[openstack-dev] [docs][ptl] Candidacy for Docs

2017-08-04 Thread Petr Kovar
Hi all,

I'd like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the docs project for Queens.

I've been active in various open source documentation and
translation projects since 2007 and started contributing to OpenStack
docs during the Mitaka cycle, both upstream and in the RDO Project.

The docs project has recently seen a significant decrease in both the
number of submitted updates and contributors, but thanks to a group of
dedicated people in the community, we've managed to come up with a clear
plan to migrate docs over to individual projects, restructure them and
reduce the scope to keep them maintainable. This is now well underway and
I'd like to help the team and the community drive and continue with this
work.

In docs, we generally like to keep it rather short and simple, so let me
summarize the main three points as follows:

Support and help drive the remaining tasks in restructuring and/or moving
content from the core docs suite.

Help establish the docs team as content editors for individual project docs
when needed or requested.

Stay open and friendly to new contributors, no matter if they are
prospective core members or drive-by docs contributors, with the
understanding that docs are a great way to get involved in the project for
both the non- and developers.

Thank you,
pk

-- 
Petr Kovar
Sr. Technical Writer | Customer Content Services
Red Hat Czech, Brno

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Docs] PTL Candidacy

2016-03-13 Thread Lana Brindley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi everyone,

I am seeking re-election as Documentation PTL for Newton. I have now been the
docs PTL for two releases (Liberty and Mitaka), and would love another term in
the middle of the alphabet! We've achieved a lot this time around, including
an almost complete conversion to RST, quite a few structural overhauls of
popular books, and some fundamental toolchain improvements. There is still
lots to be done, though, and I would love your support to achieve this in
Newton.

During Liberty we got the bulk of our books migrated away from Docbook XML and
into RST. In Mitaka, we completed that work (with only the Ops Guide remaining
to be converted in Newton). For the last couple of releases, we've also had a
focus on improving the information architecture of our books, and have now
successfully completed overhauls of our most popular books, with the
Architecture Guide also well underway. All of these tasks will be carried over
to Newton, with many of them finally coming to completion. In Newton, I would
also like to address some of the larger issues around the organisation of our
documentation suite, making it easier for developers to contribute quality
code to our docs, and better welcoming and introducing new big tent projects
to the documentation team.

At the Mitaka summit in Tokyo, we decided to make a concerted effort to pay
down a lot of our tech debt, and one of the main ways we chose to do that was
to change the way we handled the DocImpact flag in our bugs. We merged those
changes to DocImpact about a month ago now, and it is already having a
significant impact on the amount of untriaged bugs outstanding. We're now much
more able to keep on top of our bug queue, which is giving us a much greater
ability to pay down tech debt. In this vein, we also have put a lot of effort
into ensuring new contributors have a better onboarding experience to docs,
with the creation of our new Contributor Guide which replaces a lot of old
wiki-based content, a great 'get started with docs' campaign at the last
Summit (which resulted in a hard copy article in the Summit edition of
SuperUser, and Anne and I on SuperUser TV), and a general willingness to
respond to questions on the mailing lists and help out new users wherever we
find them.

In the Liberty release cycle, we closed just over 600 bugs, and we're very
close to matching that number for Mitaka, with 505 bugs closed as I write
this. Again, we've managed to keep on top of the aging bugs as well, with all
bugs older than a year now closed. In the Mitaka release, we managed to close
16 blueprints, which is a massive increase over Liberty's 7.

I'm very excited about making the trek to Austin soon for the Newton summit,
to catch up with old friends, and hopefully meet some of our newest
contributors. Please be sure to stop for a chat if you see me around :)

I'd love to have your support for the PTL role for Newton, and I'm looking
forward to continuing to grow the documentation team.

Thanks,
Lana (@loquacities)

- -- 
Lana Brindley
Technical Writer
Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
http://lanabrindley.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW5g++AAoJELppzVb4+KUy9LAH/RC5y/gM22qywGZaE2y4hWEc
b+xdCxFUuh41l3WJhQ2iRJrnZUjm84doG2eCIcCpJW/OC5udo+2GiQYGmLUH278A
uz8Rfglsu/SmDhWZbaIWtiKXo3WedmWzXUbBCV7/+aftphKLMdckD1KAharZZOWq
Jqzg56SjWRqzbO++XiciCVwQ+zgoGuzJzYEQ1SsYsAdp/+wdtO2qPORZO1UuoOfz
wFFS/OG8O4PsJa3e9KW/kHzDY3Emkz7bhqDcbE6w3HyszC6bEq8lDgmcXtg2SoNn
FzjEpoiiAyalncUfo3p+v+7CV/3M/N4nCB2K+VhYO0hIAxPgUMxhrP3jzzq/gSI=
=sboQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Docs] PTL Candidacy

2014-09-25 Thread Tristan Cacqueray
confirmed

On 25/09/14 12:10 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
 I'm writing to announce my candidacy for the Documentation Program
 Technical Lead (PTL).
 
 The past six months have flown by. I still recall writing up wish lists
 per-deliverable on the plane home from the Atlanta Summit and the great
 news is many are completed. Of course we still have a lot to do.
 
 We face many challenges as an open source community as we grow and define
 ourselves through our users. As documentation specialists, we have to be
 creative with our resourcing for documentation as the number of teams and
 services increases each release. This release we have:
 - experimented with using RST sourcing for a chapter about Heat Templates
 - managed to keep automating where it makes sense, using the toolset we
 keep improving upon
 - held another successful book sprint for the Architecture and Design Guide
 - split out a repo for the training group focusing not only on training
 guides but also scripts and other training specialties
 - split out the Security Guide with their own review team; completed a
 thorough review of that guide
 - split out the High Availability Guide with their own review team from
 discussions at the Ops Meetup
 - began a Networking Guide pulling together as many interested parties as
 possible before and after the Ops Meetup with a plan for hiring a contract
 writer to work on it with the community
 - added the openstack common client help text to the CLI Reference
 - added Chinese, German, French, and Korean language landing pages to the
 docs site
 - generated config option tables with each milestone release (with few
 exceptions of individual projects)
 - lost a key contributor to API docs (Diane's stats didn't decline far yet:
 http://stackalytics.com/?user_id=diane-flemingrelease=juno)
 - still working towards a new design for page-based docs
 - still working on API reference information
 - still working on removing spec API documents to avoid duplication and
 confusion
 - still testing three of four install guides for the JUNO release (that
 we're nearly there is just so great)
 
 So you can see we have much more to do, but we have come so far. Even in
 compiling this list I worry I'm missing items, there's just so much scope
 to OpenStack docs. We serve users, deployers, administrators, and app
 developers. It continues to be challenging but we keep looking for ways to
 make it work.
 
 We have seen amazing contributors like Andreas Jaeger, Matt Kassawara,
 Gauvain Pocentek, and Christian Berendt find their stride and shine. Yes, I
 could name more but these people have done an incredible job this release.
 
 I'm especially eager to continue collaborating with great managers like
 Nick Chase at Mirantis and Lana Brindley at Rackspace -- they see what we
 can accomplish when enterprise doc teams work well with an upstream.
 They're behind-the-scenes much of the time but I must express my gratitude
 to these two pros up front.
 
 Thanks for your consideration. I'd be honored to continue to serve in this
 role.
 Anne
 
 
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Docs] PTL Candidacy

2014-09-24 Thread Anne Gentle
I'm writing to announce my candidacy for the Documentation Program
Technical Lead (PTL).

The past six months have flown by. I still recall writing up wish lists
per-deliverable on the plane home from the Atlanta Summit and the great
news is many are completed. Of course we still have a lot to do.

We face many challenges as an open source community as we grow and define
ourselves through our users. As documentation specialists, we have to be
creative with our resourcing for documentation as the number of teams and
services increases each release. This release we have:
- experimented with using RST sourcing for a chapter about Heat Templates
- managed to keep automating where it makes sense, using the toolset we
keep improving upon
- held another successful book sprint for the Architecture and Design Guide
- split out a repo for the training group focusing not only on training
guides but also scripts and other training specialties
- split out the Security Guide with their own review team; completed a
thorough review of that guide
- split out the High Availability Guide with their own review team from
discussions at the Ops Meetup
- began a Networking Guide pulling together as many interested parties as
possible before and after the Ops Meetup with a plan for hiring a contract
writer to work on it with the community
- added the openstack common client help text to the CLI Reference
- added Chinese, German, French, and Korean language landing pages to the
docs site
- generated config option tables with each milestone release (with few
exceptions of individual projects)
- lost a key contributor to API docs (Diane's stats didn't decline far yet:
http://stackalytics.com/?user_id=diane-flemingrelease=juno)
- still working towards a new design for page-based docs
- still working on API reference information
- still working on removing spec API documents to avoid duplication and
confusion
- still testing three of four install guides for the JUNO release (that
we're nearly there is just so great)

So you can see we have much more to do, but we have come so far. Even in
compiling this list I worry I'm missing items, there's just so much scope
to OpenStack docs. We serve users, deployers, administrators, and app
developers. It continues to be challenging but we keep looking for ways to
make it work.

We have seen amazing contributors like Andreas Jaeger, Matt Kassawara,
Gauvain Pocentek, and Christian Berendt find their stride and shine. Yes, I
could name more but these people have done an incredible job this release.

I'm especially eager to continue collaborating with great managers like
Nick Chase at Mirantis and Lana Brindley at Rackspace -- they see what we
can accomplish when enterprise doc teams work well with an upstream.
They're behind-the-scenes much of the time but I must express my gratitude
to these two pros up front.

Thanks for your consideration. I'd be honored to continue to serve in this
role.
Anne
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Docs] PTL Candidacy

2014-03-29 Thread Colin McNamara
I support your continued role as the PTL for docs. It’s not always they most 
glamorous job, and you do a great job at it. You got my vote.

Regards,

Colin

Colin McNamara
People | Process | Technology

Mobile: 858-208-8105
Twitter:@colinmcnamara
Linkedin:   www.linkedin.com/in/colinmcnamara
Blog:   www.colinmcnamara.com
Email:  co...@2cups.com 







On Mar 28, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote:

 Hi all, 
 I'm writing to announce my candidacy for the Documentation Program Technical 
 Lead (PTL).
 
 I have been working on OpenStack upstream documentation since September 2010, 
 and am currently serving in this role. I recently summarized the many 
 community and collaboration methods we use to create and maintain 
 documentation across the core OpenStack programs. [1] I think these open 
 source, open documentation methods are what keep OpenStack docs vibrant and 
 alive. 
 
 I can't take credit for all the work that goes on in our community, but 
 please let me highlight the results the coordinated teams and individuals 
 have produced:
 
 - The Documentation team has grown and matured in the past release, and we 
 released simultaneously with the code for the first time with the Havana 
 release. We are on track to do that again for Icehouse. 
 
 - We have a translation toolchain working this year and I'm constantly amazed 
 at the outpouring of dedication from our translation community. 
 
 - Our coordinated documentation tool chains that enable automation and 
 continuous publication are working seamlessly with the various projects 
 across OpenStack.  
 
 - We're releasing an O'Reilly edition of the OpenStack Operations Guide. 
 
 - The API Reference at http://api.openstack.org/api-ref.html got a complete 
 refresh to provide a responsive web design and to streamline the underlying 
 CSS and JS code.
 
 - We have been incubating the open source training manuals team within the 
 OpenStack Documentation program. They’ve produced an Associate Training 
 Guide, with outlines and schedules for an Operator Training Guide, a 
 Developer Training Guide, and an Architect Training Guide.
 
 - While our focus has been on both Guides for operators and installers as 
 well as API reference documentation, I am interested in working with the app 
 developer community to build documentation collaboratively that fits their 
 needs. Everett Toews recently updated the API docs landing page to take this 
 first step.
 
 I hope you can support my continuing efforts for the wide scope and breadth 
 of serving the documentation needs in this community. 
 
