etherpard to link the design >> document and the code being discussed. I cannot seem to locate the original >> files Mellanox team shared with us. Would somebody who know where these are >> shared be able to insert the links to the etherpad >> https://et

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Bi-weekly Meeting 2017.1.4 Agenda

2017-01-04 Thread Harm Sluiman
gt; Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com > Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen > > (Previous) > Research Assistant > Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 > University of California, Irvine > Email: zhipe...@uci.edu > Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Bi-weekly Meeting 2016.12.21 Agenda

2016-12-22 Thread Harm Sluiman
nt/IT Prooduct Line > Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd > Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com > Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen > > (Previous) > Research Assistant > Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 > University of California, Irvine > Email: zhipe...@uci.edu >

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Biweekly Meeting 2016.11.23 agenda

2016-12-06 Thread Harm Sluiman
p for each type of accelerator devices :) > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Miroslav Halas <mailto:mha...@lenovo.com>> wrote: > Hello Harm, > > > > Thank you for sharing. I was wondering if you have given any thoughts how > other type of devices other than FPGAs

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Biweekly Meeting 2016.11.23 agenda

2016-12-03 Thread Harm Sluiman
Ng and Li Liu, my colleagues from Huawei that will be participating in Cyborg and helping get our initial POC underway Thanks for your time. 宋哲 Harm Sluiman > On Nov 23, 2016, at 11:49 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > > Hi team, > > Thanks for the discussion and plea

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Biweekly Meeting 2016.11.10 minutes

2016-11-22 Thread Harm Sluiman
ct Line > Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd > Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com > Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen > > (Previous) > Research Assistant > Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 > University of California, Irvine > Email: zhipe

Re: [openstack-dev] FPGA as a dynamic nested resources

2016-07-28 Thread Harm Sluiman
> On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:57 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > On 07/19/2016 06:51 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: >> On Jul 19, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Chris Friesen >> wrote: Why would a VM program the slot? Wouldn’t it usually be at the host level? >>> >>> Are there no cases where a VM might want to download

Re: [openstack-dev] FPGA as a dynamic nested resources

2016-07-21 Thread Harm Sluiman
On Jul 21, 2016 5:12 AM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:54:48AM +0200, Roman Dobosz wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:07:12 +0100 > > "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > > > > Hey Daniel, thanks for the feedback. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > I'd suggest you'll increase

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Please vote -> Removal of Harm Weites from the core reviewer team

2016-01-15 Thread Harm Weites
ride :) see you in #kolla! > Op 15 jan. 2016, om 20:10 heeft Steven Dake (stdake) het > volgende geschreven: > > I counted 6 votes in favor of removal. We have 10 people on our core team. > A majority has been met and I have removed Harm from the core reviewer team. > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposing Michal Rostecki for Core Reviewer (nihilfer on IRC)

2015-11-13 Thread Harm Weites
+1 :) Jeff Peeler schreef op 2015-11-13 19:51: On 12/11/15 08:41, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hey folks, Its been awhile since we have had a core reviewer nomination, but I really feel like Michal has the right stuff. If you look at the 30 day stats for kolla[1] , he is #3 in reviews (70 revie

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Integrating kollacli as python-kollaclient

2015-10-23 Thread Harm Weites
+1 this sort of stuff makes live a lot better :) Swapnil Kulkarni schreef op 2015-10-23 07:08: On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hello Folks, Oracle has developed a CLI tool for managing OpenStack Kolla clusters.  Several months ago at our midcycle, the topic was b

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] proposing Michal Jastrzebski (inc0) for core reviewer

2015-09-30 Thread Harm Weites
Looks like he passed 3 already, but here's another +1 :) Steven Dake (stdake) schreef op 2015-09-30 00:20: Hi folks, I am proposing Michal for core reviewer. Consider my proposal as a +1 vote. Michal has done a fantastic job with rsyslog, has done a nice job overall contributing to the project

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Followup to review in gerrit relating to RHOS + RDO types

