Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] Automatic elastic rechecks

2014-07-24 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-07-18 15:09:34 +0100 (+0100), Daniel P. Berrange wrote: [...] If there were multiple failures and only some were identified, it would be reasonable to *not* automatically recheck. [...] Another major blocker is that we often add signatures for failures which occur 100% of the time, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] Automatic elastic rechecks

2014-07-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:31:05PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-07-18 15:09:34 +0100 (+0100), Daniel P. Berrange wrote: [...] If there were multiple failures and only some were identified, it would be reasonable to *not* automatically recheck. [...] Another major blocker is that

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] Automatic elastic rechecks

2014-07-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 7/17/2014 9:01 AM, Matthew Booth wrote: Elastic recheck is a great tool. It leaves me messages like this: === I noticed jenkins failed, I think you hit bug(s): check-devstack-dsvm-cells: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1334550 gate-tempest-dsvm-large-ops:

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate] Automatic elastic rechecks

2014-07-18 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 09:06:45AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 7/17/2014 9:01 AM, Matthew Booth wrote: Elastic recheck is a great tool. It leaves me messages like this: === I noticed jenkins failed, I think you hit bug(s): check-devstack-dsvm-cells:

[openstack-dev] [gate] Automatic elastic rechecks

2014-07-17 Thread Matthew Booth
Elastic recheck is a great tool. It leaves me messages like this: === I noticed jenkins failed, I think you hit bug(s): check-devstack-dsvm-cells: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1334550 gate-tempest-dsvm-large-ops: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1334550 We don't automatically recheck or