 Thanks,
 Anne
 
  
 [1] 
 http://justwriteclick.com/2014/03/21/how-to-build-openstack-docs-and-contributors-through-community/
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Docs] PTL Candidacy

2014-03-28 Thread Anne Gentle
Hi all,
I'm writing to announce my candidacy for the Documentation Program
Technical Lead (PTL).

I have been working on OpenStack upstream documentation since September
2010, and am currently serving in this role. I recently summarized the many
community and collaboration methods we use to create and maintain
documentation across the core OpenStack programs. [1] I think these open
source, open documentation methods are what keep OpenStack docs vibrant and
alive.

I can't take credit for all the work that goes on in our community, but
please let me highlight the results the coordinated teams and individuals
have produced:

- The Documentation team has grown and matured in the past release, and we
released simultaneously with the code for the first time with the Havana
release. We are on track to do that again for Icehouse.

- We have a translation toolchain working this year and I'm constantly
amazed at the outpouring of dedication from our translation community.

- Our coordinated documentation tool chains that enable automation and
continuous publication are working seamlessly with the various projects
across OpenStack.

- We're releasing an O'Reilly edition of the OpenStack Operations Guide.

- The API Reference at http://api.openstack.org/api-ref.html got a complete
refresh to provide a responsive web design and to streamline the underlying
CSS and JS code.

- We have been incubating the open source training manuals team within the
OpenStack Documentation program. They've produced an Associate Training
Guide, with outlines and schedules for an Operator Training Guide, a
Developer Training Guide, and an Architect Training Guide.

- While our focus has been on both Guides for operators and installers as
well as API reference documentation, I am interested in working with the
app developer community to build documentation collaboratively that fits
their needs. Everett Toews recently updated the API docs landing page to
take this first step.

I hope you can support my continuing efforts for the wide scope and breadth
of serving the documentation needs in this community.

Thanks,
Anne


[1]
http://justwriteclick.com/2014/03/21/how-to-build-openstack-docs-and-contributors-through-community/
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Docs] PTL Candidacy

2014-03-28 Thread Anita Kuno
confirmed

On 03/28/2014 02:29 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
 Hi all,
 I'm writing to announce my candidacy for the Documentation Program
 Technical Lead (PTL).
 
 I have been working on OpenStack upstream documentation since September
 2010, and am currently serving in this role. I recently summarized the many
 community and collaboration methods we use to create and maintain
 documentation across the core OpenStack programs. [1] I think these open
 source, open documentation methods are what keep OpenStack docs vibrant and
 alive.
 
 I can't take credit for all the work that goes on in our community, but
 please let me highlight the results the coordinated teams and individuals
 have produced:
 
 - The Documentation team has grown and matured in the past release, and we
 released simultaneously with the code for the first time with the Havana
 release. We are on track to do that again for Icehouse.
 
 - We have a translation toolchain working this year and I'm constantly
 amazed at the outpouring of dedication from our translation community.
 
 - Our coordinated documentation tool chains that enable automation and
 continuous publication are working seamlessly with the various projects
 across OpenStack.
 
 - We're releasing an O'Reilly edition of the OpenStack Operations Guide.
 
 - The API Reference at http://api.openstack.org/api-ref.html got a complete
 refresh to provide a responsive web design and to streamline the underlying
 CSS and JS code.
 
 - We have been incubating the open source training manuals team within the
 OpenStack Documentation program. They've produced an Associate Training
 Guide, with outlines and schedules for an Operator Training Guide, a
 Developer Training Guide, and an Architect Training Guide.
 
 - While our focus has been on both Guides for operators and installers as
 well as API reference documentation, I am interested in working with the
 app developer community to build documentation collaboratively that fits
 their needs. Everett Toews recently updated the API docs landing page to
 take this first step.
 
 I hope you can support my continuing efforts for the wide scope and breadth
 of serving the documentation needs in this community.
 
 Thanks,
 Anne
 
 
 [1]
 http://justwriteclick.com/2014/03/21/how-to-build-openstack-docs-and-contributors-through-community/
 
 
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev