Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies
On 07/15/2015 05:18 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Adam Young wrote: On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz wrote: Hi Thierry, Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed to ask for. Rectifying: On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a *Spec Freeze Exception* in Liberty for it. This one is an important lead in to a lot of other work. Getting just this in to Liberty allows us to focus the remainder of the work on Dynamic policy inside Keystone. Please approve. FWIW spec freeze is project-team-specific, so it only requires PTL approval. So don't block on the release team for this :) We took a vote during the Keystone meeting today and it passed unopposed. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies
Please see http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2015/keystone.2015-08-11-18.00.html for vote results. Cheers, Morgan On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/15/2015 05:18 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Adam Young wrote: On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz wrote: Hi Thierry, Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed to ask for. Rectifying: On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a *Spec Freeze Exception* in Liberty for it. This one is an important lead in to a lot of other work. Getting just this in to Liberty allows us to focus the remainder of the work on Dynamic policy inside Keystone. Please approve. FWIW spec freeze is project-team-specific, so it only requires PTL approval. So don't block on the release team for this :) We took a vote during the Keystone meeting today and it passed unopposed. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies
Adam Young wrote: On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz wrote: Hi Thierry, Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed to ask for. Rectifying: On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a *Spec Freeze Exception* in Liberty for it. This one is an important lead in to a lot of other work. Getting just this in to Liberty allows us to focus the remainder of the work on Dynamic policy inside Keystone. Please approve. FWIW spec freeze is project-team-specific, so it only requires PTL approval. So don't block on the release team for this :) -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies
I am +1 on this SFE. Dynamic Policy team has been working hard on this and they will for sure deliver nice features for Liberty. -- Marek Denis [marek.de...@cern.ch] __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies
On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz wrote: Hi Thierry, Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed to ask for. Rectifying: On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a *Spec Freeze Exception* in Liberty for it. This one is an important lead in to a lot of other work. Getting just this in to Liberty allows us to focus the remainder of the work on Dynamic policy inside Keystone. Please approve. Thanks, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz Thierry Carrez wrote: samuel wrote: [...] On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a Feature Freeze Exception in Liberty for it. Liberty Feature Freeze is on September 3rd, so I doubt you need a feature freeze exception at this time. I suspect that would be a spec freeze exception or some other Keystone-specific freeze exception ? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/FeatureFreeze __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies
++! Per my understanding, the work, and therefore the risks, are fairly compartmentalized. The upside is this will pave the way for a much richer authorization management system. Guang From: Adam Young [mailto:ayo...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 10:15 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz wrote: Hi Thierry, Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed to ask for. Rectifying: On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a *Spec Freeze Exception* in Liberty for it. This one is an important lead in to a lot of other work. Getting just this in to Liberty allows us to focus the remainder of the work on Dynamic policy inside Keystone. Please approve. Thanks, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz Thierry Carrez wrote: samuel wrote: [...] On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a Feature Freeze Exception in Liberty for it. Liberty Feature Freeze is on September 3rd, so I doubt you need a feature freeze exception at this time. I suspect that would be a spec freeze exception or some other Keystone-specific freeze exception ? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/FeatureFreeze __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribemailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies
So although I am in favor of approving some of this, it isn’t quite clear what portions of “Dynamic Policy” is being asked for an exception? We need to be clear exactly what bps we are taking about here, since there is a lot under that umbrella. Henry On 13 Jul 2015, at 19:20, Yee, Guang guang@hp.com mailto:guang@hp.com wrote: ++! Per my understanding, the work, and therefore the risks, are fairly compartmentalized. The upside is this will pave the way for a much richer authorization management system. Guang From: Adam Young [mailto:ayo...@redhat.com mailto:ayo...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 10:15 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz wrote: Hi Thierry, Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed to ask for. Rectifying: On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a *Spec Freeze Exception* in Liberty for it. This one is an important lead in to a lot of other work. Getting just this in to Liberty allows us to focus the remainder of the work on Dynamic policy inside Keystone. Please approve. Thanks, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz Thierry Carrez wrote: samuel wrote: [...] On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a Feature Freeze Exception in Liberty for it. Liberty Feature Freeze is on September 3rd, so I doubt you need a feature freeze exception at this time. I suspect that would be a spec freeze exception or some other Keystone-specific freeze exception ? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/FeatureFreeze https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/FeatureFreeze __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies
Henry, please see the details in Samuel his first email. https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg57416.html Guang From: Henry Nash [mailto:henryna...@mac.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 2:27 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies So although I am in favor of approving some of this, it isn’t quite clear what portions of “Dynamic Policy” is being asked for an exception? We need to be clear exactly what bps we are taking about here, since there is a lot under that umbrella. Henry On 13 Jul 2015, at 19:20, Yee, Guang guang@hp.commailto:guang@hp.com wrote: ++! Per my understanding, the work, and therefore the risks, are fairly compartmentalized. The upside is this will pave the way for a much richer authorization management system. Guang From: Adam Young [mailto:ayo...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 10:15 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz wrote: Hi Thierry, Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed to ask for. Rectifying: On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a *Spec Freeze Exception* in Liberty for it. This one is an important lead in to a lot of other work. Getting just this in to Liberty allows us to focus the remainder of the work on Dynamic policy inside Keystone. Please approve. Thanks, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz Thierry Carrez wrote: samuel wrote: [...] On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a Feature Freeze Exception in Liberty for it. Liberty Feature Freeze is on September 3rd, so I doubt you need a feature freeze exception at this time. I suspect that would be a spec freeze exception or some other Keystone-specific freeze exception ? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/FeatureFreeze __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribemailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
