Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-11-06 Thread Stephen Balukoff
: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hi Jorge, I am still not convinced that we need to use logging for usage metrics. We can also use the haproxy stats interface (which the haproxy team is willing to improve based on our input) and/or iptables as Stephen suggested

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-11-05 Thread Eichberger, German
[mailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 8:20 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hi Susanne, Thanks for the reply. As Angus pointed out, the one big item that needs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-11-05 Thread Jorge Miramontes
@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hi Jorge, I am still not convinced that we need to use logging for usage metrics. We can also use the haproxy stats interface (which the haproxy team is willing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-11-04 Thread Susanne Balle
, October 22, 2014 2:41 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hi Jorge, Good discussion so far + glad to have you back J I am not a big fan of using logs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-28 Thread Jorge Miramontes
Thanks for the reply Angus, DDoS attacks are definitely a concern we are trying to address here. My assumptions are based on a solution that is engineered for this type of thing. Are you more concerned with network I/O during a DoS attack or storing the logs? Under the idea I had, I wanted to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-28 Thread Angus Lees
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 04:42:27 PM Jorge Miramontes wrote: Thanks for the reply Angus, DDoS attacks are definitely a concern we are trying to address here. My assumptions are based on a solution that is engineered for this type of thing. Are you more concerned with network I/O during a DoS

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-27 Thread Jorge Miramontes
Miramontes [mailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:30 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hey German/Susanne, To continue our conversation from our IRC

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-24 Thread Eichberger, German
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hey German/Susanne, To continue our conversation from our IRC meeting could you all provide more insight into you usage requirements? Also, I'd like to clarify a few

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-23 Thread Jorge Miramontes
Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hi Jorge, Good discussion so far + glad to have you back J I am not a big fan of using logs for billing information since ultimately (at least

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-22 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Hi Jorge! Welcome back, eh! You've been missed. Anyway, I just wanted to say that your proposal sounds great to me, and it's good to finally be closer to having concrete requirements for logging, eh. Once this discussion is nearing a conclusion, could you write up the specifics of logging into a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-22 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
I,d like to start a conversation on usage requirements and have a few suggestions. I advocate that, since we will be using TCP and HTTP/HTTPS based protocols, we inherently enable connection logging for load balancers for several reasons: Just request from the operator side of things: Please

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-22 Thread Jorge Miramontes
:04 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hi Jorge! Welcome back, eh! You've been missed. Anyway, I just wanted to say

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-22 Thread Eichberger, German
: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements Hey Stephen (and Robert), For real-time usage I was thinking something similar to what you are proposing. Using logs for this would be overkill IMO so your suggestions were what I was thinking of starting with. As far as storing logs

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Usage Requirements

2014-10-15 Thread Jorge Miramontes
Hey Octavia folks! First off, yes, I'm still alive and kicking. :) I,d like to start a conversation on usage requirements and have a few suggestions. I advocate that, since we will be using TCP and HTTP/HTTPS based protocols, we inherently enable connection logging for load balancers for