2015-09-16 Thread harm
we add?” sort of sounds like ‘how many do we support?”.  The answer to the second question is none – again the Kolla community does not support any deployment of OpenStack.  To the question as posed, how many we add, the answer is it is really up to community members willing to  implement and

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposing Swapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap) for kolla core reviewer team

2015-08-14 Thread Harm Weites
great! +1 :) Op 14-08-15 om 15:38 schreef Paul Bourke: +1, Swapnil has made a ton of useful contributions and continues to do so :) On 14/08/15 14:29, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hi folks, Swapnil has done a bunch of great technical work, participates heavily in IRC, and has contributed eno

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][magnum] Removal of Daneyon Hansen from the Core Reviewer team for Kolla

2015-07-23 Thread Harm Weites
Agreed, everyone should do what they love - so I wish you the best of luck with the Magnum crew Daneyon! Op 22-07-15 om 22:47 schreef Steven Dake (stdake): Fellow Kolla developers, Daneyon has been instrumental in getting Kolla rolling and keeping our project alive. He even found me a new jo

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for Paul Bourke for Kolla Core

2015-07-14 Thread Harm Weites
no-brainer: +1 Op 14-07-15 om 13:19 schreef Ryan Hallisey: +1 I echo all the prior comments. -Ryan - Original Message - From: "Steven Dake (stdake)" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 10:40:11 PM Subject: [openstack-dev] [

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for changing 1600UTC meeting to 1700 UTC

2015-06-16 Thread Harm Weites
I'm ok with moving to 16:30 UTC instead of staying at 16:00. I actually prefer it in my evening schedule :) Moving to 16:30 would already be a great improvement to the current schedule and should at least allow me to not miss everything. - harmw Op 12-06-15 om 15:44 schreef Steven Dake (stda

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for new core-reviewer Harm Waites

2015-06-16 Thread Harm Weites
Thanks guys, both for all the nice words and the acceptance! harmw Op 16-06-15 om 16:32 schreef Steven Dake (stdake): Its unanimous! Welcome to the core reviewer team Harm! Regards -steve From: Steven Dake mailto:std...@cisco.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing Li

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-11-21 Thread Harm Weites
Hi, We're running Juno since a few weeks now, is it now possible to go dual stack with l3-routers or are there some pieces missing and should I wait for Kilo? -Harm On 08/19/2014 07:08 PM, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) wrote: > > Hi Harm: > > > > Unfortunately I haven’t h

Re: [openstack-dev] ipv6 and ipv4 dual stack for floating IP

2014-10-30 Thread Harm Weites
2 subnets to this external net and creating a gateway to it on the l3 router causes a problem. Do we need to wait for K before we can fully go dual-stack? - Harm op 29-10-14 15:29, Jerry Xinyu Zhao schreef: > Hi > I want to use both ipv4 and ipv6 for floating ip at the same time. > However,

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-29 Thread Harm Weites
Hi Dane, Just wondering if you've made some progression on the matter :) Regards, Harm op 19-08-14 19:08, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) schreef: > > Hi Harm: > > > > Unfortunately I haven't had time to complete the changes yet. Even > if/when these changes are com

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-19 Thread Harm Weites
hanges for that yet Dane? Regards, Harm op 16-08-14 23:33, Martinx - ? schreef: > Guys, > > Just for the record, I'm using IceHouse in a Dual-Stacked environment > (with security groups working) but, Instance's IPv6 address are static > (no upstream SLAAC, arrived in J

Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-16 Thread Harm Weites
Hi Dane, Thanks, that looks promising. Once support for multiple v6 addresses on gateway ports is added I'll be happy to give this a go. Should it work just fine with an otherwise Icehouse based deployment? Regards, Harm op 16-08-14 20:31, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) schreef: > Hi Harm: >

[openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack

2014-08-16 Thread Harm Weites
/allow-multiple-subnets-on-gateway-port Regards, Harm ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev