Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

Our "TripleO" undercloud only requires a subset of the available services that we run int the Overcloud. So ironic, heat, mistral, zaqar, keystone, nova, swift, glance, neutron. These would mostly satisfy our needs. What I find interesting here is that there isn't much mention of jenkins,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

kady > -Original Message- > From: Dan Prince [mailto:dpri...@redhat.com]  > Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 6:35 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)  > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install > driven by Heat > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On 08/05/2016 01:21 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

ailto:dpri...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 6:35 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 12:27 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

..@redhat.com> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 7:34:32 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat Lastly, there is container work ongoing for the Over

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

Well, except for you need some non-openstack starting point, because unlike with e.g. ansible installing any openstack service(s) does not end at "dnf install ". You might like to watch Dan's demo again. It goes something like: yum install python-tripleoclient openstack undercloud deploy

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 13:56 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 08/05/2016 01:21 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > > > > > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > > > > > > > Last week I started some prototype work on what

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 01:56:32PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 08/05/2016 01:21 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > > > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

Hi, On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Ideally, I would love to see: > > for node in nodes: >ssh $node puppet apply blah-blah > > Maybe we're not there, but it only means we have to improve our puppet > modules. This is the same thought I had,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 13:39 +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Dan Prince > wrote: > > > > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way > > to > > install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of > > the > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On 08/05/2016 01:34 PM, Dan Prince wrote: On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 12:27 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the recent

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On 08/05/2016 01:21 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to > install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the > recent "composable services" work we've done in TripleO so initially I > called

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 12:27 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > > > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way > > to > > install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of > > the > > recent "composable services"

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to > > install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the > > recent "composable services" work

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the recent "composable services" work we've done in TripleO so initially I called in composable undercloud. There is

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the recent "composable services" work we've done in TripleO so initially I called in composable undercloud. There is an etherpad here with links to some of the